UMH Properties, Inc. (NYSE:UMH) Q4 2023 Earnings Call Transcript

UMH Properties, Inc. (NYSE:UMH) Q4 2023 Earnings Call Transcript February 29, 2024

UMH Properties, Inc. isn’t one of the 30 most popular stocks among hedge funds at the end of the third quarter (see the details here).

Operator: Good morning, and welcome to UMH Properties Fourth Quarter and Year-End 2023 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today’s presentation, there will be opportunity to ask question. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this event is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Mr. Craig Koster, Executive Vice President and General Counsel. Thank you. Mr. Koster, you may begin.

Craig Koster: Thank you very much, operator. In addition to the 10-K that we filed with the SEC yesterday, we have filed an unaudited fourth quarter and year-end supplemental information presentation. This supplemental information presentation along with our 10-K are available on the company’s website at umh.reit. We would like to remind everyone that certain statements made during this conference call, which are not historical facts, may be deemed forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements that we make on this call are based on our current expectations and involve various risks and uncertainties. Although, the company believes the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, the company can provide no assurance that its expectations will be achieved.

The risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations are detailed in the company’s fourth quarter and year-end 2023 earnings release and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company disclaims any obligation to update its forward-looking statements. In addition, during today’s call, we will be discussing non-GAAP financial metrics. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial metrics to the comparable GAAP financial metrics as well as the explanatory and cautioning language are included in our earnings release, our supplemental information and our historical SEC filings. Having said that, I would like to introduce management with us today: Eugene Landy, Founder and Chairman; Samuel Landy, President and Chief Executive Officer; Anna Chew, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Brett Taft, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; Jim Lykins, Vice President of Capital Markets; and Daniel Landy, Executive Vice President.

It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to UMH’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Samuel Landy.

Samuel Landy: Thank you very much, Craig. At this time in 2022, we were running out of homes to sell or rent and we were hoping that our manufacturers could shorten the backlog so that we could meet our occupancy and sales goals. At this time in 2023, we suddenly had 1,300 new homes in inventory and had to set up those homes before they could be sold or rented. Now, we are proud to report we rented or sold those homes. And obtaining homes for sale or rent has normalized, so we can again carry just-in-time inventory of approximately 400 homes. Our results for 2022 and the first half of 2023 were negatively impacted by our inventory issues. With those problems behind us, we are back in a position to generate growth in revenues from new rental homes, home sales and rent increases.

We made considerable progress executing our long-term business plan, which resulted in improved operating and financial results. We filled over 1,000 new rental homes and had a net increase in occupancy of 704 units or 210 basis points. This is the equivalent of building a 1,000-unit apartment complex in one year. Additionally, sales increased by 23%. These newly occupied rental and sales units resulted in a 9% same-property income growth and 13% same-property NOI growth. The improved operating results are generating a meaningful increase in community value, which is being realized through our financing and refinancing efforts. We are pleased to report another quarter of normalized FFO growth. Normalized FFO per share was $0.23 in the fourth quarter of 2023 as compared to $0.20 in the fourth quarter of 2022, representing an increase of 15%.

This is the third consecutive quarter of sequential FFO growth. We believe that the company is well positioned for additional FFO growth, as we continue to improve our operating results. Additionally, normalized FFO for the year was $0.86 as compared to $0.85 in the prior year. Our past work generates our current income and FFO does not fully reflect the tremendous effort we are putting into our future results. Our 2,100 acres of vacant land, 3,400 vacant lots and 400 homes in inventory are all part of our efforts to generate future income. Investing in value-add communities expansions and greenfield development requires patient capital, as these investments take three years or more to produce accretive returns. With the right time horizon, these investments significantly outperformed the acquisition of stabilized assets.

UMH is carefully balancing the investment in new projects with earnings accretion so that we can generate long-term shareholder value, while increasing short-term per share earnings. We have invested to-date approximately $27 million with our partner Nuveen, in developed and undeveloped lots that will not reach full occupancy for approximately three years. We have approximately $40 million invested in 500 vacant expansion lots that will not be fully occupied for three years. We are working on seven turnaround properties purchased in the last two years that will become accretive within the next two years. At any given time, UMH has $100 million or more invested that is not yet producing accretive returns. Our results are strong, but we continue to work to achieve even better results.

