Compass, Inc. (NYSE:COMP) Q1 2024 Earnings Call Transcript

Compass, Inc. (NYSE:COMP) Q1 2024 Earnings Call Transcript May 8, 2024

Compass, Inc. isn’t one of the 30 most popular stocks among hedge funds at the end of the third quarter (see the details here).

Operator: Thank you for standing by. My name is Kathleen and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Compass First Quarter 2024 Financial Results. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. I would now like to turn the call over to Richard Simonelli, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Richard Simonelli: Thank you, operator and good afternoon to all of you. Thank you for joining the Compass first quarter earnings call. Joining us today will be Robert Reffkin, our Founder and Chief Executive Officer and Kalani Reelitz, our Chief Financial Officer. In discussing our company’s performance, we will refer to some non-GAAP measures. You will find the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures in our first quarter 2024 earnings release posted on our Investor Relations website. We will be making forward-looking statements that are based on our current expectations, forecasts and assumptions and involve risks and uncertainties. These statements include our guidance for the second quarter of 2024 and full year 2024, including comments related to our operating expenses and free cash flow as well as our expectations for operational achievements.

Our actual results may differ materially from these statements. You can find out more information about risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could affect our results in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC and available on our Investor Relations website. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. All information in this presentation is as of today’s date, May 8 and we expressly disclaim any obligation to update this information. I’ll now turn the call over to Robert Reffkin. Robert?

Robert Reffkin: Thank you for joining us today for our first quarter 2024 results conference call. We had strong first quarter results with revenue towards the higher end of our guidance range and adjusted EBITDA that exceeded our guidance range and with our agents continuing to outperform the market. I am pleased to say that in Q1 2024 in a historically challenged market and the slowest quarter of the year, Compass generated positive free cash flow. This proves that our focus on cost reductions and cash generation, while still investing in agent growth in our proprietary technology platform are working. We grew revenue considerably. In Q1 2024, we generated an increase in revenue of 10% year-over-year as we increased transactions 7.1% from a year ago.

This compares favorably to the 3.5% decline in transactions for an entire market in the first quarter. We grew market share considerably. In Q1 2024, our quarterly market share increased 26 basis points year-over-year and 35 basis points on a sequential basis compared to Q4 2023. This is a testament to our agent productivity, which is further enhanced by a proprietary technology platform. I have shared repeatedly that Compass has the best agents in the industry and they are demonstrating their skill and experience navigating this difficult market. We continue to grow our agent base considerably. Our principal agent count has increased by nearly 1,000 agents between Q1 2023 and Q1 2024. This is a 7.3% increase, which is in stark contrast to industry trends.

The vast majority of agents that come to Compass tell us that the platform is the number one reason that they join. Originally, we organically in Q1 2024, we recruited 518 principal agents, the highest quarterly count since we ceased using cash and equity sign-on bonuses. Just last month in April, we added more than 1,000 principal agents with our accretive acquisition of Latter & Blum, the largest agency in the Gulf South and New Orleans. We are growing total agents faster than the market. At Compass, the number of total agents increased 2.1% year-over-year, while our three largest public company competitors by agent count reported decreases of 2%, decreases of 5%, and decrease of 6% in the same period. Moreover, this includes a reduction of over 1,000 non-productive agents in the last two quarters.

As a reminder, Latter & Blum is not in these numbers. Our balance sheet is strong. We ended Q1 with $165 million in cash and cash equivalents and no outstanding draws on our credit facility. We continue to drive cost improvements internally. We remain laser focused on driving efficiencies and reducing costs using technology. These improvements are also positively contributing to free cash flow. We reduced our OpEx in the first quarter to $211 million, an increase of $32 million from Q1 2023 OpEx of $243 million. We also reduced OpEx sequentially from Q4 2023 OpEx of $224 million. As always, Kalani, our Chief Financial Officer, will walk you through the financials later on this call. Moving on to the market, I still believe 2024 will be better than 2023 and that 2025 will be better than 2024, with the mid-cycle coming in 2026.

