CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (NYSE:CTO) Q1 2024 Earnings Call Transcript

CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (NYSE:CTO) Q1 2024 Earnings Call Transcript May 3, 2024

CTO Realty Growth, Inc.  isn’t one of the 30 most popular stocks among hedge funds at the end of the third quarter (see the details here).

Operator: Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the CTO Q1 2024 Earnings Conference Call. At this time all participants’ are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker’s presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your speaker for today, Lisa Vorakoun. Please go ahead.

Lisa Vorakoun: Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today for the CTO Realty Growth first quarter 2024 operating results conference call. With me today is our CEO and President, John Albright. Before we begin, I’d like to remind everyone that many of our comments today are considered forward-looking statements under federal securities laws. The company’s actual future results may differ significantly from the matters discussed in these forward-looking statements and we undertake no duty to update these statements. Factors and risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations are disclosed from time-to-time in greater detail in the company’s Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and other SEC filings. You can find our SEC reports, earnings release, supplemental and most recent investor presentation on our website at ctoreit.com. And now I’ll turn it over to John for his prepared remarks.

John Albright: Thanks, Lisa. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. I’d like to start off by thanking our former CFO, Matt Partridge, for his many contributions to our company. We wish him well with his new opportunity. We’ve engaged a national search firm to assist us in identifying our new CFO and have started interviewing candidates. Today, we’ll provide a brief overview of our first quarter results, discuss the continued strength we’re seeing in the leasing front and highlight our recent transactions. Starting with our operating business. We had yet another successful quarter of leasing activity in the first quarter. We signed over 100,000 square feet of new leases, renewals, options and extensions at an average rent of $27.12 per square foot.

That’s over 200,000 square feet of leasing activity in the past six months. The leasing activity was relatively widespread and included the signing of a replacement of Regal Cinemas at Beaver Creek Crossings at Apex, North Carolina. The new 45,000 square foot lease is with a well-known successful regional fitness operator. The rent is meaningfully higher than the rent under the existing Regal lease, given the reduced rent in place associated with the bankruptcy of Regal. The fitness operator tenant is tentatively scheduled to open for business in mid-2025. Comparable growth in new cash base rents versus expiring rents stood at an impressive 68%, which includes a significant impact of the Regal replacement tenant. We anticipate this activity will help push same-store NOI in 2024 and even more so in late 2025, when we get the full benefit of our rent commencement under some of the larger leases signed on acquired vacancy.

Given our recent leasing activity, our signed, but not open pipeline now represents 3.5% of prospective occupancy pickup and over 5% of our existing quarter end cash flow base rents. We ended the quarter with a strong increase in occupancy, finishing at 92.6% increase of 2.3% from year-end 2023. Additionally, our lease occupancy increased by 1% from year end 2023 to 94.3%. Turning to our investments for the quarter. We acquired the final property within the Sprouts grocery-anchored Exchange at Guinea in Beauford, Georgia, for $2.3 million. Additionally, as announced in March, we purchased Marketplace a seminal Town Center in the Sanford submarket of Orlando, Florida for $68.7 million. The multi-tenanted retail tower centers over 315,000 square feet located on 41 acres along I-4 just over 20 miles northeast of downtown Orlando.

The property is 98% leased. It is incurred by Burlington, Marshalls, World Market, Petco, Ross Dress for Less, Old Navy, Ulta, Beauty and Five Below. With this acquisition, the Orlando Metroplex, which has seen tremendous growth over the past few years is now in our top five markets, representing over 8% of our in-place cash-based rent. And Florida has moved into our top three states with over 17% of our annual cash base rent. Additionally, we originated $10 million first mortgage loan on a retail development in West Palm Beach, Florida, at a fixed interest rate of 11%, of which $6.7 million was funded during the first quarter. On the disposition front, we are pleased to complete the sale of our mixed-use property in Santa Peg, New Mexico for $20 million and ex a cap rate of 8.2% and a gain of $4.6 million.

From a capital recycling perspective, we will continue to prioritize selling smaller noncore assets for redeployment into attractive investment opportunities. After quarter end, the company issued just over 1.7 million shares of our 6.38% preferred stock for net proceeds of $33 million. With the net proceeds from this issuance and the $15 million early prepayment of the Sable Pavilion seller financing loan, we were able to pay down all of our floating rate debt under our credit facility subsequent to the quarter end. This gives us ample liquidity to pursue larger format retail center acquisitions in what we believe is a very favorable environment with limited buyer competition. With that, I’d like to hand the call back over to Lisa.

