RPM International Inc. (NYSE:RPM) Q2 2024 Earnings Call Transcript

RPM International Inc. (NYSE:RPM) Q2 2024 Earnings Call Transcript January 4, 2024

RPM International Inc. misses on earnings expectations. Reported EPS is $1.22 EPS, expectations were $1.23. RPM isn’t one of the 30 most popular stocks among hedge funds at the end of the third quarter (see the details here).

Operator: Good morning, and welcome to the RPM International Fiscal Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Matt Schlarb, Senior Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Matthew Schlarb: Thank you, Gary, and welcome to RPM International’s conference call for the fiscal 2024 second quarter. Joining today’s call are Frank Sullivan, RPM’s Chair and CEO; Rusty Gordon, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; and Michael Laroche, Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer. The call is also being webcast and can be accessed live or replayed on the RPM website at www.rpminc.com. Comments made on this call may include forward-looking statements based on current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to be materially different. For more information on these risks and uncertainties, please review RPM’s reports filed with the SEC. During this conference call, references may be made to non-GAAP financial measures.

To assist you in understanding these non-GAAP terms, RPM has posted reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures on the RPM website. Also, please note that our comments will be on an as-adjusted basis and all comparisons are to the second quarter of fiscal 2023, unless otherwise indicated. We have provided a supplemental slide presentation to support our comments on the call. It can be accessed in the Presentation and Webcasts section of the RPM website at www.rpminc.com. Additionally, as a reminder, certain businesses in Asia Pacific that were previously part of the Construction Products Group are now being managed and reported under the Performance Coatings Group effective June 1, 2023. As a result, all references to CPG and PCG today reflect the updated structure.

The recast businesses generate approximately $100 million in annual sales and this change has no impact on consolidated results. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Frank.

Frank Sullivan: Thank you, Matt, and welcome to everybody joining us on our call today. I’ll start with an overview of our second quarter performance, then I’ll turn the call over to Mike Laroche to discuss the financials in more detail. Matt will then provide an update on the balance sheet and the recent opening of an R&D facility, and Rusty will cover our outlook. At the end of the prepared remarks, we’ll be pleased to answer your questions. Starting with our second quarter results on Slide 3. We generated our eight consecutive quarter of record sales and adjusted EBIT. While revenue growth was slightly positive because of softness in certain end markets, we continued our trend of good margin expansion led by our MAP 2025 initiatives.

This resulted in double-digit adjusted EBIT growth, which is squarely in the guidance we provided and in addition to the strong growth we generated in the prior year quarter. The MAP 2025 initiatives were also a key reason we generated all-time record cash flow of $408.6 million from operating activities during the quarter. Enhanced collaboration between commercial and operational functions, means we are now able to respond to customer demand more quickly without having to build large safety stocks as we have done in the past and this is having a positive impact on working capital. Through the first six months of fiscal 2024, we generated $767.8 million of cash flow from operating activities, which surpassed our previous all-time fiscal year record.

Turning to Slide 4. Sales were led by our Construction Products Group and Perform — and Performance Coatings segment, which benefited from their focus on repair and maintenance as well as their positioning to serve strong demand for infrastructure, re-shoring, and high-performance buildings with their engineered solutions. Volumes declined in the Consumer and Specialty Products Group segments as demand in DIY and especially OEM end-markets, particularly those with residential exposure remained soft. Both of the segments have been pressured for the past year as individuals have focused their spending on travel and entertainment and existing home turnover has been at a multi-decade low. Pricing was positive in all segments and helped offset lower overall volumes.

Despite these challenging end markets, we achieved another quarter of strong margin expansion led by our MAP 2025 initiatives. Margin expansion was strongest at the Construction Products Group and the Performance Coatings Group, which both generated positive volume during the quarter. This demonstrates the potential for our MAP 2025-enabled margin expansion in our businesses underperforming when volumes begin to grow again. As a reminder, second quarter growth was in addition to a strong quarter in the prior year period. The two-year stack growth for sales and adjusted EBIT was 9.3% and 50.6% respectively. Moving to Slide 5, I’m pleased to report that the changes we recently made to our management structure are showing good progress. In Europe, new management teams have focused their sales strategy and implemented MAP 2025 initiatives to grow sales and expand margins.

In Africa, Middle East, and Asia Pacific, which are now aligned under our Performance Coatings Group management, our businesses are realizing the potential of increased collaboration in our operations. Sales in Africa, Middle East grew 13%, and Asia-Pacific increased 6.4%, and we’re realizing operational synergies that are leading to even greater profitability growth. Overall, I’m proud of our associates’ performance in the second quarter. We’re executing exceedingly well in the things that we can control and the hard work we are doing on MAP 2025 initiatives is enabling collaboration, efficiencies, and cash flow to benefit us now. And I’m optimistic that we have even greater opportunities in the future. I’d now like to turn the call over to Matt Schlarb to cover our financials — I’m sorry, Mike Laroche to cover our financial results in more detail, Mike?

Michael Laroche: Thanks, Frank. Starting on Slide 6. Consolidated sales increased slightly as positive volumes at the Construction Products Group and Performance Coatings Group, higher pricing, and favorable FX, were offset by end-market weakness in Consumer and the Specialty Products Group. MAP 2025 benefits, including the commodity cycle drove 320 basis points of gross margin improvement. Improved fixed cost leverage at the Construction Products Group and the Performance Coatings Group also contributed to gross margin expansion. SG&A as a percentage of sales increased during the quarter as we reinvest MAP savings in long-term growth initiatives and to incentivize the sale of higher margin products and services. Inflation in areas like wages, benefits, and health care expenses added to the increase in SG&A.

Expense reduction actions taken at the end of fiscal 2023 helped to mitigate the increase and we are taking additional actions to limit SG&A increases in the second half of 2024. Adjusted EBIT grew — adjusted EPS grew 10.9% to $1.22 which is a second quarter record and was driven by adjusted EBIT growth with an increase in interest rates, being offset by debt pay-downs. Turning to the Construction Products Group results on Slide 7. They achieved record Q2 sales led by concrete admixtures which continued to benefit from reshoring and infrastructure projects, as well as market-share gains. The segment also benefited from increased demand for high-performance buildings, both new and renovations, with particular strength in sealants and wall cladding.

