Amit Dayal: Understood. And just comments around the grocery side of things impacted by ongoing M&A activity, maybe some seasonality. Do you anticipate this to continue sort of maybe impacting the performance from that vertical for the next one or two quarters? Or is that something that is potentially coming to a close sooner and then you may be able to resume sort of normal activity with those types of customers?
Jim Clark: Yes. I would say that we don’t have a crystal ball on this, and I don’t think there’s a playbook. There really hasn’t been kind of a merger of this scale in decades, if it’s ever occurred at all. We do have — the customers that are affected and involved in this or doing their best to communicate timing and what their thoughts are, but it’s a very dynamic and fluid situation, everything from regulatory approvals to final disposal list and changes and all those types of things. What I will say, that is unable to be controlled. The program side of it, what they intend to do when all these hurdles are accomplished or achieved, I think, is pretty robust, and they know where they’re going. They’ve talked about different formats and different changes, and we’re very aware of what those programs are going to look like.
o I would categorize it just as timing-related issues with potentially a very big upside here. But trying to guess the timing is just beyond our scope. We — I feel like we get good solid credible information and they’re treating us well in terms of the information they share with us. But I think there’s an aspect they don’t know either. And so, we’re all going through this together.
Amit Dayal: Okay, thank you. That was helpful. And this last one from me. Any cost increases from the new production facilities coming on, maybe you mentioned the ozone solution, the new ozone solution facility coming online shortly. How should we think about any costs, et cetera, from those types of activities in the future quarters?
Jim Clark: The short answer is very minimal impact and from a cost standpoint. And just so I can touch on it a little bit broader. This is our R-29 free ozone-depleting — negative ozone-depleting, no ozone depletion refrigerant. So, we’re moving from a man-made chemical to a natural refrigerant and it doesn’t have any negative ozone impact.
Jim Galeese: No emissions.
Jim Clark: No emissions. What we did with that is we already had a facility that was supporting our primary refrigeration facility. We exited that and moved into this newer facility. And because it was kind of a ground-up effort for us, we were able to reengineer our manufacturing line. We improved — we believe we will get a pretty good improvement in terms of efficiency, which will be recognized as margin improvement and that type of thing. But we also got a pretty solid bump in capacity, too.And that’s going to be important, particularly if things play out the way we think they’re going to play out, we will need that capacity. So, short answer to your question is cost impact should be minimal, but some real benefits hitting under here, not just in terms of a new category or product for us, but in terms of our ability to manufacture total unit volume and that type of thing. And that extends across both our traditional platform and our new R-290 platform.
Amit Dayal: Understood. That’s all I have, guys. Thank you so much.
Operator: Thank you. Next question comes from the line of George Gianarikas with Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.
George Gianarikas: Hi. Thank you for taking my questions. I’d like to understand a little bit about some of the volatility you’re describing in end markets. I mean, you talked about Grocery and that seems fairly idiosyncratic and related to the mergers there. Also, I think you mentioned auto. You have a pretty diversified business. So, could you please just sort of describe what you’re seeing in broad strokes from the various end markets that you participate in? Thank you.
