KBR, Inc. (NYSE:KBR) Q2 2024 Earnings Call Transcript

KBR, Inc. (NYSE:KBR) Q2 2024 Earnings Call Transcript July 24, 2024

KBR, Inc. beats earnings expectations. Reported EPS is $0.83, expectations were $0.79.

Operator: Good morning, everyone. Welcome to KBR’s Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Kiki and I will be your conference operator today. [Operator Instructions] I will now hand you over to your host, Jamie DuBray, Vice President of Investor Relations, to begin. Jamie, please go ahead.

Jamie DuBray : Thank you. Good morning and welcome to KBR’s second quarter fiscal 2024 earnings call. Joining me are Stuart Bradie, President and Chief Executive Officer, as well as Mark Sopp, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Stuart and Mark will provide highlights from the quarter and then open the call for your questions. Today’s earnings presentation is available on the investor section of our website at KBR.com. This discussion includes forward-looking statements reflecting KBR’s views about future events and their potential impact on performance as outlined on Slide 2. These matters involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ significantly from these forward-looking statements as discussed in our most recent Form 10-K available on our website.

This discussion also includes non-GAAP financial measures that the company believes to be useful metrics for investors. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the nearest GAAP measure is included at the end of our earnings presentation. I will now turn the call over to Stuart.

Stuart Bradie : Thanks, Jamie, and welcome to our second quarter earnings presentation. I will start on Slide 5. As you’ve heard me say many, many times, KBR is a company that puts its people first. We strive to ensure our people have a strong sense of belonging that they feel connected to each other and the company, of course, and can grow within an environment where they can bring their whole selves to work every day. Now, to test that we’re actually delivering for people in a broader sense, we regularly do a people survey, which is, in fact, anonymous. And the feedback ensures we’re focusing in the right areas as we seek continual improvement, and it really helps us avoid any complacency. The survey results are also important, particularly as we bring new entities into KBR or new employees into the company.

This year, the participation levels increased 10%, and we’re over 70%, which is actually our highest to date, and we feel gives a solid representation of how our people are feeling about being part of KBR. I’m pleased to share with you that we’ve been certified as a Great Place to Work in 13 countries, and over 84% of our team members feel KBR is indeed a great place to work. And they would recommend KBR to friends. From an inclusion perspective, 85% feel they can be themselves, are heard, and that this is very much a value I hold very, very dear, so good performance there. Obviously, we are not perfect, but hopefully this gives you a good feel that we walk the talk when it comes to our people, and a big shout out to our people, in fact. So let’s move on to Slide 6 and discuss the quarter a little.

So Q2, similar to the first quarter, was a clean quarter with the businesses performing at or above expectations across all key metrics. As you can see, the revenue was up 6% year-on-year, but more importantly, adjusted EBITDA was up 13%, with margins at the group level up 75 bps. Year-to-date cash conversion was a terrific 121%. So following on from a strong Q1, this gives us confidence to raise guidance, which Mark will cover in a moment. But in short, our people, and thus KBR, continue to deliver. On the business growth side, our group book-to-bill on a trailing 12-month basis was 1, and after adjusting for the large LNG project was 1.2 times, which considering we also have substantially increased bid volume and warrants awaiting decision, this really represents a strong quarter.

We booked circa $2 billion at group level and currently sit at 92% of work under contract for 2024. And this is an important takeaway, especially with continued volatility, both politically and geopolitically. Now on to Slide 7. Firstly, we’ll start on STS. The book-to-bill after adjusting for the large LNG project sits at 1.1 for the quarter, so good performance, and 1.2 on a trailing 12-month basis. And as you can see from the awards highlighted below, we continue to lead the market in green ammonia with our first project in India and 10th project overall. Blue ammonia, however, continues to be more prominent due to affordability, and the contract with OCI reflects this. It’s critical that we continue to ensure there is value-add by delivering solutions that drive efficiency and improve yield, and this enables the energy transition, and I really think it’s a key area of differentiation for KBR.

In fact, there’s actually only two blue ammonia projects in the world that have actually FID’d, final investment decision. Both are using KBR’s technology. These are the OCI plant in Bowman, Texas, and Fertiglobes in the UAE, which will make KBR’s proprietary process technology the first to produce blue ammonia. So this, in addition to our industry position in green ammonia, as mentioned by licenses awarded, puts us in a very, very strong position. We’re also very, very excited about the award of a five-year contract to help the Iraqi government develop their future plans across infrastructure, energy, and sustainable development. I believe this demonstrates a strong position in the Middle East that we highlighted at investor day and ensures we are very much part of the early development conversations.

Onto the government side, our book-to-bill sits at 1.1 times in the quarter, and at 1.2 times on a trailing 12-month basis. Again, terrific performance. Awards under the IAC MAC IDIQ contract vehicle continued to be solid, and we’ve highlighted in the slide the recomplete win on the B52 program that we’ve had actually for eight years, which had a significantly increased value and additional scope for cybersecurity as a bit of a trend. But we do expect award volume to pick up in Q3 in this area with over $2 billion worth of bids submitted and awaiting award under the IAC MAC program alone, quite substantial in that area. We’ve highlighted two large multiple award contract wins also in the quarter. Both are effectively a license to hunt and to enable rapid response mobilization if required.

