Ross Fowler: So first one maybe to follow-up on Nick’s question, just shifting back to Indiana. How are you thinking about the timing and what consideration should we be thinking about for the Indiana rate case?
Lynn Good: So Ross, we evaluate as you know periodically, where we are with capital investment, rate case cycle. And in Indiana, we have a lot of investment in riders, but some of those riders are 80% of the investment. So we need a general base rate case to pick up the other 20%. We also have in front of us in Indiana, CPCNs for generation that are in our regulatory mines or regulatory calendar. So we’ll continue to evaluate that, what is the right timing, when do we go in? How does it relate to other things that we’re trying to accomplish in Indiana, and by flagging it for you in this call, we’re indicating that it’s under review, and we’ll keep you posted as we get closer to a final decision.
Ross Fowler: Appreciate that very much. And then maybe one for you, Brian. But — as I look at the bridge to 2024, over 40% of that is coming from this $0.12 of other. And I think I get the higher interest rates impact and maybe can you scale the — or scope the other things in there for me, there’s a lower tax rate and then there’s return from investments. And I think that’s probably coming from either Bison the insurance side or the NMC stuff in Saudi Arab around Petrochem? Or how do I think about that as I look at by 2024?
Brian Savoy: Yeah. I would point to the tax optimization, Ross. In 2023, we had an opportunity for an item in tax optimization that was, I would say, outsized from our normal tax optimization work that part of our agility efforts, which you would expect us to do because we had record mild weather, we were looking at every opportunity to offset that. As we look forward in 2024, we’re seeing a more consistent level of tax optimization that we had in previous years. So that’s the other major driver in the other section. But we still have a robust set of tax optimization and our tax team is doing a fabulous work on that front. But that’s what I’d point to. And we signaled our agility of $300 million that we were pursuing in 2023. About half of it will be sustainable. And I would point to that tax optimization as about that half that’s not sustainable.
Ross Fowler: Okay. Okay. I got you. Thank you, Brian for that clarity. Appreciate it very much.
Lynn Good: Thank you.
Operator: This concludes our Q&A session for today. So I’ll turn the call back over to Lynn Good for any closing comments.
Lynn Good: Well, let me close by just thanking everyone for participation today. I know, when we do these annual updates. We give you 40 to 50 slides to digest. So, we’re also available for questions and comments, the IR team, Brian, I’m available, and really appreciate your interest and investment in Duke. Thanks so much.
Operator: This concludes today’s call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.
