Regency Centers Corporation (NASDAQ:REG) Q2 2024 Earnings Call Transcript

Regency Centers Corporation (NASDAQ:REG) Q2 2024 Earnings Call Transcript August 2, 2024

Christy McElroy – SVP, Capital Markets:

Lisa Palmer – President and CEO:

Alan Roth – East Region President and COO:

Nick Wibbenmeyer – West Region President and CIO:

Mike Mas – CFO:

Michael Goldsmith – UBS:

Jeff Spector – Bank of America Merrill Lynch:

Juan Sanabria – BMO Capital Markets:

Viktor Fediv – Scotiabank :

Craig Mailman – Citigroup:

Samir Khanal – Evercore ISI:

Dori Kesten – Wells Fargo:

Ravi Vaidya – Mizuho Securities:

Ki Bin Kim – Truist Securities:

Ron Kamdem – Morgan Stanley:

Floris Van Dijkum – Compass Point:

Linda Tsai – Jefferies:

Tayo Okusanya – Deutsche Bank:

Alec Feygin – Baird:

Mike Mueller – JPMorgan:

Operator: Greetings, and welcome to Regency Center Corporation’s Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. At this time all participants are in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Christy McElroy. Thank you. You may begin.

Christy McElroy: Good morning, and welcome to Regency Centers’ Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. Joining me today are Lisa Palmer, President and Chief Executive Officer; Mike Mas, Chief Financial Officer; Alan Roth, East Region President and Chief Operating Officer; and Nick Wibbenmeyer, West Region President and Chief Investment Officer. As a reminder, today’s discussion may contain forward-looking statements about the company’s views of future business and financial performance, including forward earnings guidance and future market conditions. These are based on management’s current beliefs and expectations and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. It’s possible that actual results may differ materially from those suggested by these forward-looking statements we may make.

An overhead shot of a shopping complex with a variety of stores, restaurants and service providers.

Factors and risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from these statements may be included in our presentation today and are described in more detail in our filings with the SEC, specifically in our most recent Form 10-K and 10-Q filings. In our discussion today, we will also reference certain non-GAAP financial measures. The comparable GAAP financial measures are included in this quarter’s earnings materials, which are posted on our Investor Relations website. Please note that we have also posted a presentation on our website with additional information, including disclosures related to forward earnings guidance. Our caution on forward-looking statements also apply to these presentation materials. Finally, given the number of participants we have on the call today, we kindly and respectfully ask that you limit your questions to one and then rejoin the queue if you have any additional follow-up questions.

This will allow everyone who’d like to ask a question an opportunity to do so. Lisa?

Lisa Palmer: Thank you, Christy, and good morning, everyone. We had another great quarter driven by continued strong operating fundamentals and active and prudent capital allocation. While we recognize that the macro environment remains uncertain with mixed economic signals and inflationary pressures on consumers, our business continues to show strength. Consumers may be shopping with a new level of price awareness but that can be a benefit to our high-quality centers and our high-quality tenants given a focus on necessity, service, convenience and value. Sales and traffic trends remained steady and leasing demand continues to be strong. We are taking advantage of the solid and consistent tenant demand to drive rent growth and leasing activity with strong new and existing tenants.

This is evidenced in our record shop lease rate and our sizable SNO pipeline. This will provide momentum and lease commencement into 2025. Our continued leasing success is a testament to the strength of Regency’s high-quality grocery-anchored centers and strong suburban trade areas with limited new and available supply. Our value creation pipeline also supported by the strong tenant demand and focus on high-quality assets in demographically compelling areas is one of the most exciting aspects of our business today and one that truly sets or Regency apart. Our team continues to make meaningful progress sourcing new projects with another $250 million of expected starts in 2024 as well as executing on and delivering our existing pipeline. The strength of Regency’s platform and ability to self-fund our program with free cash flow, have enabled our long track record of success.

We also continue to acquire shopping centers when able to that are accretive to our quality growth and earnings. As previously disclosed, we acquired Compo Shopping Center in Westport, Connecticut in May, and we are currently under contract to purchase an additional asset in the Northeast. I can’t stress enough the importance of our balance sheet strength and liquidity position, and providing us with an ability to be opportunistic across the spectrum of capital allocation strategies, which is why in addition to sourcing select high-quality, high-growth acquisition opportunities at upper single-digit IRRs, we were also able to take advantage of a meaningful disconnect and public and private market values this past quarter with the execution of a $200 million share repurchase.