Notably, MQS2 is with a new customer, which is always positive, the Defense Health Agency. And we’ll report ongoing progress as we move on to task orders under these contract vehicles in the coming months. As we highlighted at investor day, our volume of bids overall in the government business and across that whole portfolio has increased significantly in 2024 and currently sits at over $8 billion. I will now hand over to Mark, who will give more detail on the financial performance. Mark?

Mark Sopp: Fantastic. Hello, everyone. Thanks, Stuart. I’ll pick up on Slide 9. So as you’ve just heard, we’re really pleased with our Q2 performance, and that follows an already strong Q1, registering healthy top-line growth, strong profit margins, double-digit adjusted EPS growth, and year-to-date cash flow conversion of over 120%, all leading to a bump up in our full-year guide. As I said a number of times before, the day-to-day project performance across hundreds of engagements is the foundation of our consistently strong financial results. This also pays recurring dividends with respect to client retention and employee engagement. We’ve seen delivering for our clients in critically important missions and projects around the world as a key enabler for the people survey results that Stuart just covered.

Of particular note, adjusted EBITDA margins came in at about 11.5%. This reflects superb client delivery and good cost discipline. Operating cash flow is $170 million for the quarter and $261 million year-to-date as we continue progress on driving lower DSOs and overall demonstration of our low capital intensity business model. On to Slide 10 for details on the segments. Sustainable tech has continued to deliver double-digit year-over-year growth, excellent profit margins, and equally good contribution to enterprise cash flow generation. Revenues grew 14% to $458 million, with all parts of the business contributing to that result. Margins were 21.4%, up from last year on a combination of intellectual property license mix, joint venture performance, and its highly efficient cost structure.

For government, revenue grew 3% overall, where again we saw growth in international defense and intelligence and science and space, those up 11%, 5%, and 1% respectively. This is offset in part by contraction in readiness and sustainment, particularly for UCOM activity down as funding delays earlier in the year are still trickling through related to the Ukraine conflict. However, this is beginning to reverse as sequential growth from Q1 was up 7% in the readiness and sustainment segment, pretty much attributed to this Ukraine area. Profit margins hit 10.4%, pretty much in line with expectations for GS in Q2. Now on to Slide 11, good capital deployment starts with good cash flow generation, which as discussed earlier was terrific for Q2. This enabled higher buybacks this quarter and also year-to-date, yet still reduced our leverage, which finished the quarter at 1.9x trailing 12 adjusted EBITDA.

Specifically, we bumped up our buybacks to about $100 million in Q2 on top of the $50 million in Q1. Together with increased dividends in Q1, we have returned almost $200 million in cash to shareholders through the first half. Now let me briefly cover how we plan to finance the acquisition of LinQuest. While we have cash and current revolver capacity to cover the full purchase price, we have commenced the process of tapping additional term loans to maximize our liquidity. Assuming we do that, we expect any new debt to be at the same or better rates than our existing debt. We’ll also structure any new debt to allow for repayments, so we have the option of delevering as cash flows are generated down the road. We expect the transaction to raise our pro forma net leverage to approximately 2.7x give or take post-closing.

This leverage ratio is still at a comfortable level, and thus we still have capital deployment optionality across M&A buybacks and debt reduction options. Now on to Slide 12, forward guidance. We are raising our guidance for the year on profit and cash metrics, which is all organically driven. We are not and will not factor in any expected contribution from LinQuest until it closes. We will consider an update then depending on when closing occurs and the materiality to the year at that point in time. Revenue guidance is unchanged at $7.4 billion to $7.7 billion. However, with a strong first half operating performance, we are bumping up adjusted EBITDA to a range of $825 million to $850 million with a midpoint of $838 million. Our adjusted EPS guidance is also increasing to $3.15 to $3.30 with a midpoint of $3.23.

And finally, with a strong year-to-date cash flow conversion, we’re increasing our adjusted operating cash flow guidance to $460 million to $480 million. In summary, the core business is performing really well and we are increasing the outlook for profit and cash flow production, certainly a great testament to the performance of our STS and GS operating teams. In addition, we’re truly excited about the addition of LinQuest. In fact, I’ve known this business for a really long time and have high confidence we will be an excellent home for their employees. The cultures align really well and we expect robust synergy and customer delivery benefits for years to come. All of us really just can’t wait to get started with our new colleagues on this exciting front.

With that, back to Stuart.