Our team did an exceptional job installing, renting and selling over 1,200 new homes this year. 1,040 of these homes are new rental homes and 164 were new home sales. Net rental, homes increased by 871 units with the difference being rental home sales and home removals at recent acquisitions. Our successful sales and rental programs generated a net increase in occupancy of 704 units, an increase of 210 basis points over last year. As we have discussed throughout the year, our financial results were impacted by the carrying costs associated with our unusually high inventory levels during the first half of the year. Moving forward, we anticipate our inventory being between 300 and 500 units as compared to 1,300 at the beginning of 2023. Manufactured backlogs have been reduced to four to eight weeks, so we believe we will be able to achieve similar if not better occupancy gains with just-in-time inventory.

Our same-property operating results, demonstrate the success of our value-added business plan. We generally acquire well-located communities in need of repair with existing vacancies. As we improve the communities and make them desirable places to live, demand for sales and rentals increases. In the fourth quarter, same-property income increased by 11% and same-property NOI increased by 19%. Same-property income for the year increased, by 9% and same-property NOI increased by 13% or $12.2 million. These increases were driven by an increase in occupancy of 632 units or 310 basis points and/or rent increases. Our occupancy gains occurred throughout the year but predominantly in the second and third quarters. Therefore the annualized run rate effect of the revenue, generated by these occupancy gains is not fully reflected on our financial results.

Our same-property revenue reported for the year was $182.9 million and $47.3 million for the fourth quarter, which annualizes to $189.2 million. Therefore our annualized fourth quarter revenue is $6.3 million higher than our actual results for the year meaning, if we had received these homes in early 2022 our year-end revenue would have been $6.3 million higher. The gains made on the occupancy and revenue fronts, position us for an even stronger 2024. Our sales operation continues to profitably sell and finance homes. Gross home sales were $31.2 million, as compared to $25.3 million last year, representing an increase of 23%. We sold 341 homes, of which 164 were new home sales, averaging $138,000 per home sale and 177 were used home sales, averaging $48,000 per home sale.

We were able to achieve a 32% gross profit as compared to a 31% last year. We are proud to announce that with our $31.2 million in sales this year, we broke our previous all-time sales record of $28.1 million and exceeded our sales goal of $30 million. We anticipate further improvements in our sales division, as the demand for affordable housing continues and the carrying costs of our inventory decrease. Our rental home portfolio continues to perform exceptionally well. We now own 10,000 rental units, of which 94% are occupied. We continue to experience 30% or less turnover per year, and our expenses are only approximately $400 per unit, per year. We anticipate adding another 800 to 900 homes next year. Backlogs from our manufacturers have returned to normal levels of four to eight weeks, allowing us to no longer have to carry large amounts of inventory.

This should help to reduce our interest expense and carrying costs, while allowing us to generate similar overall occupancy and revenue gains next year. COVID caused manufacturing backlogs that increased the cost of each home, increased the amount of inventory we carried and increased many costs associated with carrying high inventory, but that is all behind us now. We completed the construction of 216 expansion sites. These expansions are located in good markets in Maryland, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Indiana and should generate profitable sales. Next year, we anticipate approvals to develop 800 sites, and plan on developing approximately 300 or more sites. 2023 was a quiet year on the acquisition front. We acquired one newly developed community in Georgia, through our Opportunity Zone Fund.

The spread between buyers and sellers resulted in a relatively muted transaction year in the UMH space. We anticipate that a prolonged high interest rate environment, may result in communities being available at more reasonable prices, than the past few years. We are well positioned to execute on these opportunities when they arise. We have two communities in Maryland under contract, and anticipate closing on both in 2024. We are also evaluating several other acquisition opportunities, and hope to grow our acquisition pipeline. UMH owns a portfolio of 25,800 developed homesites situated in 135 manufactured home communities, across 11 states. Additionally, we are a 40% partner with Nuveen Real Estate, which owns two communities containing 363 sites in Florida, and one community that is under construction in Pennsylvania.