As many of you are well aware, along with our standards of quality and balance sheet strength, corporate responsibility is also a foundational strategy for Regency. This past quarter, we published our annual corporate responsibility report, highlighting our 2023 achievements as well as our future goals and strategy. Our best-in-class program is evident in the progress we’ve made toward our goals but also in the recognition we receive from third parties, including ranking sixth overall and first in the real estate industry for Newsweek’s most responsible companies list and our continued recognition by GRESB for sustainability and disclosure leadership in our sector. I appreciate the efforts of all Regency team members in helping us achieve these important accomplishments.

In closing, now that we are more than halfway through the year, with the strength in leasing activity and results that we’ve seen thus far, we are raising our eye level and our full year guidance range. Mike will go into more detail, but we’ve been able to move the needle on several fronts, including same property NOI, development activity and accretive capital allocation. I want to reiterate the importance of Regency’s strategic competitive advantages, which position us favorably to continue to outperform over the long term as we have historically. These advantages include our high-quality assets and strong trade areas with favorable demographics, the strength of our operating platform and experience and talent of our people, a value-creation pipeline that gives us more leverage to drive growth and the balance sheet strength that allows us to opportunistically allocate capital, which we did very strategically in the second quarter.

Alan?

Alan Roth: Thank you, Lisa, and good morning, everyone. We continue to have great leasing and operating success, reflecting the positive tenant demand environment for high-quality shopping centers in strong trade areas. We’re seeing this robust demand from both new and existing tenants in a wide array of categories, including grocers, restaurants, health and wellness, off-price and personal services. Our success is evident in the continued depth and momentum in our leasing pipeline as well as in our ability to drive rents and occupancy higher and improve our expense recovery rate, all while still maintaining judicious capital spend. During the quarter, we held our same-property percent leased at 95.8%, while increasing our same-property percent commenced by 10 basis points to 92.3%.

Our SNO pipeline sits at 350 basis points and represents approximately $49 million of incremental base rent. As we’ve discussed previously, the timing and commencement of this pipeline will largely impact the fourth quarter of 2024 and into 2025. Notably, beyond our signed pipeline of exciting retailers, we have another 1.3 million square feet of leases in negotiation. In the quarter, we were also able to drive strong blended cash rent spreads of more than 9%. GAAP and net effective rent spreads were in the upper teens, demonstrating our ability not only to drive strong mark-to-market increases but also continued success, negotiated embedded contractual rent step in nearly 100% of our leases. Our average rent steps on all leasing activity in the quarter was 2%.

But importantly, we achieved a record high of 2.7% rent steps in new lease transactions. Collectively, these efforts drove same-property NOI growth of 3.3% in the second quarter, excluding term fees and COVID period reserve collections, while our base rent growth contribution remained very healthy at 2.9%. Before turning the call over to Nick, I wanted to address the recent Kroger and Albertsons announcement regarding the 579 stores they intend to divest to C&S Wholesale Grocers if a merger occurs. Regency has 11 owned locations on the C&S list out of the 104 combined Kroger and Albertsons locations in our portfolio. Further detail will be provided as we learn more, but regardless of the outcome of the proposed merger, we are very comfortable with the underlying lease obligations, and we continue to feel great about the quality of our real estate for all of these locations.

In closing, as our portfolio occupancy approaches prior peak levels, combined with limited new high-quality supply and the strong trade areas in which we operate, our space is becoming more valuable. The strength in our leasing pipeline remains unabated, driven by continued appetite from retailers to expand. Our leasing and operating teams are firing on all cylinders, leveraging the current environment to deliver what we believe will be long-term sustainable performance in the years ahead. Nick?

Nick Wibbenmeyer: Thank you, Alan. Good morning, everyone. We remain very active growing and executing on our value creation pipeline, starting $40 million of new redevelopment projects in the second quarter and yields exceeding 10%. Additionally, subsequent to quarter end, we started an exciting new ground-up development project in Houston called the Jordan Ranch. This 160,000 square foot HEB-anchored center will serve as the retail component with that thriving master plan community. We are developing the center in a joint venture with the master plan developer, with Regency’s investments being approximately $23 million, bringing our year-to-date starts to more than $140 million. As we’ve discussed on prior calls, master plan developers continue to appreciate the value and benefits of bringing Regency, an experienced developer, owner and operator of high-quality retail centers into their project.