Stuart Bradie : Thanks, Mark. Terrific job as always and, on to Slide 13 and really to talk about LinQuest. What you see on the slide is the same as we published in our announcement last week. Slide 5 I would cover only a couple of points, and then I would touch on how the feedback has been since the acquisition was announced, and how we’re thinking about integration. So, LinQuest, they’re 1,500 plus people. They really do amazing work, and they do that across National Security Space, so think Space Force, Future Air Dominance, so think Air Force and JADC 2, and connected battlespace, so think interoperability and digital. I mean their capability is highly complementary to KBRs with little overlap, which I really think gives exciting synergy opportunities and we’ve highlighted how those work on the slide in there.

We’re also excited the fact that margins are double digit as is the pre-synergy growth profile. So absolutely terrific. And from a people perspective, the feedback on the announcement has been incredibly positive. In fact, positive on both sides. We’ve hosted our first Town Hall with the LinQuest team last week, and there’s a lot of excitement. LinQuest is a business we know very well, as Mark said earlier. We’re located in many of the same locations. We’ve worked with them on numerous occasions, and importantly, that people know and respect each other, which I think is absolutely unique. We have common values, we have commitment to mission. And I think from a culture perspective, we see this as really, really a terrific fit. In terms of integration, we’re actually feeling really good about it.

LinQuest already operates on many of the same ERP platforms. And for those that have done this before, that’s really is a big deal. So this greatly reduces the risk and importantly, the burden on the teams doing the integration. So I’m sure you can tell we’re super excited about LinQuest joining the KBR family. This is not only a great fit with little overlap, but an acquisition that’s absolutely bang on strategy, and focused on delivering revenue synergies in very well-funded and critical end markets. Now, obviously, in the coming weeks, we’ll be working through the HSR process, and hopefully, we’ll close soon. And more to come, and we’ll update you at our next earnings call. Now onto Slide 14, and I’ll finish with some key takeaways. Firstly, we’ve delivered a really strong first half performance across all key metrics.

And as a result, as Mark presented, we are pleased to raise full year 2024 guidance on profit and cash flow. Secondly, our work under contract for 2024 today was at 92% and bookings also ensure continued momentum, and the bid submitted and awaiting awards are at very, very high levels as we explained earlier. Thirdly, LinQuest, as I said earlier, is bang on strategy, and we are super excited about it. Double digit growth and double digit margins, really, really cool business. Lastly, at Investor Day, we emphasized our vision to continually move KBR into technology-enabled markets where our high end technical, digital and deep domain expertise really allow us to differentiate while adding value in critical areas for our customers all across the world.

Now, following on these things from IR Day and with LinQuest as a catalyst, we believe there are opportunities to realign our business to operate even better based on our capabilities and markets. The objective of this realignment will be to reduce complexity, realize synergies like AUKUS and One Saudi as we presented at Investor Day and it’s likely we will manage both segments globally to allow greater standardization and business process optimization, which should drive efficiency. Now, we’ll be working on this through the remainder of 2024, with an expectation to report along these lines in full year ‘25. And to be clear, the segments and the enterprise targets for 2027 will remain intact through this realignment. This is very much a heads up, and we’re going to continue to work on this through the remainder of the year, and we’ll update you as we make progress, so please stay tuned.

Thank you again for listening. And I’ll now hand back to the operator who will open the call up for questions.

Q&A Session

Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions] The first question we received is from Tobey Sommer from Trist Company. Tobey, your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Tobey Sommer : Thank you. Good morning. I was wondering if you could expand on that last bit and offer some more color, Stuart, on the realignment and what you think that will achieve for the firm. Thank you.

Stuart Bradie : Yeah. Thanks, Tobey. The objective will be to, as I said, reduce complexity. We’ll move from three business units to two effectively with bits of what we’ve been describing as GSI. And I’ll give you a good example, The Diriyah Gate project, which is a full on project management of a new sustainable city in Saudi Arabia. That currently sits in the government segment and but could — given its commercial contractual basis, given its program management at scale and given where it is in Saudi to realize our One Saudi vision and leverage our position across our broader customer base, that sort of project will move into STS going forward. So another example would be the Sellafield decommissioning that we do in the nuclear arena, very much a sustainable project, currently sits within GSI, big programmatic, reducing carbon footprint, obviously, managing very tricky nuclear decommissioning piece of work and managing quite a significant supply chain.

They are very much in the bailiwick of STS also. So that’s the sort of thing we’ll be pushing across. STS will get bigger. As a consequence, as I said, the guide that we’ve given won’t change, so we expect margins to hold up in STS as we go through this. But it certainly will obviously give us, I guess, an overhead advantage as well as we go from three to two, and I think allows standardization and more commercial acumen in the areas where it’s required. But the clear objective is to realize the synergies that we laid out on it yesterday. Does that make sense?

Tobey Sommer : Absolutely. If I may sneak in a follow-up, from a geographic perspective, where do you see the most rapid growth across the enterprise over the next year or two?

