Tim Casey: A couple of questions for Tony, and one for you, Glenn. Tony, can you talk a little bit about the wireless loading dynamics in the quarter in the outlook? I mean, you had a very successful loading quarter, but our proven churn did, were affected. I mean, were you more active on the Flanker brands, perhaps in anticipation of a Freedom at Quebecor. Can you just talk about the competitive dynamics within the brands in the quarter? And then just curious if you could comment on some of the media signaling coming out of chairperson each of these at the CRTC and focused on pricing again. Just wondering if you’ve had any dialogue or any comment many of us have heard this kind of signaling before, it just would be interested in your perspective. And lastly, Glenn, just a clarification on the media number. It looks like there’s a onetime BAM contribution in the fourth quarter. Could you confirm that and perhaps quantify it? Thank you.
Tony Staffieri: Thanks to Tim for the questions. A couple of things is just to give you some context on the fourth quarter, quite a bit of competitive intensity in terms of promotional activities, not just on the price plans, but to some extent on the handsets as well. So what you saw play out and we were largely more reactive in terms of the Flanker. In fact, when you look at over the course much like on home internet, we’ve been re-indexing back to our premium plan. And if you’re looking at the rate of growth in the fourth quarter of Rogers viz-a-viz Fido what you see is a significantly faster rate of growth on Rogers. And so we’re pleased with that on balance. So notwithstanding that competitive intensity. We continue to make good traction on re-indexing back to our premium brand and something we’ve been on throughout 2022 and we’ll continue to do in €˜23.
But no doubt some of the value out there, and it’s just a reflection of the market. There was good value for consumers in the fourth quarter and the overall impact on service revenue was offset by share gains, which is important in a market where the rate of growth is accelerating. And so we’re always trying to balance off both of those. And I think we are striking the right balance between market share gains, and ARPU growth as well. And so that’s what really reflected the heightened churn that you saw in Q4 for us and the industry. In terms of your second question, on pricing. Well there’s not a lot I could say, with respect to the new CRTC chair. We look forward to working constructively and proactively at the right time with the mandate of the CRTC as we would with any other regulatory body.
But what I will say is, we feel good about the market dynamics and the value add that the industry and Rogers is bringing to customers. It’s a continue to highlight against the backdrop of increasing inflation in a number of parts of the sector and consumer goods. Our industry in Rogers continues to reduce pricing. If you were to look at it over the last several years, and in particular, over 2022, one of the few if not the only sector that actually has price declines in the marketplace, and that’s owing to the competitive intensity that’s out there. And frankly, as I’ve said in other forums are intend to continue to figure out ways to bring more value add to customers
Glenn Brandt: And then, Tim, just quickly on your question around the MLB proceeds. It’s not my transaction to release the details on. And so I can’t give you a specific amount. It does relate to MLB, having sold the minority interest in the remaining minority interest in held in one of its properties, and then the distribution to each of the teams. And so that was our, we recorded our share of it in the quarter.
Operator: Our next question comes from Simon Flannery of Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
