Perimeter Solutions, SA (NYSE:PRM) Q2 2023 Earnings Call Transcript

Perimeter Solutions, SA (NYSE:PRM) Q2 2023 Earnings Call Transcript August 6, 2023

Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, good morning, and welcome to the Perimeter Solutions Second Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Seth Barker, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Seth Barker: Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining Perimeter Solutions second quarter 2023 earnings call. Speaking on today’s call are Haitham Khouri, Chief Executive Officer; and Chuck Kropp, Chief Financial Officer. We want to remind anyone who may be listening to a replay of this call, that all statements made are as of today August 3, 2023, and these statements have not been, nor will they be updated subsequent to today’s call. Also, today’s call may contain forward-looking statements. These statements made today are based on management’s current expectations, assumptions and beliefs about our business and the environment in which we operate, and our actual results may materially differ from those expressed or implied on today’s call.

VAKSMAN VOLODYMYR/Shutterstock.com

Please review our SEC filings for a more complete discussion of factors that could impact our results. The Company would also like to advise you that during the call, we will be referring to non-GAAP financial measures, including EBITDA. The reconciliation of and other information regarding these items can be found in our earnings press release and presentation, both of which will be available on our website and on the SEC’s website. With that, I will turn the call over to Haitham Khouri, Chief Executive Officer.

Haitham Khouri: Thank you, Seth. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us. I’ll start with summary comments on our strategy, then discuss our financial performance and capital allocation before turning the call over to, Chuck. Starting with our strategy on slide three. Our goal is to deliver private equity like returns with the liquidity of a public market. We plan to attain this goal by owning, operating and growing uniquely high quality businesses. We define uniquely high quality businesses through the following five very specific economic criteria. One, recurring and predictable revenue streams; Two, long-term secular growth tailwinds; Three, products that account for critical, but small portions of larger value streams; Four, significant free cash flow generation with high returns on tangible capital; and five, the potential for opportunistic consolidation.

We believe that these five economic criteria are present at our current businesses, and we use these criteria to evaluate potential new acquisitions. As described on slide four, we seek to drive long-term equity value creation via consistent improvement in our three operational value drivers, which are: profitable new business; continual productivity improvements; and pricing to reflect the value we provide. In addition to our three operational drive drivers, we seek to maximize equity value creation through a clear focus on the allocation of our capital as well as the management of our capital structure. Turning to our financial results for the second quarter, starting with Fire Safety. As we’ve noted in the past, while we expect predictable long-term growth in our Fire Safety business, we also expect an element of quarterly and annual variability, tied primarily to the severity of the North American fire season.

On our first quarter call, we observed that this past winter and spring were particularly wet in some of the most fire prone regions of the United States, and therefore, that the 2023 fire season would likely experience a delayed start. This expectation materialized. As of the end of Q2, year-to-date, U.S. acres burned ex-Alaska were down 70% year-over-year and more than 50% below their 10 year average. The very mild early U.S. fire season is reflected in our first half Fire Safety results, where second quarter and year-to-date adjusted EBITDA decreased 32% and 37%, respectively. Fire Safety’s results significantly outperformed the 70% decline in the U.S. acres burned ex-Alaska for three primary reasons. First, our U.S. retardant business benefited from ongoing productivity and value based pricing initiatives.

Second, our international retardant results were strong, with the second quarter, particularly active in Canada. And third, our global suppressants business also delivered very strong results, with significant year-over-year revenue growth and margin expansion. We’ve commented previously on the solid organic revenue and profit growth in our international retardant markets. We’re again experiencing excellent results here in 2023, with international retardant revenue more than doubling year-over-year in the first half, and adjusted EBITDA posting excellent growth as well. We expect solid revenue growth and consistent margin expansion to continue in our international retardant markets going forward. Let me also take a moment to discuss the performance of our global suppressants business.