Stuart Bradie : I mean, I think it’s — I think ultimately you’re going to see a lot of growth in what we described as the Golden South, particularly the Middle East. And I think you’ve seen that in, if you look at our, in our documents, and that we for this quarter, you’ll see the increase in activity in the Middle East in particular. So I do see that from an energy perspective going to be the area of significant activity. In terms of the government side, obviously, with the LinQuest acquisition, we obviously see a lot of activity happening in the U.S. also. But also, I think, continued emphasis in the Pacific, so we do see increasing activity across things like AUKUS and sharing intelligence data and things across the Allied forces. So I think you’re going to see it in multi-places and depending on which business, Tobey.

Tobey Sommer : Thank you.

Operator: The next question on the line comes from Michael Dudas of Vertical Research. Please go ahead.

Michael Dudas: Good morning, Jamie, Stuart, Mark.

Stuart Bradie : Good morning, Mike.

Michael Dudas: Stuart, you talked about visibility in the pipeline and you highlighted some government service opportunities. Maybe you could share a little bit on the STS side, on the pipeline. And looking at 2025, how comfortable are you relative to what’s in backlog and near-term bookings today to at least achieve the growth targets that you have?

Stuart Bradie : Yeah, I think as we presented, I mean, the bookings in STS in the quarter, excluding the LNG project, were 1.1, so there’s strong momentum there. I think that’s similar to last quarter, actually, and on a trailing 12-month basis sitting at 1.2, so good continued bookings in STS, a strong pipeline really globally. But as I said earlier, I think a lot of activity in the Middle East. In fact, I was in Saudi last week with Jay and so continued confidence in their investment profiles there. So, we’re not seeing a slowdown at all in that arena and energy security is very much on the agenda in a decarbonized way, as we’ve talked about before as well as energy transition. Probably energy transition moving a little bit slower due to affordability questions, but which just brings energy security more to the fore because the demand in energy is still very much the same. So, yeah, no real change to really what we presented in Investor Day around that, Mike.

Michael Dudas: Thank you. And my follow-up is, any early read on the new government in the UK and how things may shake out?

Stuart Bradie : Yeah, good question. The, I mean, the UK moves a bit quicker than some jurisdictions in this election process. It sort of happened in a few weeks. The new government was elected on July 4 and the cabinet was in place by July the 5. So, it’s a fully operational government. Parliament’s back. They will go back on holiday, of course, in August, like most places, but it’s all working. I do think there’ll be, as there always is with new governments, a review process, whether in defense or in other areas. But what we’ve seen so far is that the UK is very, very committed to NATO and what’s happening in supporting Ukraine. And already, the defense and foreign ministers have engaged with, in fact, Zelensky was in the UK last week. And so, we don’t see any slowdown in commitment there. And in terms of their commitment to new energy, I think Labor is actually even more committed to energy transition. So, we see that as a good opportunity going forward.

Michael Dudas: Thank you, Stuart.

Operator: Thank you. The next question is from Bert Subin from Stifel. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Bert Subin: Hey, thank you. Good morning, afternoon, Mark and Stuart. Maybe just to kick off, it was a really strong second quarter for STS. I mean, the EBITDA growth was quite a bit better than expected. Sales growth continues to be robust. I know you look at the book to bill on this business, and there’s some questions around, like, as [Indiscernible] starts to step back, what the direction of the business is going to be. So, could you give us some commentary just maybe on what you’re seeing in the second half? Do you expect these kind of growth rates to persist? And then, as you think out the ‘25, ‘26, ‘27, and beyond, I mean, you highlighted the Middle East, a big program we’re still sort of waiting to hear from is liquid chemicals, the Aramco. I’m just curious if there’s any update there.

Stuart Bradie : Yeah, I mean, I think in short, I mean, we’re standing by our guide. I mean, I was very clear on that, but I’ll move up the guidance a bit for this year, obviously. But our ‘27 guide and our growth rates that we committed to at Investor Day are still there and very much robust, and we think we can achieve them. That’s probably the first statement that could get your arms around. STS is performing really, really well. I do think that we’re seeing some movement in the LNG industry as well post the Biden sort of moratorium there. I think some projects have been released. And I think that will be progressive until Election Day in November, and I think that market will start to move again. So, we’re feeling pretty upbeat about that.

And in terms of the Middle East, I think I covered off at investor day that, the Middle East is more than just LTC, and Saudi is more than just LTC with commitments around ammonia, commitments around new gas development, and et cetera. And that’s the same in the UAE, it’s the same in Kuwait, and it’s the same in Oman. So, I think there’s lots happening across that area. And we’re very well present in all those markets. LTC, I know very much is frustrating, but we’re very client-friendly, as you can be well aware and appreciate. And we have been not able to announce anything on that program. We still feel really good about it, but we’re not yet at liberty to disclose anything until we get permission from the customer. And that is yet to be forthcoming.

So, I apologize, but that’s the best I can do right now. I’d say again, we’re feeling pretty good about where we sit.