As Frank mentioned, Europe is benefiting from a more focused sales strategy, and this includes CPG which is our largest segment in Europe. Adjusted EBIT increased to a second quarter record led by higher sales, improved fixed-cost leverage, and MAP 2025 benefits. As a result of the strong financial performance, variable compensation increased and was partially offset by expense reduction actions put in place at the end of fiscal 2023. On Slide 8, the Performance Coatings Group achieved record second quarter sales, driven by strong demand for the segment’s engineered turnkey flooring systems due to heavy activity in reshoring capital projects and market-share gains. The businesses in Africa, Middle East and Asia Pacific were all recently aligned under PCG management, contributed to the segment’s growth.

This volume growth resulted in improved fixed-cost leverage, and along with MAP 2025 benefits, generated all-time record adjusted EBIT during the quarter. Moving to Slide 9, Specialty Products Group sales declined as specialty OEM demand remained weak, particularly in the end-markets that have exposure to residential housing, including furniture, doors, windows, and cabinets. The divestiture of the non-core furniture warranty business last fiscal year, reduced sales and the segment also faced challenging comparisons to the prior year period when the disaster restoration business benefited from the response to Hurricane Ian in Florida, which did not repeat in fiscal 2024. The reduced volumes resulted in unfavorable deleveraging and adjusted EBIT declines, which were partially offset by expense reduction actions implemented at the end of fiscal 2023.

SPG also continued strategic investments in long-term growth initiatives, which weighed on adjusted EBIT margins. Matt will talk about one of those growth investments shortly. Please note that adjusted EBIT excludes a $4 million expense related to an adverse legal ruling for a divested business. Turning to Slide 10, the Consumer Group was pressured by soft takeaway at retail stores from DIY customers as they focused their time and spending on travel and entertainment rather than projects around the house and as housing turnover hit multi-year lows. Certain retailers were also more cautious with inventory levels, which pressured volumes. Market-share gains, strength in international markets, and increased pricing to catch up with prior material and current labor inflation helped limit the volume declines.

As a reminder, Consumer faced challenging comparisons as sales increased 15.3% in the prior year period. Despite challenging end markets, Consumer still generated record second quarter adjusted EBIT. This was achieved primarily due to MAP 2025 benefits and strength in international markets and was in addition to strong growth in the prior year when adjusted EBIT increased over 180%. Now I’d like to turn the call over to Matt, who will cover the balance sheet, cash flow, and provide an investment update.

Matthew Schlarb: Thank you, Mike. Moving to Slide 11, we continue to make significant progress on improving working capital, primarily through lower inventories, which decreased $287 million from prior year levels. This combined with our improved profitability, resulted in all-time record cash flow from operating activities of $408.6 million in the second quarter. As Frank mentioned, our cash flow in the first six months of the fiscal year has surpassed our previous 12-month fiscal year record. Year-to-date, we have returned $113.3 million of cash to shareholders through dividends, and in October, we achieved our 50th consecutive year of increasing our dividend, an accomplishment only 41 other publicly traded companies can claim.

This sustained dividend growth has been enabled by our strategic balance, our focus on repair and maintenance, and our entrepreneurial spirit, all of which help us grow throughout economic cycles. We have also returned additional cash to shareholders through share repurchases which total $225 million to date. Finally, we’ve continued to repay debt and at the end of the second quarter of 2024, total debt is $592 million lower than the prior year. These debt repayments have helped mitigate the impact of rising rates on interest expense and provided flexibility to take advantage of future opportunities. Moving to Slide 12, as Mike mentioned, our segments are making investments to accelerate long-term growth. We’d like to highlight one of those investments, the RPM Innovation Center of Excellence.

We recently celebrated the ribbon cutting on this new state-of-the-art facility located in Greensboro, North Carolina. This facility is the first of its kind at RPM, where multiple businesses can collaborate and share resources to help drive innovation. This is particularly important for some of our smaller businesses that do not have the scale or local talent to run a comprehensive R&D led by themselves. Additionally, the Innovation Center of Excellence serves as a showcase to customers, where they can visit and see first-hand our ability to find solutions to their challenges. Also, by sharing resources, we are eliminating the need to have duplicative equipment and multiple labs which will control long-term expenses. The facility is being overseen by Specialty Products Group because many of their businesses are prime candidates to utilize it and we already have businesses from all four segments collaborating there today.

Now, I’d like to turn the call over to Rusty, to cover the outlook.

Russell Gordon: Thanks, Matt. And before we start, just to clarify, the year-to-date share repurchases are $25 million, just so that’s clear. Now I’ll go on with the outlook. On Slide 13, you can see our third quarter outlook, which as a reminder, is our seasonally slowest quarter. Market trends in Q3 are expected to be similar to Q2 as strength in CPG and SPG, international markets, and market-share gains are offset by weakness in DIY and specialty OEM markets. The expected result is flat sales to the record prior year period. On consolidated adjusted EBIT — excuse me, our consolidated adjusted EBIT growth is expected to accelerate and increase 25% to 35% over the prior year record results, driven by MAP 2025 benefits, including in Europe, which is an area of focus for us, and less challenging prior year comparisons.

This adjusted EBIT outlook is inclusive of growth and efficiency, investments we are making in our businesses, and at the corporate level, which will weigh on short-term margins. I’ll add that we are also taking actions to limit SG&A growth in the second half of the year. By segment, CPG and PCG are expected to continue to benefit from their focus on repair and maintenance, and from continued spending on infrastructure, high-performance building, and reshoring projects. Market-share gains are also expected to contribute to sales growth. We are expecting sales in both segments to increase in the mid-single-digit range. In SPG, we have not seen an inflection point in demand, with housing turnover hovering near multi-year low levels. As a result, we expect sales to decline in the mid-teen percentage range.

