Jack McGinnis: Yes. So what I’d say, Princy, we’re a little short on time. We’re actually trying to get to a couple of other quick questions. What I would say is, I think I talked to the intra-quarter previously from one of the earlier questions and we covered that off. I think in terms of the guide overall, I think the main takeaway is pretty consistent from a revenue trend perspective. We talked about that organic days adjusted trend into Q3 being at minus 3.5%, pretty much in line with what we just saw, really what that reflects is the adjustment for Q2 for the U.S. market trend and the improvement in France from what we guided in Q2, continuing into the third quarter. So stable trends for the most part, across a lot of our major markets and again, we were cautious in that outlook.
So I would say that’s the main item. I think as you think about the third quarter to your last point, is we do know in Europe, August is always a lower activity month with the holidays and we anticipate coming out of August into September is always a bit difficult to predict, depending on how Europe comes back from the holidays from a manufacturing perspective. But right now, we’re anticipating ongoing stability in that guide. Again, being cautious on an overall basis but that’s a little more color on what we’re expecting into the third quarter.
Operator: Our next question comes from Andrew Steinerman with JPMorgan.
Stephanie Yee: This is Stephanie Yee stepping in for Andrew. I wanted to clarify your comments earlier about the staffing industry already being in a garden variety recession, I just want to clarify whether you’re speaking just to perm activity as opposed to temporary staffing because temporary staffing hours are down but pricing, as you mentioned earlier, is still holding up very well. So it’s supporting the overall revenue growth, I guess, for the industry and for manpower. So just clarity on whether temporary staffing is also in what you would characterize as a garden-variety recession at this point?
Jonas Prising: I would say that my statement was related to the temp data that you see from Prism [ph] in France, the U.S., the U.K., Netherlands, Sweden, there are very few markets that you can point at in Europe and in the U.S. where you’re not seeing us operate in a much softer environment which would be the equivalent of what we in the past would have expected to see in this garden variety recession description that I’ll — that I’m using just to give you a sense of a more shallow economic cycle than what we’ve seen in the last two recessions, one generated by the pandemic, short-lived and driven by a pandemic and the other one obviously being a great recession. But in the past, when we’ve seen shorter or shallower economic cycle downturns, these levels of activities that the industry data is reflecting for temporary staffing would be equivalent to what was then eventually a garden variety recession, if you allow me that term.
And sorry for the lack of precision on what exactly a garden-variety recession is. But it is shallower than what we’ve seen in the last couple of recessions, put it that way.
Stephanie Yee: Okay. Okay. I appreciate that. I’m sorry, just to take that maybe just extrapolate a step further. So the U.S. economy, for example, is, I guess, we wouldn’t necessarily characterize that as being in a garden-variety recession because the labor market, the unemployment rate is still very low. So if the economy or in a recession, safe to say that the staffing industry would see probably further decline?
