Shannon Cross: Okay. And then I guess my question is basically, as you think about the debt maturities you have coming due and obviously, the near-term one will be paid with cash on hand. Is your idea to delever the balance sheet over time because you are shrinking the FITTLE business? Or do you anticipate utilizing the cash that you generate from FITTLE in other areas and keeping a higher level of leverage on the — on your balance sheet going forward?
Xavier Heiss: So what we plan simply to do is to face our debt obligation. So we have a $300 million debt to pay in March, and we are on line and we plan to pay it based on the cash generated by the business. We are not planning at that time to add like a highly or overall leverage of the balance sheet. And if you look at the debt ladder that we have in 2024, 2025, I’ll say, quite clean. And we think that we’ll be able to face this debt obligation. So I’m not specifically concerned about our ability to phase debt and how debt will take a prevalence versus other type of investments we plan to do.
Shannon Cross: Okay. And then I guess, just my last question is, as you talk to customers and you look at some of these management services contracts that you have out there, what is the discussion in terms of page volumes going forward, size of equipment? Are you seeing — I think last quarter, you talked about some customers sort of negotiating in lower page volumes, is that continuing? Or as offices open up are things normalizing?
Xavier Heiss: Yes. Good question, Shannon. So what we see are currently and we commented, I think we believe we have reached like a normalized position here. We don’t see a higher erosion around, I would say, page volume. We see as well on our ability to negotiate contracts with that product minimums. And from a price point as well, we have had some data points showing that the price increase that we are passing to customers are sticking. So the way we look at this lines, what we call contracted print revenue lines there, the way we look at this line from a revenue next year is like a flattish type of line, which is good because this is not like an accelerated decline. So return to office has been, I would say, slow in some places, a little bit higher in certain geographies. But the way we look at it and for the last 3, 4 quarters, this line had been, I would call that like flattish, steady. So that’s the way we look at it for the next year.
Operator: And our final question today comes from the line of Jim Suva from Citi.
Jim Suva: In your prepared comments, you mentioned about the Federal Reserve changing of interest rates and all that. And then I have a follow-up. But can you just kind of give us some outlook about what we kind of should be modeling or thinking about for interest expense because now that you have your relationship with FITTLE and things like that, it gets a little more complicated, especially with interest rates swinging a lot? Is the Q4 number like a long-term number that we could use or kind of use the full year number and just divide it by 4? There’s just a lot of moving parts in your interest expense item.