In Consumer, we expect sales to decline by low-single-digits as soft DIY demand is expected to be partially offset by market-share gains. Moving to our full year outlook on Slide 14, we are lowering our sales expectations for the year due to lingering softness in the DIY and specialty OEM markets. Our new outlook for the year is, sales growth in the low-single-digit range versus the prior expectation of mid-single-digit growth. Despite the reduction in the sales outlook, we continue to make good progress achieving MAP 2025 benefits. And as a result, are affirming our adjusted EBIT outlook of growth in the low-double-digit to mid-teen range. This includes benefits we are capturing from the commodity cycle as overall raw material prices decline, while we maintain pricing.

This concludes our prepared remarks. We will now be pleased to answer your questions.

Operator: We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from John McNulty with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

See also 12 Best Tech Stocks To Buy According to Billionaire Ken Griffin and Wall Street Analysts Just Trimmed Price Targets for These 10 Stocks.

Q&A Session

Frank Sullivan: Hi, John.

John McNulty: Good morning. Hey, Frank. Good morning. So, I wanted to dig into Consumer a little bit. So, it was down a little bit north of 5%. Your original expectations forward (ph) in the quarter was up low-single digits. It doesn’t look like it was price, because you’ve got pricing across all the businesses. So I guess, can you help us peel back Young and a little bit on volumes, how much was kind of — was it down on just Consumer takeaway verse — versus some of the destocking that you’re seeing? And then also, can you speak to some of the share gain offset that you had? Maybe quantify that a little bit for us as well?

Frank Sullivan: Sure. On a consolidated basis, price in the quarter was up slightly less than 2% and so that should give you a sense, that’s a little bit less than Consumer, and it’s just month-after-month of negative Consumer takeaway. I would note that we are outperforming our directly comparable Consumer paid peers in terms of volume. But it’s been a consistently minus low-single-digit, minus mid-single-digit Consumer POS over the last eight to nine months, and we don’t see that changing until possibly this spring.

John McNulty: Okay. And when you think about some of the destocking that you’ve seen in the business, because I think you highlighted, at a couple of retailers that was an issue. As far as where inventories are, or at some of these bigger retailers, I guess, would you say they’re kind of about where they normally would be going into the beginning of the spring paint season, are they below? I guess, how would you characterize that?

Frank Sullivan: I think they’re back to normal. You’ve seen a significant readjustment in supply chains, both with our customers and also as we noted within RPM. Last — this time last year, we talked about our efforts to really focus on operating efficiency and cash flow, and that we would do so at the expense of profitability in terms of overhead absorption, and that’s happened throughout the last 12 months, but the execution of the RPM people in this quarter is exceptional. We have reduced debt by almost $600 million bucks over the last 12 months. We generated record levels of cash flow on a six-month period. Our cash conversion cycle versus one year ago is almost improved by 30 days. And so, the things that we can control are being executed very well.

I think we’re really happy with that. As you’re seeing in the third quarter expectation, to be able to generate a 25% to 35% EBIT growth on what essentially is the same sales as last year, gives you a good sense of the improvements we’ve made.

John McNulty: Got it. No. It makes sense. And actually maybe to that, if I can squeeze one last one in. You saw some notable margin lift despite a pretty soft volume environment. I guess, can you help us to think about how much of that was from the price versus raws benefit versus some of the MAP improvements? And then I guess maybe the third bucket would be just general mix improvements, but I guess, can you help us to parse out where some of that real improvement was coming in?

Frank Sullivan: Sure. We went cost price mix positive in most of our businesses starting in the summer and we’ll be cost price mix positive relative to raw material inflation and our price increase efforts in Consumer in the third quarter. I’ll just use Consumer as an example. Over a 18-month to 24-month period, we absorbed about $500 million of higher cost raw material, labor, and things like that. And as is normal in these cycles, we lose margin, spend time catching up, and we will be cost price mix margin positive in Consumer for the first time in Q3. And you can see we’ve been that way in PCG and CPG going back to the beginning of the summer. I think you can also see the strong leverage when we’ve got volume in the PCG and CPG performance and we would expect the same in our Specialty Products Group and Performance Coatings — I’m sorry, Consumer Group, once we start generating positive unit volume.

John McNulty: Got it. Thanks very much. Appreciate the color, Frank.

Frank Sullivan: Thank you.

Operator: The next question is from David Huang with Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Frank Sullivan: Good morning.

David Huang: Hi. Good morning. I guess, on construction, can you talk about the trends you are seeing by end markets? And I guess, specific to infrastructure and reshoring, are you seeing any project delays, either because of slower government approval or people are just delaying their projects into 2024 because of lower construction cost expectations?

Frank Sullivan: We have not seen much in the way of project delays. The project delays that we would experience tend to be weather-related in the — particularly in the Construction Products Group, and so far, we’re in pretty good shape there. It actually feels like — and some of this is what happens when the government commits a trillion dollars of infrastructure and other stimulus, that there is a manufacturing renaissance happening. And so, while we are specified on some major onshoring projects, particularly in the technology area, and that’s coming, you’re seeing the follow-on of that with suppliers. And so we’re in a pretty good space with, for instance, stonehard flooring, our Carboline high-performance coatings, Euclid Chemical and admixtures, a lot of the construction chemicals business.

Also, just as a reminder, our Tremco roofing business is about $800 million, and 95% of that is reroofing and/or renovation. And so we’re not very exposed to the commercial construction cycle there. And so, that’s doing really well. Lastly, we have been moving with our WTI business into some asset management areas, including an acquisition of a couple years ago, Pure Air, and that is the refurbishment and renovation of commercial HV and industrial HVAC systems, and that business is showing some really strong growth as well.

David Huang: Okay. Got it. And then on raw material, how much was the raw material costs during the quarter? And I guess, when do you expect the deflation benefits to peak?

Frank Sullivan: Sure. Matt, do you want to take that?

