Brian Lee: Hey, everyone. Good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. I know you alluded to this a couple of times throughout the prepared remarks, Peter. But could you maybe give us a bit more quantification? You mentioned California was sort of down in 2Q in line with plan and then you’ve seen some modest improvement here in June, July, it sounds like. Can you kind of just give us sense of what those numbers we’re looking like. I guess what I’m trying to get at is, if I look at your guidance for the rest of the year, you’ve called out Southeast and Southwest. It seems like you’re going to be down mid to high-teens year-on-year in terms of customer adds in the back half versus last year. How much of that is Southeast, Southwest versus California being down ex-percent, if you could just give us some context there?
Peter Faricy: Yes. Yes. Thank you, Brian. So yes, just to give color, I’m going to try to answer at the end of your question first. It really is any slowdown in customer growth will really ironically not be California, even though we were all interested to see how California would turn out at the beginning of the year. It will really be more focused on the Southwest, Southeast areas. California, I would say, for color, we talked about this in the last call. We actually did much better in Q1 and we had a pretty optimistic plan. But the rush of consumers that wanted to have some power products right before the NEM changes and qualify for NEM 2.0 was terrific. So we built up a very large business in Q1 with a big backlog. We certainly expect it as the year went on to have a very large drop off in Q2 and I mentioned before, we took a look at what happened during the previous NEM change.
So from NEM 1.0 to 2.0, this is exactly the behavior we saw. A big buildup in the final quarter and then a huge drop off in the quarter that follows. So really what’s most interesting for us is what’s going to happen now in Q3 and Q4. And what we baked into our guidance is I would describe as a moderate improvement in sales rate for Q3 and Q4. So far, July is tracking in California for that. And outside of California is tracking at that or maybe a little bit better than that so far in July.
Brian Lee: Okay. Fair enough. Appreciate that additional color. And then maybe one for Beth, welcome. You know, there’s been some questions around the balance sheet and you made some comments around inventory and accounts receivable. So it looks like there’s some working capital levers. But if I look at the model, I know the business has changed quite dramatically over the past several years and past cycle and half. But you really don’t generate positive free cash flow in the back half of the year. I haven’t seen it at least on a reported basis since, like, 2017. So I guess, point of my question would be, do you anticipate that free cash flow in 3Q, 4Q aggregate will be positive on the year? Or are we going to be looking more toward ‘24 to get to sort of more positive free cash flow run rates? Thank you.
Beth Eby: On a consistent basis, I would look more toward 2024. We have levers to pull particularly as you highlight on working capital, but we’ve also got some work still to do to make sure that those are consistently done.
Brian Lee: Okay. Fair enough. I’ll keep the rest for offline. Thank you.
Operator: Thank you so much. Your next question comes from the line of Colin Rusch of Oppenheimer. Please go ahead and ask your question.
Colin Rusch: Could you talk a little bit about what you’re seeing in terms of innovation around financial products? Are you seeing any combinations of loan and lease any other new approaches that we might start to see impact the market in the next call it six to 12 months?
