Brad Sills: Thanks, Chano. And then one more, if I may, please. Just on the verticals. You called out some strength in financials, healthcare. Is there a case to be made that perhaps you guys have more exposure to more resilient verticals with those in particular public sector education kind of less affected by perhaps the macro?
Aneel Bhusri: We’re pretty diversified across all the industries and some have held up better than others. When I look at what’s happening in Silicon Valley, we definitely have a bunch of tech companies, but we’re not exposed to tech the way maybe a newer company might be where they got a huge amount of exposure to just tech companies. So, — and our tech companies tend to be the mature large company. So, I don’t think there’s any particular sector that’s held us up. I would say financial services is strong, though. The one beneficiary of rising interest rates is the financial services sector and they continue to grow, and we have a very strong presence there.
Brad Sills: Thanks Aneel.
Operator: Our next question is from Brent Thill with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.
Brent Thill: Thanks. Aneel, just to follow-up on the verticals. A number of the partners have been talking about strength in state and local government and higher ed. I’m curious if you could drill in on those two, give us a sense of what you’re seeing right now in both those sectors.
Aneel Bhusri: I may turn that one over to Doug to talk about. Doug, are you there?
Doug Robinson: Yes, sorry about that. I was on mute. The question was around education, government. Is that correct?
Brent Thill: State and local and higher ed.
Doug Robinson: Yes. So both performed well in the quarter. We had a number of students or student deals, which for a while there, we were doing a number of financials, HCM on the higher ed side, but we took down some student deals in the quarter and showed really nice growth in Q3. And so we feel good about both of those verticals right now.
Brent Thill: Barbara, can I just follow-up real quick on international? It was the lowest growth in five quarters. Is there anything to point out in Europe versus the US, kind of, just the classic still over what we’ve been hearing, or is there anything specific on an execution? Can you just compare and contrast what you’re seeing?
Chano Gomez: I would say, clearly, the environment is more uncertain in Europe. Obviously, on top of everything else going on in the world, we have energy as a big challenge. And where we see, let’s say, an increase signs of deals and sell cycles lengthening that things to happen in Europe. And I would say, in general, we are more cautious overall what’s going there in the near relative terms than in other markets and other segments.
Brent Thill: Great. Thanks.
Operator: We have time for one final question from Scott Berg with Needham. Please proceed with your question.
Scott Berg: Hi everyone. Thanks for taking my questions and I guess this one will be relatively straightforward as you all called out slowness in the enterprise segment, a couple of different times. We talked about the mid-market being, I guess, relatively untouched. Can you help us kind of understand maybe what’s going on in the mid-market to not really see any weakness today? I think that’s an interesting kind of a change, at least relative to what we’re seeing out there. And then as we think about the guidance within the mid-market, is the slowness or maybe additional macro uncertainty that’s impacting the low end of the guidance, do you have some sort of conservatism baked into any potential slowdown in the mid-market also impacting that guidance? Thank you.
