Randy Wood: You bet, Brett.
Operator: Our next question will come from Brian Wright with Roth Capital. Please go ahead.
Brian Wright: Yeah. Thanks. Good morning. I was just hoping you could provide a little more color on just the backlog and you said it was kind of impacted both segments. Is there a way to think about it, North America versus South America and then just magnitude kind of comparing the segments and the backlog changes?
Brian Ketcham: Yeah. Brian, when you look at the year-over-year comparison, I would say, last year’s backlog, both in North America and in Brazil primarily were driven by still having some pretty significant price increases, which generally pulls volume forward into the backlog. I would say where we are at this year with more stability and inflation and in our prices, its reverted more to the traditional kind of selling season and the timing of the backlog. So that’s the biggest thing year-over-year, which is affecting both North America and international backlog there. And on the infrastructure side, I think, as we end our first quarter, we are into the winter, the construction season is really winding down. So that backlog is typically pretty low at the end of November.
So nothing significant from our view and what that means for future results, which result, we have always said the backlog isn’t necessarily the strongest indicator of what the next couple of quarters are going to look like.
Brian Wright: Great. Thank you so much for that clarification. Thank you.
Operator: Our next question here will come from Chris Shaw with Monness Crespi and Hardt. Please go ahead.
Chris Shaw: Hey. Good morning, everyone. In the irrigation, you might have given a bit, could you — what was the volume growth and the pricing growth during the quarter?
Brian Ketcham: Yeah. So we said the volume was comparable to last year, so pretty much flat. I think that the pricing is probably in that 7% to 8% range and then there’s some other changes that brought the overall down to 6%.
Chris Shaw: Got it. And then the — in infrastructure, the Road Zipper — the new Road Zipper machine that you introduced this week. I was just looking at the — I guess, the news there and the you are going to have two machines now that are available, I forgot the name like Gemini and Titan. I didn’t really understand what the one was smaller, one was bigger, but I didn’t really understand the difference, I guess, maybe applications or customers or I couldn’t tell if one was for leasing or buying. Could you just go into that a little bit more?
Randy Wood: Yeah. Again we have always had a few different models of Road Zipper depending on the application and so when it’s a lease situation, which is going to be part of a construction project, it’s, let’s say, a little, doesn’t have quite the all the options and things like that, that a permanent installation would have. So we have — really from a branding standpoint, have come out with the two brands as we have went through the refurbishment and redesign of the Road Zipper machine. But we have always had multiple types. One, specifically for Japan that we have produced. Hawaii was another classification where it could move — the barrier two lanes. So that part of it’s really nothing new. The big thing was just the redesign and some of the additional options that are now part of the machine.
Chris Shaw: The newer machine that’s not like, it doesn’t expand the market, you don’t have like a new customer base. It wasn’t anything like that. It was just sort of iteration of the old one?
Randy Wood: Yeah. I would say, primarily. I mean, I think, it’s something that we think from a marketing perspective might drive some additional interest, but nothing game changing, I don’t think.
Chris Shaw: Great. Thanks a lot.
Operator: And with no further questions, we will conclude our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Randy Wood for any closing remarks.