Matthew Schlarb: Sure. Yeah. So, we — raw materials were down about 5% in the second quarter. Now, other things like labor are still going up and it varies by product category, like some things, particularly in the Consumer segment like acetone was up 25%, metal packaging and TiO2 were pretty flat, propellant was little bit up, but other raw materials were down, that brought the overall average down about 5%. So, we think that we’ll probably hit a peak of raw material deflation sometime in the third or fourth quarter of fiscal 2024.

David Huang: Okay. Got it. Thank you.

Operator: The next question is from Josh Spector with UBS. Please go ahead.

Frank Sullivan: Good morning, Josh.

Joshua Spector: Hey. Good morning, Frank. So, I just wanted to follow up on the comments on SG&A. So, your inflation in the first half is about 8% year-on-year, talked about some discrete items driving that and some actions to reduce that in the second half. So what are your expectations for second half SG&A inflation and how does that carry into ’20 — fiscal ’25?

Frank Sullivan: Sure. You can see SG&A, re — grow at a lesser rate in the second half of the year, particularly in the fourth quarter as we round our performance last year. And as we talked about, there are some specific areas that we are committed to investing in, in relationship to being in a good position to capture growth when the market turns. Matt mentioned one of those today. We committed tens of millions of dollars to the establishment of a new R&D center. It’s part of our Wood Finishes Group and our Specialty Coatings Group. Their performance in the last year hasn’t been particularly good because of their direct or indirect exposure to things in housing, which has been a really tough market environment. Nonetheless, we are committed to investments there, to investments in our Legend Brands business in terms of air handling and de-humidification equipment in a number of areas there.

We have been investing significantly in some new product categories in our Consumer Group. And we’re seeing placements of some new DAC spray products and re-capture of some Rust-Oleum market share as well coming this spring. So, we’ve been very deliberate about the balance between harvesting MAP savings and reinvesting in what we believe is future growth opportunities.

Joshua Spector: Yeah. I guess…

Frank Sullivan: Yeah. I would add one other thing to that. We track that growth investment spending separately. And so, if we get to the point where the soft landing turns into something a little more difficult economically, our ability to turn on a dime and cut tens of millions of dollars of SG&A would — could happen pretty quickly.

Joshua Spector: Thanks. No. That’s helpful. And if I kind of carry that forward, so, could you remind us of the expectation for the realized MAP to growth savings in fiscal ’24, excluding raw material and price cost movements? And your comments on investment, has that increased versus your prior expectations in that, maybe the realization of those savings is less because you’re investing more, or is it the same calculus you were running too, previously?

Frank Sullivan: Sure. I’ll let Matt give you the details on the numbers in terms of what we communicated, but our investment programs are essentially the same. So while they haven’t increased in terms of the things that we’ve been doing in the MAP program, at this stage they also have not been cut back. So, we are committed to a number of initiatives in — across a number of SBUs, with a goal of being in a good position to harvest growth when the economy gets a little bit stronger.

Matthew Schlarb: Yeah. And related to the MAP savings, in prior calls, we communicated a run rate basis of $160 million and a P&L rate of about $100 million. We’re still on-track for that. The thing is, those savings and those benefits are actually being masked by a lot of the under-absorption we’ve had from lower-than-expected volumes.

Joshua Spector: Okay. Thanks, guys.

Operator: The next question is from Jeff Zekauskas with J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead.

Frank Sullivan: Good morning, Jeff.

Jeff Zekauskas: Hi. Good morning. As a base case, how much is variable compensation likely to be up this year?

Frank Sullivan: I don’t know that we have that number specifically, but in a number of our businesses, we have addressed commercial disciplines that didn’t exist before in terms of some CRM programs and other things, such that we’ve replaced some old compensation structures in Tremco Roofing and part of our Construction Products Group with more variable compensation associated with pricing and margin. And so, that’s part of the increase in SG&A which goes hand-in-glove with the increase in gross margin profitability.

Jeff Zekauskas: Okay. And can you make some general remarks on your outlook on demand in the United States over the next 12 months in your various businesses and how you think it might change as the year progresses?

Frank Sullivan: Sure. Back to the Construction Products Group and Performance Coatings Group, we’re really well-positioned with what continues to be a huge slug of federal stimulus in the areas that we have long been positioned to serve. And so, I think we feel pretty good about that over the next 12 months. The halt of the most aggressive in history interest rate rise campaign by the Fed, will start to produce some better results. I mean that our Specialty Products Group in particular, their largest business unit is our Industrial Coatings, wood, wood stains, and finishes. We sell into items that directly or indirectly go into new homes whether it’s windows, doors, wood trim, and those markets have been negative since December of last year, which if you go back and model their declining performance, because the first six months of fiscal ’23 were great.

And then you model the Fed impact of interest rates on the housing market, both in terms of new home construction, in terms of housing turnover, if you read the headlines, people being stuck in homes because of low interest rate mortgages, it’s had a direct negative impact there. And then, I also think, in the Consumer side, we’re seeing the last vestiges across the industry of maybe the COVID boom, where people did a lot of projects and redecorating, and as Mike said, headlines suggested that there is spending out there by consumers, but they are not goods, they are more on services. I think as the interest rate environment improves, you’re going to see improvement in both Consumer activity and in the housing activity, at the same time, we’ll be rounding significantly easier comparables.

And so, if we are — just to finish this, if we are seeing an interest rate environment that begins to modestly improve in the housing market, both in terms of new construction and turnover improved, you’re going to see our numbers pickup both in our Consumer DIY businesses as well as our Specialty Products Group.

Jeff Zekauskas: Okay. Great. Thank you so much.

Frank Sullivan: Thank you.

Operator: The next question is from Vincent Andrews with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Vincent Andrews: Thank you, and good morning.

Frank Sullivan: Good morning, Vincent.

