Pure Storage, Inc. (NYSE:PSTG) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Pure Storage, Inc. (NYSE:PSTG) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript February 26, 2025

Pure Storage, Inc. beats earnings expectations. Reported EPS is $0.45, expectations were $0.42.

Operator: Good day, and welcome to the Pure Storage Fourth Quarter and Full Year Fiscal 2025 Financial Results Conference Call. Today’s conference is being recorded. All lines have been muted during the presentation portion of the call with an opportunity for questions-and-answers at the end. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I’d like to turn the call over to Paul Ziots, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Paul Ziots: Thank you. Good afternoon everyone and welcome to Pure’s fourth quarter fiscal year 2025 earnings conference call. On the call we have Charlie Giancarlo, Chief Executive Officer; Kevan Krysler, Chief Financial Officer; and Rob Lee, Chief Technology Officer. Following Charlie’s and Kevan’s prepared remarks, we will take questions. Our press release was issued after close of market and is posted on our website where this call is being simultaneously webcast. The slides that accompany this webcast can be downloaded at investor.purestorage.com. On this call today, we will make forward-looking statements, which are subject to various risks and uncertainties. These include statements regarding our financial outlook and operations, our strategy, technology and its advantages, our current and new product offerings and competitive industry and economic trends.

Any forward-looking statements that we make today are based on facts and assumptions as of today, and we undertake no obligation to update them. Our actual results may differ materially from the results forecasted, and reported results should not be considered as an indication of future performance. A discussion of some of the risks and uncertainties relating to our business is contained in our filings with the SEC, and we refer you to these public filings. During this call, all financial metrics and associated growth rates are non-GAAP measures other than revenue, remaining performance obligations, or RPO, and cash and investments. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are provided in our earnings press release and slides.

This call is being broadcast live on the Pure Storage Investor Relations website and is being recorded for playback purposes. An archive of the webcast will be available on the IR website and is the property of Pure Storage. Our first quarter fiscal 2026 quiet period begins at the close of business, Friday, April 18, 2025. With that, I’ll turn it over to Charlie.

Charlie Giancarlo: Thank you, Paul. Good afternoon, everyone and welcome to our Q4 and Fiscal 2025 earnings call. We delivered a solid Q4, exceeding both revenue and earnings guidance. And capping off the year marks by progress as our long-term data platform strategy is changing how enterprises think about data storage and management. In FY ’25, we delivered on several key strategic initiatives. First, we achieved a design win with a top four hyperscaler. This relationship is proceeding well in the next stages of both testing and deployment plans. We see continued progress on certifying our use across multiple price performance layers. Pure’s DirectFlash technology will enable this hyperscaler to deploy a consistent architecture across multiple performance tiers of their storage hierarchy.

It also allows them to redeploy significant amounts of power and space to new workloads and to increase their data storage performance, reliability, and lifetime. We also launched our 150 terabyte DirectFlash module, marking a fivefold increase in capacity over standard hard disks and 2.5 over the largest SSDs. We are on track to deliver a 300 terabyte DFM late this year. Next, our expansion and growth of the E family during the year signified a major advancement to address the expected tenfold increase in unstructured data driven by AI over the next 5 years. This offers businesses far better economics compared to disk, along with superior power and density efficiencies that will drive the displacement of disk in data centers. The E family has become a strong competitor to existing hybrid and hard disk environments.

The rise of NAND prices in 2024 relative to disk competition did affect gross margins negatively in the year, which we expect to abate in 2025. We also continue to invest and see success in our Evergreen//One program, which has attracted strong customer satisfaction and high existing customer growth. Perhaps our most significant and revolutionary technology advancement last year, was the GA release of our Fusion v.2. Available as a non-disruptive upgrade to all pure customers, Fusion v.2 transforms traditional enterprise data storage architectures from application data silos to enterprise data clouds. With Fusion, Pure can now provide customers with data set management services supporting their global data estate. This is an area in the enterprise which is largely managed manually, if at all.

Manual management and inadequate traceability of datasets is a leading cause of data sprawl and cyber risk for enterprises worldwide. Fusion opens up significant new opportunity and value for Pure in this space. The best way for me to describe the transformational impact of Fusion is with a familiar analogy. A decade ago, many of us used an external hard drive to add storage to our computers. It provided additional storage and could back up our files. However, when it filled up, we needed to replace it with a larger unit and migrate the data from the old unit to the new. If a colleague also had a hard drive which had spare capacity, it couldn’t easily be shared, and file sharing between computers was difficult. Finally, if the external hard drive failed, there was little that one could do to recover.

Today, few people use external drives. We’ve all moved to personal cloud storage provided by many different cloud providers. The benefits go well beyond just storage. For example, personal cloud storage provides unlimited storage scalability. When one needs more, one only needs to pay for more without having to migrate data. Consistent updates to their infrastructure with non-disruptive software and hardware improvement. In other words, the service doesn’t grow old. Guaranteed resiliency, one expects never to lose your data. Global access, one can access their data from anywhere, from any machine with search features to find content and easy file sharing with just a few mouse clicks. This model has extended to how colleagues now work in a company.