Bert Subin: So, that’s super helpful. Thank you, Stuart. Just as a follow up on the other side of the house the GS, you talked about a pretty substantial ramp up in bids, and it sounds like you’re starting to see that. Could you maybe just help us understand, like, what changes, by segments you had. Based on what I think Mark said, 5% growth in D&I and 1% in S&S? So, how do those ramp up into the targets you’ve given at Investor Day? And then, regarding R&S, can you just give us some color on maybe early days of home sales?

Stuart Bradie : Yeah. So, I think our bid target for this year is circa $12 billion in GS. And I think we’ve achieved to date, so we’re well on the path to achieve that, which is terrific. And what we’ve done is we’ve refined costs in other areas and put more effort into BD to ensure our rates are still competitive. We’ve centralized our big, I guess, our big acquisitive project group into a centralized group that oversees and drives I guess, more volume, but obviously more quality through that pipeline. And we’re seeing that manifest itself. And I think, as I described earlier, we’ve really got a very strong IDIQ machine opposite IAC MAC. We’ve got $2 billion awaiting award in that program alone, and that is absolutely significant.

And we do expect, I guess, some ramp up in volumes of awards between now and October, just because of the cycle of government, and hopefully we’ll see that coming in Q3. But this was all part and parcel of how we positioned Investor Day, very much strategically how we aligned our targets, how we thought through how we could achieve those targets. So I think what you’re showing is strategy in action and for strategy to work and achieve your outcomes. You’ve got to also just deliver and I think our teams are actually doing just that. So that’s probably the best way to put that.

Bert Subin: Okay, and then just on the wholesale. In April, I think when we spoke, it just starting. So, maybe how that’s progressing so far.

Stuart Bradie : Yeah, I mean, the early moves have gone very, very well. The feedback on the quality and the service have been terrific. As you can imagine, the volumes are quite low, so we’re all over that. So you would expect it. But so far so good in that sense. We know we’ve got the supply chain lined up in terms of what we’re thinking about. We’ve got to achieve in the next little while, so no issues there. In terms of public statements, TRANSCOM came out in May and basically said that, we’ll be progressively ramping up, particularly in the fall as we look at interstate moves, which is aligned with our program where we’re testing for that the system is right now, and so far so good. With a view that we’ll be doing full domestic moves in the busy season of 2025.

Now, obviously, the targets that we gave in Investor Day are a bit more conservative than that, and rightfully so. It’s a new program, but we’re doing all we can to achieve that and line up behind that expectation. But, that’s kind of where we sit today.

Bert Subin: Thanks very much, Stuart.

Stuart Bradie : Thanks.

Operator: Thank you. The next question is from Brent Thielman from D.A. Davidson. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Brent Thielman: Hey, thanks. Good morning. Mark or Stuart, can you just talk about your expectations for R&S, and I guess particularly your activities in Europe as you’re moving into the second half of the year and what’s embedded in your outlook?

Stuart Bradie : Yeah, I’ll start, Mark, and jump in. I mean, R&S is actually quite interesting in what’s happening there and its activity levels. So, as you know, it slowed down a bit with the Ukraine supplemental not being approved for some time and a bit of CR. Both of them are behind us. And we’re seeing some movement there in EUCOM. But actually, if you look at the sequential growth, much of the sequential growth in R&S is actually coming from non-LOGCAP activities, so really a broader base operational support business, which is actually a terrific fact set because we do expect EUCOM and the impact of EUCOM to come through in Q3 and Q4 based on our outlook. So I think that’s quite an interesting dynamic there. Mark, any more to say on that?

Mark Sopp: No, I think you said it. I think R&S is more diversified than one might think, and so they’ve been active. As we talked about, upping the bids, submittals by 50% this year. They’re very much included. And they’ve expanded their reach in their markets and are doing really well. On Ukraine, we’ll see. I did say that the trickle down was a little slow in Q2. It did pick up toward the end. So we’re optimistic the second half will be a little bit better than the first, and then we’ll just play that as the government dictates longer term.

Stuart Bradie : Yeah, and we’ve got a couple of recent bids that, as ever, you’re told you’ve won, and then they go into protest. We do think these will be additive if the protests resolve in our favor, but we’ll obviously update you on that hopefully in Q3 earnings. So we’re feeling pretty good about R&S and that whole business performance.

Brent Thielman: Got it. Okay, and then, Stuart, just your answer to one of the previous questions, talking around some of the opportunities in LNG percolating. I guess in particular some of the opportunities here in the U.S., what might be embedded into your 2027 sort of financial targets for STS versus what isn’t, especially related to those types of opportunities here in the U.S.?

Stuart Bradie : Yeah, I mean, in the 2027 numbers, and the reason we put out to ‘27 is to really answer that question. We do believe there’s enough globally in LNG, not just the U.S. And we’ve talked about our project management work in Abu Dhabi, and we’ve talked about where we are in the Middle East, in the broader Middle East as well, and the activities we’re doing in and around Oman. So I’m thinking that LNG will pick up also in the U.S., but really our targets in 2027 are not dependent on LNG. We think the markets are broader, we think our positioning in those markets are strong enough to achieve targets. LNG does factor in a bit, but we’re not absolutely holistically dependent on that. And as you know, we run a probabilistic model where we do what’s the chance of projects going ahead, what’s the chances of us getting them.

