Harmonic Inc. (NASDAQ:HLIT) Q2 2023 Earnings Call Transcript

Harmonic Inc. (NASDAQ:HLIT) Q2 2023 Earnings Call Transcript July 31, 2023

Harmonic Inc. misses on earnings expectations. Reported EPS is $0.12 EPS, expectations were $0.13.

Operator: Thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Second Quarter 2023 Harmonic Earnings Conference Call. My name is Jonathan, and I will be your operator for today’s call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers’ presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this conference is being recorded. And now I would like to turn the call over to David Hanover, Investor Relations. David, you may begin.

David Hanover: Thank you, Operator. Hello everyone, and thank you for joining us today for Harmonic’s second quarter 2023 financial results conference call. With me today are Patrick Harshman, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Walter Jankovic, Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I’d like to point out that in addition to the audio portion of the webcast, we have also provided slides for this webcast, which you may view by going to our webcast on our Investor Relations Web site. Now, turning to slide two, during this call, we will provide projections and other forward-looking statements regarding future events or future financial performance of the company. Such statements are only current expectations and actual events or results may differ materially.

We refer you to documents Harmonic filed with the SEC, including our most recent 10-Q and 10-K reports and the forward-looking statements section of today’s preliminary results press release. These documents identify important risk factors, which can cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in our projections or forward-looking statements. And please note that unless otherwise indicated, the financial metrics we provide you on this call are determined on a non-GAAP basis. These metrics, together with corresponding GAAP numbers and a reconciliation to GAAP, are contained in today’s press release, which we have posted on our Web site and filed with the SEC on Form 8-K. We will also discuss historical, financial and other statistical information regarding our business and operation.

And some of this information is included in the press release. The remainder of the information will be available on a recorded version of this call or on our Web site. And now, I’ll turn the call over to our CEO, Patrick Harshman. Patrick?

Patrick Harshman: Thanks, David, and welcome everyone to our second quarter call. In the second quarter, Harmonic delivered solid Broadband and Video SaaS growth, while also encountering short-term headwinds. Revenue was $156 million, EPS was $$0.12, and adjusted EBITDA margin was 13.5%. Our Broadband segment revenue grew 20% year-over-year, our Video SaaS revenue was up 58%, and book-to-bill was over $1.2 million, leading to record backlog and deferred revenue of over $663 million. Hardware deliveries on both the Broadband and Video sides of the business were softer than anticipated. And we expect this softness to persist through the third quarter before rebounding in Q4. Our competitive position continues to be strong, evidenced by several important new customer wins during the quarter.

The combination of record backlog and deferred revenue, active and health existing customers, and new customer relationships that have yet to scale continues to position us well for sustained long-term growth. Taking a closer look, first, at our Broadband segment, we delivered another quarter of solid growth, with segment revenue $97.1 million, up 20% year-over-year. Customers deploying our solution reached 98, up 24% year-over-year, with corresponding 21 million cable modems now served worldwide, still only approximately 12% of the addressable global market, highlighting our significant expansion opportunity expanding existing and new accounts. We did expect Q2 growth to be higher, and during the quarter we ran into unexpected reductions in hardware deliveries, reductions we now expect persist through the third quarter.

I want to emphasize we see no loss of business, nor do we see any change in our mid-to-long-term growth opportunity. Indeed, our customers remain on offense with regard to new gigabit services. Our new broadband bookings were strong, enabling record backlog and deferred revenue, and our competitive position has never been stronger. Contributing to these bookings were initial multi-million-dollar from two new Tier 1 accounts; one in North America, and one international. Neither of these accounts have yet begun deployment or contributing revenue. Further highlighting our still-strengthening market position, market intelligence firm, Dell’Oro Group, recently, and for the first time, recognized Harmonic as the cable broadband equipment market share leader.

Another highlight of the quarter was the extension of our software license relationship with a key customer. Our cloud-native core software continues to be unrivalled in the market, valued by our customers, and key to our unique to powerful market proposition. Illustrating the flexibility and competitive advantage of our software core, we’re leading in enabling new DOCSIS 4.0 standard, which opens the door to compelling, new multi-gigabit services for our customers and new growth opportunities for our business. Complementing our extended software core is a new family of backward-compatible DOCSIS 4.0 RPDs and optical networks. The technology development and trial progress in this area has been truly remarkable, and we’re now gearing up to support initial deployments in the coming months.