At the same time, we and our tenants recognize the benefits of developing our groceries and shopping centers directly adjacent to new, high-quality suburban residential communities. We also continue to make great progress executing on our in-process pipeline, which now totals nearly $580 million. Leasing activity remains robust with projects currently more than 90% leased at blended returns exceeding 9%. Turning to transactions. We have seen a recent pickup in activity in the private markets as well as deeper bidding pools. Our teams are actively underwriting opportunities that fit our investment strategy as well as return, growth and accretion requirements. In May, we closed on the purchase of Compo Shopping Center in Westport, Connecticut, which is adjacent to our Trader Joe’s anchored Compo Acres Center.

We also currently have a grocery-anchored center in the Northeast region under contract, which you’ll note we’ve included in our updated acquisition guidance and on which we look forward to sharing more details post-closing. While cap rates have remained relatively low for high-quality centers and compelling opportunities at high single-digit IRRs are a limited opportunity set in today’s market, we have been able to source these select assets where we believe we can drive accretion both to earnings as well as to our long-term growth rate. Looking ahead, our teams remain focused on continuing to source high-quality incremental investment opportunities, including accretive acquisitions like these as well as further building our value creation pipeline.

It’s true that it is difficult to find and execute new ground-up development opportunities at accretive returns, but this is where we believe our ability to create value is a meaningful differentiator for Regency. Our national platform and deep relationships, combined with our low cost of capital, liquidity and balance sheet strength enable us to be one of the only developers right now who can fund projects and execute at scale. You’ve heard us talk about our objective of starting more than $1 billion of development and redevelopment projects over the next five years. With $250 million of projects started in 2023, and another $250 million planned to start in 2024, we are confident in our visibility to achieving this goal. Mike?

Mike Mas: Thank you, Nick, and good morning, everyone. For the second quarter, we reported NAREIT FFO of $1.06 per share, core operating earnings of $1.02 per share and same-property NOI growth, excluding term fees and COVID period reserve collections of 3.3%. During the quarter, recognizing the meaningful disconnect between public and private market pricing, we executed on the opportunity to repurchase approximately 3.3 million shares for $200 million, representing an average price of just over $60 per share. We bought our shares at an implied cap rate of roughly 7% compared to where we are seeing private market values today for high-quality grocery-anchored centers in the 5.5% to 6.5% range, sometimes even in the low 5s. This opportunistic investment was accretive to earnings, and was afforded to us by our strong balance sheet and liquidity position.

Importantly, we remain well within our strategic leverage range with an expectation to end the year around the midpoint of our 5 to 5.5 times net debt and preferred to EBITDA target. We also maintain flexibility to continue sourcing new accretive investment opportunities, including redevelopments, new ground-up developments and acquisitions. Turning to our forward guidance. I’ll refer you to the details on Slides 5 through 6 in our earnings presentation and highlight some key changes. We increased our core operating earnings midpoint by $0.03 per share, which now implies close to 4% growth this year at the midpoint, excluding the COVID period reserve collections in 2023. As we show on Slide 6 in the presentation, this increase is driven in effectively equal parts by a 25 basis point increase in our same-property NOI growth range, now at 2.25% 2.75% an increase in expectations of non-same-property NOI, largely related to accelerated contributions from ground-up developments and the positive impact of capital allocation activity, net of financing including the share repurchases I’ve discussed previously.

We also increased our NAREIT FFO range by $0.05 per share at the midpoint or an incremental $0.02 above our core operating earnings revision, matching the increase in our guidance for non-cash items. As a reminder, for modeling purposes, as you think about the mechanics of our interest expense and interest income for the balance of the year, recall that much of the proceeds from our January bond offering were parked in similar yielding deposit accounts as we awaited the $250 million June maturity date. Therefore, the impact of refinancing this debt at a higher rate will come through earnings in the second half of this year. Looking beyond year-end, we continue to point to the embedded growth elements we see over the next 18 to 24 months, coming from our leasing and redevelopment progress.