So there’s a whole mix of opportunity in there, and if we win a fair share. I think if we win LNG, that’s great. But at the end of the day, I think there’s enough opportunity to stand behind those targets.

Brent Thielman: Very good. Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. The next question is from Steven Fisher from UBS. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Steven Fisher: Thanks. Good morning. Nice to see the guidance increase. I’m just curious on that guidance increase, if you could maybe bridge us between the old EBITDA and EPS guidance to the new guidance. I’m curious, was it more kind of contingency captures in the first half that drove the increase, or was it more on the business wins? And then I’m curious to know if there was anything that was restraining the outlook there and any new headwinds that came up that had to be, blended in that guidance change.

Stuart Bradie : Yeah, and Steve, the increase in guidance was driven by operational performance, full stop. I mean, our people deliver day in, day out. I’ve said it many times, they’re absolutely terrific and they continue to perform. So really, really strong operational performance that drove the guide. In terms of our outlook, we gave, I guess, modest increase in guidance, but an increase nonetheless. And, we’re about to enter quite volatile times in the U.S., as you can imagine, with elections looming and all the noise before then and probably after then also. So we’ve been a little bit sensible and prudent in terms of how much we raised. And we’ll see where we land in Q3. And, we’ll see what’s in the backlog and how we’re performing and what impact some of this volatility has, both in the U.S. and outside, of course. And that’s really the basis of why we’ve guided up, but perhaps been quite prudent in doing so.

Steven Fisher: Okay, that’s helpful. And then related to the LinQuest, relative to the 12% plus growth rate that you cited in 2024, what’s the growth rate that you’re embedding in there in the multiple that you called out, I guess, implied EBITDA for 2025? It seems like you’re implying around $65 million to $70 million EBITDA next year, but it’s a little hard to tell based on the tax benefits trying to back into it. And then is that going to be immediately accretive upon close or will it take some time to be accretive?

Stuart Bradie : Yeah, the growth that we’ve looked at going into 2025 is in low-double digits. And we think, well, we know through diligence, they’ve got the backlog and the contract vehicles to achieve that. And that excludes synergies. So I think we’re feeling really good about that. And in terms of accretion, yeah, it’s accretive from day one on a cash basis. And yeah, as you would expect with something of that growth and those margin performances. And I think we paid a sensible multiple for it. We didn’t get deal fever or anything like that. We had a very sensible discussion with the owners, Madison Dearborn. And I think they recognized KBR was a good home for this business. And certainly the two management teams got on very well, as I said, through the process. So we’re feeling real good about it.

Steven Fisher: Great. Thank you very much.

Stuart Bradie : Thanks.

Operator: Thank you. The next question is from Mariana Perez Mora from Bank of America. The line is now open. Please go ahead.

Samantha Stiroh: Hi, this is Samantha Stiroh on for Mariana. So you mentioned that the volume of bids at GS is increasing substantially. So for those new bids, is it kind of a greater volume of the same types of work? Or have you been seeing KBR able to address maybe like a wider scope of type of work, if that makes sense?

Stuart Bradie : Yeah, it does. I think it’s a bit of both. I certainly think that, there are obviously similar pieces of work as we do now because they’re very ever present in those markets. But we are seeing, I guess, a lot of activity and things like human health performance that we got involved in through initially NASA and then the port of contract and we’re seeing. We strategically went forward there we think we’ve got great differentiation in performance and we’re obviously penetrated into new customers as we presented today. So I think it’s really a bit of both. We’re seeing far more opportunity in the digital cyber world than we’d seen historically and that again obviously — that’s obviously market driven but I think our credentials stand up to scrutiny there.

So I do think it’s a bit of both, but we’re forever aligning on our vision and that’s to continually move up market and be differentiated based on our technologies and our capabilities. And those are the new type bids we’re going after.

Samantha Stiroh: Great okay I’ll keep it at one. Thank you so much.

Stuart Bradie : Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. The next question is from Andy Kaplowitz from Citigroup. Andy your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Andy Kaplowitz: Hey good morning everyone.

Stuart Bradie : Good morning Andy.

Andy Kaplowitz: Good morning. Stuart, obviously you’re still bullish on STS GS but just to be clear with the understanding that Plaquemines will still burn do you think you could grow backlog from here over the next few quarters in STS? And maybe elaborate on this transition from energy transition type projects in STS to energy security? Some of it could be LNG as you said but what are other types of energy security projects that you’re seeing that could offset or more than offset if energy transition works a little slower?

