Neil Mehta: Thanks, Lane. And then the follow-up is just around return of capital. And just maybe you could provide an update. It was another quarter where you were able to return cash in excess of sort of the brackets that you talked about historically. And how are you thinking about with the stock having done well here more recently, continuing to lean into the buyback versus reinvest back in the business and talk about the dividend as well.
Lane Riggs: Yes. I don’t think there’s any revisiting of our approach to capital really strong performance. And I’m sorry, with regard to like buybacks and dividend we’re going to continue our same approach as well. As far as going above our long-term target of 40% to 50% return to shareholders. Historically, back before the pandemic, we had been at the high end or above our target range pretty regularly. And then last year, we got back to the 45% midpoint of our range, while at the same time getting our debt back down to prepayment levels and building cash. So we got ourselves back in the good posture that we were comfortable with. And we’d also said with that accomplished, we’d be at the midpoint or above going forward. In the second quarter, like you said, we were up above our 50% range.
We had a 50% — 53% payout. Year-to-date, we’re at a 52% payout — so this year, we’ve clearly trended above 50%. And going forward, as in the past, as I said back before COVID was an unusual circumstance for us we won’t hesitate to pay out above the upper end of the range for the year, where we think that’s the best use of our excess cash under the circumstances. And on the dividend, we continue to have the same approach to it. We want our dividend to be positioned, we want our yield to be positioned competitive versus our peers who wanted to be growing and sustainable through the cycle. So that continues to be our approach on the dividend. That’s how we’ll set it and then the buybacks will continue to serve as a flywheel to round out our return to get us to our targets.
Operator: The next question is coming from Jason Gabelman of Cowen. Please go ahead.
Jason Gabelman: Yeah. Hey, thanks for taking my questions. First, I want to ask on the renewable fuel standard as well and the outlook for RIN prices and the impact of the business, there’s a decent amount of concern that there’s going to be an oversupply of RINs next year, and that has implications both for Diamond Green Diesel as well as on refining and the ability to capture some of the pass-through of the RIN cost in the crack. So I was wondering, if you have any comments around your RIN outlook as it relates to impacts to both of those segments given some risk to RIN prices moving lower next year? And I have a follow-up. Thanks.
Eric Fisher: Yeah, this is Eric. On the RIN prices, the EPA held the ethanol requirement of 15 billion gallons, which as we’ve seen over the last several years, it’s beyond the blend wall, which means the D4 RIN will be used to fulfill that obligation. Given our outlook, we don’t see a big change in RINs. RIN prices or RIN supply you see that as relatively business as usual.
Jason Gabelman: I mean, I guess if I could just push back a little bit. There is a lot of new renewable diesel capacity coming online next year. So it does seem like there’s going to be a lot more RIN supply. I don’t know if that enters into your thought process as you look out next year?
