Kevin Lobo: Yes. Look, I’m actually pretty happy with double-digit growth in our Knee business. And look at OUS, we’re really starting to ramp the OUS. Mako is just getting going. It’s really getting started. So that massive outperformance you saw before was on the backs of Mako and cementless. And we’re probably going to see some of that outside the United States. And the U.S. performance is very strong. In one quarter, I’m not going to get overly excited. We’re still the fastest growing Hip and Knee company. And you remember from the past, you used to be — grew well in one, you didn’t grow well in the other, and we covered both, hips and knees. It wasn’t hips or knees, hips and knees in Q2. So, no, we’re not seeing anything as really different. We focus on our own execution with our market-leading robotics and our strong portfolio continue the rollout in Insignia, which has been an absolute home run. We’re going to continue to perform very well.
Matthew O’Brien: I appreciate that, Kevin. And then on the pricing side, I know it’s now flipped from kind of a headwind this year to a tailwind. But I’m assuming we’re working through some of those benefits. So, is pricing going to be another tailwind or positive for Stryker into ‘24 and even ‘25 as well as you’ve got these long-term contracts? Thanks.
Glenn Boehnlein: Yes. I think I’ll make some couple of comments around that without maybe providing exact guidance on 2024. But, if we look at the initiatives that we executed this year, we had a very targeted program that looked kind of product by product. And in general, what we’re seeing is MSNT is generally gaining positive price. And I would say Ortho is less negative and has much larger, longer-term contract negotiations. Keep in mind too that our price comparison that we report on includes sort of same product sales compared to prior year. So, if you think about increases that we gain on prices, say, on next-gen products that we’re going to launch, that’s not necessarily included in the number we say for price.
But I would tell you that we generally see meaningful price increases on these next-gen products, especially when we bring newer technology to the market or a feature set that currently isn’t provided. So, I do think that we’ll continue to see price as a tailwind. It’s a muscle that we’ve certainly grown this year, and I think it’s going to be part of our game plan for sure.
Operator: We’ll take our next question from Ryan Zimmerman with BTIG.
Ryan Zimmerman: Congrats on a really nice quarter, guys. I wanted to ask, Kevin, a little bit about the Cerus deal and Neurovascular. It was slower before, but 9% organic growth in the U.S. is really nice to see, especially in hemorrhagic. When we look at what Cerus has done in the UK, it’s been pretty impressive. And so, I’m curious kind of what your expectations are for the contribution in the U.S. and when we start to really see that in numbers, especially if you’re doing 9% U.S. organic growth in Neurovascular.
Kevin Lobo: Yes. So the first thing I’d say is that Cerus has not yet approved in the United States. So, that 9% growth had no benefit from Cerus, right? So I think you know that. I just want to make that clear to everybody that the trials are ongoing right now. We look forward to that approval in the United States. We’ve launched two new products. We had a Tetra small coil as well as 46 catheter — 46 size catheter, Vecta catheter. So two new products that helps in terms of driving the hemorrhagic growth. And the U.S. has been a little bit of a challenge for us more if you look back at the last few quarters, and really pleased to see that step up in this quarter, and we’re very excited that — and we closed the deal. Obviously, it was during the quarter.
It hasn’t had been a big impact at all. But a lot of excitement at the product we know performs extremely well based on what’s happening in OUS, and we can’t wait for the approval. It’s definitely going to be a shot in the arm when it does happen in the United States.
Ryan Zimmerman: Yes. No question. We saw that at SNIS this week. I wanted to ask a follow-up on robotics. We didn’t hear you say much on your Shoulder and Spine programs. And just given that there is some other commentary out there from competitors about kind of Shoulders and Spine. What’s your latest thinking about potential timing, launch cycles and so forth on Mako shoulder and/or spine.
Kevin Lobo: Yes. Great. Nothing new to report. We’re kind of on schedule with what we had said before. Spine in the back half of next year and shoulder towards the end of next year. And frankly, we’re not really concerned about competitive activity in this space. We already know Globus and Medtronic have robots in spine. We are really excited about our overall enabling technology starting with Q Guidance. We have an additional product that we’ll be launching and Mako Spine. So, by the end of next year we’ll have a really compelling suite of enabling technology tools for Spine, which we’re really excited about. If someone else is first in shoulder it doesn’t concern me in the least. We have Blueprint already. We already have a very powerful enabling tech platform for shoulder, whether it’s patient matched ID, whether it’s using HoloLens to do the procedure with virtual reality, whether it’s the Blueprint technology, which is amazing.