Vincent Andrews: Could you talk a little bit about — a little bit far enough along in its reshoring and infrastructure activity that maybe you have some insight into how lumpy it’s going to be for your business in terms of, is there sell-in on these particular products — projects that you’re specked in on and as those projects are completed, do you have a very orderly handoff to another suite of projects that’s of the same volume or more, or how should we think about the potential lumpiness of this benefit to your business?

Frank Sullivan: Yeah. Sure. Back to my earlier comments. It feels like we’re in a mini-manufacturing renaissance. Because, while we’re being specified on a lot of these larger onshoring projects, in some cases, they haven’t even put a shovel in the ground. And so on some larger projects that could be multimillion dollars, they will add some lumpiness to our results, as you suggest. But that’s down the road. What we’re seeing now is just a pretty solid industrial capital spending number and a market share gains target to point to in terms of new products with our Construction Products Group or Performance Coatings Group. But there’s been a preference in some instances for our Stonhard flooring because we not only provide the material, but we supply the labor.

So, we do a turnkey project in an environment where labor has been challenging, that’s provided a competitive advantage for us. The same thing is true in our Tremco Roofing business with our WTI business. And so, having a labor component both in elements of Tremco and in the Stonhard division of our Performance Coatings Group has also helped us from a competitive advantage.

Vincent Andrews: And then as a follow-up, in areas like Consumer, where the volume is challenged, are you facing any pressure from your retail partners to either price promote more or to step-up media or ad spend or any types of things that might encourage foot traffic?

Frank Sullivan: Sure. We are facing pressure from customers across RPM businesses for modest price reductions here and there. As I mentioned, specific to Consumer, we absorbed over — that was our largest hit in terms of raw material costs. We absorbed about $500 million of rising costs over an 18-month to 24-month period. And frustratingly, it remains the one segment that’s still seeing some inflation. There are some tariff items around tin plate, which goes directly to metal cans, and a couple of other chemicals like acetone, that are — that have not experienced the meaningful raw material reduction that some broader chemical categories have, like epoxy resins or silicones.

Vincent Andrews: Okay. Thanks, guys. I appreciate it.

Frank Sullivan: Thank you.

Operator: The next question is from Mike Harrison with Seaport Research Partners. Please go ahead.

Frank Sullivan: Good morning, Mike.

Michael Harrison: Hi. Good morning, Frank. I was hoping maybe you could give us a little bit more detail on the improvement that you’ve seen in the Construction business in Europe related to the more focused sales strategy and the benefits that you saw in Asia Pacific and Africa, and the Middle East in your Performance Coatings business, where there is some better coordination going on? Maybe just, again, some more detail on the changes that you’ve made there? And it sounds like you expect some additional improvement to come, just wanted to gauge your confidence around how much more legs you could have from those actions. Thank you.

Frank Sullivan: Sure. And it’s a great question. So, I think the — first, you got to step back and recall our 2020 MAP to Growth operating improvement program. We made a lot of good progress there, but our progress was interrupted by the COVID pandemic. Most of our early efforts in the first couple of years of the 2020 MAP to Growth program were focused on North America, and particularly in the — what we call MS168 operating focus. We were interrupted in getting at Europe. Post-COVID and with MAP ’25, we’ve had tremendous cooperation between our Construction Products Group and our Performance Coatings Group. But across all four of our segments, the President, the Group President of our Performance Coatings Group relocated with his family to Europe, and he’s providing direct senior leadership oversight on executing the simplest way to think about it, is a MAP to Growth initiative in Europe.

Likewise, we had too many small, far away, uncoordinated locations in the developing world. And we have coordinated and consolidated the oversight of those with a leadership team out of South Africa, and they’ve done an exceptional job. And so now in the Middle East, and Africa, and India, and Southeast Asia, we are approaching the market as RPM, not by products, certainly, it’s all of our products, but in terms of oversight of asset allocation, accounting and finance, IT systems, we’re consolidating more of that under one Group, and we’re having real good benefits. We’re getting the right people in the right places. We’re eliminating redundant costs by — as you’ll recall, at one point, we closed the books in 104 places every month, so we’re addressing that.

And so of all these have had a really positive impact. The last thing I’ll say is, in Europe, we had a pretty strong performance in the quarter. The UK was the first of the major markets that we’re involved in that really went into a recession. And so it feels like there is some spending activity there. I would say continental Europe is not economically doing particularly well. So, most of what you’re seeing there is self-help and the good execution on what I would call a European MAP to Growth initiative with senior leadership on the ground overseeing it.

Michael Harrison: All right. Thanks for that. And then, you guys have done a really nice job managing working capital and obviously, that’s showing up in the cash flow. But as you look across your segments, are your internal inventory levels where they need to be at this point? I’m just kind of trying to think about how we should look at production rates and fixed-cost absorption, particularly in that Specialty business and maybe Consumer, as we’re kind of moving through the seasonally slower period in Q3 and they get into the spring pickup in Q4?

Frank Sullivan: Sure. Thank you. There is more room for us to improve in working capital. It will be incrementally smaller in the coming quarters, because again, as you recall, this time last year, we talked about tackling inventories in particular and the underlying operating efficiencies. And we’ve been doing that very effectively. And there, as I mentioned earlier on the call, we picked up almost 30 days over the last 12 months in our cash conversion cycle, we’ve got another 30 days to pick up. But there is incremental improvement that we will be generating in the coming quarters and the coming years.

Michael Harrison: All right. Thanks very much.

Operator: The next question is from Mike Sison with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Frank Sullivan: Good morning, Michael.

Michael Sison: Hey, guys. Happy New Year. Great. Frank, you mentioned that the Consumer Group could or maybe can see an inflection point in the spring. What do you think — what are you looking forward to see — any indicators, anything you’re looking for to maybe give you confidence that, that could happen?

Frank Sullivan: Sure. I think we need to get into the spring months which is our typical strongest selling season. We introduced the Rust-Oleum five in one and Stop Rust this time last year. We’ve introduced a highly-anticipated new DAP spray product, it’s a — essentially a single component that replaces a prior two component product. So, we’ve got a number of new product areas. We’re also picking up a little bit of lost market share from the prior year. And so, some of it’s going to be some new product placements and others of it is going to be a sense that if the economy picks up a little bit, particularly as it relates to housing turnover, you’ll see improvement in our Consumer and Specialty Products Group. As a reminder, and I think all of you on the call know this, housing turnover, particularly for us, is more an indicator of economic activity than new home construction.

