When investing in master limited partnerships, one of the most critical objectives is to make sure that the company can continue to pay its distribution. Investors in Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE:EEP) might start to have their confidence shaken by the company’s recent performance. At the most recent earnings release, the company’s coverage ratio was at 0.79, which means that the company is taking in less money in free cash flow than what is required to service its debt and pay its distribution obligations. Could this be a bad sign for Enbridge’s 7.4% distribution yield? Let’s look at what’s happening and find out why this might not be as bad as it seems.
Much like many players in the midstream space, Enbridge Energy Partners and its operating company, Enbridge Inc (USA) (NYSE:ENB), built its energy infrastructure around the theory that oil and gas needed to be imported into the United States. While there are still some imports coming to the country, the necessity of those imports is falling off every day. Greater and greater production from emerging unconventional energy plays has bumped domestic supplies and created severe price differentials on oil and gas throughout the nation.
As recently as 2012, Enbridge used both commodity-sensitive and fee-based pricing structures to generate more than 66% of its revenue. This makes the company very vulnerable to commodity prices. With gas trading at about $3.50 in the most recent quarter, it severely cut into revenue for the company.
Another major reason the company has been taking a hit as of late is the emergence of rail as a method for transporting oil from these emerging oil plays. Both Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) and Valero Energy Corporation (NYSE:VLO) recently announced the purchase of 2,000 and 1,000 railcars for moving oil, respectively. These rail cars will be used to move mostly Bakken crude to refineries on the East and West coasts to help replace high-cost Brent and Alaskan North Slope crudes that these facilities are currently processing. While rail is a more expensive option for moving crude than pipeline, it works for the time being because midstream companies lack the infrastructure to deliver crude from these emerging plays to the places of need.
Big plans, bigger profits
These changes in market dynamics have put Enbridge in catch-up mode. To meet the changing times, the company has needed to pour lots of money into capital expenditures. In 2012, Enbridge spent about $1.7 billion in capital expenditures. The company intends to bump that number to about $2.2 billion for 2013 and a return to 2012 numbers until about 2016. The most encouraging sign for all this investment is that it will almost completely change the revenue structure for the company. These new projects will use take-or-pay contracts, which will ensure that the company receives payment even if the pipeline isn’t used. It’s a much more stable revenue source than a fee-based contract. Once all of the slated projects are complete, Enbridge anticipates that the company will receive 60% of its revenue from take-or-pay contracts.
The largest project the company has coming online soon is the joint venture with Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (NYSE:EPD) for the reversal of the Seaway Pipeline from Cushing, Okla., to the Gulf of Mexico. This will also be tied to an extension in the works that will extend from Cushing to its mainline hubs around the Chicago area. This pipeline will put it in direct competition with TransCanada Corporation (USA) (NYSE:TRP)‘s Keystone XL pipeline to deliver Canadian oil sands to the Gulf of Mexico. Luckily for Enbridge, it hasn’t met the political resistance for its project that TransCanada has, and it will more than likely bring the project online sooner.