We have over 3,400 vacant sites to fill, plus 2,100 vacant acres of land that can potentially be developed into an additional 8,500 home sales. We can project that our $190 million rental revenue will grow 5% due to our rent increases. That amounts to $9.5 million in new revenue. Additionally, we plan on installing and renting, 800 homes in 2024, resulting in an increase in revenue of approximately $10 million. Also every 100 new homes sold, should generate $10 million in additional gross revenue and $2 million in additional net income. We expect that in 2024, rental and sales revenue should be approximately $20 million higher than our 2023. Our accomplishments in 2023, and previous years laid the groundwork to make this possible. And now, Anna, will provide you with greater detail on our results for the quarter.

Anna Chew: Thank you, Sam. Normalized FFO, which excludes amortization and nonrecurring items was $15.4 million or $0.23 per diluted share, for the fourth quarter of 2023 compared to $11.3 million or $0.20 per diluted share for 2022, resulting in a 15% per share increase. Sequentially, normalized FFO increased from $0.22 for the third quarter to $0.23 in the fourth quarter, resulting in a 4.5% per share increase. For the full year 2023, normalized FFO was $54.5 million or $0.86 per diluted share compared to $46.8 million or $0.85 per diluted share for 2022. We were able to obtain this increase in normalized FFO, despite our operating results being largely impacted by our investments to grow the company through value-add acquisitions and developments, inflation and rising interest rates on our short-term borrowings.

Rental and related income for the quarter was $49.2 million compared to $43.7 million a year ago, representing an increase of 13%. For the full year, rental and related income, increased from $170.4 million in 2022 to $189.7 million in 2023, an increase of 11%. This increase was primarily due to recent community acquisitions, the addition of rental homes and an increase in rental rates. Community operating expenses increased 5% during the quarter and 8% for the year. This increase was mainly due to our recent acquisitions as well as an increase in payroll, rental home expenses, real estate taxes, insurance, waste removal, water and sewer expenses. Despite the increase in community operating expenses, community NOI increased by 18% for the quarter from $24.3 million in 2022 to $28.7 million in 2023, an increased by 14% for the full year from $94.8 million in 2022 to $108.4 million in 2023.

Our same-property results continue to meet our expectations. Same-property income increased by 11% for the quarter and 9% for the year generating same-property NOI growth of 19% for the quarter and 13% for the year. As we turn to our capital structure, at year-end, we had approximately $690 million in debt, of which $497 million was community level mortgage debt, $93 million was loans payable and $100 million was our 4.72% Series A bonds. 90% of our total debt is fixed rate. The weighted average interest rate on our mortgage debt was 4.17% at year-end compared to 3.93% at year-end last year. The weighted average maturity on our mortgage debt was 5.3 years at year-end and 5.1 years at year-end last year. The weighted average interest rates on our short-term borrowings, was 6.98% as compared to 6.76% last year.

In total, the weighted average interest rate on our total debt was 4.63% at year-end compared to 4.60% at year-end last year. We completed the addition to our Fannie Mae credit facility of a pool of eight communities totaling 1,280 sites for total proceeds of approximately $58 million. The addition is interest-only at a fixed rate of 5.97%. These communities were acquired in 2012 and 2013. Our total investment in these communities, including capital improvements, is $52.2 million or approximately $41,000 per site. The community is appraised for approximately $108 million or $84,000 per site, reflecting an increase in value of $55.9 million or 107%. We utilize this capital to pay down our short-term borrowings, which resulted in increased earnings.

At year-end, UMH had a total of $290 million in perpetual preferred equity. Our preferred stock, combined with an equity market capitalization of over $1 billion and our $690 million in debt results in a total market capitalization of approximately $2 billion at year-end as compared to $1.9 billion last year, generating an increase of 6%. During the year, we issued and sold 9.4 million shares of common stock through our common ATM programs generating net proceeds of approximately $145.8 million. The company also received $9 million including dividends reinvested through the DRIP. In addition we issued and sold 2.6 million shares of our Series D preferred stock during 2023 through the preferred ATM programs generating net proceeds of approximately $55.7 million.

Subsequent to year-end we issued 1.2 million shares of common stock through our common ATM program generating net proceeds of approximately $18.9 million. In addition we issued 121,000 shares of our Series D preferred stock through our ATM program, generating net proceeds of approximately $2.7 million. From a credit standpoint, we ended the year with net debt to total market capitalization of 31.3% net debt less securities to total market capitalization of 29.6%, net debt to adjusted EBITDA of 6.2 times, and net debt less securities to adjusted EBITDA of 5.9 times. Interest coverage was 2.7 times and fixed charge coverage was 1.9 times. From a liquidity standpoint, we ended the year with $57.3 million in cash and cash equivalents and $110 million available on our unsecured revolving credit facility with an additional $400 million potentially available pursuant to an accordion feature.