My opinion is influenced by the following. One, inventory is up 33% from a year ago. More inventory leads to more sales. Two, the percentage of all cash homebuyers is at the highest level in over 2 years, with the stock market nearing all-time high. Homebuyers are less reliant on mortgages. Three, the percentage of sellers with 4% mortgage rates or below is approaching 50% after dropping from approximately 75% at the peak. At this rate, we believe in 2 years, only approximately 25% of people may still have 4% mortgage rates or below, nearly eliminating the biggest bottleneck to the mid-cycle real estate market. And four, we now have over 2 years of pent-up demand assuming 2024 is just modestly better than 2023. This will end up being a 3-year housing downturn, forcing many people to live and remain in homes that they don’t want to be in.

We believe when rates come down, it will create a massive surge in transactions. The longer this lasts, the stronger the market bounce back will be. As I mentioned on the last call, assuming we continue to add net agents annually, maintain or modestly improve our agent economics and keep our $600 million of annual cost savings with minimal inflationary growth of 3% to 4% in 2025 and beyond, we believe that is a formula for generating hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars in adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow as the market recovers to a more normalized mid-cycle annual home sales level of 5.4 million to 5.6 million homes. But in the meantime, as I mentioned on our last earnings call, we have conservatively budgeted for a flat year on transactions and have brought our OpEx to that level.

We expect to be free cash flow positive in 2024, even after the cost of the first payment related to our litigation settlement, which we agreed to in April ‘24 and which we expect to make in the second quarter. The number one question we are getting from investors is, what is the settlement having on the business? What effect is it having? To help with this question, let me share with you five facts as well as five beliefs. Let’s start with the facts. One, buyers are using buyer agents now more than ever. In 2023, 89% of buyers use an agent, which is up from 75% just 20 years ago in 2003. Two, buyer agreements are not new and are already required in half of the states in which Compass operates. Thousands of Compass agents have been getting buyer representation agreements signed for years with no issue.

Three, 90% of our agents have been trained and are prepared for the rules. Since the verdict, we have provided our agents with 57 national training sessions and hundreds of local training sessions. With these efforts, I have seen our agents transition from initially being worried to now being confident. Four, per NAR and RealTrends, commissions were 5.5% in 2023 that compares to 5.1%, just 20 years earlier in 2003. Five, the industry has not seen a noticeable change in either the percentage of sellers that offer a buyer agent’s commission, nor in the average commission amount they are paying the buyer’s agent. We reviewed the MLS data in the markets generating the majority of our revenue since the announcement of the NAR settlement on March 15.

Here is what we found. More than 99% of new listings since March included offers to pay the buyer agent. Furthermore, more than 96% of all listings included offers to pay 2% or more and more than 67% are offering to pay 2.5% or more. To-date, we are not hearing from agents that any of these numbers are coming down. We believe the sensational press has caused significantly more reaction than what we expect to see from the actual rule changes. Specifically, the headlines since the March 15 NAR settlement have led to sellers asking if they need to pay a buyer agent more than ever before. And the result of those conversations is that sellers felt more than 99% of the time that it was still in their interest to provide a commission to buyer’s agents.

Now, here are some of our beliefs after conversations with hundreds of our agents across the country. One, we believe there will be little impact on the professional full-time agents. And Compass is composed of experienced full-time agents with very strong repeat and referral business. Two, we believe that agents will increasingly need to be able to sell their brokerages value proposition to communicate that to buyers. And that Compass has the best value proposition for buyers of any brokerage firm. For example, Compass has access to off-market inventory through Compass private exclusives and Compass coming soon, which is particularly important in a low inventory environment. Another example being buyer technology tools like Compass collections, like Compass digital tour sheets, like Compass CNA and the client dashboard launching in less than a year.