We’re not directly involved in new home construction except in our Specialty Products Group and to a lesser extent at DAP. But when you have housing turnover, a lot of repair and maintenance and a lot of fix-up for people that are selling and then a lot of repair and maintenance and redecorating for the buyers, and that activity has been at multi-decade lows over the last 12 months.

Michael Sison: Got it. And then just a quick follow-up, I apologize if I missed this, what did you think pricing would be in the third and the fourth quarter? And then, there are some sort of news on the home improvement guys, they want to get a lot of the inflation back from their suppliers. So, it sounds like they are pushing for price decreases. How do you sort of handle that in the Consumer Group and are there other ways to really keep some of the pricing that you achieved over the last several years?

Frank Sullivan: Yes. I don’t think about it so much as pricing as I do margin. Some of that goes along with new product introductions, some of it goes along with category management activities that we have at big customers. And quite candidly, some of it is finally recapturing the lost margin during the commodity cycle activity. I don’t — and to your earlier part of the question, I don’t anticipate much in the way of price in Q3 or Q4. The exception might be in a few rare areas like Consumer, I think people are paying attention to what’s happening with this tariff negotiation around tin plate. There is some consolidation there in the industry. It’s a frustrating item. So, there are a couple of areas that we’re paying attention to. Now, whether that drives additional price increases or not, time will tell. But broadly speaking, across RPM, we don’t anticipate much in the way of price in Q3 or Q4.

Michael Sison: Got it. Thanks.

Operator: The next question is from Aleksey Yefremov with KeyBanc. Please go ahead.

Ryan Weis: Good morning. This is Ryan on for Aleksey. I kind of wanted to piggyback off of the last pricing question there. So, I was wondering if you could maybe talk about how pricing is trending on bids for new projects in both CPG and PCG.

Frank Sullivan: Well, in general, we have held price across most RPM businesses. Very few exceptions and the exceptions tend to be more commodity spaces around epoxy resins or silicones. We participate in line striping and in bridge and highway work and that tends to be a little more price-sensitive because they tend to have basic coatings that are more directly related to the underlying chemical raw materials.

Ryan Weis: Okay. That’s helpful. Thank you. And then, can you just maybe talk about what you guys are seeing in the repair and maintenance business? Obviously, it’s held up relatively well. Is this business still growing? Or any color here would be great. Thank you.

Frank Sullivan: Absolutely, it’s holding up really well. You can see that in our Construction Products Group. The vast majority of that is repair and maintenance. And then also industrial capital spending, which seems to be pretty solid. That also impacts our Performance Coatings Group. So, we’re pushing, as I mentioned earlier, other opportunities. I mentioned the Pure Air acquisition of a couple of years ago over the last two calls, we’re seeing some nice growth there. And that was really in response to customers who talk to Tremco and our WTI services component. When we’re up on their roof, can we help them with their HVAC equipment? And we didn’t have any answer to that question for many, many years and we do now. So, we’re able to sell more on the same roof and/or sell new components with the same sales force, and we’re pretty excited about it and over time, I think we’ll look for other opportunities as we think about this business more as an asset management, asset maintenance business, as opposed to just a purely roofing materials business.

Ryan Weis: Very helpful. Thank you.

Operator: The next question is from Stephen Byrne with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Stephen Byrne: Yes. Thank you.

Frank Sullivan: Good morning, Steve.

Stephen Byrne: Thank you. Frank, with respect to the new Innovation Center down in North Carolina, I was curious whether you’re seeing any responses and changes between the various segments. Is there any increase in collaboration between them? And maybe more specifically, do you expect that multi-segment R&D center to benefit primarily from across a transfer of technology from one segment to another or do you think that it will have more effect on cross-selling, at the more of the commercial level between the segments?

Frank Sullivan: So, it’s a great question. And if you recall, one of the key elements of our original MAP to Growth program, was going from a relatively decentralized RPM with a holding company perspective to thinking about functions and disciplines in three areas, one is remaining independent and entrepreneurial, the other would be centralized and then the middle one is center-led. We have effectively centralized our procurement across RPM, that’s helped us meaningfully. That was a big element on the original MAP to Growth program. We are centre-led in manufacturing and operations, and we are instituting a common playbook for our manufacturing facilities across the globe. We’ll continue but on a smaller basis. In the original MAP to Growth program, we closed about 25 facilities.

You’ll see a few incremental closures, particularly related to our activities in Europe. And the R&D Center was really born of our operations asking us and recognizing that there is an opportunity for better collaboration across our businesses. So, I think it’s going to be sharing best practices and I think it will be cross-fertilization of technologies that can play, for instance, from an industrial sector into the consumer sector. We’re pretty excited about it. It’s going to take time to be realized, but it goes hand-in-glove with really trying to look at RPM as a formerly pretty much holding company with 40 or 50 independent units, to recognizing what can we centralize and what can be center-led to take advantage of collaboration. Our four Group Presidents are doing an extraordinary job of leading that collaboration in terms of their actions and their words and it’s filtering down through the organization in a very positive way.

So, I said I — the execution in this quarter of the things that we control was really good. And I would expect more of that to come. Obviously, results will be impacted by the underlying economic activity.

Stephen Byrne: Well, thank you, Frank. And maybe just continuing with this potential for cross-selling. I wanted to ask you a little bit about the Specialty Group. Are you reevaluating that segment in any way? Are there businesses in there that you would view as maybe not having either sufficient growth potential or maybe there’s just no potential for cross-selling with your other businesses and thus some might be targeted for divestiture?