While we won’t make a habit of breaking out suppressants results, I would like to highlight our progress over the past 18 months, in order to provide another example of how our operating strategy is impacting our business’s financial performance. In 2021, our suppressants business delivered an adjusted EBITDA margin in the mid-teens. In the first half of 2023, our suppressants business delivered an adjusted EBITDA margin in the low-30s. We expect our full year 2023 suppressants adjusted EBITDA margin to be in-line with, if not slightly above our low-30s first half margins. This near doubling of sustainable margins over an 18-month period, coupled with an organic revenue CAGR well into the double-digits, reflect strong progress by our suppressants business unit leaders in implementing all three aspects of our 3Ps operating model.

First, driving profitable new business, primarily through our market leading fluorine-free foam offerings; Second, making solid progress on our productivity initiatives; and Third, pricing our products and services to more accurately reflect the value they provide our customers. Turning now to Specialty Products. As evidenced by the fact that our Q2 sales didn’t improve versus Q1, and were down notably versus the prior year second quarter, the inventory de-stock activity that commenced in late 2022, persisted throughout the first half of 2023. Despite weak end market demand, we believe that pricing end market share in our Specialty Products business remained solid in the first half of this year. As I mentioned on the Q1 call, while it’s difficult to predict precisely when inventory de-stocks will abate, they are definitionally temporary in nature, and should end when channel inventories are depleted, which we believe will inevitably occur in this case as well.

Before moving away from our operating results, let me make a summary comment reflecting on our first 18 or so months as a public company. In summary, we are very confident in our 3Ps operating strategy, and believe that we are driving significant improvement across each of our business lines through this operating strategy. The results are very clear in suppressants. The results are also very clear in our international retardant markets. The results are clear in specialty products when comparing 2022 to 2021, both of which we believe to be roughly similar market demand years. As I just discussed, the soft chemical’s end market is temporarily obscuring the improvement so far this year. The results are not yet clear to investors in our retardant business.

This is primarily because our first couple of wildfire seasons have been very much, with 2022 U.S. acres burned ex-Alaska down 36% year-over-year, and first half 2023 acres burned down a further 70%. That said, with everything we’ve learned over the past 18 months, we feel strongly that our retardant business fits our long-term criteria for businesses we want to own and is a business in which our value creation playbook applies. We feel excellent about the underlying improvement in our retardant business, and we are confident that this improvement will be visible to investors in a more normal fire season. Turning now to cash and capital allocation. We repurchased approximately 4 million shares in the second quarter at an average purchase price of $6.58.

We have approximately $71.6 million remaining on our existing repurchase authorization, and we ended the second quarter with approximately $22 million of cash on our balance sheet. Turning to M&A. Over the past 12 months to 18 months, capital markets have been challenging and overall M&A activity has been tepid. This challenging market backdrop combined with the consecutive mild fire seasons over the same time frame have impacted our M&A efforts. However, we believe that slow M&A markets, and soft fire seasons, are transitory phenomena. In the meantime, we are honing our operational playbook and building our M&A pipeline. We are confident that we will eventually acquire the right business, we’re 3Ps playbook applies and therefore, where we expect to drive improvements in-line with what we’ve delivered at our different businesses so far at Perimeter.

M&A remains a key part of our long-term value creation playbook. Between our available cash balance and the significant free cash flow we expect to generate in the second half of 2023, which Chuck, will touch on here shortly, we believe that we’re well-positioned to take advantage of any potential compelling capital allocation opportunities that might arise, including potential acquisitions, significant share repurchases or otherwise. Let me now comment on the competitive environment in our retardant business. We don’t control what will occur around the potential introduction of competing retardant products. We do, however, control how we prepare for potential competition, and we are preparing vigorously. Perimeter is the gold standard, as far as the efficacy and safety of our products, quality of our service and the passion, dedication and integrity of our people.

