Charles Meade: Yes. It is. Thank for your comments, Andy. It’s an exciting prospect and when we’re going to be able to follow for a while here. My follow-up, Jubilee Southeast, you made a couple of comments in your prepared remarks about and I think you also had some in the press release that not only did you establish pressure connectivity with the main field pays in Jubilee proper, but that you found — it seems like you found maybe some new sand, some new reservoirs.
Andy Inglis: Yes.
Charles Meade: And that is a — that’s a near-term upside for you guys, it seems like. So I wonder if you could perhaps elaborate a bit on your prepared remarks there.
Andy Inglis: You know, look you know. I think those three wells that we’ve drilled now in Jubilee Southeast were important. We’re obviously testing an expansion of the field. From the slide that we included with our presentation you can see the step out of the field to the Southeast. And so important that those wells actually delivered the subsurface results that we were hoping for. And actually, it was more than we’d hope for. We — as you say, there were a couple of things that were important. We believe that we have the indication of connectivity to the main field, which clearly sort of says that there was additional resource sort of inboard of the wells that we drilled. And then we found some deeper horizons. So I think if you step back from the detail Charles, you’re absolutely right.
Jubilee, as we said, is a big field gets bigger. We’re continuing to see upside from the development of the field. And from a near-term perspective, having sort of derisk the subsurface now for Jubilee Southeast, at least for the initial phase of the field, we think there’s additional follow-on potential. There were 30 development locations that we found, which gives you an indication, I think, of the longevity of the plateau that we can build.
Charles Meade: Great. Thank you for your comments, Andy.
Andy Inglis: Great. Thanks, Charles. Appreciate it.
Operator: Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Alex Smith with Investec. Please proceed with your questions.
Alex Smith: Hi, guys there. Thanks for the call today. Just a question on TEN for me, please, today, just given the impairment. It looks like a decision has been taken on the back of the two strategic wells and the Greater area back in 2022. So it would be good to hear your views on the medium-term prospects for that asset? And any opportunities you feel there could be to kind of get things back on track and grow the area, especially maybe the opportunity for gas for TEN as opposed to oil in terms of growth, given that gas agreements are being signed with the government. So any kind of clear views on TEN would be great. Thank you.
Andy Inglis: Thanks, Alex. Good question. Look, when you step back from it from a reserves perspective, it was roughly more 3.5%. So there was some reduction in oil offset by some additions of gas. So sort of on a reserve basis, a relatively small impact across that trigger then the assessment against the ceiling test. I think when we look at the investment in TEN, we actually see less capital going in, therefore, a more conservative development case. So there is future development in the field, but we are going to target lower risk areas where we have good well control. And fundamentally, for Kosmos, it’s about how would that development therefore compete with other opportunities that we have in our portfolio. Clearly, in the material today, we talked about the deep hopper of opportunities that we have in Mauritania and Senegal, opportunities that are opening up in the Gulf of Mexico and in Equitorial Guinea.
