David Burritt: But it’s going very well this commissioning. These people know how to do this. And what we like to see is when we take the legacy people at US Steel who have been around for a long time, they know how to do these things like electrical steel. The partnership in Europe that trips back and forth to Europe from our Big River team, it’s a great environment for them to learn from one another. We’re learning to be more nimble, and we’re learning some expertise, and it’s showing up very nicely in this because when you’ve been making electrical steels for 20 years, making that transaction, that transfer to the US, it really does make a difference.
Operator: Thank you very much. We’ll proceed with our next question on the line. It’s from Curt Woodworth with Credit Suisse. Please go right ahead.
Curtis Woodworth: Yeah, thanks. Good morning, Dave and team. Hope you are well? My first question is just with respect to the metallic strategy. I was wondering if you could give us an update on the plans for Granite City and there’s a tentative agreement with SunCoke, too, I think, repurpose some of these furnaces into pig iron facilities. Is that still part of the framework? I know that’s been a little while. And then I guess within that idea, the $1 billion of free cash flow to the Mini Mill segment, is that — does that assume any captive metallics in that number? Would that be a third-party? And then how should we think about potential economics of what you would try to do to get more backward integration on metallics over at Big River 2?
David Burritt: Well, thanks for calling out that competitive advantage that we have with our iron range. It’s a low cash cost in North America iron range and we ought be able to exploit that competitive advantage with the new pig facility in Gary. And then also the float plant that’s well underway. I might say both of those on-time, on-budget. And then, of course, your more specific question is related to Granite City, which has been in discussions for some time. I know Rich is following that closely. I’m not sure we got a whole lot to update you on here, but Rich?
Richard Fruehauf: Well, I think you kind of hit it, Dave. So first of all, we got the 500,000 tons coming out of Gary from that pig project. That’s already flowing down to Big River, and we’ve seen some meaningful cost improvements coming from that project. And I think the Granite City conversations with SunCoke, we continue to have conversations with them. We think things are going well and we hope to have a mutually acceptable agreement. But that’s all I can say right now in terms of the Granite City project and I’ll turn it to Kevin in terms of the free cash flow.
Kevin Lewis: Sure. And Curt, great question. Thanks for highlighting the Big River free cash flow. We have not assumed in those projections that there are any incremental benefits from future metallics investments. So that really is just based off of being essentially a market participant for metallics across our metallic needs. So to the extent that we can continue to build out pig capabilities, continue to leverage the phenomenal work that Gary team has done to ramp up that asset very, very quickly and supply the existing Big River operations with more cost-effective internally sourced pig iron, that would all be additional value creation within the Mini Mill segment and an additional opportunity for us to extract value from our mining assets. So I think a lot more to be had. And our assumptions currently — our assumptions to underwrite our free cash flow projections currently do not include the benefits of those potential opportunities.