While technology transitions such as this can result in short-term headwinds, as some customers begin to look ahead to the coming standard, the new growth opportunities being created by the associated new wave of symmetrical multi-gigabit services the DOCSIS 4.0 unlocks are good news for our business. Also good news for our business is the progress we continue to make in the fiber-to-the-home area. We recently announced Claro Perú has selected our 10G PON solution for their new fiber service. And we also announced the availability of a powerful, new hardened switch for XGS and 10G-EPON. Worldwide, cable customers are looking to fiber as they edge out their footprints and compete head-to-head with telecos. And our growing fiber sales pipeline reflects this expanding opportunity.

In summary for our Broadband business, we continue to be confident in our technology position, our market position, and our opportunities. With record backlog and deferred revenue, we’re continuing to execute on high-impact cable and fiber initiatives that are being embraced by a growing number of customers worldwide, positioning us for sustainable, long-term growth. And turning now to our Video segment, the highlight of the quarter was SaaS revenue, $13.6 million, up 58% year-over-year. Total revenue was $58.9 million, down from $76.2 million a year ago, reflecting our intentional SaaS transformation, some project delays, and a continuing transition of historical appliance revenue to software, evident in the second quarter from the 61.7% segment gross margin.

The business delivered a positive EBITDA, demonstrating our commitment to profitability, while investing in the transition to SaaS, with its inherent revenue timing challenges. While streaming sales growth was again driven primarily by live sports, with both existing and newer customers contributing. As a reminder, we’re benefiting from several newer SaaS customers signed in prior periods that are now coming online and ramping usage. The exceptional video quality and low-latency characteristics of our video SaaS continue to shine in the market. For example, we’re currently supporting the Women’s World Cup, and consumer feedback on the relative quality of the streaming services we’re powering has been excellent. Based on this progress and growing impact of several new capabilities we announced last quarter, we continue to forecast SaaS growth greater than 50% for the full-year.

On the appliance side of the business, North America was quite solid, while we experienced some project delay headwinds internationally. We’ve undertaken a thorough review of our sales pipeline, and are working closely with key customers worldwide. The net result is a reconfirmed, solid sales pipeline for second-half of the year, with a seasonally strong fourth quarter, which is typical for our video business. Recapping our Video segment strategy, we remain focused on taking a leading position in growing streaming SaaS market, particularly for live sports, while also maximizing profit from the traditional video appliance market. Our results through the first-half of the year demonstrate continuing excellent progress on SaaS, and continued overall profitability despite some macro international headwinds.

We’re confident in our second-half outlook and in our ability to continue to create value through sustained streaming SaaS growth. With that, let me turn it over to you, Walter, for a deeper discussion of our financial results and outlook.

Walter Jankovic: Thanks, Patrick, and thank you all for joining us today. Before I discuss our quarterly results as well as our outlook, I’d like to remind everyone that the financial results I’ll be referring are provided on a non-GAAP basis. As David mentioned earlier, our Q2 press release and earnings presentation includes reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP that are discussed on this call. Both of these are available on our Web site. During the second quarter, we delivered double-digit year-over-year broadband and SaaS revenue growth, and generated strong gross margins in total, and across our business segments. Having said that, we also experienced hardware sales delays which resulted in total revenue below our expectations.

Despite this, our SaaS continue to grow to record levels, and our overall mix of software revenue was up significantly as reflected in our gross margins. Our operating model demonstrated its inherent strength as we continue to deliver solid profitability, resulting gin EPS of $0.12, which was within our guidance range. We ended the second quarter with a solid balance sheet as well as record backlog and deferred revenue of $663.8 million, positioning us well for continued long-term growth. Before reviewing our Q2 2023 financials in more detail, I’ll briefly review the key highlights here, on slide seven. For the quarter, we reported revenue of $156 million, with EPS of $0.12, bookings of $194.7 million, and record backlog and deferred revenue of $663.8 million.

IN a few minutes, we will discuss our Q3 2023 and full-year ’23 guidance, which now taken to consideration the impact of recent customer demand push-outs that have occurred following our last earnings call. These demand changes reflect inventory adjustments by our broadband customers, and macroeconomic challenges affecting our video customers. To offer some additional color, they do not reflect any loss of market share or any changes in the competitive landscape. Now, let’s review our second quarter financials in detail. Turning to slide eight, again, total Q2 revenue was $156 million, down less than 1% on a year-over-year basis. Looking first at our Broadband segment, Q2 revenue was $97.1 million, down slightly sequentially and up 20% year-over-year.

We continue to see current ramp-up and newer customer launches during the quarter including modest contribution from fiber revenue. As mentioned, hardware revenue was lower than expected reflecting sales delays across several customers. In our Video segment, we reported Q2 revenue of $58.9 million, up 3% sequentially, and down 23% year-over-year. While hardware sales were lower, our Video revenue included SaaS revenue of $13.6 million or 23% of segment revenue in the quarter, up 58% from the prior year. We continue to execute the strategic transformation of our video business and the continued growth of SaaS, while also focusing on maximizing profitability in the appliance business. We had one customer representing greater than 10% of total revenue during the quarter, with Comcast representing 47% of total revenue which was similar to last quarter.

