James Goss: Okay. Thank you. Sorry about that last thing. I wanted to ask about a couple of things. One about the streaming apps. Obviously, this is a great way to try to offset the risk to some of the economics with the traditional cable and satellite platform. I’m wondering in terms of the various outlets you used between Roku or YouTube, there will be different types of economic implications. I wonder if you could talk a little more about how you’re viewing that and how things are developing along those lines.
Dave Lougee : Let’s say, James, it varies right? Because we — a lot of our major usage comes off of our own apps and our own without any to any third-party platform. So, it really varies on the platform, if it’s our own it’s obviously zero share. And then those deals look very different based on them. Some of them we feel good about, some of them we don’t love for the long term. But we go on for distribution in the short-term to get it out there. Some of them we’ve not done for — and baked into the question you’ve asked. But I think that over time it will become a scale play and we will be — I think we are big. And then I think we’ll look for opportunities to get even bigger over time. I’m not signaling anything relative to anything big until 2024. But it’s — as you point out it’s a good opportunity for us. And frankly the programming cost is all pretty much incremental marginal cost over our existing operations. So it’s a win-win.
James Goss: Okay. A couple of other things. One with DBL. It’s gaining increased traction you’re at 55% of the country. Is there any consistency of the time slabs it’s applying? And can you talk about the economic level that you’re able to get with that particular effort?
David Lougee: I’m sorry, Jim you broke up could you just say that last part again?
James Goss: Yeah. With DBL gaining increased traction to 55% of the country. Can you talk about the consistency of the time slots that typically gets put into and what the economics are in terms of your value as you deal with other broadcasters, and distributing that service?
David Lougee: Yeah. I mean, mostly what we value we take the last part of that first, Jim, is we value the distribution as that distribution gets us audience and eyeballs, which then we can monetize over time. So as it relates to time slots, they’re almost exclusively right now in the afternoon time slot. They vary across markets. It varies a lot based on the makeup of that market the strength of that station. So I wouldn’t say any one time period. We have success stories in every time period. And in every time period there’s some places where we don’t do as well. But bottom line is it’s a great model for us because like — as I think you know we produced that in Denver on a much lower cost model than lower if we did that in Hollywood.
And it’s all additional distribution is crazy for us off of a pretty much a fixed expense run rate. So it’s a good play for us and we haven’t talked a lot about it in recent years, but it’s just been a great thing for us that’s continued to keep on giving.
James Goss: Okay. One last thing that hasn’t been talked about, ATSC 3.0. Even though the broadcasters seem pretty enthused about it, I think a lot of the TV sellers do not seem so enthused because they might have competing products and they may not want to have incurred the additional costs. And maybe the FCC could mandate inclusion. And I’m just wondering how you are looking at what your expectations are in terms of how it might fit in with you in particular with TEGNA?