We also had $198.5 million available on our other lines of credit for the financing of home sales and the purchase of inventory and rental homes. Additionally, we had $34.5 million in our REIT securities portfolio all of which is unencumbered. The portfolio represents only approximately 1.9% of our undepreciated assets. We are committed to not increasing our investments in our REIT securities portfolio and have in fact continued to sell certain positions. We are well-positioned to continue to grow the company internally and externally. And now let me turn it over to Gene before we open it up for questions.

Eugene Landy: UMH begins 2024 by reflecting on everything we accomplished in 2023 and setting our goals higher for 2024. We are proud that we installed and rented or sold over 1200 homes in 2023. These new homes generated a 230 basis point increase in same-property occupancy a 23% increase in gross sales of manufactured homes and a 13% increase in same-property NOI. The occupancy and revenue gains position UMH to outperform the market in 2024. We plan on installing and renting 800 to 900 new homes achieving our 5% rent increases growing our gross sales and our sales margins. We also intend to be active in the acquisition market assuming attractive asset pricing and to develop 300 or more expansion sites. These items will help us to generate additional occupancy and revenue gains thereby increasing earnings and property values.

We have a mission to provide the nation with high-quality affordable housing. We have made strides in executing this mission through the acquisition and rehabilitation of older communities, the development of expansion sites, and new communities and our financing of home sales. We have the best quality affordable housing at a price point that can’t be matched. The affordable housing crisis is only going to intensify from single-family homebuilders pulling back resulting in fewer housing starts, mass migration to the United States, and the obsolescence of the existing housing stock. Our new manufactured homes sell for as little as $90,000 and rent for as low as $1,000 per month. These are prices that are unmatched by any quality competition in the market.

Families with a household income of $40000 can afford to either buy or rent a home in a UMH-managed community. UMH operates our communities with a long-term business plan. We complete the necessary improvements, which results in a high-quality community with happy tenants. We treat our tenants fairly by limiting their rent increases to 5%, 6%, even though we may be able to achieve larger rent increases. These policies generate good relationships with our tenants, which results in lower turnover and turnover-related expenses. UMH had a solid year on the financial and operating fronts. We believe that we have positioned the company to outperform in the coming years. As site and home rental income should continue to grow through our rent increases and improvements in occupancy, we should continue to increase the profitability of our sales operation.

We intend to acquire communities as they become available and develop new expansion sites in new communities. Our business plan has positioned the company with 3,400 vacant sites and 2,100 acres of vacant land that can be developed into additional sites. Our vacant sites and land holdings have significant potential. As we fill the existing vacant sites and build more sites on our vacant land, these values can be realized. We are pleased with the progress to date and look forward to furthering our mission and accomplishing our goals again in 2024. Congratulations to all our staff who have executed so well on our mission statement to provide quality affordable housing for the nation.

Operator: Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Rob Stevenson of Janney. Please go ahead.

See also 14 Social Security Spousal Benefits and Loopholes You Need to Know and 16 Best Cities for Retirees in the Pacific Northwest.

Q&A Session

Rob Stevenson: Good morning guys. Are you seeing any uptick in bad debt on the rental units? The apartment guys have been getting a hit harder by various fraud schemes. Anything like that going on in your business these days?

Samuel Landy: No. We keep a close eye on our receivables and it’s in line with where it typically is and it’s above 98% I believe in the 98.8% range.

Anna Chew: Our bad debt and our write-offs are still at around the 1%. I mean, yes, the dollar value has gone up, but that’s because our rent roll has gone up. But again it’s around the 1% range.

Rob Stevenson: And how does that differ between the rental units and the — and just the pad rentals? I would assume if somebody’s got a $50000 or $75000 house sitting on a pad that they’re going to be much more inclined to pay the monthly rents and if they don’t have any skin in the game on a rental.

