David Ciesinski: Yeah. No there — we’ve stayed obviously really close to our sales teams on retail and in Foodservice and there haven’t been any conversations like that. So there’s nothing that we can point to specifically. Having done this a while like Tom and the rest of us here, you see this periodically you’d much rather see what we’re seeing now where your consumption of the shelf is faster than your shipments than the other way around. But just generally if we’re looking at the business and we look at the fundamentals, it’s tracking very much in line with our expectations. What I would also tell you is even on things like one question could be, are there execution issues inside where we’re having problems getting the product out?
Our on-time and in-full was higher in this period than it was last year same period. So we’re continuing to see sequential improvements on all operating metrics, not just improved inventory but our service levels have improved even our safety in our plants have improved. We’ve really just spent the last year trying to buckle down to tighten up execution and end-to-end coordination.
Andrew Wolf: Got it. Thank you.
Operator: The next question is a follow-up from Todd Brooks with The Benchmark Company. Please got ahead.
Todd Brooks: Hey, just a couple of quick follow-ups if I may. What’s the timing on the Horse Cave cutover? When that four-day shutdown will be? I’m just wondering where that is?
David Ciesinski: This weekend.
Todd Brooks: Okay. Perfect. So we’re in the middle of the quarter. So we don’t really need to think knock wood, obviously, but we don’t need to think about any impact to how we model the quarter for the shutdown, given it’s a mid-quarter shutdown assuming all goes well?
Tom Pigott: Yes. We’re looking at it as a modest headwind. If everything goes well certainly, we lose — there’s a couple of headwind factors to it. We do lose those production days and you’ve got the factory absorption impact. And then, certainly, there’s a cost to training and a start-up cost. So there should be a bit of a modest headwind in Q3 from it. It’s difficult to quantify, what it will be until we actually are through it, but we’ll certainly keep you posted.
David Ciesinski: And part of it is just the absorption hit, because we have the factory down for four days and this is a factory that would be running 24/7. So if you just look at the rough math, 90 days in a period, four days in the period are going to be down, which is just going to drive a little bit — on top of what Tom described a little bit of modest absorption.
Todd Brooks: Okay. Great. And then my other follow-up was on the G&A side. I think you talked about some timing changes in consumer spend. I mean, if I back out the onetime Project Ascent costs, it looks like SG&A is running just north of 9%. What’s the right level set to put that at based on the commentary around maybe some accelerating consumer spend, as we look to the back half of the year?