Three, we believe real estate agents are project managing a highly complex, multi-month process where they can often be coordinating between over a dozen different parties, loan officers, title officers, home inspectors, home appraisers, painters, stagers, photographers, videographers, agents on the other side and so on. We do not believe this important role will be displaced or discounted. Four, we believe the percentage of buyers and sellers that will use an agent will continue to be at the 90% level. Buying and selling a home is the biggest financial decision that most people make in their lifetime. However, for decades, people have been declaring that there will be a decline in the use of the real estate agent. In the last 20 years, since the rise of the internet, we have seen so many attempts to replace the agent, such as for sale by owner companies and then you had the Aggregators and then you had the Discounters, then you have the iBuyers and then the Power Buyers.

Yet despite all of these attempts to disrupt the real estate agent, buyers and sellers are using agents more than ever before. In the last 20 years, the percentage of buyers using an agent has increased from 75% in 2003 to 89% in 2023. And finally, we believe the vast majority of buyers and sellers prefer to pay for value over receiving a discount. If saving money on commissions was the most important thing to a seller, the majority of home sales would be for sale by owner. Obviously, that is not the case. In every market we know of, there are countless agents and brokerages that offer low commission rates. Discounters are not new and have been operating the market for decades. Many of these discount firms have either gone out of business or have not gained traction.

In fact, one of the largest public companies in residential real estate today is a professional discounter, offering the majority of the country discounted commissions with salaried agents for decades. This company can go to every seller and say, we have more than 50 million visitors on our site a month. More internet exposure than every other brokerage firm in the country combined for your listing. And we only charge 1%. However, after 20 years of offering discounts, they have only 0.8% market share. That is the proof that buyers and sellers are speaking with their checkbooks in that they prefer professional advice over a discount. In closing, I believe Compass is approaching an inflection point. We have done the hard work. We have brought expenses down and continue to grow our agent count and inventory advantage.

The market will inevitably come back. And when the Fed cuts rates, we will be in a position to thrive. I want to thank the entire Compass team of employees and agents. I see their commitment to making Compass successful with their incredible dedication and determination. It has allowed us to be named the number one real estate brokerage by sales volume in the United States for 3 years in a row and to have a strong foundation for the future. I will now pass it over to Kalani.

Kalani Reelitz: Thank you, Robert. Before getting into financials, I wanted to give you some details on our operations. In the first quarter, we processed 38,449 transactions, an increase of 7.1% from a year ago, which compares favorably to the 3.5% decline in transactions for the entire residential real estate market in the first quarter, as reported by National Association of Realtors. Our market share for Q1 2024 was 4.76%, up 26 basis points year-over-year and up 35 basis points sequentially from Q4 2023. Historically, we disclosed our principal agent count as an average for each quarter, which reflects the average of the principal agent count as of the end of each of the 3 months in any given quarter. We have been consistent with that since our IPO and the logic was to avoid the choppiness that can sometimes occur as a result of using a specific date at the end of the quarter versus an average across the quarter.

However, the feedback we have received from many analysts and investors is that this was a confusing metric. As a result, on a go-forward basis, we will disclose our principal agent count as of the last day of the quarter. On this basis, as of March 31, 2024, we had 14,591 principal agents compared to 13,601 as of March 31, 2023, an increase of 990 year-over-year or 7.3%. Our team recruited 518 principal agents in the first quarter, which was a strong recruiting quarter for us. Historically, the first quarter tends to be a higher than average quarter for attrition and we saw that again this Q1. Our net principal agent count shows a net decline of 92 in Q1, but this number includes more than 100 principal agents who exited that had no production in the prior 12 months and therefore their absence will have no impact on our financials.

Let me now turn to our first quarter financial results and our guidance for the second quarter. Our first quarter revenue was $1.05 billion, an increase of 10% from a year ago period, which was towards the higher end of our guidance range of $975 million to $1.075 billion. Gross transaction value was $40.1 billion in the first quarter, an increase of 9.6% from a year ago, reflecting the 7.1% increase in total transactions, combined with a slight increase in average selling price. Our non-GAAP commission expense as a percent of revenue was 81.8%, an increase of 39 basis points from Q1 of last year. The majority of this or about 25 of the 39 basis points is attributable to the acquisitions we closed since the year ago period that were made in markets with lower average splits than our overall brokerage.