Corporate provisioning of personal data storage on services such as Google Drive or Microsoft OneDrive further allows companies to place their corporate data policy on employee data management, such as controlling file sharing to meet corporate compliance requirements, managing file retention and deletion policies, enabling or disabling individual access when employees join, change role, or leave the company, and providing administrative global search for all stored files.

application STAC: Many enterprise customers have hundreds of storage arrays globally, each operating as an independent data silo. The amazing advancement of Pure Fusion v.2 transforms Pure Storage arrays from individual storage arrays into an enterprise data cloud. Pure Fusion allows all of an enterprise’s pure arrays to be managed as an integrated system. Better yet, it allows the stored data to be managed as a data cloud rather than individual data silos. Fusion allows applications to utilize the total shared capacity and performance of all the arrays, not just the ones that they are directly connected to. Fusion automates compliance policies for secure, consistent data handling. It enhances cybersecurity and eliminates manual errors.

It enables automated data set management, enforcing and tracking corporate rules and policies. It also allows stored data to be accessed across the global enterprise, breaking down data silos and enabling a true enterprise data cloud. Early feedback from dozens of customers has been enthusiastically positive. As enterprises face challenges like AI integration, cybersecurity threats, and hybrid cloud optimization, the need to move beyond traditional manual storage management is clear. Operating as a data cloud, Fusion automates data management, enhances security, and simplifies hybrid on-prem and cloud environments. It supports real-time AI access, eliminates the need for excessive copies of data, and fosters API-driven innovation. Pure Fusion enables a fundamental shift from data silos to an enterprise data cloud model for data management.

With Fusion, enterprises have a universally accessible storage solution that can automate and simplify their data management across thousands of arrays as simply as managing one array. This enables enterprise to operate all of their data storage on a workflow basis, just like the Cloud. This marks not just an evolution, but a revolution in IT infrastructure, redefining enterprise storage standards and data management. The success of several large enterprise deals this quarter was largely due to this expanded platform strategy. For example, a financial services technology company re-architected its entire storage environment with Cure due to slow response times with legacy architecture. By consolidating fragmented storage onto our unified platform, the company now turns data into a powerful asset while processing hundreds of billions of financial transactions a year.

One of the world’s largest telcos selected Pure to tackle its significant data center power consumption challenges, and reduce energy usage in data storage by an impressive 89%. Our 150 terabyte DFMs were foundational to this success, driving substantial business impact. Our solution enabled this provider to manage petabytes of data, run advanced analytics, and archive data for extended periods with the same core architecture. Portworx, our storage solution designed for containerized applications in Kubernetes environments, saw a strong increase during FY ’25, driven by significant growth in AI analytics and Cloud-native platform use cases. Last quarter, two Fortune 50 companies decided to transition their VMware environments to a modern virtualization environment using Portworx and Red Hat OpenShift.

One of these companies will significantly accelerate its application deployment speed and time to achieve results, while also reducing its cost by 30%. The other, a major manufacturer, is consolidating their containerized and virtualized application platforms in their manufacturing plants onto Kubernetes. Portworx enables them to reduce the cost of managing different infrastructures for VMs and containers and to simplify their operations. As I’ve indicated in recent quarters, our activity in AI continues to grow. Machine learning and training environments are increasingly utilizing our high performance storage and AI data preparation chains increasingly utilizing Portworx. We are looking forward to showcasing our latest AI advancements at the upcoming NVIDIA GPU Technology Conference next month.

We will unveil how Flashblade will set a new bar for unmatched performance, scalability and ease of deployment for large scale AI infrastructure deployments. Turning to the macro environment, we expect geopolitical uncertainty to contribute to a dynamic environment, at least through this year. In addition to our standard practice of operating with globally distributed and diversified supply and distribution chains, we have also developed contingency plans for a variety of tariff scenarios. Overall, we are pleased with our performance in FY ’25, and remain highly confident in our differentiated leading data platform strategy and vision. We are excited to help our customers build their own enterprise data clouds across their distributed and hybrid IT environments.

This confidence is reinforced by the four key competitive advantages of the Pure platform. Our unified purity operating system, our evergreen technology and business model, our purity DirectFlash technology, and our cloud operating model, now enhanced with Pure Fusion v.2, which allows our customers to build their own enterprise data cloud. With that, I’ll pass the mic to Kevin.

A – Kevan Krysler: Thank you, Charlie. We close the year on a high note, exceeding guidance with double-digit revenue growth, generating $153 million in operating profit and achieving an operating margin of 17.4%. In Q4, total revenue increased by 11%, and we set a record for TCV sales of Evergreen//One. In FY ’25, we reached a major financial milestone by surpassing $3 billion in total revenue for the first time with total revenue of $3.2 billion, growing 12%. We also delivered our highest annual operating profit of $559 million. Sales of our solutions across our data storage platform contributed to our strong Q4 performance. Record sales in Q4 were achieved by Flashblade, FlashArray XL, Portworx, our E family, and renewals of our Evergreen subscriptions across our install base.