Samuel Landy: No. The great discovery through COVID was that people appreciate the house we provide them at the price we provided. So to such an extent that even when they lost jobs during COVID, we maintained 95% rental occupancy and 98% rent collection. Because they’re only paying about $1000 per month for this great 3-bedroom, 2-bath house on a 5000-square-foot lot, they know if they lose this they go into a place that’s not as desirable that costs more. Therefore they do everything in their power to pay the rent. And so the great tests in our history, right? So 2011, we began doing rental homes staring at just $100 per year and we proved to ourselves, our bankers and our investors that the income stream from rental homes is just as good as the income stream from resident-owned homes.

Sam Zell said back in 1994 that there is nothing more stable than the revenue from a resident-owned home in a community. Well, after COVID, we proved that the rents on rental homes are just as stable as that revenue which is why we then went into acquisition mode in the South where there’s other forms of inexpensive housing. But because nobody on the rental front can compete with a factory-built home on a lot, we did more of those because we know, we’ll maintain 95% occupancy and 98% rent collection.

Rob Stevenson: Okay. That’s helpful. And can you talk about where you’re financing home sales today and how much of an impact 25 or 50 basis point change in rates is likely to have on incremental demand there?

Samuel Landy: Well, so first, the affordability gap widens as interest rates increase. So a $400,000 house becomes further out of reach to a significant part of the population as interest rates rise. And on a $100,000 house, even though you feel that increase in interest rates, it’s just not as great. The size of the market that needs our product increases as interest rates rise. And the history of that goes all the way back to the 1970s when interest rates got to 18% in manufactured home, shipments got to about 400,000 units in a year. So the interest rates are a positive for us. We source our own financing. We provide the money to the company that approves the loans. And then we gauge what interest rate to charge our retail customer based on interest rates, and we’re currently —

Brett Taft: Our new home sales were currently at 7.5%.

Rob Stevenson: Okay. That’s helpful. And then last one for me. Can you talk a little bit about some of your larger ’22 acquisitions that had a bunch of upside potential from vacancy now that you’ve owned them for more than 18 months? And specifically, I think Hidden Creek in Michigan and Fohl Village in Ohio, they were both sort of larger $20 million-ish acquisitions that were sub-80% occupied a year ago. Just trying to get a sense of how much upside has already been realized there on the revenue run rate and how much is left to come over the next, call it, 18 months.

Brett Taft: Yeah. Sure. Happy to address those communities specifically. So Hidden Creek in Erie, Michigan, has 351 sites. It was purchased with 220 occupied sites. Last year, we rented 54 new homes, which resulted in an overall increase in occupancy of 40 units. So we still have plenty of runway to go, and we’ve proven that demand is very strong. So we anticipate a similar increase in occupancy here this year, with just-in-time inventory to limit the impact that interest expenses on floor plan had on overall operations. And Fohl Village has been a very strong location and we’re very pleased with the numbers. We haven’t implemented our rental home program the way we typically would because sales have been so strong. I believe we sold about eight new homes last year and have very strong demand to continue to sell homes, and those are all very profitable sales.

So we’re closely looking at demand. Assuming sales traffic remains strong, we’ll probably continue to go in that route, while putting some rental homes in, but I wouldn’t expect an increase in occupancy of 40 units there this year. The other acquisition from 2022, I’m sorry, we’re completing our initial improvements. That might be water or sewer line replacements, and we’re starting to get rental homes in. So that pool of assets still has quite a bit of upside.

Rob Stevenson: Okay. That’s helpful. I mean, just a follow-up on that though. How are you guys thinking about, if you have the opportunity to sell a home and not have to buy the rental unit yourself and deal with that versus the upside from the rental unit? I mean, what does the returns look like to you guys when you pencil out between selling a typical home on a site and just collecting the pad rentals in perpetuity versus having to outlay the cash for the rental unit, but then collecting a higher rent over that time period? How does that look to you guys when you think about that trade-off?

Samuel Landy: Warren Buffett bought Clayton Homes to obtain the finance business. Rental homes are really the finance business. We own the home, and we rent it out year after year, increasing the rents 5%. It starts out earning about 9%, and that’s un-levered. And then it goes up from there as the rent increases occur. And these homes are going to last as long as any other home, so 50 years. We sell homes because banks, investors like resident-owned homes and communities, but we’re building Memphis Blues as an all-rental community. And we think we’re going to obtain a mortgage on both the land and the home from a government-sponsored entity. And so we’re going to prove that horizontal apartments, communities with manufactured homes are the best way to build affordable rental housing.

