Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (NASDAQ:SAMG) Q3 2023 Earnings Call Transcript

Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (NASDAQ:SAMG) Q3 2023 Earnings Call Transcript November 3, 2023

Operator: Good morning and welcome to the Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. Q3 2023 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please note this event is being recorded. Before we begin, let me remind you that during today’s call, certain statements made regarding our future performance are forward-looking statements. They are based on current expectations and projections, which are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, and many factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the statements that are made. Those factors are disclosed in the filings with the SEC under the caption Risk Factors.

For all such forward-looking statements, we claim the protection provided by the Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All forward-looking statements made on this call are made as of the date hereof and Silvercrest assumes no obligation to update them. I would now like to turn the conference over to Rick Hough, Chairman and CEO of Silvercrest. Please go ahead.

An empowered woman in the boardroom leading a discussion on the company’s wealth & asset management strategy.

Richard Hough: Good morning and thanks for joining us for this third quarter 2023 results of Silvercrest. The uncertain and more volatile markets during this past quarter had an outsized effect on our assets under management, with Silvercrest concluding the quarter with a total AUM of $31.2 billion and discretionary AUM of $20.5 billion. The discretionary AUM, which primarily drives our revenue, decreased by $1 billion from the second quarter, and discretionary AUM has increased by $1.1 billion or 5.7% year-over-year since the third quarter of 2022. The firm’s total AUM has increased by $3.8 billion or 13.9% year-over-year from $27.4 billion to $31.2 billion. Revenue increased 2.3% year-over-year for the third quarter of 2023 compared to the same period in 2022 and our revenue decreased 6.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2023.

Most business metrics remain down on a year-over-year and year-to-date basis. Higher expenses during the third quarter this year negatively impacted our adjusted EBITDA and the adjusted EBITDA margin, and the year-to-date decline in revenue affected adjusted EBITDA, the adjusted EBITDA margin and our adjusted diluted earnings per share. But Silvercrest adjusted EBITDA margin of 26.9% and 27.3% for the three and nine months ended September 30 remains healthy for the company. Silvercrest pipeline of new business opportunities remains solid, but we have weakened since the second quarter. This is the result of slower decision-making, not lost opportunities for the firm. We attribute this to a changing and uncertain business environment, higher interest rates and geopolitical concerns.

We’re focused on these new opportunities as well as investments to drive future growth in the business, including value-added hires. On October 31st, the company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share of Class A common stock and that dividend will be paid on or about December 15th, 2023. With that I’ll hand it over to Scott Gerard to go through our financials and then we will take questions. Thanks.

Scott Gerard: Great. Thanks, Rick. As disclosed in our earnings release for the third quarter, discretionary AUM as of September 30th of this year was $20.5 billion and total AUM as of the same date was $31.2 billion. Revenue for the quarter was $29.7 million and reported consolidated net income for the quarter was $5.4 million. Looking further at the quarter, again, revenue of $29.7 million represented approximately a 2% increase from revenue of approximately $29 million for the same period last year. This increase was driven by an increase in the average annual management fee based on the mix of discretionary and nondiscretionary assets. Expenses for the third quarter were $23.2 million, representing approximately a 6% increase from expenses of $21.9 million for the same period last year.

This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in G&A expenses of $0.8 million and an increase in compensation and benefits expense of $0.4 million. Looking further, comp and benefits expense increased approximately 3% to $16.7 million for the third quarter from $16.3 million for the same period last year. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in salaries and benefits of $0.3 million, primarily as a result of merit-based increases and newly hired staff, and an increase in equity-based compensation of $0.1 million due to the granting of additional RSUs. General and administrative expenses increased by $0.8 million to $6.5 million for the third quarter from $5.7 million for the same period last year. This was primarily attributable to an adjustment to the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Cortina Acquisition of negative $0.3 million recorded during the third quarter of 2022, in addition to increases in portfolio and systems expense, travel and entertainment expense, occupancy, marketing expense as well.

And these were partially offset by lower professional fees. Reported consolidated net income was $5.4 million for the quarter as compared to $5.6 million in the same period last year. Reported net income attributable to Silvercrest or to Class A shareholders for the third quarter of this year was approximately $3.2 million or $0.34 per basic and diluted Class A share. Adjusted EBITDA, which we define as EBITDA without giving effect to equity-based compensation expense and noncore and nonrecurring items, was approximately $8 million or 26.9% of revenue for the quarter compared to $8.2 million or 28.1% of revenue for the same period in the prior year. Adjusted net income, which we define as net income without giving effect to noncore and nonrecurring items and income tax expense assuming a blended corporate rate of 26%, was approximately $5.1 million for the quarter or $0.37 and $0.36 per adjusted basic and diluted EPS, respectively.