Accelerating customers’ transition of cost-sensitive workloads to our E family and FlashArray C solutions remains a key strategic priority as customers are increasingly recognizing the superior economics over traditional disk solutions. Record sales of our E Family solutions combined with higher QLC flash costs and comparatively stable hard disk solution pricing have contributed to temporarily lower product gross margins of 62.9% in Q4. We also closed out the year with record quarterly TCV sales of Evergreen//One of $140 million, a 20% increase. FY ’25 TCV sales for Evergreen//One and our other service based offerings, reached 393 million, representing a 3% decline. This was the result of both extended timelines needed to close Evergreen//One deals greater than 5 million, and a higher conversion of Evergreen//One opportunities to a traditional sale that we experienced last quarter.

We remain confident in the long-term growth potential of our expanding as-a-service offerings. We expect TCV sales of Evergreen//One to grow next year, and we will continue to provide quarterly updates, those specific guidance will not be provided. Q4 subscription services revenue of $385 million increased 17% and subscription services annual recurring revenue or ARR grew 21% to $1.7 billion. Total remaining obligations or RPO exiting Q4 encompassing both subscription services and non-cancellable product orders grew 14% to $2.6 billion. Excluding non-cancellable product orders, RPO related solely to our subscription services increased by 15%. Overall RPO growth was impacted by the decline in TCV sales for our storage as a service offerings during FY ’25.

Our subscription services net dollar retention or NDR at the end of the year was 117% and continues to be aligned with our long-term target of 115%. In Q4, U.S revenue of $619 million was the primary driver of growth, while international revenue reached $261 million, down 3% year-over-year. For FY ’25, U.S revenue grew by 12% and international revenue increased by 13%. Additionally, we acquired 334 new customers, generally consistent with both Q4 FY ’24 and the previous quarter. We continue to serve 62% of the Fortune 500. In Q4, total gross margin was 69.2%, supported by a robust subscription services margin of 77.2%, while product gross margin, influenced by record sales of our E family, stood at 62.9%. For the year, total gross margin was 71.8%, compared to 73.2% in FY ’24.

Looking ahead for the full year of FY ’26, we expect product gross margins to settle in the mid 60s, which is in the range of our long-term expectation for product gross margins of 65% to 70%. This outlook is driven by expected strong demand for E family and FlashArray C solutions, alongside our expectation that QLC flash pricing will moderate, an important factor as we compete against disk-based solutions. Our headcount increased slightly to nearly 6,000 employees at the end of the year. Our balance sheet remains robust with $1.5 billion in cash and investments at the end of the year. Cash flow from operations in Q4 was $208 million and $753 million for the year. Capital expenditures during the year were $227 million, representing approximately 7.2% of revenue for FY ’25.

Our capital investments during the year supported data center expansion to support expanded testing of new products and solutions, including our recent hyperscale solution design win, accelerating density of our DirectFlash modules, and software development of our Fusion v.2 solution. Free cash flow for Q4 was $152 million and $526 million for the year. Free cash flow margin for the year was 16.6%. In Q4, we repurchased 3.1 million shares, returning approximately $192 $million to shareholders. For FY ’25, share repurchases amounted to $374 million, or 6.7 million shares. Additionally, we paid 65 million in withholding taxes on employee awards in Q4, offsetting dilution by about 1 million shares, and 209 million for FY ’25, offsetting about 3.5 million shares.

We currently have 21 million remaining under our existing repurchase authorization and are announcing a new share repurchase program for an additional 250 million. Turning to our FY ’26 guidance, we again expect double-digit revenue growth, increasing by 11% to just over $3.5 billion. Our annual revenue outlook considers an IT spending environment similar to FY ’25, and a return to growth for Evergreen//One and other service offerings. For Q1, we expect revenue of $770 million, representing an 11% year-over-year increase. Moving to operating profit. We remain committed to our bold strategic initiatives, positioning ourselves for strong, sustainable, long-term growth. This includes leveraging our recent hyperscale design win through incremental investments to scale operations for large production and deployments starting in FY ’27 as well as accelerating density in our DirectFlash modules.

We expect an operating margin in FY ’26 of approximately 17% consistent with my remarks last quarter, translating to an operating profit of around $595 million. For Q1, we are guiding operating profit of $80 million and operating margin of 10.4%. In closing, we are pleased to have returned to double-digit revenue growth and surpassing $3 billion in revenue for the first time. This pivotal year has been marked by remarkable innovation and execution, setting the stage for sustainable long-term growth. With that, I will turn it back to Paul for Q&A.

Paul Ziots: Thanks, Kevin. Before we begin the Q&A session, I’ll ask you to please limit yourselves to one question consisting of one part so we can get to as many people as possible. If you have additional questions, we kindly ask that you please rejoin the queue and we’ll be happy to take those additional questions as time allows. Operator, let’s get started.

Q&A Session

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Mike Cikos from Needham. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Mike Cikos: Great. Thanks for taking the questions here guys. I wanted to come back to some of the prepared commentary on Fusion. And really I know it’s early with the launch of Fusion 2.0, but do we have signs yet of customers that have adopted Fusion showing either faster expansions or stickiness? Or if it’s still too early, can you at least provide commentary on the go-to-market potentially and where we are in driving the adoption and awareness of what Fusion enables? Thank you.

