The second thing is we have actually invested additional maintenance CapEx to increase the reliability on the units, specifically in areas where we have seen issues during scarcity conditions. So those 2 things really mitigate what I described as the operational risk on our units. The other tool, we actually trade these operational risk or counterparty risk, credit risk. So while it’s perhaps more firmer in terms of the megawatts, it also — we have to monitor the health of the entities that we’re transacting with. So what I like about this approach is that we’re diversifying our risk that is not a all-generation, all-operational risk. So we actually diversify the risk. And this one was one of the big lessons during winter storm Yuri. So I feel very comfortable the risk adjustment that we have made.
And then lastly, in terms of hedging our loans, we are being a little bit more conservative. So we’re leaning perhaps longer than we have done in the past and to make sure that we manage some of the scarcity periods where we see higher load. But obviously, you cannot derisk completely the business because it would be cost prohibitive. So we’ve been very, very intentional and very thoughtful about.
Operator: Our final question comes from Steve Fleishman with Wolfe Research.
Steven Fleishman: I appreciate the time. Just a question on the 2023 kind of base pre-Vivint, what are you assuming in there, I guess, obviously, you’re expecting a big recovery from ’22 and some of the issues, just but what are you assuming in there for outages, any lingering outages and then the related insurance money? And then also are you including any asset sale gains or losses in the guidance for ’23? I think you’ve sold Astoria already at a decent price. Can you talk about that?
Mauricio Gutierrez: Yes. So we already sold Astoria. And let me just give you my view on the 2023 guidance, which I started talking to and about it, and then I’ll pass it on to Alberto to tell you exactly what’s the amount. But the way to think about the 2023 speed is more conservative forecast that we have done in the past, both from an operational productivities of the power plants, how we’re managing our retail load but also because of the dynamics that existed in 2022 that don’t exist today, like if you remember, we have the supply chain issues on coal and chemicals. That has abated for the most part. We are falling to stable natural gas prices now that allows us to better manage our retail margins. We have an environment in the East where we feel very comfortable that we can gain market share on our retail business.
So I think in general, I would say that 2023 is a lot more conservative. The guidance is right on top of what we provided to you back at the Investor Day when you adjust for asset sales which we provided you the bridge back then. So actually, in the Investor Day deck, you have the ins and outs, given the portfolio optimization that we have done. And we’re literally on top of where we should have been so — 2 things. One, I feel very confident that this is in line with what we provided you. And two, that is taking — we’re taking a little bit more of our conservative approach in so the number. Obviously, we will update you throughout the year. But just keep in mind that we’re just at the beginning of the year. But I don’t know if there is anything else that we need to add.
Steven Fleishman: I mean Parish, part, like outage cost insurance and asset sales. Could you identify what’s in the guidance for those?