As Alan mentioned, our SNO pipeline sits at 350 basis points, representing approximately $49 million of annual base rent of which about 65% is scheduled to commence by the end of this year. As these lease commencements are weighted to the fourth quarter, the resulting NOI growth will largely occur next year. And part of this commencement is within our redevelopment pipeline, where we continue to expect an outsized benefit to same-property NOI growth in 2025 from delivering completed projects with the positive contribution likely to exceed 100 basis points, which is double what we would have experienced in past normal years. Finally, we continue to be very proud of our sector-leading balance sheet and liquidity position, which provides Regency with the cost of capital advantage and the ability to invest opportunistically.

Our debt is nearly all fixed rate. Our weighted average maturity is close to seven years. We remain within our targeted leverage range of 5 to 5.5 times net debt and preferred to EBITDA, and we expect to continue generating free cash flow of more than $160 million annually. Supported by our financial position, we often reference the available options within our capital allocation toolbox that we utilize for various reasons and at different times. And in the second quarter, we had a unique opportunity to purposely employ nearly all of these tools successfully and accretively from leasing to operations to investments to capital allocation and balance sheet management, wrapped together with an increased outlook on current year earnings, Regency’s unequaled strategic advantages were on full display.

With that, we look forward to taking your questions.

Q&A Session

Follow Regency Centers Corp

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Michael Goldsmith with UBS. Please proceed with your question.

Michael Goldsmith: Good morning. Thanks all for taking my question. From a capital allocation perspective, you kind of did it all in the past quarter. You bought, you sold, you repurchased stock and you started ground-up development. So can you talk a little bit about your capital allocation priorities? And maybe just touch about what the cap rates are in the acquisition market for Regency type centers versus kind of how you are looking at the implied cap rate of where your stock was treating and caused you to buy back shares?

Lisa Palmer: Great. Thanks, Michael. I appreciate the question. And I appreciate the recognition that we basically used really every kind of tool, if you will, in the toolbox for capital allocation. Our goal — our objective is to create value for our shareholders. And we remain very consistent in our belief that the best use of our capital is to our development and redevelopment program. And we absolutely believe that we are in the position, very intentionally that we had the capacity, the balance sheet strength, the liquidity to do it all this quarter. And we’ve been talking about that for quite some time now how we’ve been on the — we are on the offensive. And we were able to execute that. And as we mentioned in our prepared remarks, in my history with — in the sector with the company, all the stars need to align to successfully execute on a share repurchase program, and they did for us.

So we bought back our shares at an implied cap rate of 7%, and this disconnect between public and private market pricing has been much more permanent than we ever imagined. And so we were able to lean into our balance sheet strength because while we are very active in the acquisition market as well, and I can have Nick just touch on that a little bit as to the cap rates we’re seeing you can see that we’ve been active as well. We are seeing assets, shopping centers, grocery-anchored of the quality that we would like to invest in the 5.5 to — if you’re lucky, Nick likes to say it a lot, the needle in a haystack, bring in those that are 6.5. But those are rare. We’re seeing a lot more and had a lot more conviction that are trading in the mid-5 cap rate range.

And that made the share repurchase an excellent use of our capital. And I’d love for Nick to touch a little more on the transaction market and what we’re seeing.

Nick Wibbenmeyer: Absolutely. Thank you, Lisa. I appreciate the question, Michael. As Lisa alluded to, we’re seeing the bid pools are much deeper than they were a quarter ago. So things that are on market now have very bidding pools. And we’re staying very disciplined to what we’ve always articulated, which is the opportunities that we’re going to pull the trigger on have to be more accretive to our quality and our growth profile, and we have to fund accretively. And so the opportunities that we’ve disclosed so far this year. You can see those ingoing yields are in the mid-6s. We’re very comfortable, they check all those boxes, but there have been a lot of opportunities in the market that have traded that are well below that cap rate and did not check all those boxes, and we stay disciplined to making sure we are ultimately driving accretion. And so we’ve seen things trade in the low 5s even.

Operator: Our next question comes from Jeff Spector with Bank of America. Please proceed with your question.

Jeff Spector: Great, thank you. I do have a question on markets, but I know it’s one question. Can I just confirm on the repurchase program to clarify the $250 million, that’s still left?

Mike Mas: No, Jeff. So Jeff, we — as a practice like just — and our board likes to have an open repurchase program authorized by the Board at about a level of $250 million. So our activity in the quarter exhausted the previous authorization. So we’ve simply refreshed the authorization for another two years at $250 million capacity.

Operator: Our next question comes from Juan Sanabria with BMO Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.