Frank Sullivan: Sure. It’s a great question and we look at divestitures regularly — a possibility of divestitures regularly with our Board. But I can tell you, in this MAP ’25 program, in many ways, we’re going just the opposite. We’ve had some challenges in our Day-Glo business, but we’ve had huge success with Arnette Polymers, and then the Corsicana chemical plant that we bought in Texas, it’s part of our Construction Products Group. We’re taking those leadership teams and working with Day-Glo to create a Resin Center of Excellence in Europe and expect the same type of benefits in Europe that we’re gaining from having some control over some key chemical raw materials. Our Legend Brands business has a new MRO, if you will, focus that will allow for a more steady state as opposed to the swings of the weather events that have really spiked their business from one quarter to the next or one year to the next.

And there is some real complementary efforts there with our Construction Products Group that is already in that asset management business. But we regularly look at opportunities to divest. And as you all know, the M&A market has been pretty dead and so the — whether it’s on the buy-side or in the sell-side, we’ll have to see interest rates come down and M&A activity and valuations come back up and that plays both ways.

Stephen Byrne: Thank you.

Operator: The next question is from Frank Mitsch with Fermium Research. Please go ahead.

Frank Sullivan: Good morning, Frank.

Frank Mitsch: Hey. Good morning, and Happy New Year. if I could just follow up on that last question, it kind of begs the — it does beg the question about your thoughts on uses of cash, and you just discussed that the M&A market is all of it and made the comment before about your buybacks today overstated. I don’t know if that was a 40 and slip, but to try and signal that you guys are thinking about increasing your buybacks at these levels, what are your thoughts there, M&A versus buybacks?

Frank Sullivan: So, we are committed to buying back the dilution in every year. And then, boy, throughout my career here, we’ve been pretty strategic as to whether we get aggressive in buybacks relative to how we perceive value, and that will continue. But, we will be a more common, more regular buyer of our stock quarter-by-quarter-by-quarter, along with increasing our dividend. Frank, if you look at the opportunities we have with a higher level of permanent cash flow, a year ago we talked about, and I think it might have been a question from you, focus on cash generation and we indicated it would be to pay down debt. We’ve done that very successfully. But our dividend payout ratio over 20 years has gone from the mid-50%s to the mid-30%s.

Our cash flow has increased dramatically and we’re in a better position to be a regular buyer of our stock and/or continue our dividend program, unless in relationship to buying our stock, we see some sizable acquisition opportunities at the right value.

Frank Mitsch: Got you. Very helpful. And if I can come back earlier, I believe it was Matt made the comment that, unabsorbed fixed costs are kind of masking the benefits of the MAP program, what have you, and I guess, I was thinking that for fiscal 2024, unabsorbed fixed costs would be materially less than they were in fiscal ’23, how are you thinking about the interplay between this fiscal year and last fiscal year on that item?

Frank Sullivan: Sure. They should be less than fiscal ’23 in the second half. Unfortunately, not as much of a recovery as we had hoped because of our original expectation on volume growth, which is, we covered in today’s call, we’re not seeing yet in Consumer or in the Specialty Products Group. But you are seeing in this quarter, and you’ll see in future quarters, a real strong leverage to the bottom-line of our Construction Products Group and Performance Coatings Group, because of the MAP 25 benefits. When we have good volume and it’s going to be coming, you’re going to see nice leverage.

Frank Mitsch: Very helpful. Thank you.

Frank Sullivan: Thank you.

Operator: The next question is from Kevin McCarthy with Vertical Research Partners. Please go ahead.

Frank Sullivan: Good morning, Kevin.

Kevin McCarthy: Yes. Good morning, Frank. A question on your sales mix by geography, if I look at Slide 5, it seems to me that there is a very large disparity between your negative 3% in North America and what looks to be an average of positive 9% to 10% overseas. It doesn’t look like currency was a big factor this quarter. So, I’m curious, can you speak to why you’re doing so well overseas, what are maybe the two or three most important drivers in your view, and how sustainable those might be? And do you think that in future quarters, we’ll continue to see faster growth overseas versus the U.S.?

Frank Sullivan: Yeah. So, I commented earlier in the call, Kevin, that, what we’re seeing, particularly in Europe, is just a better focus and better organized approach. Think of it as a MAP to Growth for Europe. And so, we are driving efficiencies there. We’re also having a more focused sales effort in a bunch of our businesses. And then, lastly, we’re rounding some easier comps, particularly in UK, that went into a recession before most of the other markets that we serve. We also organized in what we call a platform approach for the developing world and it’s having real positive effect. So, unless there is a some type of further disruption in a world with plenty of disruptions, I would expect that we would see really solid growth in Europe and the rest of the world and the growth in North America probably is not going to be a lot different in the coming quarter than you see here, again because of the year-over-year flat to negative in Consumer and Specialty Products Group.

Hopefully, that will change in Q4, but we will see.

Kevin McCarthy: Okay. That’s helpful. And then, I wanted to follow up on the discussion regarding Specialty Products. Can you speak to the margin level and outlook there, Frank? I’m cognizant that you had a step-down when you divested the higher-margin Guardian business there. First half of the year, it seems to be running 9%, 10%, how would you characterize the current level versus normal? And do you have a target for that segment margin? Looking out a couple of years, how can we think about the likely trajectory there?

Frank Sullivan: Yeah. That’s a great question, and yes, we do. The Specialty Products Group should be generating in a better economic environment, mid to slightly higher-teen EBIT margins, and they’ve been there before. The Guardian Products business was an outsized EBIT margin, but that was a $40 million business. And so, our expectations are, with an economic recovery, in a few years, especially Products Group will be back to the mid-single — I’m sorry, mid-double-digit mid-teens EBIT growth. And to an earlier question, I’m very confident that we can get there. We’re taking advantage of this opportunity now to synergize a few things. But if we don’t get back there, then we would take a look at that Specialty Products Group or pieces of it in relationship to RPM’s future.

Kevin McCarthy: Very good. I appreciate the color.

Operator: The next question is from Ghansham Panjabi with Baird. Please go ahead.