However, we will not get complacent. We are pushing harder than ever to raise the bar on ourselves in every aspect of our business. We believe this competitive mentality will make us and even better company irrespective of the what, when, and how of potential competition. Turning finally, to our full year 2023 financial expectations. We’re confident that the unit economics of all our businesses are improved in 2023 versus 2022. Therefore, we’re confident that with similar year-over-year end market conditions in 2023 versus 2022, each of our businesses should deliver notably improved year-over-year financial results. That said, our 2023 financial results will largely depend on these end market conditions, namely the severity of the U.S. fire season, and the timing of the normalization of the Specialty Products end market.

Specifically, if the second half of the U.S. fire season is severe to the point where it compensates for the mild first half, such that the overall ‘23 U.S. fire season is an on trend fire season, and if the Specialty Products end market normalizes in the second half, we are comfortable that consolidated adjusted EBITDA of approximately $180 million is a reasonable expectation for 2023. That said, if these end markets fail to recover, as I just articulated in the second half, we’d expect to deliver softer year. In either case, we will focus on what we can control. We’ll continue to press on each of our value drivers across each of our business units and grow our latent long-term earnings power. With that, I’ll turn the call over to, Chuck.

Chuck Kropp: Thanks, Haitham. Turning to slide six. Second quarter sales in our Fire Safety business were $53.1 million, down 20% versus the prior year and $71.9 million year-to-date, down 15% versus the prior year. The decline was driven by lower fire retardant sales in the United States, partially offset by higher international retardant sales and higher suppressants sales. Second quarter adjusted EBITDA in our Fire Safety business was $16.5 million, down 32% versus the prior year, and $13.2 million year-to-date, down 37% versus the prior year. Second quarter sales in our Specialty Products business were $23million, down 33% versus the prior year, and $48.1 million year-to-date, down 35% versus the prior year. Second quarter adjusted EDITDA in our Specialty Products business was $4.5 million, down 61% versus the prior year, and $10.9 million year-to-date down 59% versus the prior year.

As Haitham noted, we believe that our pricing and market in Specialty Products are similar to last year, and that the first half weakness is primarily attributable to temporarily soft end market demand. Moving on to the consolidated business. Second quarter consolidated sales were $76.1 million, down 25% versus the prior year and $120 million year-to-date, down 24% versus the prior year. Second quarter consolidated adjusted EBITDA was $21 million, down 41% versus the prior year, and $24.1 million year-to-date, down 49% versus the prior year. Moving below adjusted EBITDA. Interest expense in the second quarter was $10.3 million in-line with our regular quarterly run-rate. Depreciation was approximately $2.4 million, while amortization expense was $13.8 million.

Cash paid for income tax was $8.2 million in Q2. CapEx was approximately $1.9 million in Q2. Our full year 2023 expectations for interest expense, depreciation, taxes, working capital and CapEx are unchanged. We ended the quarter with approximately $675 million of senior notes, cash of approximately $22.1 million, and approximately $154.5 million basic shares outstanding. Slide eight bridges our basic and diluted share count, which includes shares issuable under the Founder Advisory Agreement in future periods. We expect our second half cash generation to be strong, as we draw down from our peak inventory levels. Even if like the second half fire season is relatively mild, such that the 2023 U.S. fire season looks like the mild 2022 U.S. season, we expect to generate approximately $100 million or more in second half 2023 free cash flow, and end the year with over $120 million in cash on our balance sheet.

This figure will of course change, if the second half of the fire season is extremely mild or if we deploy capital towards M&A or share repurchases. With that, I’ll hand the call back to the operator for Q&A.

See also 10 Energy Stocks with Insider Buying and 20 Countries With The Most Snapchat Users in 2023.

Q&A Session

Operator: Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Josh Spector with UBS. Please go ahead.

Josh Spector: Yes, hi guys. Thanks for taking my question. So, I actually want to follow-up on one of the last point that Chuck made just on free cash flow. So, $100 million in second half, that you have similar year-on-year performance. What’s the implied EBITDA behind that?

Chuck Kropp: You asked what the EBITDA assumption is behind that?

Josh Spector: Yes.

Chuck Kropp: We haven’t disclosed that, Josh. I mean, it’s not the hardest thing in the world to back solve to, but we haven’t disclosed it.

