Packaging Corporation of America (NYSE:PKG) Q1 2023 Earnings Call Transcript

Packaging Corporation of America (NYSE:PKG) Q1 2023 Earnings Call Transcript April 25, 2023

Packaging Corporation of America misses on earnings expectations. Reported EPS is $2.2 EPS, expectations were $2.27.

Operator: Thank you for joining Packaging Corporation of America’s First Quarter 2023 Earnings Results Conference Call. Your host today will be Mark Kowlzan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PCA. Upon conclusion of his narrative, there will be a question-and-answer session. Please also note today’s event is being recorded. At this time, I’d like to turn the conference call over to Mr. Kowlzan. Please proceed when you are ready.

Mark Kowlzan: Thank you, Jamie. Good morning, and thank you for participating in Packaging Corporation of America’s First Quarter 2023 Earnings Release Conference Call. Again, I’m Mark Kowlzan, Chairman and CEO of PCA. And with me on the call today is Tom Hassfurther, Executive Vice President, who runs the Packaging business; and Bob Mundy, our Chief Financial Officer. As usual, I’ll begin the call with an overview of our first quarter results. And then I’ll turn the call over to Tom and Bob will provide further details. And then I’ll wrap things up, and we’d be glad to take questions. Yesterday, we reported first quarter net income of $190 million or $2.11 per share. Excluding special items, first quarter 2023, net income was $198 million or $2.20 per share compared to the first quarter of 2022 net income of $256 million or $2.72 per share.

First quarter net sales were $2 billion in 2023 and $2.1 billion in 2022. The Total company EBITDA for the first quarter, excluding special items, was $405 million in 2023 and $467 million in 2022. The First quarter net income included special items expenses of $0.09 per share, primarily; for the closure costs related to corrugated products facilities and design centers. Details of special items for both the first quarter of 2023 and 2022 were included in the schedules that accompanied our earnings press release. Excluding the special items, the $0.52 per share decrease in first quarter 2023 earnings compared to the first quarter of 2022 was driven primarily by lower volumes in our Packaging segment for $0.95, and Paper segment $0.04. Although recycled fiber costs were lower than last year.

Overall operating costs were 27% — $0.27 higher, primarily due to inflation on chemicals, labor and benefits, supplies, repair materials and services. Energy costs, although trending down, were also higher versus the first quarter of 2022. In addition, we had higher depreciation expense of $0.11, freight and logistics expenses, $0.04; nonoperating pension expenses, $0.04; and higher converting costs, $0.02. These items were partially offset by higher prices and mix in the Packaging segment for $0.58 and Paper segment $0.18. A lower share count resulting from share repurchases we made in the second quarter of 2022 for $0.11, lower interest expense, $0.03; lower other expenses for $0.03, lower scheduled maintenance outage expenses for $0.01, and lower tax rate, $0.01.

The results were $0.03 below the first quarter guidance of $2.23 and per share, primarily due to the lower volume and lower prices and mix in the Packaging segment. Looking at our Packaging segment. EBITDA, excluding special items in the first quarter 2023, of $392 million with sales of $1.81 billion resulted in a margin of 21.7% versus last year’s EBITDA of $464 million and sales of $1.96 billion or 23.6% margin. Demand in the Packaging segment was well below our expectations for the quarter. Tom will discuss this further in a moment. The mills and corrugated products plants responded to the lower demand by remaining highly focused on efficient and cost-effective operations as we balanced our supply accordingly. Our employees continue to deliver on numerous cost reduction initiatives, efficiency improvements, integration and optimization enhancements and capital project benefits to not only minimize the negative demand impacts on the short term but also to remain in position to capitalize on our longer-term strategic goals.

The accomplishments were achieved while building less inventory than we had planned and staying committed to ending the quarter at our targeted weeks of supply inventory. I’ll now turn it over to Tom, who will provide further details on containerboard sales and the corrugated business.

Thomas Hassfurther: Thanks, Mark. Domestic containerboard and corrugated products prices and mix were $0.64 per share above the first quarter of 2022 and were down $0.50 per share compared to the fourth quarter of 2022. Export Containerboard prices were down $0.06 per share versus last year’s first quarter and down $0.04 per share compared to the fourth quarter of 2022. Corrugated product shipments were down 12.7% in total and per workday compared to last year’s first quarter. Outside sales volume of containerboard was 69,000 tons below last year’s first quarter and 33,000 tons above the fourth quarter of 2022. With the first quarter of 2022 setting a shipments per workday record as well as being our all-time record for total shipments, we knew this would be a tough comparison period.