Our total non-GAAP operating expenses, excluding commissions and other related expenses were $211 million for the first quarter. This reflects a reduction in expense of $32 million, or 13% from Q1 a year ago. Even after considering the added expenses we assumed related to each of the three brokerage acquisitions we completed in 2023 and our Florida Title acquisition this past January. I’m very pleased at the continued cost discipline in place across the organization, and we’ve committed to it as a management team, and it’s become part of the culture of how we operate as a company. That said, it’s important to note that Q1 OpEx figure is the low watermark for OpEx for the 2024 quarters, as there is some anticipated inflation to consider beginning in Q2, in particular related to the effect of compensation increases for our staff coming out of our annual performance cycle at the end of March.

The additional OpEx we assume from Latter & Blum acquisition that closed in April, and the seasonal increase in agent marketing expenses typically seen in the second quarter. As a reminder, the non-GAAP operating expenses we refer to exclude certain expenses that exclude from the calculation of adjusted EBITDA, including stock compensation, depreciation, and amortization, and in this quarter, the $57.5 million charge related to the class action litigation settlement. We’ve included tables on Pages 12 and 13 in our Q1 investor deck that reconcile these amounts to our GAAP operating expenses. Our adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter was a negative $20.1 million, which was slightly better than the favorable end of our guidance range of a negative $22 million to negative $40 million, and an improvement of 70% over the adjusted EBITDA loss of $67 million a year ago.

Our GAAP net loss for the first quarter was $133 million, which reflects the full charge of the $57.5 million settlement for the class action lawsuit that we previously disclosed. We took the full P&L charge during Q1. However, we expect that half of this amount will be paid in cash in Q2 of 2024 and the other half in Q2 of 2025. Free cash flow for the first quarter was positive, $5.9 million, which compares very favorably to negative $59 million of free cash flow in the year-ago quarter. It’s extremely rewarding to see the results of our efforts over the past 2 years. that have allowed us to generate positive free cash flow in the first quarter, which is a seasonally weak quarter for the brokerage industry. As we consider full year performance, it’s important to note that our positive cash flow in Q1 is partially due to a couple of timing items that will have offsetting effects later in the year.

First, many of the fees that are billed to our agents occur at the beginning of the calendar year, so our cash flow in the early part of the year is aided by the timing of when the fees are paid, and it will have an offsetting effect later in the year. Second, we tend to see seasonal impacts to working capital that are favorable in the first two quarters of the year when the cash collections from our brokerage commissions are higher at the end of each of these quarters compared to the beginning of these quarters. The opposite is generally true in Q3 and especially in Q4 when seasonality impacts working capital in a negative way. These two timing items should be neutral for the year but can create choppiness for individual quarters within the year.

For those listening to the call that are modeling cash flow for the year, you should not assume a similar conversion of adjusted EBITDA to free cash flow for the remaining quarters of 2024. With that said, I have maintained since I started here at Compass that we will be focused on free cash flow, and over the last six quarters, our operations and finance teams are delivering on that relentless focus, and the results are becoming more and more evident each quarter. We ended the first quarter with $166 million of cash and cash equivalents on our balance sheet, and we have no outstanding draws on our revolving line of credit. We believe we are well positioned to react to continued market challenges. Now, turning to our financial guidance, for Q2 of 2024, we expect revenue in the range of $1.6 billion to $1.7 billion, and we expect adjusted EBITDAs to be in the range of $55 million to $75 million.

Last quarter, we stated that for the full year of 2024, we are targeting a non-GAAP OpEx level between 855 to 875 with a midpoint of 865. As a reminder, the midpoint of this range equates to $850 million for the company’s core OpEx, plus the additional $15 million of OpEx from two acquisitions we closed in September 2023. We are maintaining that range for the current business, but are increasing the range – the total range by $12 million on both the low and high end to consider the additional OpEx for the balance of 2024 that we assumed for the Latter & Blum acquisition that we just closed in April. We expect this acquisition to be accretive to adjusted EBITDA in 2024, but the additional OpEx needs to be considered. Additionally, we are reiterating our expectation to be free cash flow positive for the full year of 2024.