Charlie Giancarlo: Thanks, Mike. Charlie here. Thanks for the question. So what we’ve had now in order for a customer to experience Fusion, they have to download the latest update to the software operating system in FlashArray. We’ve had dozens of companies do that and specifically turn on Fusion and start operating with it. And with less than a quarter of that being in the market, as I said, we’ve had dozens of customers do that. That’s a very fast uptake. And as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, of course, we’re getting feedback and the feedback has been not just positive, but enthusiastic. They find that the ability to manage all the systems that they put under Fusion as a fleet rather than as individual arrays to make life just a lot easier.

They are now experimenting with something we call presets. What presets allow them to do is set policies for how the data is handled across the arrays, such that for any specific storage class, all of the data in that storage class will be handled the same way. So as opposed to having to manage different application use cases manually in terms of policy, now the policy is carried out under software control. So the feedback has been very positive. Obviously, this creates a network effect. It creates a network effect for our products, meaning that if you have all or even some significant portion of your Pure Storage arrays under Fusion, the likelihood of you adding another array that’s not part of that, I think is going to be pretty low. But to your point, it is a bit early at this point.

We are still in the early rollout phases. I would expect that type of network effect to occur after several quarters of use.

Paul Ziots: Thank you, Mike. Next question please.

Operator: Our next question comes from Aaron Rakers from Wells Fargo. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Aaron Rakers: Yes. Thanks for taking the question. I wanted to ask about the hyperscale opportunity. And while I can appreciate it’s early to really unpack the announcement from last quarter, I’m curious, any progression of how maybe the model around this opportunity might be evolving? And then on that same kind of narrative, how would you characterize the discussions or the degree of discussions you might be having with other hyperscale opportunities? Thank you.

Charlie Giancarlo: Yes. The — as you might imagine, we are early, but the conversation continues to evolve and to expand frankly, in terms of the use cases for different types of data storage tiers inside that hyperscaler. So, we’ve been evolving and continuing in terms of the depth of the testing and the co development, in particular, but also discussions around future states and where that storage will go. Relative to other vendors, we continue to expand our conversations, I would say they’ve we indicated last time we expected them to accelerate. They have in fact accelerated through this quarter. Nothing to announce just yet, but certainly we are seeing increased interest. Rob, do you want to add anything?

Robert Lee: No, I think that summarizes well. The engagement is progressing as we expect and as Charlie mentioned moving forward through the more advanced phases of completing their kind of implementation plans and the typical engineering process we would expect to see leading to more detailed field testing on the way to ramping the significant scale. And, yes, I mean, the discussions and engagements we are having with other hyperscalers are definitely moving forward with a faster pace.

Paul Ziots: Thank you, Aaron. Next question, please.

Operator: Our next question comes from Amit Daryanani from Evercore ISI. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Amit Daryanani: Thanks a lot. Good afternoon, everyone. I guess maybe just a follow-up on the hyperscale question from Aaron. Can you just talk about what investments are needed by Pure at this point to get this from a design win and how to progress to a production environment? I would love to understand kind of what investments do you need to make to get there? And then just any clarity on what steps are needed to actually move this from design today to I think starting production in fiscal ’27 that would be helpful to understand? Thank you.

Robert Lee: Yes. So this is an ongoing co-development with that hyperscaler, meaning that they are developing new software, new architectures, new infrastructure architectures for, as we’ve discussed, it’s their next-generation data center design. And as they design that software and those hardware architectures, we have to work alongside them to make sure that our software works closely with theirs. Of course, we are constantly working together to try to improve both performance and price performance in that environment. As we mentioned, we are working now on multiple different performance tiers. Each one of them requires its own set of tuning. And of course, we have to also qualify several different scales of our DirectFlash modules along with several different Flash partners, if you will, different flash manufacturers for those DirectFlash modules. Now all of that requires quite a bit of work and testing on our side as well.

Kevan Krysler: So and this is Kevin, Amit. I’d probably summarize it into four key areas just to summarize what Charlie’s points are. Integrating the Purity software and our DirectFlash technology with the hyperscaler hardware specifications, accelerating our density roadmap with our DirectFlash modules, qualifying additional NAND suppliers that Charlie alluded to, expanding our supply chain capabilities and scale and really as well as investment in pursuing other opportunities, hyperscaler opportunities as well.

Paul Ziots: Thank you, Amit. Next question please.

Operator: Our next question comes from Howard Ma from Guggenheim. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Howard Ma: Thank you. For Charlie and/or Kevin, can you help us understand how much of the product gross margin decline is — how much is it due to incremental sales of the E and the C families versus say higher QLC costs or perhaps more aggressive pricing in other areas of your portfolio? Thanks.

Charlie Giancarlo: Yes. So, yes, our gross margin performance on other areas of our portfolio has stayed relatively constant. So, no real change there. So it’s entirely attributable to the E family. Now there are two effects of that. One is that the E family now is a higher percentage of our overall mix. But the other effect is that the E family, because it competes with disk that where the rise in NAND prices and the media prices did not affect the disk market. So in that case, whereas when we compete with other flash pricing, our margins have been very stable, but when we compete against disk solutions where NAND prices have increased, it affects that family more as you might imagine. So we view that as somewhat temporary as NAND prices moderate this coming year, where the margins for the E family will come back to what our longer term or actually I shouldn’t put it that way, what our early stage e margins were because we do expect that as we gain market share in the E family, even the E family will start to approach our normalized margins.

