Brian E. Shore
Yes the key here is more predictable so we are expecting some growth in the calendar 2015. The big spikes will come maybe 17, so we should see some growth in 15, some growth in 16 then will see some spike in 17, 18, and 19 that’s based upon the programs that are in flight, these are meaningful forecast I would say. As far as aerospace in general is concern, yes, I would very much hope that we could see some real revenue growth in aerospace outside of GE. There are hundreds and hundreds of other customers out there that were calling on, and I think maybe you or somebody asked this question last quarter about you know they asked me about if I would be disappointed if we did not see skipping growth in aerospace this coming year, I surely would be, and we all have a lot of pressure on us, I mean internal pressure but it’s proper pressure. We pay a lot dues you know over the last five, six years in aerospace, we’ve made major investments and my feeling is that we should see some meaningful growth in aerospace this coming year and if we don’t, and then I would say we’ve failed, give us an F.
Sean Hannan – Needham and Company
Ok, alright that’s helpful color. Next question I have or topic is really more related to SGNA this was a, it contains number that came through in a quarter wanted to get a sense from you or matt, the degree that this level is able to be maintained or how we should think about movements versus that November quarter number.
Brian E. Shore
Correct, it was contained. A number of people you know took salary cuts during the quarter so we were careful and we did not compromise Park’s future, we don’t cut back on R&D, we’re still very active with our marketing efforts. But we did try to control our SGNA especially in the US where business level is very poor in electronics anyways. So I would say there are some level of growth in SGNA in the coming quarters but it’s not significant, we’re not saying to spike off or maybe the third quarter level was not totally sustainable, or maybe it shouldn’t be or it’s not healthy for Park to make it sustainable.
Sean Hannan – Needham and Company
Ok, that’s helpful. Last question and I’ll jump back in the cue, can you talk little bit about Brian about the cost in environment both on the electronics side and the aerospace side. Are there any variables that are impacting the business today and to what degree can they be mitigated, managed or are there even positives that maybe helping you as well. Thanks
Brian E. Shore
Sean, when you say cost you’re talking about raw material cost or something else.
Sean Hannan – Needham and Company
Yes that’s correct, raw material cost.
Brian E. Shore
Raw material cost really not much of an issue in electronics you know, nothing to write home about, obviously you know coppers are a big story but right now nothing special, no impact copper was on Q3 versus Q2 for instance, we’d like to see where copper goes but right now no significant impact on copper and the rest of the raw material I think are not really, nothing significant to talk about. Aerospace is, quite a bit more dynamic we use, even though the revenues are smaller in aerospace electronics probably source I don’t know maybe five or ten times more raw materials from different suppliers to bring in different kind of business and that’s definitely a dynamic situation in which it requires a lot of management on a day to day basis and that something you know what we need to be better at and I’m hoping that’s an opportunity for us in the future to do better at it and our pricing in aerospace is different in electronics.