Josh Spector: Yes. I guess the variable is working capital. So, I assume in that scenario, you’d have a pretty significant working capital release. Can you size that?

Chuck Kropp: So, definitely going to convert some inventory to cash, no question, but in terms of overall working capital, in-line with our expectations.

Josh Spector: Okay. Let me try it a different way here. So, I mean, Haitham, if you were, it’s helpful to kind of understand your view we get back to a normal fire season? I mean, is there a way to think about things are similar year-on-year or still remain down 50%. I guess, what levers are in your control to have EBITDA growth? Because you talked about, I think, delivering growth even in that scenario, maybe exclude specialties. I think we can make our own assumptions on de-stocking there within fire solutions. I think probably the uplift you described in suppressants is maybe a few million. I guess what on the retardant side gives you conviction that you could deliver growth in that scenario?

Haitham Khouri: It’s just a question of unit economics. Josh, at this point in the fire season, frankly the cake is largely baked on I don’t know what the unit economics are. What we sort of harvest today are the effort we’ve put in over the past 12 months, 18 months. And the question is just what we’ve been able to do, as far as number one, offering more value to our customers and being fairly compensated for that value in the form of pricing. And number two, reducing and improving our costs through productivity, the net of both of those is unit economics. And we feel like we’ve done enough on a unit economic basis to do meaningfully better than last year, all things being equal. It’s almost impossible to do enough on unit economics to overcome the 70% decline in acres we had in the first half.

So, the ultimate second half result will be based on the ultimate second half severity or lack thereof of the fire season. But we feel very good about the work we’ve done on what we control here which is unit economics per gallon sold.

Josh Spector: Okay, thanks. And if I could just ask one more and just go on to hit specialty briefly. I mean, imagine you’re not going to want to break out price or volume for us. So, I just asked like with what we’re seeing majority de-stocking, has anything changed on the pricing side in terms of what you’re getting? So when destocking ends, is that unit economic for you guys better or worse than where you exited last year?

Haitham Khouri: We feel very good, very good that it is no worse than last year, our unit economics if anything have improved versus last year. Everything you’re seeing there is lower volume. And I’ll add you can have lower volume due to lower market demand or lower market share and we feel very good that it is not a function of lower market share, but rather a function of a destock, which has persisted throughout the first half, but like I said in the prepared remarks, we’ll end at some point hard to predict when exactly.

Josh Spector: Okay. Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Brian DiRubbio with Baird. Please go ahead.

Brian DiRubbio: Good morning, gentlemen. Just a couple of questions for me. I want to focus on working capital and specifically just the inventory build over the last year. I think by my numbers, inventories are up about 32.5%. Can you help us get a sense of, I understand the fire season has been crush versus last year and probably versus expectations, but just love to get a sense of what that inventory is comprised of how much of that is retardants versus maybe specialty products? And how’s that going to impact your plant operating rates going forward? Just love to get the dynamics here?

Haitham Khouri: Sure. Majority of it is in the fire safety retardant market. There is some impact on specialty products with the de-stock, but not nearly as impactful as Fire Safety. And there is some impact to the operations, but in terms of just being prepared for the customer, that’s what we’re focused on, and that’s what the inventory is there for.

Brian DiRubbio: Okay, understood. And just as we think about cash flow, cash needs, capital allocations, what’s the minimum liquidity level that you’re comfortable running the business at over a year period?

Chuck Kropp: I’m not going to give you an exact number, Brian, but the answer is not much at all. We ended the second quarter with little over $20 million on the balance sheet and are very, very comfortable at that level. So, it’s some number meaningfully lower than that and keep in mind the $100 million revolver, which is undrawn that has, in fact, never been drawn. So, we’re very comfortable with our liquidity situation.

Brian DiRubbio: And maybe just, if you don’t mind, put it in a different way, which would you be comfortable drawing your revolver for the right opportunity in terms of capital allocation?