Jim Teague: $160 million in really key quarters. I mean, those kind of bolt-on deals will do all day long. As to PDH 3, I’ll throw Chris D’Ann out of my office if he walks in with PDH 3.
Randy Fowler: And as one astute analysts put it, it takes money to make money.
Operator: Our next question comes from the line of Neal Dingmann with Truist.
Neal Dingmann: My question is also on the petrochem and refined segment specifically. Could you give me an idea of your sales volume expectations for the remainder of the year for your Chambers County propylene facility, wondered any more downtime expected there? And then maybe secondly, just is that PDH 2 facility in Texas Western System still on pace for next quarter and later this year respectively?
Jim Teague: I think Texas Western is toward the end of the year, Graham?
Graham Bacon: Yes, that come on in stages.
Jim Teague: And PDH 2 is midyear?
Graham Bacon: Yes.
Chris D’Anna: And just in terms of sales, we expect those to be pretty stable. It’s really a function of refinery grade propylene supply coming out of the refineries and what their run rates are. And so looking at cracks today, it’s pretty profitable for them to run. So I would expect that to continue.
Operator: And our next question comes from the line of John Mackay with Goldman Sachs.
John Mackay: Maybe just going back to the Permian. We had — I guess there was a bit of a debate last quarter on just the pace of growth going forward. The Shin Oak kind of pushed to the right fell out of that, I guess. Just curious if you could update us there on again, when you think Shin Oak might be needed? I know you have the early €˜25 in the deck. So maybe just puts and takes on that timing and your general view on kind of NGL growth beyond this year out of the Permian.
Justin Kleiderer: This is Justin Kleiderer, I’ll speak to Shin Oak timing. I think we still feel good about that first half of €˜25. There’s probably room for it to be accelerated given its two years from now. And in the meantime, we’ve got various amounts of options to create incremental capacity if that first half ’25 doesn’t prove early enough and we can’t accelerate it. So we feel good at least for the next couple of years that we’ve got enough capacity. And then beyond that, we’ll continue to evaluate what projects are needed to make sure that we have enough capacity going forward.
Tony Chovanec: Relative to Permian production, just so everybody know the EIA reported yesterday growth in crude from year end €˜21 year to November of 741,000 barrels, that was down from what they reported in October. So I know that we hear different things and everybody looks at their own acreage and capture our own numbers. But these are — for lack of a better term, these are what the EIA calls actuals. We go back and we gauge our numbers to them. So we take a look back in our own models and directionally, these numbers are correct. And almost all of it, I’ll use that term , but comes out of the Permian Basin, has liquids associated with it. So no change in the trend for us relative to what the production profile out in the Permian Basin.
John Mackay: One quick one should be easy. Can you just remind us, are we done with the Eagle Ford contract roll offs? And maybe an update on what you’re thinking about the basin overall?