Juan Sanabria: Hi, good morning. And thanks for the time. I noticed the small shop occupancy ticked down a little bit sequentially. Just curious for some color behind that. Is there any signs of stress that you’re seeing on the small shop side, in particular, with the local mom-and-pops? Or is that still relatively healthy?

Alan Roth: Juan, good morning. Let’s say, good afternoon. It’s Alan. I appreciate the question. The short answer is no. There is no concern over the underlying fundamentals. We feel great about where we are in terms of the health of those regions, both national and local mom-and-pops. I would point you to how we’re thinking about foot traffic being up 6% year-over-year, year-to-date. Sales are remaining healthy. Again, both in the national and local level. Retention rates are also above 80%, which is slightly above what our historical trends have been. So as we put all of that together, we feel very comfortable that where we sit today. The portfolio is certainly healthy. And I think that’s largely a testament to how our teams go through a very rigorous qualification process for durability of occupancy.

Lisa Palmer: When we think about it, it’s interesting. It seems like it shouldn’t be this way. But when we’re in the position of strength that we are in, we are much more comfortable getting space back and because we’re able to re-lease it at higher rents and with better merchandising. So we are — when a lease comes up for renewal, if the tenant isn’t necessarily going to pay what we want them to pay. We are happy to move on.

Operator: Our next question comes from Greg McGinniss with Scotiabank. Please proceed with your question.

Viktor Fediv : This is Viktor Fediv on for Greg McGinniss. I just wanted to ask on the credit side. So we have now $300 million on revolver. Are you on the market now for new decisions to cover that? Because we’ve seen a 20 bps decline today and more than 50 bps decline within the last month. So just curious what’s your thoughts on that?

Mike Mas: I appreciate the question. First, I’d say we’re very comfortable with our liquidity today. We recently recast our revolver so we have $1.5 billion of capacity. You’re correct. We are at $300 million drawn on that facility. That’s largely attributed to the active investments we made in the second quarter, largely also stemming from our repurchases. We’re monitoring the capital markets, as you would expect us to. We do have a bias towards public unsecured financing on a long-term basis at a fixed rate, and we’ll continue to monitor those markets. It is — I mean, in the past 48 hours have been somewhat choppy, and we have seen a pretty significant rally in base treasury rates. But as you would expect, oftentimes with that type of movement, you start to see a little bit of weakness from a credit spread perspective. So just expect us to be highly attentive and attuned to where the market is going, and we will term out that facility when we think it’s appropriate.

Operator: Our next question comes from Craig Mailman with Citigroup. Please proceed with your question.

Craig Mailman : Hey apologies, if someone asked this. I got dropped of the call. But just on the development side, you guys have been in a pretty good position here, having liquidity to start projects and clearly, higher interest rates made it difficult for peers. But given kind of the pullback in the 10-year here and potentially lower rates going forward, do you feel like it gets harder for you guys to source or at least a more competitive environment as maybe construction financing becomes an option for others going forward?

Nick Wibbenmeyer: Craig, this is Nick. I appreciate the question. Yes, look, as we’ve talked about a lot, there’s a lot that goes in defining these development opportunities and executing on them. And you’ve heard me say time and time again, capital is one of those key components. And so if capital does become available, that does open up some opportunities for others. But let’s not forget the other two needed ingredients, which is relationships and expertise to find and execute on these opportunities. And so we continue to have the best relationships in the business with not only the key tenants that are expanding, but also the brokers and landowners in those markets that we’re looking to expand in. And clearly, our team has the expertise coast to coast.

And so regardless of capital markets, we feel really good about our ability to get more than our fair share of these opportunities as we look forward. And our shadow pipeline continues to grow as we’re getting arms around these opportunities.

Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Samir Khanal with Evercore. Please proceed with your question.

Samir Khanal : Good morning, everybody. I guess, Mike or Lisa, can you expand on the opportunities that exist on the shop space? I’m just trying to understand how much more you can push on occupancy when you clearly will have one of the best growth in the strip sector next year, right? And I’m just trying to see from a — whether it’s first start bid, or just trying to see how much more incremental growth there could be versus kind of what you’ve already put out for ’25 at this point.

Lisa Palmer: I think the team might be petrified if I answer this question because I’ll just keep pushing and pushing and pushing. So I’ll let Mike answer it.