Total company gross margins was 54.7% for Q2 ’23, up 80 basis points sequentially and 190 basis points year-over-year reflecting increased gross margins in both of our business segments sequentially. Broadband gross margin was 50.5% for Q2 ’23, up 40 basis points sequentially and 750 basis points year-over-year. The sequential increase predominantly reflects favorable software mix as a result of lower hardware sales in Q2. Video segment gross margin was 61.7% in Q2 ’23, up 130 basis points sequentially and down 150 basis points year-over-year. The sequential increase was primarily due to SaaS continuing to scale. Moving down the income statement on slide nine, Q2 ’23 operating expenses were $67.2 million, up 1.5% sequentially and 9% year-over-year.

The sequential increase reflects higher sales commissions due to recent contract wins. Adjusted EBITDA for Q2 ’23 was $21.1 million, or 13.5% of revenue, down 13.4% versus Q2 ’22, comprised of $19.7 million from broadband representing 20.2% of segment revenue and $1.4 million from video. This all translated into Q2 ’23 EPS of $0.12 per share consistent with Q1 ’23 and compared to $0.16 per share for Q2 ’22. We ended the second quarter of 2023 with a calculated diluted weighted average share count of 119.3 million compared to 117.8 million in Q1 ’23 and 109 million in Q2 ’22. The sequential increase is primarily due to the increased convertible debt dilution of 1.2 million shares. Turning now to the order book, we reported bookings of $194.7 million.

The book-to-bill ratio was 1.2 for the second quarter. For Q1 ’23 and Q3 ’22, our book-to-bill ratios were 2.1 and 0.9 respectively. This follows what we’ve stated previously that over time, as supply chain conditions improve, we expect this ratio to normalize and approach the historical benchmark of greater than one as it did in Q2. There is one item that I would like to draw your attention to from our GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations for Q2. In Q2, we recorded a nonrecurring expense of $2.1 million that is excluded from our non-GAAP results relating to professional accounting, tax and legal fees associated with strategic corporate initiatives. Given their nonrecurring nature, we have excluded these costs from our non-GAAP results to provide investors greater transparency regarding the performance of our core businesses.

Turning to the balance sheet on slide 10, we ended Q2 ’23 with cash of $71 million compared to $90.9 million at the end of Q1 ’23. The net $19.9 million sequential decrease was due to a few factors. We used $16.5 million of cash in operations. This was primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable, offset partially by a decrease in inventory in the quarter. I will address these two items in a moment. We also used $1.5 million of cash in the purchase of fixed assets. Turning to accounts receivables and days sales outstanding, at the end of Q2 ’23, DSO was 69 compared to 50 in Q1 ’23 and 61 in the prior year period. Our second quarter DSO reflected a significantly larger portion of shipments in the final two weeks of the quarter that have since been collected.

Going forward, one of our larger customers has informed us that they will no longer take an early pay discount, so that will now be reflected in our go-forward DSOs and cash forecasts. Days inventory on hand was 145 days at the end of Q2 ’23 compared to 163 at the end of Q1 ’23 and 100 at the end of Q2 ’22. It’s important to note that the inventory decline in the quarter was a result of lower than expected material infeed as we tighten our supply chain. Regarding capital allocation, our top priority remains driving our future growth. As such, when appropriate, we will strategically invest in building inventory as we’ve done in the past to meet strong demand. Having said that, as we’ve stated previously we have the flexibility to maintain somewhat lower inventory levels that is reflected in our ending inventory balances for the second quarter.

At the same time, our capital allocation strategy takes into account our ability to return capital to our shareholders through stock repurchases. Again, as stated previously, the timing and amount of any repurchases will depend on a variety of factors, including the price of Harmonic’s common stock, market condition, corporate needs, and regulatory requirements. We also consider our 2024 convertible notes in our forward cash planning activities. At the end of Q2, total backlog and deferred revenue was $663.8 million compared to $623.5 million at the end of Q1. This record backlog in deferred revenue reflects continued demand from our large broadband customers and growing video SaaS commitments. The majority of our backlog and deferred revenue has customer request dates for shipments of products and providing services within the next 12 months.

