So I feel like we’re positioned there to procure the rest and hopefully, a better service price environment for steel. And then as far as sand and water is concerned, those are largely locked in and feel good. One thing I’d say about sand, that’s important to note because that’s something that has really been backers in other parts of the country. Appalachia, the large part of the sand that we procure is not is it a different market than what people are seeing in basin sand in the Permian. A lot of the sand that we’re getting is coming from Wisconsin, Northern White. So it’s a little bit it’s not — hasn’t been as exposed as much service price inflation as other places in the country. So that’s sort of how we see the service cost sensitivities and feel like we’re in a good position and can be flexible and hopefully take advantage of a better service cost environment in the second half of this year.
Neal Dingmann: Yes, definitely, it seems like the applicant guys are in better price or better area there. And just maybe lastly, just on housekeeping. I’m just wondering — you mentioned about the $50 million adjustment per month color on the purchase price for the adjusted to included in Tug Hill. I’m just wondering, is that included in the Tug Hill hedges? Or is that incremental?
David Khani: The $50 million, is that what you just said?
Neal Dingmann: Yes. You mentioned about isn’t there — with that, you mentioned that $50 million per month regarding the purchase price adjustment, I’m just wondering, is that included in the Tug Hill hedges? Or is that incremental?
David Khani: Well, so I think in the first 6 months of last — so last year, we basically believe it was probably generate about $300 million to $350 million of excess free cash flow that would lower the purchase price. Roughly half of it goes to cash. Half of it goes to reducing the share count. And so with their hedges, if you thought the free cash flow still trends along that same pace, you might have, we’ll call somewhere in that same vicinity in the second half of the year. So you could — maybe you talk about 600 plus of purchase price adjustments that will help lower that purchase price. So the hedges will just solidify that.
Operator: The next question comes from Roger Read of Wells Fargo. Your line is now open.
Roger Read: Yes. Just one quick question probably for you, Toby. Just on — as you think about gas prices, do you think in the end, it’s more about the absolute decline risk in gas prices? Or do you think it’s going to be more about duration of, let’s just say, something below the average breakevens out there that ultimately forces activity and production lower and then maybe creates a little headroom for you on service costs by the latter part of this year.
Toby Rice: Yes. I think there’s a couple of things that are happening from an activity level, as these mature basins — or the shale plays continue to mature, the amount of activity levels will lower over time that should have an impact on lowering service costs. But also the other thing that’s taking place is the breakevens in the United States is rising as operators are moving to Tier 2 geology and both in geography and also in the zones that they’re completing. That will have the impact of increasing the marginal breakeven price of gas. That will help solidify price. The other thing I’d say is, as far as duration is concerned, I mean the one thing that we’re seeing is the call for cheap reliable clean energy. And if we learned one thing in 2022, looking what happened in Ukraine and Russia, the lesson learned there is energy security matters.
