Tim Savageaux: Got it. And last question for me is given the growth that you’ve seen and the kind of metrics you’ve discussed in the past, where do we stand in terms of major additional capacity additions in this facility.
Seamus Grady: Yes, facility problem it seems in a funny in a way it seems crazy that we’re even that we’re even talking about it, but it is something we have to keep a close eye on as we ramp up it seems like at the blink of an eye ago that we opened Building 8 in Chonburi, it’s now completely full and Building 9 is off to a flying start, so we’ll be keeping a close eye on that. I think in all probability you could say well, if we pull the trigger too early what are the implications of that, they’re very, very small implications really. So, typically what we said in the past is once we get to 70% utilization in our last building, we’ll build another building whether we do that this time around or whether we pull the trigger a little bit earlier remains to be seen but I think we’re, I would say stay tuned over the next couple of quarters, it’s not going to take us 5 years or anything like that to get to capacity in Building 9, we’re off to a great start there, I was there last week and the facilitation that’s going on in Building 9 and the expansion is just amazing and it’s really encouraging to see and whether it was good look or good planning on our part I think our timing on building nine months as it turns out exactly right, little bit of luck I think never hurt anyone.
So, we’ll be keeping a close eye on that Tim and once we do make that decision we communicate it on this call and in due course but again the cost would be subject to Csaba correcting me, I would say if I put a range on $50 million to $60 million for another one million square feet and about a one year to 18 months time horizon. But yes, it’s something we’d be keeping a close eye on Tim.
Seamus Grady: Great, thanks very much.
Seamus Grady: Thank you, Tim.
Operator: Thank you and one moment for our next question. And we have a follow-up question from the line of Samik Chatterjee with JPM. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Samik Chatterjee: Hi, thanks for taking the follow-ups. I’ll be quick I promise. Just Csaba, any color on I know you mentioned the gross margin moderated sequentially because of the merit increases. But as you embed that now into the cost structure, puts and takes on how to think about gross margin going forward and then Seamus either for you or Csaba, like the automotive revenue declining and you said it will decline modestly is that more of a temporary production led headwind or is this a fall-off of the legacy programs while growth is sort of continuing on the new programs? Thank you, any clarification on those two items?
Seamus Grady: Maybe I’ll take the automotive question first and then I will let Csaba discuss the gross margin. Yes, we saw some I would call it inventory digestion going on in automotive. This past quarter we think it’s primarily temporary, there may be another quarter or so of inventory digestion but nothing to get too concerned about. We remain optimistic about our EV charging business overall, but like any business that’s ramping, it’s a little bit of inventory digestion going on. If you look at our overall revenue, we’ve always said we’re around kind of the $90 million mark since we overcame the component charges a couple of quarters ago. So, it’s been pretty stable actually. If you look at the last few quarters in our Q3, we had $94 million of automotive revenue.
Q4 was $93 million and then Q1 was $88 million. So, not a huge amount of variation, kind of normal variability as our customers go through inventory, inventory digestion I would say. But overall we remain optimistic about that business.