I’ll end by saying thank you again to our agents and team members for all that you do for Compass, and I would now like to turn the call over to the operator to begin Q&A.

See also 15 Countries Hosting the Most Foreign Students in the World and 15 States With the Highest Rates of SNAP Recipients in the US.

Q&A Session

Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Jason Helfstein of Oppenheimer. Please go ahead.

Jason Helfstein: Thanks. Hi, everybody. Two questions. So, Robert, just first, maybe give us your thoughts on second half. Just broad thoughts as we’re all trying to work through our models. And then, secondly, it seemed like agent productivity improved in the quarter. Was this calling less productive agents or from kind of improvements in workflow or other factors or a combination of both? Thank you.

Robert Reffkin: So, on the first question, the key constraint to transactions last year, it wasn’t buyer demand, it was lack of inventory. And so what is making me more positive about this year than last year is more inventory. Like I mentioned in the call, there’s 33% more inventory today than there was this time last year. It looks like we may have in the weeks ahead more inventory coming to the market than any time in the last 3 years. And so that to me, it leaves me feeling positive about the second half. Of course, in mortgage rates, do they go to 8, 8 plus? Do they stay where they are? Do they go to the 6s? That will have as big of an impact as inventory. But assuming that mortgage rates stay where they are right now, I would expect the second half of the year to be better than last year.

Let’s also keep in mind, remember, second half of last year was 8% mortgage rates. So you had lower inventory, you had 8% mortgage rates for the first time in well over a decade. And it came right in front of the fall market. And so it’s hard to see circumstances that could lead to it being worse than it was last year. Or another way to say it is, it’s hard to see it not being better than it was last year. In terms of why are agents more productive, we mentioned on the last call, we mentioned on this call as well, that we’ve been separating ways with agents that are not producing because they take away resources from our other agents and we have limited resources and we want to give to agents that are producing. That, along with technology and coaching and training, we believe makes them more productive.

I think we mentioned in the last call before, we had something called the Back to Basics Challenge, it was a 100-day challenge for the first 100 days of the year where we had national awards, local awards for – in total, there were hundreds of different awards and categories for agents that developed their repeat and referral business the most through in-person connections. And there are ways we recommended how they would do that. And they had to log in every in-person interaction in the Compass platform. And we believe that also is contributing to the outperformance.

Jason Helfstein: Thank you.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Soham Bhonsle of BTIG. Please go ahead.

Soham Bhonsle: Hey, guys. Good evening. Robert, first maybe on market share on the unit count side, I guess wondering if you could give us some more color, if there were certain markets or price points where you think you took more share. And who do you think you’re sort of taking this share from today?

Robert Reffkin: Yes. So, who are we taking? Okay. So, let me start with, I think, in down markets, the best agents gain market share and the best brokerages gain market share. And it’s been that way forever. And we are a company of top agents. The average company agent sells more than the average agent in the country. And so I think they’re gaining market share on balance from lower producers in the industry that are having a harder time competing. At the company level, we are also gaining market share. And I think the entities that are having the harder time I would say are the boutique brokerages. I think over the last 5 years, it is – a brokerage firm is required to offer agents more than they were 5 years ago, more in terms of technology, more in terms of coaching and training. And it’s harder for a small firm to be able to stay competitive.

Soham Bhonsle: Got it. And then Kalani on the OpEx side, I think, so you said $850 million at the core, but then acquisitions, get you to $865 million from the 2023 acquisitions. Now you’re raising that midpoint, I guess, by $12 million. So that’s $877 million at the midpoint. But I guess the question is, what gets you to the low end of that guide, right? Because you’ve kept the low end sort of still open. So I’m just wondering, what gets you there? And then I guess high end, the $887 million, I guess, is that just more M&A from here?