Lisa Vorakoun: Thanks, John. As of the end of the quarter, our income property portfolio consisted of 20 properties comprised of approximately 3.9 million square feet of rentable space located in eight states and 11 markets. The geographic makeup of our portfolio includes top-performing markets such as Atlanta, Dallas, Richmond, Orlando and Jacksonville. As we’ve mentioned in the past, these markets have demonstrated outstanding potential for growth and are delivering extensive employment and population expansion, which bodes well for our tenants and the underlying value of our properties. From a tenant makeup perspective, our top retail tenants consist of well-known operators such as Best Buy, Ross, Whole Foods, T.J. Maxx, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Darden Restaurants and Publix.

As John previously mentioned, at quarter end, occupancy was 93%, and our leased occupancy was 94% with 95% of our portfolio’s annualized cash-based rents coming from retail and mixed-use properties, and the majority of those rents coming from grocery anchored, lifestyle and tower center assets. The overarching fundamentals for real estate are strong, and these properties continue to benefit from outsized tenant demand and limited supply. Jumping into our earnings results for the quarter. Our earnings for the first quarter of 2024 exceeded expectations with core FFO per share coming in at $0.48 per share, representing a 23% increase compared to the first quarter of 2023. First quarter 2024 AFFO was $0.52 per share, representing a 21% increase over the first quarter of 2023.

First quarter 2024 core FFO and AFFO as compared to the first quarter of 2023 benefited from a full quarter’s impact of our second quarter 2023 acquisition, which included Plaza at Rockwell and out parcels at the Exchange Equinet, as well as the partial quarter impact of Marketplace at Seminal Town Center offset by asset dispositions in the same period. Core FFO and AFFO also benefited from rent commencements at several properties. Our same-property NOI increased by 6% compared to the first quarter of 2023, which increase was largely due to the lease-up of several properties, including the collection at Forsyth and West Broad Village as well as increased percentage rents at several properties. We do anticipate our same-property NOI growth will normalize during the remainder of 2024 due to certain onetime benefits included in our first quarter 2024 results, primarily related to finalizing our 2023 CAM reconciliation billing.

As we announced in February, we distributed a first quarter regular cash dividend of $0.38 per share resulting in a Q1 2024 AFFO payout ratio of 73% and an attractive current annualized yield of approximately 8.8%. Turning to our balance sheet. As of the end of the quarter, our total long-term debt outstanding was $543 million. Net debt to total enterprise value was just over 53% and our net debt-to-EBITDA was 7.6 times. While we ended the quarter with total cash and restricted cash of nearly $15 million and had $59.5 million of floating rate debt on our revolving credit facility, as John mentioned earlier, in April, we were able to pay down our revolver balance, and we currently have no floating rate debt outstanding on the revolver. On the capital markets front, during the first quarter, we repurchased nearly 41,000 shares of our common stock in the open market for approximately $700,000 at an average price of $16.28 per share.

We also issued over 125,000 shares of common stock through our ATM program for total net proceeds of $2.1 million at an average issuance price of $17.05 per share. And finally, as a part of the earnings release yesterday, we increased our full-year 2024 core FFO and AFFO earnings guidance to take into account our first quarter results and go-forward expectations. Our 2024 core FFO and AFFO guidance both increased by $0.04 per share. We also reduced our disposition guidance to a range of $50 million to $75 million for the balance of the year. And with that, I’ll turn the call back to the operator to open the line up for questions and answers.

See also 15 Best Places to Retire in Montana and 20 Beautiful Places in the World Ruined by Overtourism.

Q&A Session

Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question today will be coming from Gopal Mehta from Alliance Global Partners. Your line is open.

Gopal Mehta: Good morning. Thanks, I wanted to ask you on your Orlando acquisition. Hoping to get some more color on any value-add opportunities in that property? And maybe some color on the mark-to-market rent upside?

John Albright: Yes. Thanks very much. So there’s not a lot of value add there. It’s fairly stabilized. But what we liked about there was some vacancy that we think will be able to get leased up. And then there’s some below-market leases that really have a lot of opportunity, roughly 20,000 to 40,000 square feet is the below market. And so even though it’s very stabilized as far as occupancy, there is some future opportunity to drive some NOI growth.