Stuart Bradie : Yeah. So just on the market in general to start there. So the energy demand is growing and it’s growing significantly particularly in the Global South as the more developing nations become more developed and you know that’s and you can see that. So that dynamic is not going away. Energy transition projects are still growing, but I think the whole market believed they would go faster but there are affordability issues particularly around green molecules versus say blue. And I presented a bit of that in my prepared remarks. So we are seeing energy transition growing but to meet demand energy security has to grow faster albeit in a decarbonized way. So I think the programs that were mentioned earlier things like liquid to chemicals, gas monetization, LNG projects, all your traditional sort of hydrocarbons transition fuel type opportunities.

As I say with electric drives or using renewable power or carbon sequestration et cetera to make them more blue is really sort of at the forefront. So that’s kind of where the market is heading today and certainly that was echoed by Aramco when I met the CEO last week. It was echoed by Sadik [ph] when I met the CEO there last week and I think you’re hearing it from the majors like BP and Shell other than Exxon et cetera. But at the same time you are seeing companies like BP and Shell move into the ammonia market for the very first time. And I think our recent announcements and our successes with those international energy companies as they diversify the portfolio to get ready for energy transition is clear. So I think we’re really very well positioned in both sides and as I say demand overall is not reducing fulfilling that demand and the balance between it may differ a little.

But I think we’re very well placed to take advantage of both sides and actually take advantage of the overall demand. And given where a lot of that demand is happening, again you have to be ever present or omnipresent there. And I think we have presented that at Investor Day that we’re very well positioned in these markets. So I think that’s why you’re seeing strong performance in STS, that’s why we remain kind of bullish on the performance and the outlook for STS and so may it continue.

Andy Kaplowitz: And then Stuart or Mark equity and earnings of unconsolidated affiliates is continuing to pick up in Q2 is higher again. Is that Plaquemines contribution continuing to pick up or is anything else helping and is the run-rate in Q2 the right level of equity earnings to model moving forward?

Mark Sopp: I think I would say Andy, that Plaquemines is or VG sometimes said is pretty much at peak right now. And so that is contributing quite a bit to the equity and earnings that you’re seeing. It’ll stay strong and it’ll start to wane off from that project a little bit in ‘25 and more so in ‘26. What we’re also seeing which is terrific is really strong programs like ASPIRE or our Brown & Root joint venture is benefiting from the energy security dynamics that Stuart mentioned earlier and that those contributions have continued to grow not at quite the pace as the LNG project as it is ramped up to its peak here but has really come along really well. And so it’s more diversified than you might think in that line. And that is healthy for a lot of reasons. But that number might dissipate just a little bit this year from the 40 you see this quarter but not much it’s pretty steady.

Andy Kaplowitz: Appreciate the color.

Operator: Thank you. The next line is from Sangita Jain from KeyBanc Capital Markets. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Sangita Jain: Hi thanks for taking my questions. So the first one on a Plaquemines, can you tell us when we should expect that book to build headwind to go away? I understand it’s burning at peak rates right now but just from a modeling perspective when should we think of that normalizing?

Stuart Bradie : Probably halfway through next year.

Sangita Jain: Okay got it. And as a follow-up can I ask you about the LinQuest acquisition? It seems like it was an acquisition from a private equity firm. Was that a competitive process and are you seeing more or less of those kind of deals coming through your way these days?

Stuart Bradie : Yeah. It was a competitive process and but through that process I think that we very much aligned with management on values and outlook and opportunity. And I think that played a part into us getting into a very strong position at the end. But yes it was a competitive process that was circumvented somewhat and narrowed down quite quickly, which was terrific. But again I would say that we kept our discipline through the process. In terms of what we’re seeing, yeah there’s quite a bit in the market today. But like all things in this area we have to be — well a, they have to be at a reasonable price but also they have to fit strategically. We don’t buy to bulk out we buy for strategic acceleration et cetera. So we’ll continue to look as Mark said.

We do have some firepower. We are happy for the leverage to take up a bit if it makes sense. And we’ve got a de-leveraging story and we’re still very much in the healthy balance sheet zone. But yeah the market’s quite active just now.

Sangita Jain: Great, thank you so much.

Stuart Bradie : In saying all that we need to close LinQuest get through HSR through the integration deliver if there’s any upside to that deliver it this year and really get that business off to a firm footing. And that’s really our primary mission.

Sangita Jain: Understood thank you.

Stuart Bradie : Thanks.

Operator: Thank you. The next question is from Gautam Khanna from TD Cowen. Your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Gautam Khanna: Thanks good morning. I was curious the mechanics that you expect on liquid to chemicals, like how does that appear in backlog and when like what sort of the milestones that we should be looking for? And is it going to be like a major kind of lump sum booking at some point in the next couple quarters or is it going to be more incremental over a number of years if you could frame that for us.

Stuart Bradie : Yeah. I think Gautam, the way that Aramco typically work in these big programs is they do things called [indiscernible] which is a work authorization request and you agree what the level of effort is there. So it’s more incremental than the big bank booking. And so that’s the way it’s going to come through in backlog. So I think the best way that when we can talk about it we will describe what we think it could be, but we’ll be very clear of what is and not in backlog and how we see that coming through over time. But typically it’s more a slow burn than a big bang.

