David Slater: Yeah. Thanks for that question. Yeah, I don’t really have any comment on that. I mean we’ve talked about this for many quarters and most of the year. From our perspective nothing has changed. I think our partner has a very full plate of activities that are in front of them and wish them the best with that, but our view hasn’t changed. We’re very happy with the asset. We’re very happy that we’re the majority owner of the asset. The asset has performed exceptionally well this year. Beyond pro forma when we acquired grid’s interest a year ago, and again I’m not going to add to any comments that I’ve made previously on this topic and I think this is probably a question really for TC.
Michael Blum: Got it. Understood. Thank you.
Operator: The next question is from John Mackay with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.
John Mackay: Hey, good morning, everyone. Thanks for the time. I wanted to just pick up on maybe two things for the EBITDA guide for 2023 and 2024. Third quarter was better than we expected, but we had — you guys narrowed the range but didn’t guide us higher in 2023. Are there any offsets for fourth quarter that we should think about versus your current run rate? And then for 2024 you guys have added a few projects, pulled forward a few projects but that number is also unchanged. Wondering if you can just bridge the gap on both of those? Thanks.
David Slater: Sure. Good morning, John, great question. So I’ll talk 2023. And, yeah, we had a really strong quarter here in Q3, which will set us up with high confidence for delivering the year — this year. We narrowed the band just reflecting what I’ll call the water under the bridge so far this year. As you know we like to deliver strong years. So I’ll just leave it at that. In terms of looking at Q4 and I’m inferring from the way you asked the question, how does the gathering side of the business look in Q4, I’ll refer you back to my comments, my fundamental comments in my opening remarks we’ve all heard from a lot of the public producers that there’s been a deferral and delay of some of the completion activity as a derivative of the low prices that they experienced this summer and earlier in the fall.
So that’s going to play through. It will play through. But again this is a very short-term phenomenon. It doesn’t change their long-term plan and how they expect to use the system long-term. So it’s a timing issue. So I’ll leave it at that for comments on the balance of this year. In terms of next year, it’s our practice to refresh and update the prompt year on the year-end call. And will digest all the puts and takes across the portfolio and play that through for 2024 and for 2025 and it has been our practice to always give an early outlook plus a year. So I think we’ll just leave our comments until the year-end call. And the reason why we do that John just for everyone’s benefit is so that we have high confidence in the guidance that we provide to you is that we wait as you would expect we get a lot of information from all of our customers.
That information becomes much better, crisper and more reliable as you get to the end of the year and the January time frame when they’re locking down their plants. So that gives us high confidence in the guidance that we provide for the prompt year and gives us a lot of confidence in the prompt plus year as well. So, a lot of the focus that we’ll have on 2024 is going to be on the gathering side of our business, the pipeline side. As we’ve talked about all year, it’s been performing — just outstanding performance on the pipeline side of our business. And as you know, that’s the largest portion of our business, that’s about two-thirds of our business. So we’ve seen some really strong fundamentals playing out both in the south around our LEAP asset as well, across all of our pipeline assets in the North and that gives us tremendous confidence for the year and for the years ahead.
So…