Mike Mas: Let me start, and Alan, you can cover my comments up. But just kind of fundamentally, Samir, Page seven in our quarterly investor materials is really helpful. And I think that’s what gets us so excited about our near-term prospects for growth. And I would point you to the percent commenced bullet on that line. And what we’re indicating is that compared to our historical prior peak, we have 220 basis points of commenced occupancy opportunity. That dovetails very nicely that the $50 million of SNO pipeline that the team has built, and that we know we’re going to deliver starting in the fourth quarter of this year and largely into 2025. And there’s runway beyond that. As I look at that chart and think about the post-GE recovery period, you can see significant increases and percent commenced achieved over about a two to three-year period.

And all else being equal, as I think about the quality of our portfolio, the quality of our leasing team and the demand we’re seeing, we don’t see that there’s any reason why we can’t replicate that process going forward over the near term. It’s going to be — it will take longer than one year to make 20 basis points of GAAP differential, right? You’re still going to have churn. You’re still going to have move-outs. As Lisa said, we’re going to be very differentiating with our tenant selection. So it will take more than a year’s worth of time, but very excited and bullish about our growth prospects from here.

Operator: Our next question comes from Dori Kesten with Wells Fargo. Please proceed with your question.

Dori Kesten: Thanks, good morning. Your tenant watch list exposure is quite low versus peers. Can you hit on the highlights of the process you go through in evaluating tenant credit pre-signing and just any refinements you’ve added to the process over the last year?

Alan Roth: Dori, yes, this is Alan. I appreciate the question. It’s very rigorous. We do not just lease for occupancy. We’re very thoughtful and deliberate in our approach to how we think about our retailers. I would say that our watch list is comprised of roughly 150 basis points of ABR. But if you think about what the industry has experienced this quarter, cons filing for bankruptcy, we have 0. Eastern Mountain Sports, we had 1. Rue21, we had 1. Big lots announced store closures, although not yet filed for bankruptcy, again, we have 1. And so I sort of look at that and go, this is exactly what we have asked of our leasing teams on how to think about not just doing transactions, but being very thoughtful in aligning with the right retailers, and I feel great about where we stand on that front.

Lisa Palmer: I go back to how I think I started the first question answer that our objective in every part of the business is to create value for our shareholders. And we can also create — we also do create it by applying those principles and concepts to our leasing program and ensuring that we are merchandising to the long term, not just for the short term.

Operator: Our next question comes from Haendel St. Juste with Mizuho. Please proceed with your question.

Ravi Vaidya : Hi, good morning. This is Ravi Vaidya on the line for Haendel. Just wanted to touch on the CapEx and the TI. For new leases this quarter, a little bit elevated versus previous quarters. Is there anything onetime in there? And how do you expect this to go — how do you expect it to trend going forward?

Alan Roth: Ravi, I appreciate that question. The answer is feel very good about the approach of how we are prudently managing capital. I would just bring us back to net effective rent as a percent of GAAP rent. And we’re in that 80% to 85% range that we’re very comfortable with. I would also say when you look at total comparable capital for the quarter, it is lower than our trailing 12 months. So the team is prudently managing it. We’re growing rents appropriately. We’re focused not just on rent spreads, but the embedded rent steps as well. And I don’t see any shift in underlying fundamentals or trends to your question.

Operator: Our next question comes from Ki Bin Kim with Truist Securities. Please proceed with your question.

Ki Bin Kim : Thank you, good morning. So — I mean, it looks like you’re setting up for a pretty good growth year in ’25. If you look at the snow pipeline of 5% upside, and of course, there’s some upside from contractual rent step-ups of 140 basis points and then if you add on lease spreads. So you can get to a pretty big number. Obviously, not everyone renews. But can you just talk about some of the factors that might bring down some of those positive growth factors. And if you have any kind of large known tenant move-outs that might occur in the foreseeable future. Thank you.

Mike Mas: Ki Bin, number one, I appreciate you articulating our wheel of growth very well. We spent a lot of time communicating that. So thank you. And we have spoken to the plus 100 basis points of same property growth attributed to the activation of our redevelopment pipeline that we anticipate next year, which is about double what we would expect in a historical average year. We are set up for growth. I talked a lot about the SNO pipeline. I talked about where we stand from a percent commenced perspective. I appreciate the direction that you’re indicating. I’m going to stop short of providing any guidance for next year, and there’s more to come on that side as we dig into our plan effectively as soon as this call is over, as we get back to work.