And we should be entitled to the lowest interest rates on what we pay the banks. But comparing a sale to a rental, I can make the argument we don’t even want to sell homes. But on the other hand, it benefits the resident. If a resident knows they’re staying three years or more, it benefits them to own a house because then they only receive the rent increase on the lot rent. So if the lot rent is $500 they’re receiving a 5% increase on the $500 versus if they were renting the home for $1,000 a month, they receive 5% on the $1,000. So over a five-to-10-year period, the person in a resident-owned home builds equity in the house. The house could be appreciating. It benefits them. On the other hand, the rental home benefits us. That 30% turnover on the rental home allows us to mark the rent-to-market wherever we are, whereas when the resident owns the home, we’re probably only going to receive a 5% rent increase per year.

So we receive better rent increases on the rentals. And I believe, the rental homes are more profitable, than selling the house and renting a lot. But it’s still nice to gross $30 million. And on each additional $10 million in sales we’ll have approximately 20% profit hitting the bottom-line. So growing sales from $30 million to $40 million will be beneficial. I think it would be even more beneficial, if we rented the homes, but because it benefits the resident we continue to sell homes.

Rob Stevenson: Okay. Thank you very much guys. That’s all for me.

Operator: The next question comes from Jeff Walkenhorst of Copeland Capital Management. Please go ahead.

Jeff Walkenhorst: Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. So great progress on the underlying property fundamentals are among the best of any REIT that I’ve seen report recently and the double-digit growth in same-store NOI is very, very compelling. I’m wondering on the per share FFO growth, which also was strong in the fourth quarter, if that sort of operating leverage in growth might be expected for 2024. And related to that, a big part of your business has been — the challenge has been the higher cost of funding, because you do have significant growth opportunities that you’re investing in. So I was wondering if you can walk us through your sources and uses in the spreads the expected returns on the large uses of capital that you expect and again, how that might impact that per share growth for 2024. Thank you.

Samuel Landy: So it’s really remarkable if you look back at our 2020 annual report, how similar the results are, but how more of it hit on a per share level. But to the extent it didn’t hit on a per share level today, it’s strictly because of the problems we spoke about the first half of the year carrying such inventory and needing to pay down the cost of that inventory through issuing equity. But as you project forward, the purpose of that equity is to make more money. And these rental homes generate 9%. Additional lots generate additional income. Sales generate additional income. So you had a lag in 2023, caused by not having inventory in 2022 and too much inventory in early 2023. But all of that’s behind us. So that’s why I look back at that 2020 annual report. Our cost of capital was high this year, because of the low stock price. But despite it being high, it’s accretive and going to make money for us.

Eugene Landy: If I could add the government-sponsored entities are a wonderful thing, for the housing industry. It enables people to buy houses and rent apartments for much less than they would otherwise. And it’s unique to the United States. And we recently borrowed I think it was $56 million under 6% in a market where other companies are paying 9% for money. So our hats are off to the GSEs. And long-term we feel that we can get 60% of the value of our properties from the Government-Sponsored Entities long-term at low interest rates and that will be the source of growth in the returns on our equity.

Anna Chew: Having said that, I also want to mention that, it is still a balancing act. The GSEs are lending to us, because we’re a strong company. And so therefore, we always have to have that balancing act whether it be, 50% capital, 50% debt or whatever. Right now we’ve always been a conservative company. Our net debt to total market cap is approximately 30%, 34% right as of this moment. So we are a strong company. We do need additional sources of capital, because every year we will need approximately $100 million to $130 million in new capital for our expansion programs for our rental homes for any — for the loans on the sales since we finance approximately 70% of them. So, again, we will always need between $100 million and $130 million in additional capital.

Samuel Landy: I just wanted to point out we talked about the properties we refinanced this year. And so that $52 million in properties doubled in value over 10 years to $108 million which is a 7.2% per year compounded return. Additionally, those properties throw off about 7% so you’re talking about 14% unlevered returns. So the capital we raised through the common ATM is invested in properties that you’re earning 14% on so it has to be accretive.

Brett Taft : And just to add to what everybody else said and going back to Sam’s initial comment about the same-property NOI returns from 2020. In 2020 and 2021, we had eight consecutive quarters in a row where we had double-digit same-property NOI increases. We’re very pleased that this year we were also able to achieve a double-digit same-property NOI increase. And we look at our inventory and the locations and the demand the rent increases, we obtained last year with the increase in occupancy we obtained we think that we’re on track to continue achieving similar returns going forward, maybe not quite double-digit, but certainly high single digits. Every quarter that goes by we anticipate more of that getting down to the bottom line as shown through our three sequential quarters of normalized FFO growth.

Jeff Walkenhorst : So to summarize — that’s really helpful. To summarize that operating leverage I think you just pointed out as you move through the year should continue to be visible on a per share basis. And we would expect to see FFO per share growth in 2024 over 2023.

Samuel Landy: Yes, exactly. You saw it in the fourth quarter. And so the first quarter should even be better and that lines us up for our March Board meeting to discuss dividend increases.

Jeff Walkenhorst : Okay. That was also my next question. So I know that you have been a consistent dividend grower. Is the objective to be consistent with your peers Sun and ELS where they do grow the dividend on a regular annual basis?

Samuel Landy: Well, whether you’re running track or whatever you’re doing you shouldn’t look back at the competition. So it has nothing to do with considering them, but it does have to do with considering, our increase in property values, our increase in income our increase in FFO, and our projections for the future growth. And since all of those are positive I tend to believe we will be able to seriously discuss dividend increases. Good time to mention. I’ve mentioned it on the previous calls but that land next to Fairview Manor where Tiger Woods and Mike Trout are building a golf course is becoming very valuable and we’re working on that and hope to eventually have some kind of agreement to sell that land which could potentially further increase income.

Jeff Walkenhorst : Okay. That’s a potential source of capital to fund your growth initiatives.

Samuel Landy: Yes. All those things take those things don’t happen all at once. But over time the answer is yes.

Jeff Walkenhorst : Okay. Sam, can I go back to the fundamental question? Looking across the 11 states. You’re talking about continued occupancy gains in the same-store portfolio where last year occupancy was up a couple of hundred basis points. And the rental occupancy as well on the rental units was up 70 basis points year-over-year whereas most departments I think are seeing flat to down occupancy trends. Are you seeing any differences in demand across the different states when it comes to whether it’s the purchases or the rentals?

Samuel Landy: No. Demand is incredibly strong on the sales and the rental front. I have no question we’ll receive our 5% rent increase during the year 2024. Last year we added an incredible number of homes. And so the challenge there is can you add that many homes with just-in-time inventory. But even to the extent that you’re not able to you’re going to have significant savings on interest costs. But if you’re able to achieve the same number of homes coming in but on a just-in-time basis, the results will be even better than they are today.

Jeff Walkenhorst: Thank you very much.

Operator: The next question is from Joel Goodman, a private investor. Please go ahead.

Unidentified Analyst: Good morning. This is Joel Goodman in Colorado. One of your investors and I want to commend UMH on your mission to provide affordable housing. I also want to thank you for your efforts on my behalf as an individual investor. My question has to do with analyst coverage. There are some very sharp analysts from small firms who cover your stock and I’d like to know if there have been recent efforts to attract analysts from the big firms to take an interest in UMH?

Samuel Landy: Yes, absolutely. And one of the issues out there to obtain coverage from the major firm is we have to provide guidance. And so we’re giving a lot of thought to providing guidance and hope to provide guidance shortly so that the major firms will pick up coverage.

Unidentified Analyst: Thank you.

Samuel Landy: Thank you. And good to hear from you.

Operator: The next question comes from John Massocca of B. Riley. Please go ahead.

John Massocca: Good morning.

Samuel Landy: Good morning.

John Massocca: So you kind of talked about it a little bit in some of your prior answers but if you look at kind of the same-store occupancy sitting at over 80% kind of historically relatively flat. And I know in this coming year things are going to change as some new properties move into the same-store bucket. But what do you kind of see as maybe the ceiling for occupancy in a steady-state portfolio? Is there opportunity for more uplift in occupancy maybe in some of the properties that were considered same-store in 2023? Just any kind of color there. It’s been a pretty big driver of some of the same-store NOI growth.