In summary, while our Q2 revenue was below expectations, our SaaS business continued to grow to record levels. In addition, our overall mix of software revenue was up significantly, as reflected in the strength of our gross margins. While we do expect to see continued short-term headwinds in our revenue as customers deal with inventory levels and macroeconomic conditions, we do not see these factors impacting our market share or our long-term expectations for continued growth. Before reviewing the guidance, I’d like to take a moment to comment on my first two months here at Harmonic and my priorities going forward. First of all, as I’ve met with all the organizations and conducted a deeper review into our technology capabilities and market opportunity, I’m extremely excited about the opportunities ahead of us and our ability to grow over the long-term.

To facilitate our long-term growth plans, I’ve laid out the following key priorities for my team in collaboration with the broader organization; first, to conduct a thorough review of our long-term market opportunities to drive an updated strategic plan which we will share with you at our next Analyst Day late this year; second, to develop a roadmap on how we scale up the organization cost effectively and with the appropriate tools and processes to facilitate our expected growth; and third, revise our capital allocation plan based on our updated strategic plan. I look forward to updating you as we progress on these key priorities. Let’s now review our revised non-GAAP guidance for 2023, beginning on slide 11. Based on the current macroeconomic conditions and the continued demand we’re seeing for our products, for the full-year 2023, on a total company basis, we expect revenue in the range of $620 million to $660 million, gross margin in the range of 51.9% to 52.9%, operating expenses to range from $262 million to $268 million, adjusted EBITDA to range from $71 million to $93 million, and effective tax rate of 20% up from 13% from last year as we exhausted our NOLs in the past year.

Our weighted average diluted share count was approximately 119.2 million. Please note that the convertible debt related dilution included in our share count uses the Q2 average stock price, which was approximately $16.05. As a reminder, the share count figure utilized in our dilution calculations will change depending on stock price movements. EPS to range from $0.38 to $0.52 per share, subject to the just mentioned dilution calculation down 24% at the midpoint from previous guidance and cash at the end of 2023 is expected to come in between $80 million to $95 million. Our cash guidance reflects one of our larger customers no longer taking an early paid discount option as I mentioned earlier, this will result in higher DSOs than what we have seen over the past few quarters.

We still see cash accretion over the second-half of 2023 and into 2024 to give us full optionality on how we handle the repayment of the principal of our 2024 convertible notes. For total company for the third quarter of 2023 on slide 12, we expect revenue in the range of $125 million to $140 million, gross margin in the range of 50.0% to 50.8%. Operating expenses to range from $65 million to $67 million, adjusted EBITDA to range from $0 million to $8 million, an effective tax rate of 20%, a weighted average diluted share count of approximately 112 million to 119.8 million and EPS to range from a loss of $0.02 to a profit of $0.02 and then cash to range from $80 million to $90 million. Turning to slide 13 for the full-year 2023 based on the progress to date, we expect broadband to achieve revenue between $385 million to $410 million below our prior guidance at the midpoint.

Gross margin is between 47.0% to 48.0%, reflecting a much greater mix of hardware in the second-half of 2023 versus the first-half. Operating expense is between $122 million to $125 million, and adjusted EBITDA between $65 million to $78 million. For our Broadband segment in Q3, we expect revenue in the range of $70 million to $80 million, gross margin in the range of 42.5% to 43.5%, operating expenses in the range of $30 million to $31 million and adjusted EBITDA to range from $1 million to $6 million. Now, on slide 14, I will review full-year ’23 Video segment guidance. We expect revenue in the range of $235 million to $250 million, gross margins in the range of 60% to 61%, operating expenses in the range of $140 million to $143 million and adjusted EBITDA in the range of $6 million to $15 million.

For our Video segment in Q3, we expect revenue in the range of $55 million to $60 million, gross margin in the range of 59.5% to 60.5%, operating expenses in the range of $35 million to $36 million, and adjusted EBITDA to range from a loss of $1 million to a profit of $2 million. This guidance reflects a wider range on revenue and earnings related to short-term headwinds we are seeing with customers. We believe it’s somewhat conservative, which we think is appropriate given the current environment. In summary, during the second quarter we continue to execute on our long-term strategic plans with continued growth in our Broadband segment and further progress with the planned transformation of our Video segment and shift to SaaS. We ended the second quarter with record backlog and deferred revenue which we believe positions us well for future growth.

Thank you, everyone for your attention today. And now I’ll turn it back to Patrick for final remarks before we open up the call for questions.

Patrick Harshman: Thanks very much, Walter. I think you got the summary right. Our products and services, our customer relationships and our team all continue to lead the markets we serve. We remain determined and confident in leveraging this leadership to take full advantage of the expanding market opportunities in front of us. And we appreciate all of you listening on the call today. Our shareholders, we appreciate your continued support. With that, let’s now open up the call for questions.