But as we indicated many quarters ago, we were going to be aggressive with the E family given that we’re really the only player in the market right now that can compete with disk and we want to take advantage of that. So we are being aggressive there. The more recent last year’s uptick in NAND pricing affected us a bit more than one would have hoped.

Kevan Krysler: Yes. And so with that, this is Kevan, Howard. Just to follow on to Charlie’s points, as we think about next year, we expect fully that the E family momentum will continue. But with the moderation of QLC pricing, we do think we’ll get back into a product gross margin range of around 65%, which again is aligned with our long-term product gross margin profile.

Paul Ziots: Thank you, Howard. Next question please.

Operator: Our next question comes from Pinjalim Bora from JPMorgan. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Unidentified Analyst: Hey guys, this is — on for Pinjalim. Thanks for taking our questions. Can you just maybe provide a little color about some of the geographical theaters, given the outperformance in the U. S. relative to international this quarter? Thank you.

Kevan Krysler: Yes, this is Kevin. Look, I think, well, one is we were actually quite pleased to see the performance in the U. S. and the growth driven by the U. S. Not unusual to see variability in growth by geographies on a quarterly basis. I think on balance, the growth was actually relatively comparable for the year both for international markets as a whole as well as the U. S. And look our international revenue growth was quite strong through the first three quarters of the year came down obviously in Q4, but nothing that I would call out specifically and we do expect our international markets and revenue to grow at a faster pace longer term than the U. S., given the size and markets and opportunity.

Paul Ziots: Thank you. Next question please.

Operator: Our next question comes from Krish Sankar from TD Cowen. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Krish Sankar: Hi. Thanks for taking my question. Question for Charlie or Kevin. On RPO, it looks like the RPO growth rate has declined from about 30% a year ago to 14% in the last quarter. I’m kind of curious, is this just a law of large numbers? Or is there something else going on the RPN? What does it mean for your core enterprise business? Thank you.

Kevan Krysler: Yes, this is Kevin. I’ll start out and then have Charlie add. I mean, this is just really a derivative of what we saw in our Evergreen//One TCV sales this year. So obviously with a small drop in revenue for the year, that’s impacting our RPO for the year as well at 15% when you exclude non-cancelable product orders. But look, we were quite pleased to see in Q4 a record Evergreen//One performance of 20%. We’ve certainly considered growth in our revenue guide for this year, Evergreen//One offering. And we are very pleased and excited with that offering and the value realization that our customers are seeing with Evergreen//One as a whole.

Krish Sankar: Okay. That covers it, Kevin. Thank you.

Paul Ziots: Okay. Thank you, Krish. Next question please.

Operator: Our next question comes from Jason Ader from William Blair. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Jason Ader: Yes. Thanks. Good afternoon, guys. I wanted to just follow-up on Rakers question earlier. I don’t think, Charlie, you answered the question on just the model and how gross margin, operating margin might look for the hyperscaler business. And do you think you’ll be able to provide more specific guidance on revenue as we move through the year?

Charlie Giancarlo: The answer on that is yes. As we understand better the exact rollout of the hyperscalers deployment plans, and we assume that we should be able to understand that in the 3 to 6 months prior to the actual rollout. We should be able to give an update on exactly where that stands. I’ll say that right now it’s fairly dynamic. So until we get a little bit on firmer footing, dynamic just in the sense that we are still in the planning phase and a lot of considerations in terms of the exact timing. So as soon as we get into a place where we feel more confident about the exact timing and the rollout, we’ll be able to give more updates.

Kevan Krysler: And Jason, the other thing too that I would add from a financial perspective is really nothing new from what we just discussed last quarter in detail with that design win. From a gross margin profile, again, hardware would not be reflected as how we’re planning that. Obviously, longer term from an operating margin, we expect expansion over time with this opportunity. But again, these factors are very consistent with what we described last quarter in detail.

Paul Ziots: Thank you, Jason. Next question please.

Operator: Our next question comes from Simon Leopold from Raymond James. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Simon Leopold: Thanks. I was hoping you could update us on your thinking of how enterprise adoption of AI initiatives could affect your business. I know, Charlie, you’ve highlighted this uplift phase. If you could talk about how you think that could affect your business and when? Thank you.

Charlie Giancarlo: Yes. Well, AI as we’ve talked in the past is a multifaceted subject. One is there is the large scale machine learning environment, which is really just the top — the peak of the pyramid, if you will, of enterprises that will be doing their own machine learning environment. We did hint, I did hint that we’ve got a nice new announcement coming that we’ll be demonstrating at GTC. That really does relate to the largest scale of the AI opportunities. Second is the inference opportunity. We’ve had a number of conversations. We continue to have conversations with both customers as well as with NVIDIA on the inference opportunity. I still see that as a little ways out, but we’re starting to build some momentum early on in terms of early conversations with customers who plan on deploying in that area.

I’ll state once again that I think our biggest opportunity is in reorganizing the way that customers manage their production data from data silos into an enterprise data cloud. We see that as a major, we see AI as a major prod, if you will, towards customers rethinking the architecture of their data storage into something that is much friendlier, if you will, to AI getting access to data for real time analysis, especially in inference and RAG type environments. So that’s, we believe that Fusion couldn’t be coming too soon, that it’s a major opportunity for us not only in the management space, in the compliance space to allow customers to have a better non manual automated method for managing their data, but frankly in the AI space making all of that data available for AI analysis.