However, that being said, the lower demand in our Packaging segment that Mark spoke of was driven by several items, the combined impact of which resulted in our volumes being much lower than we anticipated. As we mentioned on last quarter’s earnings call, it was difficult to predict the demand curve given the numerous variables with varying degrees of impact. As noted in our earnings release yesterday, the shift of consumer buying preferences more towards service-oriented spending, persistent inflation and higher interest rates continue to negatively impact consumers’ purchases of both durable and nondurable goods. In addition, there is a varying degree of inventory destocking across our customer bases, both in boxes and our customers’ products.

Copyright: bialasiewicz / 123RF Stock Photo

The inventory destocking situation has been a longer-term issue than we originally anticipated. The manufacturing index has remained in contraction territory for several months now. And as you know, we have a large presence in the ag business in the Pacific Northwest and also down in Florida, where both of these regions have been dealing with significant weather events. As we look to the second quarter, we expect the inventory destocking of both customer product and boxes to be near completion. We expect to see recovery in our ag business and we have received some positive feedback from our customers regarding improvements in their business. Our April volume, as we see it today supports that position. I’d also like to point out that the capital spending and optimization strategy within our box plant system that we have been focused on over the last few years continues to remain one of our top priorities.

The current demand trends will not cause us to lose our focus in this area. The investments from this strategy provide the products and service needs that our customers desire and allows them to grow while focusing on the mix of customers, we want to profitably grow our revenues with. I’ll now turn it back to Mark.

Mark Kowlzan: Thanks, Tom. Looking at our Paper segment. EBITDA, excluding special items in the first quarter was $41 million with sales of $151 million or a 27.2% margin, compared to the first quarter of 2022 EBITDA of $29 million and sales of $153 million or an 18.9% margin. Paper prices and mix were 18% higher than last year’s first quarter and about 3% above for the fourth quarter of 2022. Sales volume was about 17% below last year’s first quarter which included some of the inventory that had been sold from our Jackson Alabama mill and just over 4.5% below the fourth quarter of 2022. The efforts of our employees to optimize the cost structure inventory and product mix in our paper business helped minimize the inflationary cost increases compared to last year and delivered solid returns for the quarter. I’ll now turn it over to Bob.

Robert Mundy: Thanks, Mark. For the first quarter, we generated cash from operations of $280 million and free cash flow of $168 million. Fee cash payments during the quarter included capital expenditures of $112 million and common stock dividends of $112 million. We ended the quarter with $520 million of cash on hand, including marketable securities. I want to update you on a revision to the scheduled mill maintenance outage guidance we provided on last quarter’s call. Current plans and the scope of work for the scheduled maintenance outages at our containerboard mills has changed, resulting in a revised total company estimated cost impact for the year of $0.75 per share versus the $0.67 per share we mentioned previously. The actual impact in the first quarter was $0.13 per share.

And the revised estimate impact by quarter for the remainder of the year is now $0.18 per share in the second quarter, $0.24 in the third and $0.20 per share in the fourth quarter. I’ll now turn it back over to Mark.

Mark Kowlzan: Thanks, Bob. Looking ahead, as we move from the first and into the second quarter, although there is one less shipping day for the corrugated business, we expect improved volume in our Packaging segment. However, prices will be lower as a result of the previously published domestic containerboard price decreases along with lower export prices. Sales volume as well as prices and mix in the Paper segment are assumed to be slightly lower based on lower demand. Although we do look for most operating costs to trend lower, our converting costs, scheduled maintenance outage expense and depreciation expense will be higher, primarily due to recent increases in contract rail rates at most of our mills, we expect higher freight and logistics expenses compared to the first quarter.

Considering these items, we expect second quarter earnings of $1.96 per share. With that, we’d be happy to entertain any questions, but I must remind you that some of the statements we’ve made on the call constituted forward-looking statements. The statements were based on current estimates, expectations and projections of the company and involve inherent risks and uncertainties, including the direction of the economy and those identified as risk factors in the annual report on Form 10-K on file with the SEC. The actual results could differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. And with that, Jamie, I’d like to open the call up for questions, please.

See also 15 Biggest Mutual Fund Companies in the World and 11 Best Waste Management Stocks to Buy Now.

Q&A Session

Operator: . Our first question today comes from George Staphos from Bank of America Securities.

George Staphos: Thanks for the details. Mark, a question for you. Normally 2Q is up sequentially from 1Q. And when we look back historically over time, the only time that we saw a down 2Q, if we’re correct, was the COVID second quarter, even if we went back to the, the great recession in ’08 and ’09, you had up 2Q versus 1Q. As you sit here today and if you’re in our seat, what is the biggest driver of the drop off 2Q versus 1Q. Is it the timing effect on the pricing and just how that’s flowing through? Or is it the demand affect the continued demand effect being worse than expected. If you could give us some qualitative comments on that, that would be helpful. And then a couple of follow-ons.