Q&A Session

Operator: Certainly. One moment for our first question. And our first question comes from the line of Simon Leopold from Raymond James. Your question, please?

Simon Leopold: Great. Thanks for taking the question. So, a couple of things I’m trying to digest here, but it really comes down to trying to make sure we understand what’s changed in terms of the commentary you offered last quarter to this quarter, because it seems to me that this is a combination of factors and not just one. So, I think we had been expecting, during the second-half of the calendar year, you would be seeing more growth from your other customers besides your largest. And we also felt like your largest customer was sort of running at a pretty steady pace. And given this outlook for the third quarter, it seems as if, perhaps, your largest customer is sitting on too much inventory, and the other customers are maybe not showing up with the strength you thought.

And just one clarification to tie this together, is it does seem as if the fourth quarter, you’re anticipating very, very strong sequential growth, and I want to make sure I’m plugging that in correctly, and what gets us there? Thank you.

Patrick Harshman: Okay, well, thank you, Simon. There’s a lot there in the question. As you know, we cannot parse out what’s happening with different customers. Maybe going back to the headline, indeed what transpired during the past quarter in terms of expected demand, we saw a significant change in terms of what was communicated to us. And that change was not exclusively from one customer. We don’t think in any way reflects changes in long-term or even mid-range plans. It does reflect though some absorption of inventory, some contraction. And secondarily, I think some other market factors; transition to FDX being one of them. I think the outlook for the business, while it’s premature to give 2024 guidance, the outlook for the business is really unchanged.

And I think recent statements by several of our customers, as they’ve issued their earnings releases, speaks to their continuing aggressiveness in advancing their deployment plans. We’re certainly encouraged by that, and we’re — yes, we’re confident in the guide that we’ve given here for the fourth quarter, and confident in our positioning with these customers as they continue to drive their businesses.

Simon Leopold: Thanks for that clarification. And just maybe a quite follow-up, if I might, is I wanted to get a little bit more color on how you structure your agreements in the cable CableOS, whether your customers are getting perpetual licenses, paying by the [seat] (ph), whether there is a renewal stream, just if you can unpack the business arrangement around the software aspects on the cable side. Thank you.

Patrick Harshman: Okay, I’ll take it. And, Walter, you can chime in. Simon, the most common model, and the truth is there are a couple of different we’ve used. But by far and away, the most common model is a perpetual license associated with a fixed amount of provisions of bandwidth around a specific standard. So, let’s just say 100 megabits, 5-gigabits, 10-gigabits of DOCSIS 3.1 traffic; a perpetual license for that, that is associated with the underlying compute. [Indiscernible]

Simon Leopold: So, when a customer migrates to 4.0, you’d essentially have a new software agreement?

Patrick Harshman: That is the most common model. That is correct.

Simon Leopold: And, Walter, you were going to say something?

Walter Jankovic: Yes, I was just going to add, as Patrick highlighted, just to emphasize the point, there are different models in terms of the CableOS and how we’re selling that through to customers, and how that will transact going forward. So, as we see customers, there are many customers who will be buying on a subscriber basis. So, as they increase their network in terms of adding subscribers, that will have an impact in terms of our software revenues.

Simon Leopold: Thank you for taking the questions.

Patrick Harshman: Okay, thank you.

Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our next question comes from the line of Ryan Koontz from Needham & Company. Your question, please?

Ryan Koontz: And thanks for the question. Given your software license model there around bandwidth consumption, I’ve been hearing there was some recent history reports about declines in broadband traffic demands. And I wonder if you’re seeing that have any impact relative to the pace of customer project and maybe over-purchase of inventory. So, as you look at these near-term headwinds and it sounds like you mentioned it was mostly international. Can you parse out any of those thoughts for me in terms of how you think it might be affecting your near-term demand?

Walter Jankovic: Hi, Ryan, it’s Walter. Thanks for the question. So, first of all, with regards to international demand and comments, I think those comments reflect across both broadband and video. We’re seeing certain regions that are being more impacted in terms of delaying their decisions to move forward with certain projects. So, I first wanted to clarify that point specifically. And then secondly, as we had emphasized in our opening remarks, customers are adjusting inventory levels. I think that’s something that’s happening across the board with many customers out there, and as in necessarily reflect their plans in terms of deployments moving forward. And I think that’s a really important point to take away from the comments here.

We expect, as Patrick highlighted earlier, that the fundamentals, the expectation of continued growth and roll-outs from our customers is happening, and will continue to happen. And from the position of where we stand and the wins that we have in the market share, we’ve never been stronger. So, I just wanted to clarify with those comments.

