Bart Brookman: Oliver, I’ll tackle that and Dave can add flavor. And I think the general answer is no. The way our planning process in the basin, the permit process, the electrification systems that we have and the acreage as we permit it, we want to go in and call it, I think we use the term mow the lawn. We want to start at one corner of the acreage and move to the other to optimize the parent child. There are no parent child impacts by doing it that way. Okay. So I think the team has done a phenomenal job in their planning. The thing to just remind you going to one of the slide that Dave presented, the oil content, lateral foot on those reserves is pretty consistent, and the gas is all incremental revenue. And so the economics, even in poor gas prices are incredibly strong.
They probably still improve on the gassier wells. And so I can assure you that the value we’re delivering to the shareholders with the drilling programs is phenomenal. And €“ but I don’t think we have a lot of flexibility in the drilling program the way it’s laid out. Dave, did I?
Dave Lillo: Yes, that’s exactly right. When we plan this out, it kind of falls in place with our permits in hand. As Bart said, mowing the lawn where we continue, one rig will be in the range area drilling ahead. The other one will continue to drill in Kersey. The other one will be in our CAP type area in the Summit area. So any changes really to our drill schedule at this point. And there’s slight modifications we can do to push if we need to, but it’s really, it’s kind of set in stone. It’s a very methodical plan at this point.
Bart Brookman: Oliver, the other thing to remember, and for everyone on the call some of the emissions reductions that I talked about entail electrification, obviously gas pipelines, but water pipelines and oil pipelines and all that infrastructure is pre-planned. And that’s fairly significant planning also. So for us to say we’re going to drill one area and move and go drill another area creates a disruption in the planning process. So it’s just another component of the complexities in the Wattenberg in the planning.
Oliver Huang: Okay. That all makes sense. And just for a second question, I didn’t see any specific cadence color for the back half of the year yet. So I was just kind of wondering if we might be able to get some more incremental color there on anything out of the ordinary in terms of maybe any large batch of wells coming online late in the year that’s largely non-productive for 2023, that would potentially put you all on pretty strong footing when thinking about exiting the year and heading into 2024?
Bart Brookman: Yes, I mean, our €“ from what I’ve messaged before, we really haven’t changed anything. Just think of it this way. In the second quarter, as I’ve said on the call today, our capital to midpoints down about 75 million, and that’s because your Delaware completion crew and the second Wattenberg completion crew are going down. The third quarter we really only have one completion crew running that’s the Wattenberg completion crew, and that comes back in the fourth quarter. So if you look from a CapEx standpoint, third quarter should be a step down from the second quarter, and fourth quarter should be a step up from the third quarter. From a production standpoint, obviously, we’ve given you the first two quarters.
Third quarter will remain strong as we’re still getting peak production from our Delaware properties that we’re turning on and the turn-in-line program from the Delaware, and then the fourth quarter probably steps down a bit from the third quarter as we don’t get much benefit from that second Wattenberg crew until 2024. So hopefully that’ll help you give a little bit of curve and shape to the numbers and delivers confidence in our annual goals.
Oliver Huang: Awesome. Thanks for the time, guys.