Gopal Mehta: Okay. Second question on your disposition guidance that was lower. And hoping to get some more color on why that was lowered.

John Albright: Yes. I mean where we don’t want to feel pressed to sell some assets. If we had some — an acquisition, larger acquisition lined up, we would certainly move through some assets we want to sell but we want to be patient on the sell side. And so we — after doing the preferred raise kind of like there’s one real need to kind of push through some dispositions.

Gopal Mehta: Okay, thank you.

John Albright: Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question will be coming from Rob Stevenson of Janney Montgomery and Scott. Your line is open.

Rob Stevenson: Good morning, guys. John, I guess just continuing on the theme of dispositions. Any incremental update on your thinking on the remaining office asset at this point? Is that something that you guys think will transact this year? Or is it looking like more of a ’25 or later? How should we be thinking about that at this point?

John Albright: Yes. I mean, I don’t really doesn’t feel like it’s going to be this year. We’re talking with the tenant, but the tenant is in no rush. The facility is bind for their uses, and they have other things that they’re working on. So we’re not — we’re kind of need to be in the queue as far as when they can kind of get around to discussions with us. So unless we have like again, a really large acquisition that we’re able to transact on. We’re not going to feel like we need to be in a hurry with that. I’d love to take you out there some time because once you see what’s going on in the area, the property positions only getting better and better with time. So it’s kind of like a nice bottle of Bordeaux in the seller. It’s only getting better. I know a lot of people obviously rightfully get nervous about office. And that’s why we moved through a lot really fast. But this one, you don’t really need to feel like you had exposure.

Robert Stevenson: Okay. And then I think in your prepared comments, you talked about the lease but not open yet portion of the portfolio. When do the bulk of those leases commence and start paying rent? Is that late in this year with the biggest financial impact in ’25? Or is it really mostly all in ’25 that you’ll start actually seeing that pop up in the occupancy numbers and then also in the rental line?

John Albright: Yes. It’s mostly the back half of this year. So 2025 is really the year that’s going to get a lot of love on the revenue coming forward, especially the replacement of the Regal, that one is probably mid-2025. But the rest of the signed but not open is really the back half of this year.

Robert Stevenson: Okay. And then any — on the other side of that coin, any known move-outs at this point of note over the next 18 to 24 months?

John Albright: No. It’s — we keep on having the incentives up for any issues. But so far, all green light.

Robert Stevenson: Okay. And then last one for me. After the preferred deal, how are you thinking about incremental use of preferreds going forward? Do you think the cap structure right now is maxed out at this point on preferred? Is there still room for you to be able to do that if the common isn’t at a price that’s to your liking? How should we be thinking about that and where that sort of fits in your capital stack?

John Albright: Yes. I mean we feel like we did the appropriate amount. And what — one thing I’d point out is we did the size necessary for the preferred to be index qualified and it’s gone into the index. And as you probably noticed, the preferred has just ripped in price and volume. So that’s going to give us a nice tailwind of cost of capital in the future. But if we get productive here on some acquisitions, we probably won’t lean into the preferred until kind of balancing out the rest of the capital structure.

Robert Stevenson: Okay, that’s helpful. Thanks, and have a great weekend.

John Albright: Thank you, you too.

Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question will be coming from R.J. Milligan of Raymond James. Your line is open.

R.J. Milligan: Hey, good morning. First, just to clarify, I’m not sure if I missed it, but for the big same-store NOI growth in single tenant, is that percentage rents? Or is that CAM catch ups? Or is it both?

John Albright: Yes, I’m going to let Lisa answer that, R.J.

Lisa Vorakoun: Hey R.J., Yes, so really what that is on the single tenant side is our properties we have in Daytona Beach that we bought in the back of 2024. We kind of bought those as vacant and rents came on board in Q3 of 2023. So what you’re seeing there is about $140,000 of rent in Q1 2024 when there was none in Q1 of last year. So that’s about 15% of the 21% increase there.

R.J. Milligan: That’s helpful. And then, John, maybe you could just elaborate a little bit more on the acquisition environment. Obviously, there’s been some adjustment in this higher for longer interest rate environment. I’m just curious what you’re seeing out there in terms of sellers and seller expectations.