Ryan Koontz: That’s great. And want to continue that thought forward with a comment around FDX and DOCSIS 4. It sounds like you feel well-prepared to participate in some of these early trials. When do you think you’ll see the customers, in total, really begin to move over to DOCSIS 4? We still talking ’25, do you think?

Patrick Harshman: It’s a fluid picture, Ryan. Actually, the progress, the technology progress and the early trial progress that we’ve been involved with has actually moved more quickly than I think many anticipated. We expect not just trials, but we now expect initial true deployment — revenue deployments to be happening beginning in 2024. Now, some customers are further along and more aggressive than others. So, 2024, I think, will still be more of a DOCSIS 3.1 story, but there’s no doubt that, because of the pace of progress that we in particular have made, and I believe that we’ve very much leading here, the door is now open to some customers to start to pivot to that, even in 2024. And I think it’s exciting. It’s creating — it’s going to enable, I think, a very interesting additional competitive platform for cable versus telco and pure fiber competitors.

And I think it also speaks, maybe back to the earlier part of your question, to the continuing aggressiveness that many of our customers are still — or still have motivating them as they’re looking at competing in this space.

Ryan Koontz: Helpful, Patrick. Thank you both.

Patrick Harshman: Thank you.

Walter Jankovic: Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our next question comes from the line of Steven Frankel from Rosenblatt Securities. Your question, please?

Steven Frankel: Thank you, Patrick. Let me just circle back to the second part of Simon’s question, which was, I think, all of us had this assumption that one of your largest customer may be going through something, there was a set of other customers, including some Tier 1s that hadn’t really gotten started yet, they were still in the early deployment phases. And the assumption was they would be ramping up in the back-half of this year. Are you telling us that some of those customers are also putting the breaks on at this point; they’re not ready to ramp up?

Walter Jankovic: Hey, Steve, it’s Walter. I’ll first answer then, and Patrick can add some more color. I think, and it was mentioned earlier here in the Q&A, that when you look at our guidance, we do expect multiple customers to be ramping up in Q4. And you see that in our number based on the full-year guide that we’ve provided. So, the quick answer to that is, yes, we’re seeing customers starting to ramp up, and we’re seeing it in our Q4 guidance, and we’ve built it in. And Patrick, if you —

Patrick Harshman: No, I think that captures it all.

Steven Frankel: Okay. But no one is stepping up in Q3 to fill the gap, clearly, from the guidance. Patrick, maybe some color on the two new Tier 1 wins?

Patrick Harshman: We’ve excited about them. They’re definitely players, or let’s say, if I can use in quotes, “Household names in the community.” So, they’re premier account, and we’re excited to have them onboard. I think that, as I mentioned in the prepared remarks, initial multi-million dollar orders, so we have a ways to go. But to your question, neither is contributing revenue yet. And likely, only modest revenue before year-end, but it’s really part of the layering that’s going on of our business. And speaking to what we think will be greater diversity of customers, a breadth of customers, larger as well as well, that’s building, over time, here. Yes, Steve, it’s not always easy to exactly prognosticate what the pace of the ramp will be; every customer has got their own thing going on. But having more in the funnel, it’s only good news for our business. And so, we’re thrilled to see continuing progress in North America, as well as continuing progress overseas.

Steven Frankel: Okay. And just a clarification on the backlog, I think you said, a couple times, you didn’t feel like you were losing market share or any shifts there. But from a technical point of view, if I was a customer, do I have the ability to cancel that backlog or am I locked in to some extent?

Walter Jankovic: Generally, customers are locked in with their purchase commitment. What we sometimes see, and is obviously experience, is customers will push out the order dates. And so, we have to work with our customers with regards to their plans and requirement, and so is something that does impact us from the perspective of timing, as compared to an order being cancelable.

Steven Frankel: All right, thank you. I’ll jump back in the queue.

Patrick Harshman: Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our next question comes from the line of George Notter from Jefferies. Your question, please?

Blake Mielke: Hi, everyone. This is Blake on for George. Thanks for taking our question. I’m curious if you can provide any additional detail on the follow-on software contract with the existing, large Tier 1, maybe how that deal is structured, if it’s any different, and if the economics have improved at all for you?

Patrick Harshman: I appreciate the question, and I understand where it’s coming from. But I ask you to appreciate it’s not something that we can really unpack for you. I think that the headline message is that the differentiation, the power of the software is enduring. I think we’ve faced the question of, “Will some customers stay with you?” And I think we’re offering it as an example of the durability of our — of the leadership, and of the relationships that are built around or — built around the software have the software as a major building block. What we can’t talk about really is the duration or the scope or other aspects of that, and, other than to say that, it in no way is a one-for-one with what has been done previously with the customer. But it’s an important reflection of our continuing relationship and the continuing leadership that we have in the industry with our software capability.