Ghansham Panjabi: Good morning, guys. Happy New Year.

Frank Sullivan: Happy New Year, Ghansham.

Ghansham Panjabi: Thank you, Frank. To you as well. Just going back to the lower consolidated sales guidance for fiscal year ’24, can you just sort of clarify what specific segment or segments it is due to and the offset in maintaining your EBIT guidance just purely incrementally more favorable price-cost?

Frank Sullivan: No, the EBIT guidance is a favorable price cost mix and significant improvements from our MAP ’25 initiatives. And as Frank Mitsch asked earlier, some better overhead absorption versus last year when we really tackled inventory, shut down production in a number of places. So, we’ve been very aggressive in rightsizing inventories and after, quite candidly, 30 years of my career, talking about improving working capital, finally getting around to getting it done on a sustainable basis. So, that’s been our focus and we’re executing and it’s happening. So, we’re excited about that. But the EBIT margin improvement is a combination of cost price mix which finally turned positive this fiscal year and the benefits to the MAP ’25 program in our operations.

One of the key things to that is that the vast majority of the MAP ’25 initiatives are related to commercial activities in terms of how we incentivize salespeople relative to margins. It’s focused on conversion costs in a number of areas there. So, the impact is mostly a gross margin impact, which means you don’t realize it until you sell something. So, it’s not like an SG&A cut that you can annualize over — divide by 12 and annualize over a year. It really flows into your P&L as you move units.

Ghansham Panjabi: Okay. And then on the Consumer business, I mean, if you kind of zoom out, there has been a lot of ups and downs over the years with COVID and supply-chain shortages, etc., and then, of course, interest rates, what is the base case at RPM at this point for calendar year ’24, in terms of volumes? Are you expecting a better year? I mean, obviously, interest rates impacted the markets last year, but that in theory should be in the base — that should be in the base from last year ?

Frank Sullivan: Sure. I think you’re asking about maybe fiscal ’25, which starts on June 1. Our fill rates are back in the high-90%s across the board. That was not true two years ago. We are at lower levels of inventory. And, last year for the first time in my career, shut down production in January and February to right-size inventories where typically we’d be adding inventory to sell into a big spring season. So, we’ve gotten much more agile in our manufacturing ability, so that we don’t have to have the same size of safety stock. So those are the improvements that we have made. But fill rates are where they need to be. I think inventories for the most part in the supply chain are where they need to be. And we just need to help with our retail customers drive consumers back into the stores.

Help them think of projects that they can do. And the real first opportunity for us to do that will be this spring because of the seasonality of the business in particular. You see, we expect good leverage in the third quarter, but the third quarter is not where we expect to see any revenue surprises because of the weather seasonality of some of our industrial businesses and certainly our Consumer Group.

Ghansham Panjabi: Okay. Thank you.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] The next question is from Arun Viswanathan with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Frank Sullivan: Good morning, Arun.

Arun Viswanathan: Good morning, Frank. Thanks for taking my question, and Happy New Year. So, I guess, first, I just wanted to go back to kind of the sales outlook. It looks like it’s kind of a tale of two cities here with the Consumer and Specialty Products Group maybe a little bit more sluggish, while reshoring infrastructure drives more strength in Construction Products and PMC. Would you see that maybe switching as we move into the back half of calendar ’24? Maybe I’ll just start with that and just see if that’s kind of in line with your thinking.

Frank Sullivan: No. We think that the Construction Products Group and Performance Coatings Group will have a solid second half of fiscal ’24, and the dynamics that we had talked about earlier in terms of stimulus, infrastructure bills, and Increases in industrial capital spending and a resurgence in manufacturing, should bode well for those business units and product lines in fiscal ’25. I think the thing that we’re focused on is continuing to improve our businesses and operating leverage with the expectation, whether it’s in Q4 or as we get into fiscal ’25, seeing some positive unit volume growth at a Consumer and a return to growth in most of our Specialty Products Group companies. And again, that’s what we are most exposed to OEM, coatings to residential construction and we’re not alone in having a very difficult challenge.

There are certain segments of manufacturing that have had a tough year and anything that touches housing in the last year has not done very well.

Arun Viswanathan: Got it. And then, you mentioned fiscal ’25, I think previously you had put out some MAP 2025 targets of that 16% adjusted EBIT margin. Do you still see that in the cards? I think we’re maybe a couple of 100 basis points below that on an annual basis right now, but maybe what’s kind of the bridge to getting there? What are some of the factors that we would need to see to realize that level of margin performance?

Frank Sullivan: Sure. I think we’re on target for that. I think whether we can achieve that on the timeliness or within the timeframe that we communicated depends on when we see the turn in positive unit growth in Consumer and Specialty Products Group. But we’ll have a pretty robust appraisal of that when we release our fourth quarter results in July and talk about the balance of our 2025 fiscal year, which is the end of the MAP ’25 program.

Arun Viswanathan: And just lastly, I think this question, you may have offered some comments, but I just wanted to ask again, within any of the businesses, are there any particular areas that you think that are just likely — not likely to recover as you see, and may be candidates for divestiture? How is kind of the portfolio review going? Thanks.

Frank Sullivan: Sure. Yeah. Not at this time, but back to your earlier question, one of the key elements of getting to that 16% consolidated EBIT margin, is especially Products Group who’s consolidated — or Group level EBIT margins are in the mid-teens or slightly higher, which is up from about 9% or 10% level today. So, there needs to be a significant recovery there and we’re focused on it. Without that, we will not hit the 16% consolidated goal.

Arun Viswanathan: Great. Thanks a lot.

Operator: This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Frank Sullivan for any closing remarks.

Frank Sullivan: Thank you. We appreciate everybody’s participation in our investor call this morning and for your continuing interest in RPM. I’d also like to thank our associates for their tremendous dedication and hard work in fiscal 2024. We are executing at a high level and you can see it in our results. And lastly, to all on the call, we wish you a happy, healthy, and prosperous New Year. Thank you and have a great day.

Operator: The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect.