Richard McPhail: But it’s – I think at the end of the day, it’s all the same demand. And whether the Pro is fulfilling that demand or not, it’s sort of all the same. So, I wouldn’t – I actually would view it as saying we feel good about where our Pro business is. We feel good about the entirety of it, really. We don’t know where those trends will go. But again, we know our Pros say their backlogs are healthy.
Karen Short: And then the second question is – oh…
Ted Decker: No, I was just going to say that the consumer – the nearest term view of consumer is the engagement in seasonal is led by the consumer, certainly, the garden business, but also things like exterior painting and stain. And when the weather improved, consumer responded. And it was really steady constructive demand. So, what we expect going forward, I think you look at all those macro comments we mentioned earlier that our consumer is a homeowner, 80%-odd of them on their homes, up tremendous equity value in that home, great jobs, great income, and it’s a very healthy consumer segment in the overall economy. So, seeing their engagement in Q2 as weather improved, seeing their engagement in something like Halloween, I mean it’s not an enormous business for us. But to say unbelievable engagement, Billy, in that product category, which is 100% discretionary, is a pretty decent telltale of engagement in the sector.
Karen Short: Okay. That’s really helpful. Thank you. And then my second question is, Richard, you always discussed your ability to flex SG&A with respect to labor, but then also inventory rapidly based on the comp in order to maintain stability with operating margins. So, I guess my question is, with the recent wage investments, do you still have the same flexibility within the same timeline in general to – with that rule of thumb in mind?
Richard McPhail: Absolutely. I mean you would say that the jumping-off point would be post-wage investment. But post-wage investment, we have the same degree of flexibility we all – we have always had.
Karen Short: Okay. Thanks very much.
Isabel Janci: Christine, we have time for one more question.
Operator: Thank you. Our final question comes from the line of Steven Forbes with Guggenheim. Please proceed with your question.
Steven Forbes: Good morning everyone. So, just two quick follow-ups. The first on ticket, curious if you could expand on DIY ticket versus Pro ticket trends as we think about sort of second half complexion. And then maybe if you could just speak to what the full year comp implies in terms of ticket, if it’s still positive as you see it today?
Richard McPhail: We have – I will answer the second part first, and then I will turn it to Billy. Again, we have got 24 weeks to go. We are not going to break out ticket and transaction within our guidance, other than just to repeat, we are encouraged by what we have seen with respect to settling of ticket and recovery in transactions. Billy?
Billy Bastek: Yes. And as we called out just on the lumber piece alone, we will see that abate as we get to the back half of the year, and there will be much less of an impact than we saw in the first half overall.
Steven Forbes: And then just lastly, as we think about the Dallas market, the 350 basis points you guys noted as of 2022 at the Analyst Day presentation, any update on how that market is trending year-to-date 2023 versus the company average?
