Raj Vennam: Yeah. I think — so, especially with Ruth’s coming in, you should — we ended the fiscal year with closer to $390 million. I’d say at this point, our best estimate is probably still maintaining closer to that 3.7% of total sales, which would get you closer to the call it $430 million for the year. Obviously, plus or minus 10 there. But that would be the number we would — that is embedded in our guidance. Yeah.
Andrew Charles: Helpful. Thank you.
Raj Vennam: Hey. By the way, as we talk about G&A, I just want to clarify one other thing. We do expect the cadence to be a little different. So, Q1 is probably going to be the highest level, call it closer to $115 million and then kind of tick down $5 million a quarter throughout the — for the next few quarters. It’s how we think about it just from a cadence standpoint. So there are some things that — sudden specific variables that are influencing Q1 to be higher.
Operator: Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Chris Carril with RBC Capital Markets. Please proceed with your questions.
Chris Carril: Hi. Good morning. So, just returning to the same restaurant sales growth guidance for ’24, can you provide any more detail on how you’re thinking about your largest brands, Olive Garden and LongHorn and how they fit into this? We’ve been pretty clear so far on fine dining and how you expect comparisons to impact that segment in the very near term. But just curious if you could provide any additional thoughts in your largest brands and how they factor into the comp guide.
Raj Vennam: Yeah. I would say the way we’re thinking about it is our core casual brands are probably closer to the — I guess, let’s just go through the big brands. Olive Garden is probably — would be in the middle of the range is our expectation going in. And then LongHorn would be outside of that range to the upside primarily because of stake inflation and the pricing there is probably a little bit higher, would need to be. And then Fine Dining to be a little bit south of that. And that’s really how we’re thinking about it.
Chris Carril: Okay. Great. That’s really helpful. And then, you mentioned productivity improvements helped to drive the improvement and labor in the 4Q. So how are you thinking about productivity improvements from here maybe in the context of Ruth’s and then ex-Ruth’s and just how much of a tailwind that could be in ’24? Thanks.
Rick Cardenas: Yeah, Chris. As we’ve said before, over the last years, our brands have done a great job improving productivity. We would expect to continue to have some productivity improvements over time, but not to the extent that we had during COVID. As we continue to look at improving training, having turnover come down, that should help productivity little bit. We’re not going to have to discuss Ruth’s right now. We’ve only owned them for eight days. So we’ll have to just get through the — getting through integration is going to actually probably be a productivity downer for them for a little bit. So let’s let us get Ruth’s under our belt for a little bit longer than eight days before we talk about the details there. But as I said, labor productivity, we should expect it to tick better as the year progresses as we continue to improve on our turnover and as we continue to improve our training.
Chris Carril: Great. Thanks so much.
Operator: Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of David Tarantino with Baird. Please proceed with your questions (ph).