Blake Mielke: Understood. And then curious where lead time stand for cable access equipment, I believe they’re about 12 months, recently, for larger quantity node orders. Is that still the case, and maybe how did they change at all out — they did during the quarter, if so? Thanks.

Walter Jankovic: Blake, it’s Walter here. So, what I can say is that, from or perspective, we’ve continued to work with our customers based on our lead time requirements. And from a supply chain perspective, and I made the comments in the opening remarks, you we continue to see certain long lead-time parts that require 52-week lead times. But there’s many parts in the supply chain now that have actually improved, and that’s given us more flexibility in terms of our ability to order up and square up inventory. And I think, from a customer standpoint, customers are looking at their buffers and determining what inventory levels they want to hold. And I think that’s where — comes back to the comments we made around customers making inventory adjustments. And we see that across many customers that we have today.

Blake Mielke: Great, thank you.

Walter Jankovic: Thank you, Blake.

Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our next question comes from the line of Tim Savageaux from Northland Capital. Your question, please?

Tim Savageaux: Hey, good afternoon. Got a couple of questions here, first, following on earlier discussion about the new Tier 1 wins, and I guess I’ll throw Charter in there as well. To the extent, Patrick, you talk about your growth outlook, though not explicitly stated, for ’24, being unchanged. Does that imply that the real — you won’t seen much in terms of meaningful revenue contribution from any of those three wins this year with the — even though you’ve booked some orders, the meaningful ramp coming next year? And to those in the aggregate, help to get you pretty close to achieving that growth plan.

Patrick Harshman: I appreciate the question, Tim. I think is a premature for us to be talking in any quantitative way about 2024. And as you also I think will appreciate, I can’t comment specifically about Charter. But, look, what we’ve seen with other Tier 1s, and going back to the Comcast relationship, it takes a while to get going. It’s a powerful but new operational paradigm, in addition to technology, et cetera. And so there is a non-ramp, for lack of a better term, that needs to be worked through. And in each of these accounts, we’re working through that. I cannot say that there is no contribution in 2023, in fact that there is modest contribution from some of the newer Tier 1s in 2023. But indeed, the lion’s share of the opportunity lies ahead in 2024 and 2025, and that’s for sure.

And as we look out to 2024 and 2025, that’s one of the reasons why we can say with more certainty or more confidence, that as we look at customer concentration in our business, et cetera, we think we will be in a different place as more of these Tier 1s have come online. Exact timing and exact size, I think we’re going to have to hold back being quantitative until we’re a little closer to 2024, and we’ve reviewed with our customers in more detail 2024 plans.

Tim Savageaux: Got it. And on to a separate topic here, and this might get a little sticky, so please bear with me. You commented earlier in the call and in the prepared remarks that you didn’t feel like — well, A, most of your comments about areas of weakness seem to be focused on the outside plan. When you say hardware, at least that’s what it means to me. And your order book kind of reflects that; it’s a pretty good order book for a weakening demand environment. And you mentioned some of the new Tier 1s there. So, are we seeing some differentiation in how the business is behaving between their virtualized CCAP, the router side of the house versus the node side. And you did mention you didn’t feel like you were losing market share, but to the extent that FDX is ramping pretty quickly and one of your big, established competitors is arguably very well-positioned there.

A, wouldn’t that implicitly imply some market share loss in the hardware side nodes. B, might not that be a good thing in your business model, over time, like less revenue, higher margins? And C, is that what’s behind maybe a rethinking of the ’25 Analyst Day targets? On the one hand, Patrick, you said support long-term growth targets. I thought Walter just told me we have new numbers coming. Can you guys clarify that? And I apologize in advance for that, so sorry.

Patrick Harshman: No, it’s okay. But there are several things there, so we’ll do our best to track through them, and maybe you can remind us along the way. Why don’t we start at the end, Walter, and you —

Walter Jankovic: Let me handle that one first, Tim. So, in my remarks, in terms of our focus, every year we go through a strap planning process, and now I’m coming in new into the organization and working with the team to thoroughly go through that process and build up our long-term strat plan. And so, we will be revising that plan. We’ll be working together as a team internally and then presenting that at our Analyst Day later this year. So, I just wanted to clarify, this is something that will happen each and every year. And as you would expect in terms of us recasting our long-term plan, and with regards to the target models that have been provided previously, those were put together a year ago and presented at Analyst Day.

And as Patrick pointed out earlier and in some of our remarks, if you look at the long-term opportunity for us in terms of the market itself and our position in the market, we’re still very strong in terms of our overall position. So, I’ll let Patrick handle the next couple of questions here.