Adjusted EPS is equal to adjusted net income divided by the actual Class A and Class B shares outstanding as of the end of the reporting period. For adjusted basic EPS and to the extent dilutive, we add unvested restricted stock units and nonqualified stock options to the total shares outstanding to compute diluted adjusted EPS. Looking at the nine months, of this year, revenue was approximately $88.9 million, and this was approximately a 6% decrease from revenue of approximately $94.7 million for the same period last year. This decrease was driven by a decrease in the average annual management fee based on the mix of discretionary and nondiscretionary assets, also market impacts as well. Expenses for the nine months ended September 30th of this year were $69.1 million, representing approximately a 15% increase from expenses of $60.3 million for the same period last year.

This increase was attributable to an increase in G&A expenses of $11.7 million, partially offset by a decrease in compensation and benefits expense of $2.9 million. Looking further, compensation and benefits expense represented approximately a 6% decrease to $50 million for the nine months ended September 30th of this year, from $52.9 million for the same period last year. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in the accrual for bonuses of $4.3 million partially offset by an increase in salary and benefits expense of $1.1 million and an increase in equity-based compensation expense of $0.3 million. General and administrative expenses increased by $11.7 million to $19.1 million for year-to-date September 30th this year from $7.4 million for the same period last year.

This was primarily attributable to an adjustment to the fair value of contingent consideration related to Cortina of $10.9 million, and that was a negative $10.9 million, so a reduction to expense. That was recorded during the nine months ended September 30th of 2022. Increases in portfolio and systems expense, professional fees, occupancy, marketing and depreciation and amortization expense, partially offset by a decrease in sub advisory and referral fees. Reported consolidated net income was $15.8 million for year-to-date September 30th of this year compared to $27.5 million in the same period last year. Reported net income attributable to the Class A shareholders for year-to-date September 30th of this year was approximately $9.5 million or $1.01 and $1 per basic and diluted Class A share respectively.

Adjusted EBITDA was approximately $24.3 million or 27.3% of revenue for year-to-date September 30th this year compared to $27.6 million or 29.1% of revenue for the same period last year. Adjusted net income was approximately $15.1 million for year-to-date this year or $1.08 and $1.05 per adjusted basic and diluted EPS, respectively. Looking at the balance sheet. Total assets as of September 30th of this year were $191.3 million compared to $212.7 million as of the end of last year. Cash and cash equivalents were approximately $58.9 million as of September 30th this year compared to $77.4 million at the end of 2022. Total borrowings as of September 30th of this year were $3.6 million. Total Class A stockholders’ equity was approximately $83.6 million as of September 30th this year.

That concludes my remarks. So I’ll turn it over to Rick for Q&A.

Richard Hough: Great. Thanks, Scott. I look forward to taking questions at this time.

See also 12 Best Large Cap Stocks To Buy Now and 25 Most Dangerous Gangs in the US.

Q&A Session

Operator: We will now begin the question and answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question will come from Sandy Mehta with Evaluate Research. You may now go ahead.

Sandy Mehta: Yes, good morning. Rick, could you talk a little bit more about the pipeline? You have said in your comments that it remains solid, but there has been some slowness in people taking action. And are you seeing that from institutional investors? Or is it more the consultants? And now that the Fed yesterday has signaled that they may be at a pause, do you think that things will — people will be taking more decisions going forward? Thank you.

Richard Hough: Yes, you’re welcome. And in fact, just on that note, when I mentioned in my introductory comments that we’re just seeing a pretty uncertain business environment and sort of just very slow decision-making. It’s one of the few times, if any, in the past 10 years, I’ve ever commented on the larger environment. We’ve done really well in this firm through a variety of conditions. And one of the most measurable things at our company is the institutional pipeline. So I’m mostly, to answer your question, characterizing the institutional business. But you feel a lot of uncertainties and probably so are decision-making on the high net worth side. It’s just a little harder to measure in the time lines for those mandates.