Gautam Khanna: Okay and then just to put a finer point on the second quarter STS bookings, recognize that the backlog came down but some of that reflects the Plaquemines. What were the orders the actual like dollar value of orders that were received in the quarter for STS?

Stuart Bradie : Well it was 1.1 times the burn excluding.

Mark Sopp: Yeah it’s 1.1 times the revenue that they stated.

Stuart Bradie : Because obviously the Plaquemines burn doesn’t come through revenue, roughly $500 million give or take.

Mark Sopp: Yeah.

Gautam Khanna: Okay roughly so. $500 million. And then last question on LinQuest, I was curious did they have any set aside business that may fade over time or is that 100% full and open?

Stuart Bradie : It’s 100% full and open. There’s no small business in there at all.

Gautam Khanna: Thanks a lot guys.

Stuart Bradie : Thanks, Gautam.

Operator: Thank you. The next question is from Jerry Revich from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Unidentified Analyst : Hi this is Adam on for Jerry. Good morning. You were selected as one of the 11 awardees on the $43 billion MQS2 contract. What percent of that $43 billion could flow to KBR over time and how are you thinking about the timing of that ramp?

Stuart Bradie : Yeah, I think as I said we’re very excited about the award. I mean it’s a substantial ceiling value. We are very excited it’s a new customer and really sort of reinforces our credentials in the human health side of our business. But given it’s a new customer and a new contract, I really don’t want to speculate Adam, as to the volume that could come through each of the awards is a separate work like. I think it could get up to well we don’t know is the answer. But $40 million, $50 million, $60 million a year as a sort of base, if it’s less or more than that I guess we’ll tell you but I’m absolutely speculating. We’re just brand new in. We think it could do very well for us. But I don’t want to get out in front of a skis.

I would very much say it’s new business for us. So it’s kind of upside and as we get into a bit more I’m sure we can report I guess some activities there. But I think you should view it as very, very good news. I think you should view it as a step forward strategically in that arena. And I think you should see as potential upside as we move forward.

Mark Sopp: And I’ll add that you know we’ve really been on a good run in this area as we said earlier. Health and human performance is a real niche and great performer within our portfolio. I’ll also add that on this particular award we’re really the only quote-unquote household name of the awardees. And so there are niche players in the other 10, but we’re I think the biggest and the most recognizable maybe most — able to deliver a wide variety of capabilities here. So pretty excited about that, but it’s early days as Stuart said.

Unidentified Analyst : And then in STS can you just update us on your plastics monetization progress? Where do we stand in the construction progress on projects that have moved forward so far? And what’s the timing of additional projects moving to construction phase?

Mark Sopp: Yeah so we’ve got again as we — I think we said this at investor day we’ve got three under construction today. The one in the UK, the Wiltshire site is a stick build. It started before we got involved with Mura. They have progressed slower than expected and we do expect them to be producing product in Q3, so that’s sort of right now. And the other one where we have been involved is in Korea with LG Chem where we modularize the solution. And I think it’s been proven that we’ve taken a year off the execution schedule as a consequence. And they’re looking to reach mechanical completion at the end of Q3. So very much on schedule and doing very, very well. And then the third one’s in Japan which will be in Q1 next year.

Again we’ve been partied to that. So I think that’s where the three under construction sit. Over and above that we have opportunities in Europe and North America that are very well mature. The key to unlock is actually, this is a Stuart view if you like is actually producing product in one of these sites but probably in the UK. We’ve had a number of interested parties through the site to see progress and to see what the plant looks like in face to face if you like and all very, very positive. So there’s a number coming behind it but the key to unlock the market is to buy all new technologies although we’re very, very confident. We’ve got to get this facility up and running and producing. And I think once that happens I think you’ll see a lot of activity in that marketplace.

Unidentified Analyst: Great thank you.

Operator: Thank you. As we currently have no further questions I will now hand back to Stuart Bradie for closing remarks.

Stuart Bradie : Thank you Kiki. So thank you again for taking the time to listen to our prepared remarks and the questions obviously today. We’re very excited about the addition of LinQuest as you’ve had on numerous occasions through this call. We think it’s a terrific acquisition and really accelerates our strategy particularly around the mission IT set. It’s a real capability and customer play for us and really strong synergy opportunities. I’ll reiterate none of that is in the guidance. And so once we get through HSR and close obviously we’ll be having a look at that. But to get halfway through the year with a little bit of over performance prudently raise guidance in a volatile world, I think really sends a strong signal to the market.

We’re feeling really good about our operational performance and our backlog and also our pipeline of potential bookings going forward. So all up very pleased with where the company’s at halfway through the year. A lot of work and a lot of wood to chop, obviously to get to the end of the year. But so far so good. So thank you very much.

Operator: This concludes today’s conference call. You may now disconnect your lines. Thank you.