Robert Lee: Yes. And Simon, this is Rob. Just to add on to that. I think if we step back, the AI segment and the opportunity, I think it continues to be playing out much as we had expected. And as Charlie alluded to, you’ve got the high performance training infrastructure environments that have in the last year or so gotten a lot of the attention. What we are starting to see a bit more driving our engagements are as enterprises move more towards the inference or RAG deployment type phases or start considering how they’re going to connect their broader data environments and datasets and silos into those AI workflows coming to Pure and — Pure Fusion to go help them do that. And so if we step back and we look at where we sit in the AI segment today, a lot of that has been historically led by FlashBlade.

But as the inference opportunity starts to play out and certainly as Fusion comes into play, we are also now seeing more and more customers that are deploying our Portworx and FlashArray solutions, really our entire portfolio and platform of solutions to help them drive their AI initiatives as they broaden out from purely just looking at training to the entire gamut of those environments.

Paul Ziots: Thank you, Simon. Next question please.

Operator: Our next question comes from Jim Fish from Piper Sandler. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Quinton Gabrielli: Hey guys, this is Quinton on for Jim Fish. Thanks for taking our question. Maybe two kind of interrelated ones on the margin side for you, Kevin. How, if at all, have you embedded tariffs into this guide? And then I think I heard you say that investments for this year are to support other hyperscaler opportunities. So should we assume that any potential incremental announcement this year wouldn’t require the incremental spend, so our kind of 17% margins that we are establishing are roughly safe? Thank you.

Kevan Krysler: Yes, that sounds great. Which question would you like to pick?

Quinton Gabrielli: I’ll get the hyperscaler.

Kevan Krysler: Yes, look, I mean, we are building out the ecosystem on the hyperscaler environment. That includes enhancing for scale our supply chain overall to absorb not only increased volume from the one design win, but also new wins as well. But that wouldn’t preclude us from requiring investment to grow other opportunities. I mean each opportunity we are looking at has some customization attached to it in terms of the integration of our Purity software with hardware. But obviously a huge long-term opportunity as we see it going forward. Charlie, do you want to just comment on tariffs as well?

Charlie Giancarlo: Yes, it’s a little bit on the tariff side of things, as we first of all, I think we’ve proved ourselves during the COVID period with remarkable supply chain disruptions of being very flexible and capable and having a solid and reliable and diverse supply chain. As you may recall or for those that haven’t followed us for as long, we at most we went to a 6-week lead time, which was leadership in not just in our industry, but across the tech landscape. We’ve further diversified since then our supply chain and our distribution chain. Now, I can’t predict nor do I think anybody can predict right now exactly what tariffs are going to occur and when and how long they’ll last. We are developing contingency plans for many different scenarios. We will be monitoring tariffs and at the appropriate time, we’ll take the right action and we’ll report back when we do.

Paul Ziots: Next question please.

Operator: Our next question comes from Wamsi Mohan from Bank of America. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Wamsi Mohan: Yes. Thank you so much. Charlie and Kevan, you just noted that E Series is becoming a larger piece of the mix and you intend to be more aggressive with the E family. So as you penetrate this opportunity, why are you not projecting a more meaningful reacceleration in revenues? I mean, your exit rate this year is 11% growth. You’re forecasting 11% growth, all things equal from a macro standpoint, but you’re really aggressively attacking this opportunity. So is there some other offset like how should we be thinking about sort of the lack of reacceleration in revenue terms? Thank you.

Charlie Giancarlo: Yes. If you consider the fact that we also are expecting a return to growth in the Evergreen//One area. I think it’s a we think it’s a reasonable forecast or guide for the year. Obviously, it will depend a lot on the overall buying and macro environment. But of course, we are still we are growing faster than the industry and growing faster than all of our competitors. So that’s an important characteristic. Obviously, we’d like to grow even faster, but I think given the beginning of the year and the political uncertainties that exists right now, I think it’s a good guide.

Kevan Krysler: Yes. And Wamsi, I’d add a couple other points to that from our view is obviously our guide for this year is contemplating an IT spend environment that’s relatively consistent year-over-year. So we are not considering any significant or substantial change to that environment. And I do want to remind you, when we think about the FY ’25 revenue growth, we did see some benefit as a result of higher Evergreen//One opportunities converting to traditional sales in the back half of the year and I talked about that last quarter. When you normalize for that tailwind that’s about a point and a half in FY ’25. So we are and then combined with Charlie’s point of expected growth of Evergreen//One in FY ’26, we are seeing a bit of an uptick in revenue growth year-over-year when normalizing for those two points.

Paul Ziots: Thank you, Wamsi. Next question please.

Operator: Our next question comes from Meta Marshall from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Meta Marshall: Great. Thanks. Just kind of — on kind of CapEx versus OpEx dynamic, last year, when we were in a more constrained CapEx environment, you were talking about kind of seeing an acceleration in Evergreen. Just wanted to get a sense of, do you feel like customers are kind of opting more for OpEx — sorry, for CapEx in this period as they kind of refresh a lot of data center equipment or just kind of, some of the dynamics that you’re seeing just in terms of customers’ appetite for CapEx versus OpEx purchases? Thanks.

