Tanya Jakusconek: And would you be able to give us some sort of guidance on what we should expect?
Paul Rollinson: Yes, look – we’ve drilled it out, we know it’s there but we haven’t put a technical report around it yet. It’s ranging–
Ned Jalil: I would say, Paul, it’s ranging–there is, again like what Paul said, there’s no technical report, but based on our knowledge, our vision, based on what I look at from my experience, based on what I look at from the drilling and when I see what’s on the screen, it’s potentially–what I saw now is looking like 500,000 increase approximately in the underground resource, and targeting continuous growth into year end.
Tanya Jakusconek: Okay, that’s helpful.
Paul Rollinson: I think as the other point that Ned made earlier, is we are seeing generally higher grades. Part of that is how we design the open pit and how it pulls and dives for grade at depth in the bottom of the pit, so we’re sort of seeing a rebalancing as we focus on the underground, which is dragging the average grade up as well.
Tanya Jakusconek: Okay, this is all good news. Maybe just thinking overall for the company, can I assume that at year end when I look at your resource category, can I assume that the exploration success you’re having at Great Bear, the exploration success at Gold Hill and at Curlew, can I expect those three projects to have increases in resources?
Ned Jalil: Yes, for sure Tanya, there will be increases in resources. I’m not sure if we’re going to catch it up in a block model and an update for Gold Hill by this year end. For sure, the drilling is there and we bring it in and we look at what potentially could be, but the other two assets, Great Bear and Curlew, we are looking at an increase in resource, yes.
Tanya Jakusconek: Okay.
Paul Rollinson: We won’t have Round Mountain and Gold Hill in an underground resource yet, but we’re definitely seeing the drilling and in the fullness of time, that will pull in.
Ned Jalil: Exactly, yes.
Tanya Jakusconek: Maybe that’s a year-end 2024. Maybe if I could ask about the overall reserves, I know it’s just half a year has gone by, but any guidance on how you’re seeing your drilling at your current mine sites, to see whether reserves can be replaced at those assets?
Ned Jalil: As you know, Tanya, we bring ounces from not being inferred, or we call it category 4 internally in Kinross, we bring that into inferred and then we drill the inferred and bring that into indicated and into measured. That is ongoing at all our assets, right. Our focus mainly when it comes to resource is growing Great Bear, as you know, then after that is growing Curlew, and with the underground decline at Round Mountain, we really want to drill from depth. As you know, we’re already progressed, we’re underground now but it will take us a little bit of time to get there and set up at the right angles to drill Phase X from the underground. That will bring in more resources. Then, we continue to drill, as an example, in Fort Knox and bringing some of the resources into reserves at Fort Knox and other operating sites that we have.
Tanya Jakusconek: Okay, so I should take that as it’s bit too early for you to comment on whether reserve replacement is occurring?
Ned Jalil: Yes.
Tanya Jakusconek: Okay. I’ll ask next quarter. If I could just ask a final question, Andrea touched a little bit on this about the inflationary pressures in the cost structure, you’ve assumed 5% of inflation in [indiscernible] 2022. You mentioned that you are seeing lower oil prices, diesel prices positively helping your costs, offset by royalties. Can I just touch on the other components? Are you seeing any relief or any lower pricing in other consumables – labor, anything else relative to what you’ve budgeted? You may not be experiencing it now because you may have inventory, but are you seeing any relief in other portions of your cost structure?
Andrea Freeborough: We are seeing some relief in certain areas, but there’s generally been offsets for us going the other way. Overall, we’re not expecting to see the cost–we’re not expecting to see anything different than what we factored into the guidance, which was the 5% increase overall. We’ve seen some increases in maintenance and labor costs just year-over-year. We don’t expect labor costs to go down even as inflation decreases or reverses. We’ve also got some higher power costs in Nevada than we’ve had in the past, so overall we’re not seeing a net decrease because of inflation reversing, but it’s sort of leveling out with some puts and takes here. Claude, I don’t know–?