John Albright: Yes. So the good news is we’re seeing plenty of opportunities. And so we’re kind of being patient and bidding appropriately for where we think there’s value. But there are clearly other buyers out there. But it’s really finding given that we’re an all-cash buyer, we’re seeing a lot of the competition on the buyer side, needing financing. So it’s really the sellers who they kind of go through the analysis. Do they want to take a risk going with a buyer that needs financing, subject to financing, which that buyer is typically higher than us or do they just want to go with an all-cash more certainty buyer at a lower price. And so it’s really waiting for those good opportunities for us. So the good news is there’s plenty of opportunity out there.

So I think sellers are — if they’re in the market now, it’s really part of their plan to sell, whether there’s financing that’s coming due, whether there’s redemption queues and the funds that own these properties or it was just basically partners looking for time to sale sort of thing. So it’s a good environment, and we’re just trying to be patient.

R.J. Milligan: Thanks, John, just to add to that, I’m curious what is the interest rate environment where you think that there’s going to be more transactions? Is it stability in interest rates? Or is it lower interest rates? Because obviously, this morning, we’re seeing the 10-year come down and just there’s been a lot of sellers who said, we think rates are going to come down later, so we’re going to stay on the sidelines. So I’m just curious, is it — are you looking more for stability or just for lower rates in general?

John Albright: I think from the sell side, people are not really waiting. If they’re in the market now, they need to sell in the next six months or so. I think that as far as your general question there, I think with stability and kind of knowing that there’s going to be some rate cuts in the future. I think you’re going to see more buyers come off the sideline. And so that’s not going to be good for us. But we’re all trying to kind of get some transactions while the getting is good. So we are surprised to see some transactions happen at cap rates that are just slightly above the 10-year. And so it’s just like how does that math ever work. But there are some buyers that that kind of fits in their model. So I think any kind of stability in interest rates is really kind of does the trick.

R.J. Milligan: Thanks so much. That’s it for me.

John Albright: Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. One moment for the next question. And our next question is coming from Matthew Erdner of Jones Trading. Your line is open.

Matthew Erdner: Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks for taking the question. Could you talk a little bit about acquisition timing? Should we expect that to kind of happen more so in the near-term? Or is it back half ended? And then — can you also talk about the difference in opportunities that you’re seeing between the loans and just overall asset acquisitions?

John Albright: Yes. So the acquisitions are more kind of back half of the year. We were hoping to have something in the first half of the year, but didn’t work out. With regards to loans, there are certainly some acquisitions that we weren’t the winner, and we felt like there would be buyers that would need some help on the financing side. So we’ve offered it up, but so far, no takers. But I think we’re hopeful that we’ll have a little opportunity there as there are some really some great basis sort of property value add, a lot of heavy lift. So the financing market is not going to be very productive for these buyers, and it will be a pretty big gap in the capital structure, which we hope to fill.

Matthew Erdner: Yes, that’s helpful. Thank you, guys.

John Albright: Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. One moment for the next question. And our next question will be coming from John Massocca of B. Riley Securities.

John Massocca: Good morning. Just kind of quickly on the old Regal box. You mentioned those — the rents are kind of higher versus what Regal is paying. I guess how do they compare to Regal’s rents, maybe pre-bankruptcy?

John Albright: Yes. So pre-bankruptcy, it’s basically double-digits percentage up from their previous rent.

John Massocca: Okay. Very helpful. And then the Lake Worth loan investment or loan you put in place. Are there any kind of options on that to purchase the property or any kind of other kind of moving pieces to that loan besides just obviously, the interest income and the drawdown?

John Albright: Yes. There’s definitely, we do have a right of first refusal if certain cap rates are above a certain level. So we do have the right to acquire if the yields get to a level of interest to us.

John Massocca: Okay. That’s very helpful. And then kind of last kind of quick detail question. As we think about disposition guidance, I mean, the seller loan repayment included in that? Or to Sabal? Or is that kind of excluded just given the transaction occurred last year?

John Albright: Yes, it does not include that.

John Massocca: Okay, that’s it for me. Thank you very much.

John Albright: Great, Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. This concludes our Q&A session. As well, this concludes the meeting for today. Thank you all for joining. You may disconnect.