Charlie Giancarlo: Yes. Meta, we saw a lot of change during the year. Each quarter turned out to be a little different than the quarter before and different than the quarters last year, which you pointed out to which we believe that the market is still quite immature in the area of what is a traditional product where the corporate data center, the on prem data center has typically purchased their products to where we are one of the first to really provide an as a service offering, a SaaS offering on prem. And what we find is that it’s a more complex sale and the complexity involves the finance organization within a customer where they have to get their heads around what it means to them, not just from a total cost standpoint, but frankly from their own reporting and accounting standpoint, which makes it a longer and more challenging sale, whether that’s for us or for our channel as well.

So we see still quite a lot of misunderstanding and immaturity, if you will, of the market overall. And we think that’s still causing a greater difficulty in terms of getting consistency, if you will, on a quarter by quarter basis. So it’s something that we do expect that as the market matures, we’ll start to stabilize more as we go forward, but it does make it a little bit difficult to project.

Kevan Krysler: If I break that down a little bit more to Q3 when we saw really a significant peak, if you will, in terms of Evergreen//One opportunities converting to a traditional sale. We saw that moderate in Q4 and I think that’s in part contributing to the record sales that we saw in the quarter as well. And then if I take a step back on our Evergreen//One performance as a whole in the year and look at what was the driver of the year-over-year decline, it really comes down to the timing of the larger deals, which we defined as over $5 million in the first half closing because we picked that up in the second half, closed the same amount of large deals in the second half as we did last year. And our velocity business which is below $5 million really picked up nice.

We saw a nice annual growth over that. So I really do think that as we look through the year, it was really coming down to the larger deals and the timing of closing of those larger deals in the first half.

Paul Ziots: Thank you, Meta. Next question please.

Operator: Our next question comes from Asiya Merchant from Citigroup. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Asiya Merchant: Oh, great. Thanks for squeezing me in here. On gross margins, do you need to do some NAND pre buys here in order to kind of get your guidance for improving product gross margins for the E family? Just if you could walk us through the confidence and what’s underpinning the confidence that product gross margins improve here from what you delivered in 4Q? Thank you.

Charlie Giancarlo: Yes. Thank you, Asiya. We actually believe that well, first of all, pre buys and managing, if you will, pricing in the market is something we really believe that we have a very high skill at. Now we don’t — I understand that some other companies have announced when they’ve done pre buys. We’ve never really done that. We are in the market every day, every month. We are quite skilled at buying ahead when we believe it’s advantageous to us or using the spot market when we believe that’s advantageous. So and we probably won’t start here. What I will say, it’s just something that we’re in the market all the time for such things. And yes, we’ll take advantage of, let’s say, market opportunities when we believe we have them.

Paul Ziots: Thank you, Asiya. Next question please.

Operator: Our next question comes from Tim Long from Barclays. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Timothy Long: Thank you. Sorry, I just want to circle back on the kind of pricing. It’s interesting it used to be NAND pricing. As you said, everyone else had the same thing now that you’re competing more with the HDD. It’s a different kind of calculus. Just curious how you’re thinking about like advancements in HDD [ph] and it sounds like maybe you think this in 2024 was kind of a one-off year where NAND increased and HDD didn’t. But how are you thinking about the potential for this happening again in the future and what that would mean for the timeline for HDD replacement with NAND? How does that change the ROI calculation or anything, any color you can provide on that would be helpful? Thank you.

Charlie Giancarlo: Sure. Thank you, Tim. Tim, so you’re very savvy in this market. Indeed, we are competing with HDD systems, right? So think of it as a NAND based system versus an HDD based system. I’d also say that there are, although we don’t want to get into all that detail on this call, there are multiple different layers of HDD systems depending on size and level of performance with the lowest level of performance obviously being the cheapest that are out there. That being said, we believe that we are basically the HDD systems are basically at a system level about as lower price as they can possibly get. That is to say that the HDDs themselves are not as much of a factor in the price of the total system compared to the amount of common equipment now that it takes to be able to run those environments.

So that’s a long way of saying that it really our pricing and gross margins are going to depend a lot more on the NAND prices versus the HDD systems than it’s going to depend on the HDD price. In other words, HAMR, a greater density of HDDs is not going to make that much of a difference at this point. It’s really going to be determined by the NAND market. And once we get to a competitive both price as well as competitive gross margin, then I think it’s game over.

Robert Lee: And Tim, this is Rob. Just to add on to that, I think the first part of your question was, hey, as you talk to the HDD vendors, they’re laying out roadmaps, how does that factor in? As we’ve said, we really haven’t seen nor do we foresee the pricing environment for hard disk drives to move very much. We don’t feel like the technology environment is going to move that much either. Disks are struggling to get larger, but they’re not getting any faster. In fact, they are actually getting slower per unit capacity and that’s really limiting their applicability. I think the other part of your question was, hey, so how does this factor into the ROI or really the TCO equation? And this is where, as Charlie alluded to, if you look at our solutions on a full system basis as compared to HDD based systems, we are already you could give the disks away for free and on a TCO basis, our systems are already advantaged.