But some headwinds, there’s always going to be move-outs. You’re always going to — you’re not retaining everybody. And I think we do an awesome job of selecting who we want. Bankruptcies are always going to play a role. Historically speaking, that could range anywhere from 30 to 60 basis points on a look-back basis depending on who files and when timing is a big factor in that. But I don’t know that I would anticipate our credit loss provision being wildly different than what we’re experiencing now. So more to come is where I’ll end it. But we are — we’re looking at 2025, the same way we did last quarter. We had a lot of positive momentum building into next year.

Operator: Our next question comes from Ron Kamdem with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question.

Ron Kamdem : Just a quick two-parter. Just on, obviously, this earnings season, we’ve seen a lot of institutional capital since you’re looking at the open shopping center space. Just if you could comment on either on the acquisition front or just in general, if you’re seeing institutional capital, private equity and so on and so forth coming to more into the space. And then Mike, the second part is, I had sort of a follow-up on that occupancy gain slides on the peak commence where you have 220 basis points. Any way to double-click whether it’s market or assets? Can we get a second layer of where that upside is really concentrated in?

Lisa Palmer: That was a sneaky way to ask two questions. I think Nick really did already address the, I believe, the transactions market that maybe as Nick just touched because you mentioned that the pools were deeper. So just maybe, Nick, the composition of the kind of the bids that we’re seeing, if it’s any different if it’s changed at all?

Nick Wibbenmeyer: Absolutely. Ron, appreciate the question. No question. The bidding pools are much deeper for assets that we’re pursuing and looking at and evaluating. And so where maybe before there were 3 to 5 bids now there’s 15 to 20 bids on assets. And so we’re definitely watching funds flow into our asset class for all the reasons we’re bullish on that Mike just articulated in. As you would appreciate, a lot of those bidders are institutional, whether it be pension funds, whether it be private equity backed, et cetera. And so no question seeing a lot of institutional capital pursuing assets right now.

Mike Mas: Ron. Take a look at Page 8 of our investor presentation for the quarter, and I think you’ll get some good composition with respect to our existing SNO pipeline. And there, you’ll see that it’s roughly 60% shops, 40% anchors. And from a timing perspective, we also have detail that about only about 15% of that income is going to be recognized in ’24, up to 90% of that income will be recognized next year, sticking to our bullish posture on ’25. I would say, though, that as we think about moving the needle on occupancy, we have some room to run on the anchor front, and we’ve got some really exciting opportunities that the team is working on. And I thought — I know Alan may want to color up some of that activity.

Alan Roth: Yes. I mean, I guess, Ron, the only thing I would add to that, to put definitive occupancy to it is we’re at 97.2% and our historic peaks are 98.5%. So there is certainly runway there. There’s been a couple of, I’ll call them, stubborn deals that have been out there that are really right at the goal line right now. So I feel great about the trajectory of where we are. I look at that SNO pipeline, and I would say the top 6 that are sitting there are grocery stores that we’re really excited to get online, and that will also provide for some ancillary center of gravity and synergistic merchandising to go with it. So the future is looking great there.

Operator: Our next question comes from Floris Van Dijkum with Compass Point.

Floris Van Dijkum: Lisa, I wanted to ask you a question, more of a bigger picture question, perhaps. But I think you’re probably uniquely position to be able to answer something like this. Obviously, there’s — the news, the Blackstone is looking at one of your peers. There’s the private formations. The fact that interest rates are likely coming down in September. You talked a little bit about your implied cap rates being at 7% back when you bought back the stock. Obviously, your stock price is more than 10% higher, so it’s gone down a little bit. But I’m curious to get your sense. I mean, from where are cap rates in the shopping center sector headed in your view? And do you think that we could see some of the cap rate expansion retrace itself over the next 12 to 18 months as capital comes in as interest rates come down and frankly, is growth and IRR from assets still appear pretty interesting?

Lisa Palmer: Floris, thanks for the question. I would go back to the conviction that we had with regards to the — what we believe a meaningful discount to private market values. We would not have executed the share repurchase. So I don’t believe that cap rates are rising in the future. And with cost of financing potentially going down if we see that, I think that our product type, grocery-anchored, higher-quality shopping centers. We’ve seen it throughout what we thought should be a time when cap rates would rise, the cap rates were really sticky. And that’s because our product type offers that sustainability and stability of cash flows. So we have convictions that cap rates are going to stay where they are. And if anything, and that’s in the private market, perhaps with more capital coming into the sector, I think the scenario you described would say cap rates should go down, not up.