Patrick Harshman: Okay, thanks, Walter. So, Tim, I think there’s a couple of interrelated topics I’ll try to touch briefly and then you can direct follow-up. So, no particular order, may be DOCSIS 4.0. We think we’re incredibly well positioned there and the work we’ve done we think is exceptional. And the feedback we’re getting from the customer base on the products we’ve made is exceptional. So, in fact, we see DOCSIS 4.0 as an opportunity to capture even more hardware market share. And of course, the quick way we’ve been able to adapt because of a software basis of the core is a big part of the agility and speed there. So, we see 4.0 as a positive in terms of strengthening the competitive position and frankly, from a hardware perspective, it’s a higher price point.

So, from multiple perspectives it’s a good thing. Although there may be a little bit of delay in the market as some folks begin to look ahead to DOCSIS 4.0 product. You also touched and maybe related to that to market share more broadly. Look, we do not think that we are losing any market share. In fact, we think what the politically correct word is we think that we have by far and away leadership share on the software core, the only real virtualized solution out there. On the hardware side of things though, we think we actually continue to exceed our expectations in terms of market share and in particular, the most recent edition of the DeLorean Report, I think calls out for the first time Harmonic as the clear market leader here in all things DAA and vCMTS.

And maybe last but not least, you asked about the software, hardware balance and indeed I think what you saw in the second quarter was lighter software — hardware excuse me for the reasons we’ve discussed but you saw pretty strong software which is why the mix kind of tilted and the margins were as strong as they are. So, no doubt about it. Our strength in software I would call commanding. On the hardware front though, I’ll take the opportunity to remind everybody that we have a couple of different models out there and while some customers are buying our Node and our RPD. There’re some customers, particularly overseas where we actually just provide the RPD inside of a third-party node platform and in fact we have some North America customers who are looking at that model as well and to your side comment that’s more than fine by us frankly.

The RPD is the highest value, the highest margin part of the hardware solution. And if we can piggyback on third-party enclosures and whatnot, it’s goodness, even though it does reflect in maybe a lower headline revenue number from a gross profit perspective, the business is very strong and in many regards that’s what you saw play out in the second quarter. So, in summary, we don’t think we’re losing any market share in terms of lost opportunity. We are pursuing a couple of different business models that may tilt towards a higher software mix and we think that the advent of DOCSIS 4.0 is doing nothing but solidifying our position in the market.

Tim Savageaux: Great. Thank you very much.

Patrick Harshman: Forgive me, but did that cover what you were after?

Tim Savageaux: It absolutely did. I really appreciate it. Thanks.

Patrick Harshman: All right, thank you.

Operator: Thank you. One moment for our next question. And our next question comes from the line of Alyssa Shreves from Barclays. Your question, please?

Alyssa Shreves: Hi, this is Alyssa Shreves on from Barclays. Just could you talk a little bit about the broadband slowdown? Specifically, when did you kind of see in the quarter customers kind of changing their plans and delaying? And was it all at the same time or did you start to see it accelerate? And then, also, can you talk a little bit about in which GEOs you’re seeing the weakness in video? Thanks.

Patrick Harshman: Okay, thanks for the question, Alyssa. The changing requests or direction we started receiving for customers on broadband were really back-half of the quarter, mid-quarter and onwards. And yes, I don’t think there’s much information to be further parsed by exact timing, but more on the back end, and as you can see, modest impact on the second quarter, really, and this is more of a third quarter impact and somewhat movement to fourth quarter, as evidenced in our guidance. On the video side of the business, the weakness is definitely overseas and we think it’s really macro related. Our SaaS business is strong worldwide. Our video appliance business was quite robust in North America. The real weakness that we saw really manifest as delays, not lost project, but customers kind of saying, well, you know what?

We’re not ready to pull the trigger this quarter as planned. We’d like to do it a little later in the year. That kind of dialog we saw in several instances internationally.

Alyssa Shreves: Thanks.

Patrick Harshman: All right. Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. This does conclude the question-and-answer session of today’s program. I’d like to hand the program back to management for any further remarks.

Patrick Harshman: All right, well, thank you all for joining us again today. Through our prepared remarks, and I think this is very good Q&A session. I hope it’s evident that the fundamental market drivers on which we’re focused remain in full force and we believe will for the mid to long-term. There’s no doubt about it. We’ve laid out our best understanding and as Walter said, we believe conservative understanding what the remainder of this year looks like. But make no mistake, we’re playing long ball here, and we’re extremely excited about the future of this business. We’re 100% focused on execution, and we look forward to keeping you apprised of our progress. Thank you all, again. Good day.

Operator: Thank you, ladies and gentlemen for your participation in today’s conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Good day.