Mark Kowlzan: Yes, George, let me start that out. I think, again, if you look at the November, December and February, price decreases, and how they’ve rolled in. I think in the past 20-plus years, we only had 1 or 2 incidents of this kind of timing of price decreases. But Bob can give you some real detailed color on how that’s impacting, but that’s pretty much what’s happening.

Robert Mundy: You’re right, Mark. And in the magnitude, that $70, George, the timing of that, as you look at going from 1Q to 2Q, it’s just — that’s unprecedented in the company’s history. And we mentioned on last quarter’s call that the vast majority of those price declines would show up in the second quarter. And that’s exactly what’s happening. So it’s sort of an unprecedented drop in price just based on the timing of the published decreases is really what’s driving that. And that’s pretty much the answer.

George Staphos: Understood. And I appreciate the color there. Could you give us a sense for how much demand might have been off relative to your prior expectations and what the bookings and billings look like early in 2Q?

Mark Kowlzan: Yes. Tom, why don’t you go ahead and take a…

Thomas Hassfurther: Yes, George. Let me give you a little — let me give you color on that. If you recall on our call last quarter, we were starting out in January pretty decent in the bookings. And as the quarter rolled on, I mean, it just got a little bit weaker each month. So that was disappointing. And of course, what I told you back then was it was impossible to predict what was happening in the destocking and what was really happening in terms of consumer demand. And if you look all those indicators, whether it was consumer demand or the manufacturing index, the Purchasing Managers Index they all really kind of got more negative as the months went on and correlated exactly with kind of what the volume situation was. The good news is, is that there’s been a big turnaround starting in April.

And so we’ve got a good look 13 days into the month. And our bookings right now just over March alone are up 11%, and they’re up 10% over the first quarter. Still down 6% compared to April of ’22, but April of ’22 was our all-time record. So just to calibrate everybody, the volume continued to increase significantly because of COVID all the way through April and then finally started to turn the other way. So we’ve still got that really tough comp coming in the month of April. But given the fact that we’re double digits ahead of where we are in March is a huge improvement. And it’s across all of the sectors. Now we’ve still got some laggards in there. If you talk home improvement or you talk home building or some of these other areas, but the other big plus for us is that we suffered badly in that first quarter in that ag business as we alluded to, down in Florida from the hurricanes.

In Northern California from the significant rain and flooding that they had, and of course, in the Pacific Northwest because of the cold weather. And that’s coming back as well. So I think that we’ve got some — I think we’re towards the end of that big problem relative to the volume situation.

George Staphos: Last quick one, I’ll turn it over. Just from an operations standpoint. Can you talk a little bit about the facility closures, kind of what they’re allowing or optimizing for PCA. And given the shift in recycled cost versus virgin cost, this question comes up periodically on your calls. How are you flexing your system relative to lower-cost recycled and lower-cost recycled board, recognizing your customers ultimately dictate what kind of box they want that ultimately dictates the Board. I’ll let it go there.

Thomas Hassfurther: Okay. Thanks, George. Yes, relative to the plant and the design center closure that we announced in the first quarter, that is typical of the evaluation that we do of our footprint at all times, and it’s part of our capital planning process. So these are not knee-jerk reactions to let’s just say, volume demand change or anything like that. These are all part of our capital planning process where we’re trying to optimize our system. Of course, we’ve made acquisitions over the years and other things like that. So we do have — we do have some duplicity in some of the markets that we want to fix. And so it’s been a continuous process that we’ve been doing this. Relative to the recycled versus virgin what PCA has been, and I’ve said this before, what we have been focused on for years now in our mill system is to be able to match the — just the right amount of fiber to the performance that’s necessary in the marketplace.

And some of those proprietary products and some of the things that we’ve done in our mill system has served us incredibly well in the marketplace and is ultimately even more competitive than recycled than most of those in virtually all of those markets. So I’m very, very pleased with what we’ve been able to do in the mill system. It’s been an outstanding performance by all of our people. And we’ve talked about our engineering expertise. We’ve talked about our paper tech expertise, and that’s provided us. And of course, the flexibility we have in these mills, and we will flex back and forth, obviously, with OCC to the degree we can when the prices of a nature that, that makes the most sense.

Operator: Our next question comes from Mark Weintraub from Seaport Research Partners.

Mark Weintraub: Good to hear that demand looking better in April, but I did want to follow up a little bit on George’s question, and I realize it’s a bit of an overlap. But in the third quarter and the fourth quarter as well, your year-over-year box shipments were a bit below the industry. And we don’t have the industry data yet, we’ll get that, I guess, on Friday. But certainly, the 12.7% was surprised us to the downside and you guys as well. As if you look back over the last 6 months or so, any thoughts as to why you might have been showing reduced market share, recognizing that over time, you’ve actually outgrown the industry very substantially and very profitably. And whether it’s this ag business? Or what are you coming up with in terms as to what might have been going on with your book of business?