It just looks very different from the institutional business. So I know for sure, for the institutional business. And basically, it’s driven in part by clients who have withdrawn searches or are just waiting and seeing but also probably some consultants. All things being equal, I’m sure consultants would rather have the opportunity to move things along and drive the process. So perhaps that means it’s a little bit more institutional client driven. The pipeline was $1.3 billion for different institutional parts of the business. That includes our US value equity capability, our US growth capability as well as the international and OCIO capabilities. And at the end of the second quarter, I reported $1.3 billion, and just to remind everyone, those were opportunities where we were invited — invite only RFP processes or we were a finalist or semifinalist with kind of a six month actionable period of time.

And I had actually lowered the pipeline at that time because things were taking longer than six months. It was one of the few times, if ever, that we just took opportunities out of the pipeline because it’s not how we measure it. And that has occurred again for this quarter. So these are situations where we’re still in the running where there may be an opportunity, but it’s moving past the six-month window that we’re comfortable measuring. And I want to make sure, when I talk to our investors that we’re making an apples-to-apples comparison from one period or a year to another. And that pipeline, which was $1.3 billion last quarter, is now at $810 million. So a pretty substantial drop. But again most of that is just due to the extended time lines for decision making or even things just flat out put on hold, where there will not be a decision or a search until perhaps the sponsoring institution feels a little more comfortable with the environment.

We’ve had periods of time where that pipeline has actually gone to zero. There was a period in COVID, where our pipeline dropped to nothing, and it came right back. So we’ll see what it means. We just want to be really clear about what we’re seeing out there. Your final point in your question was about the Fed. And I would agree that should the Fed or interest rates themselves start to decrease, that could be helpful. I think one reason we don’t have a broadening out in the markets is due to higher interest rates, which can cause financing pressure for many companies, of course. And it changes capital allocation decisions, right, when it’s moving around as much as it has and has increased as much as it has, really changes a lot of analysis of making investments.

So I’ll take other questions, but that’s an extended comment on both the environment related to the pipeline.

Sandy Mehta: And just one follow-up. The OCI business — OCIO continues to grow.

Richard Hough: The OCIO business continues to have really good opportunities. I expect a very near-term win there. We’ll see, but I expect that. And it remains at basically $1.5 billion in assets under management. It’s about the same, very similar to what I reported at the end of the second quarter. But keep in mind the markets were down during the quarter. So that’s a relatively positive report.

Sandy Mehta: Great. Thank you.

Richard Hough: You’re welcome.

Operator: Our next question will come from Christopher Marinac with Janney Montgomery Scott. You may now go ahead.

Christopher Marinac: Hey, good morning, Rick and good morning, Scott. Just wanted to ask first about the discretionary versus nondiscretionary AUM. Are those trends going to continue to shift in the next year? And maybe just a related pricing question, too.

Richard Hough: Yes. Okay. Yes, so it has gone up quite substantially over the past recent, I don’t know, 12 months to 18 months, as you’ve noticed, at a higher rate than I think we’ve ever really experienced with the company. I think year-over-year, to your point, it’s up something like 34%. That is a function primarily of our family office services. The assets related to nondiscretionary work is usually a project fee for services rendered. I should note, by the way, that a fair bit of OCIO capabilities, if not the vast majority of it is also in nondiscretionary. That’s the nature of those relationships, and those have more of a basis point relationship. So on the family office side I expect the increases due to that to moderate.

There is not really a change in the amount of revenue we get. That’s just a function of us doing reporting work and other tracking and balance sheet work on behalf of extremely wealthy clients who have often non-liquid holdings, private equity, real estate, operating businesses that we, for supervisory reasons, have to report as nondiscretionary assets under management. So whether that goes up a lot or down a lot, it really doesn’t change revenue on that side. With the OCIO business, if you think about most of that $1.5 billion being in there is nondiscretionary then, yes, to the extent that, that business continues to grow, which we’re quite optimistic about and continue to make progress on, as you know, that number will increase. And that is additive to revenue, and we’ll have a closer tie to kind of the economics of total AUM.

Does that help?

Christopher Marinac: Yes, it does. That’s great. Thank you for that. And I guess just related question about this kind of the pricing in basis points. I know it’s been sort of trending for a while, and it’s kind of more secular. I’m just kind of curious if this environment leads that to change at any different pace.

Richard Hough: If you could ask your question another way, I’m not sure I quite followed it. I’ll just say one thing before you clarify. One thing we have to watch is backing into total basis points by taking our total assets under management as the denominator, with revenue as denominator is misleading because you’re putting in a lot of assets that don’t really have basis points associated with them. So to the extent that family office assets under management, nondiscretionary increase, which I described before, it looks like the basis points that we’re getting for the business is going down when that is not, in fact, the case. But I’m not sure that’s what you were asking about.