Michael Bondi: I’ll answer it this way in a more broader answer. In in the past couple of years, you’ve seen our EBITDA contributions come down from say, the 14%, that we were doing pre-COVID. As a company in all of our product areas, not just in the 911 area, we want to get back to those historical levels and if not exceed that. As we’ve articulated, we have a lot of initiatives going on right now and once we start to bear fruit, our expectation is that we will get there. So, I don’t want to overstate we have a lot of work to do. It’s certainly a challenging environment, but in the next couple of years, I would expect this to get back to that level.
Greg Burns: Okay. On the contract with Verizon, how many years has that extended for? And was there any change in pricing?
Michael Bondi: That contract was an annual renewal. It was at this point in time annual renewals, and in terms of pricing, just due to competitive aspects of it, we have a very good relationship with a Tier 1 carrier, and it was a seamless type of renewal.
Ken Peterman: Just rolled forward.
Greg Burns: Okay. The Tropo deliveries to the Marines, or maybe that was in bookings, can you remind us that the total size of that contract that you were awarded, and how much of that have you delivered on?
Ken Peterman: Greg, just to be clear, you’re talking about the marine contract for next gen Tropo?
Greg Burns: Yes.
Ken Peterman: Okay. That’s the contract we won about two years ago. I think the headline ceiling was $200 plus million, maybe $213 million. We initially got a $13 million order to run out the first leg of prototypes, which we delivered about a year ago. And they’ve been using them in the field and testing them. And this particular go around, it was a $50 plus million order that we received, which is sort of the first production run in terms of their needs for it, it’s something that they have a need and a desire for, it’s going to take some time to get the deliveries out based on the fact that it’s a very large order. But globally, there’s still a lot of headroom left on that contract. But in terms of our outlook, we’re just focusing on the current order that we have.
Greg Burns: Okay. And then the, the award to the U.S. Army, I think at the time, when you were awarded the Marine contract, the U.S. Army had a larger contract that they awarded to someone else is the is what you were awarded this quarter part of that, are they coming back to market? Like, what is the opportunity there?
Ken Peterman: Well, we were awarded, this quarter is completely independent of the Army situation. The Army situation is one that we are exploring, and working toward, because our equipment — as I mentioned, before, our equipment is proven in battle. And obviously, that’s a heck of a credential. So, what we’re doing is trying to leverage that, and have exploratory discussions that can lead to something that helps the Army be more effective as they get in the fight. But we don’t have any more to say on that right now.
Greg Burns: Okay. And then on the E911 side, any update on Ohio, is there any line of sight on when funding might be approved for that contract?
Michael Bondi: You want me to take that one?
Ken Peterman: Yes.