And so while QLC prices will fluctuate in the short-term, the long-term trajectory is clear. They’re going to continue to decline over time. And as that does, that’s just going to continue to allow us to accelerate the replacement of disc.

Paul Ziots: Thank you, Tim. Next question please.

Operator: Our next question comes from Max Michaelis from Lake Street Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Max Michaelis: Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. You mentioned dynamic geopolitical environment as well as tariffs. But I was wondering if there’s anything peer specific that may be, that you’re seeing on the market right now that may risk that 11% guide for next year? Thanks.

Charlie Giancarlo: Well, part of the difficulty of answering the question is it’s very difficult to predict anything specific. The political environment is in fact very dynamic and unpredictable at the moment. So I would say we don’t see anything specific that would artificially block us from getting to the 11%. If anything, I would say that in a normalized market, that is a market where we didn’t expect, let’s say, a lot of political uncertainty, over time, I’d expect the market to be improving rather than declining at this point.

Kevan Krysler: Yes. And again, our guide this is Kevin. Our guide for next year on revenue growth, again considered a consistent IT spending environment year-over-year. So if that changes to the positive or negative in a substantial way, that would be a consideration. And the other thing we highlighted as well is that we are expecting Evergreen//One, our service offering to grow next year and that’s built into our expectations of 11% as well.

Paul Ziots: Next question please.

Operator: Our next question comes from Ari Terjanian from Cleveland Research. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Ari Terjanian: Thanks for taking the question. Nice to speak here. Just on the coming GTC conference, like, just any more color on the decision to enter here? I mean, it seems a little bit different versus prior commentary in terms of pursuing the training opportunity? And yes, just curious how you hope to stand out in this market? Thank you.

Charlie Giancarlo: Well, the AI training market has traditionally been HPC or high performance computing oriented in the past. We have traditionally sold into the standard enterprise market and the values, if you will, by which purchasers make decisions in those two markets are actually quite different. We have always indicated that we have a very superior technology by virtue of our Purity operating environment and the unique advantages that we have with DirectFlash. We’ve been able to make some modifications to our product that really allows it to address a lot of the performance characteristics that HPC environments are specifically looking for. And kudos to our team to have been able to do that inside of our R and D spending budget and to be able to deliver that at GTC. So we are quite proud of it. We think it’s going to make a big splash and you can all go visit pure.ai right now and start to be part of the roll up to the to GTC.

Paul Ziots: Thank you, Ari. Next question please.

Operator: Our next question comes from David Vogt from UBS. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

David Vogt: Thanks guys. Thanks, Charlie. Thanks, Kevin. I want to ask a question on Portworx. You referenced in your prepared remarks that you had two Fortune 50 companies migrate from VMware using Portworx to, it looks like OpenShift. Can you maybe drive a little bit detail on kind of what was kind of the reasoning behind it, what were the customers looking for? You mentioned a little bit in the release, but we’d love to get some more color on how BoardWorks is successful and sort of migrating those environments over from a VMware backdrop effectively? Thanks.

Charlie Giancarlo: Yes. Well, consistent with our conversations in the past, many, many customers are looking towards Kubernetes and containers as their solutions in the future. And if you’re looking to Kubernetes to manage your application environment in the future and you are a customer today of virtualized solutions, which most customers are, they have a lot of virtualization, why would you want to manage it any differently than the way you’re managing your future container environments? So the attraction and the allure, if you will, of moving to Kubernetes as your base application management environment is very compelling. And now that, what’s so called KubeVirt or Kubernetes virtualization, Now that that exists, it’s a compelling future movement, if you will, for companies looking to get to a consolidated integrated application management environment.

And I think that’s what’s drawn both of these companies towards that direction. Now to be very fair, its — [indiscernible] is still immature just like every other solution compared to VMware. But on a long-term basis, it’s compelling because it is integrated with Kubernetes.

Paul Ziots: Thank you, David. We’ll take our last question from a person who reentered the queue. Thank you for that.

Operator: Our last question will come from Howard Ma from Guggenheim. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Howard Ma: Hey, thanks for taking the follow-up. Does your FY ’26 guidance, the full year guidance bake in the one to two exabytes of hyperscaler shipments that you mentioned last time?

Kevan Krysler: It does, Howard. We’ve contemplated that in terms of our guide for this year. So nothing additional to that than what we talked about last quarter.

Paul Ziots: Thank you, Howard. Before we conclude, I think Charlie has some final comments to make.

Charlie Giancarlo: Yes. Thank you, Paul. As we close out our last fiscal year, I do want to reflect on the great progress that our team has made. The platform strategy is continuing to drive transformation in this storage industry and we are helping enterprises address now their fragmented data environments and unlock the full potential of artificial intelligence and to build their own enterprise data clouds. The hyperscale design win has been a key milestone. It’s highlighted, I think, our role in solving large scale data management and growth of data, when it drives energy usage in the hyperscalers. I want to thank our customers, our investors, our employees and partners and our suppliers for supporting us throughout the year and we look forward to continuing the journey together in FY ’26. Thank you.

Operator: That concludes the Pure Storage fourth quarter and full year fiscal 2025 financial results. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your line.