Operator: Our next question comes from Linda Tsai with Jefferies.

Linda Tsai: On the 100 basis points of positive contribution from redevs coming online in 2025 being 2x the average. Could you just expand on some of the underlying drivers? Does it have to do with underwriting higher-than-expected rents?

Mike Mas: No, Linda. It’s really project specific. Going back a little bit in time, recall, our development, redevelopment pipeline, which we talk about in totality, over the last several years have been more balanced to redevelopments. And if you go back several years, that’s us kind of working through much of the opportunity that we acquired in the Equity One merger frankly. So these projects are now largely well on their way. They’ve been constructive. They’ve been leased, and we’re delivering that income into the same property pool. So it’s more a function of the quantum of the projects than it is the rates on the rents which, by the way, adds to our transparency and visibility. We feel really good about delivering new centers.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Tayo Okusanya with Deutsche Bank.

Tayo Okusanya: Congrats on the quarter. In regards to commenced occupancy, curious if you could help us think about what that could look like going into 2025. Again, occupancy is already pretty high. You have a very large new pipeline, but you’re also going through very strong leasing as well. So just kind of curious where you think that can end up going over the course of the next 12 months and what snow could look like over the next 12 months?

Mike Mas: I appreciate the question. And I promise, we’ll give much more visibility in 2025 on a granular level at — when it’s the right time. But again, I’ll point you to that Page 7, at 220 basis points. I’ll reflect you to the — our historical commenced occupancy changes and in really good years, we can move that number by about 100 basis points. And if you recall, it’s in our investor materials, but every 10 basis points of percent commenced increase can contribute up to 15 basis points of same property growth. So that’s where we get comfortable indicating that the contribution of redevelopment, which is moving commenced occupancy being 100 basis points, 100 basis points through the 15 bps would give us about 150 basis points of potential growth.

Again, timing matters here. So I don’t want to get too into the weeds on 2025. But I think that should help you understand and appreciate the opportunity set in front of us, and I would just encourage you to spend some time on that Page 7 in our investor materials.

Operator: Our next question comes from Alec Feygin with Baird. Please proceed with your question.

Alec Feygin : Hi, good morning. And thanks for taking my question. Kind of curious about the competition that Regency is seeing in the Northeast? And is there anything specific to the region to explain what’s driving the increased activity there?

Lisa Palmer: I’m not sure we understand the question. It increased the — you’re saying transaction activity?

Alec Feygin: Yes, sorry, the increased transaction activity.

Nick Wibbenmeyer: Yes. I would just tell you a couple and this is Nick. Appreciate the question, Al. So a couple of things. Obviously, the acquisition of UBP that’s got our team up there, very, very active and increased our presence throughout that market. But a lot of it is also just timing. And so although this quarter, we were very active in the Northeast and very happy with the opportunities that have been presented. We’re seeing a lot of activity across the country. And so as we move into future quarters, I think you’ll see that activity be geographically dispersed more than it was this past quarter. So continued opportunities are presenting themselves in each of our markets at this point.

Operator: Our next question comes from Mike Mueller with JPMorgan. Please proceed with your question.

Mike Mueller : I guess, between Erstad, the Westport acquisition and the Northeast center you have under contract, it seems like you put a lot of capital to work up here recently. When you’re looking at the broader pipeline that you see today, are the opportunities more geographically diverse or still kind of concentrated?

Nick Wibbenmeyer: Mike, yes, we’re definitely seeing opportunities coast to coast. And so it is just timing related this quarter as it relates to the Northeast. And our team up there is doing a great job continuing to find opportunities. But I know the Southeast region, the West region, the Central region is anxiously waiting for some announcements and opportunities they’re working on as well. And so we feel good about the opportunities we’re seeing all around the country at the moment.

Operator: We have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. I’d now like to turn the call back over to Lisa Palmer for closing comments.

Lisa Palmer: I want to thank all of you for spending the last approximate hour with us. We appreciate your interest in Regency. Have a great weekend, though. Thank you.

Operator: This concludes today’s conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and we thank you for your participation.

Follow Regency Centers Corp