Kalani Reelitz: Yes, so, I think we think about OpEx in those two pieces, right? The core at $850 million, and I think importantly, we are on track to deliver that, and then the additive and accretive acquisitions. I think to answer your question directly, what gets us to the low end, I think, we’ve seen continued diligence, right? Cost for us and cost discipline is an ongoing muscle now. It is a core competency, and so we are continuously looking at new ways to cut costs, to save costs, to just quite frankly, be more efficient. So as I think about the lower end, it’s just our continued focus and ability to kind of drive more efficiencies, everything from looking at AI on marketing and robotics in our back office, we have a Lean Six Sigma team, right?

Those folks are working actively. They can drive us to the bottom of that range. I think the top end is probably the more acquisitions or a bit of some agent expenses if the market comes back and we see some of the small variable marketing expenses pop a little more.

Soham Bhonsle: Okay. And if I could just squeeze one more in. Robert, I wanted to get your thoughts on the M&A environment out there. You touched on the boutiques and the challenges there. So maybe, are you hearing more concern from them in what could develop going forward and sort of what’s your appetite to continue to consolidate? Thank you.

Robert Reffkin: Yes, I’ll pass on to Kalani, but, I have spoken to the brokerage firm owners, there is more interest in selling to Compass than ever before and by a huge margin. Of course, there’s the natural driver of difficult industry dynamics, whether market or the broader dynamics, the ones I addressed earlier. But I think on top of that, when I’m speaking to the brokerage owners, what I’m hearing from them say is when agents are coming to Compass now, they’re saying that they’re coming for the technology. And remember, it took $1.6 billion for us to build this. I don’t believe it’ll be built by another brokerage firm. And the unintended consequence, one of the unforeseen consequences of discontinuing all equity and cash incentives to hire agents, is that before brokerage firm owners would always say, the agent just came for money.

The agent came for money. But when we stopped that, then an agent left, the brokerage owner had to say, there must actually be something better at Compass. And so now they do that now almost 2 years. I think brokerage owners are realizing that we have a real competitive advantage of what we built that isn’t just financial. It’s value. It’s in terms of the value that we can provide an agent that they cannot. But then secondly, the impact of understanding the value of the broker of the technology is a lot of brokerage owners. They really care about the agents. We all do. And they don’t want to merge with or sell to a brokerage firm where they can look their agents in the eye and say, I promise you life is going to be better. But now that they with the conviction around the platform, all this is going to market going on the market more broadly, they can look agents in the eye and say, trust me, this is going to be better for you.

And that really changes the level of interest from broker donors. I’ll pass on to Kalani.

Kalani Reelitz: Yes, I would just add a few things. Once just that excitement we’re seeing the advantage between not only from M&A, but also organically, as we mentioned, one of our highest growth quarters. And so that advantage is organic, inorganic. I think from M&A, Soham, we do believe M&A allows us to quickly move into new markets. You saw that with Latter & Blum. It also allows us to expand our presence in top markets and grow that inventory. I think we firmly believe that our ability to amortize our platform across more agents, our ability to drive continuing growth and inventory for us will lead to further margin expansion and value creation. And I think, look, we’re extremely pleased with the partners that we’ve brought on over the last 12 to 18 months, and I think you’ll see us continue to review accretive deals that are favorable terms to Compass going forward.

Soham Bhonsle: Alright, guys. Thank you.

Operator: Your next question comes from the line of Matthew Bouley from Barclays. Please go ahead.

Anika Dholakia: Good evening. You have Anika Dholakia on for Matt. Thanks for taking my question. So first off, in your prepared remarks, you spoke to commissions at that 5.5% level. I’m just curious, looking ahead, where you think this will trend. Do you assume that this kind of stays the same and it’s just the way that it’s communicated and displayed that changes? Or is there maybe a risk that we can see some further compression? Thanks.

Robert Reffkin: Yes, we just given the sensitive nature of the topic, we’re not going to expand on it beyond what we said on the call earlier.

Anika Dholakia: Okay. And then on my second question, could you speak to some of the cost efforts that you guys have been taking? And maybe if this like sluggish macro backdrop persists, is there risk that you might pause on some of these efforts and maybe risk your OpEx target? Thanks.

Kalani Reelitz: Yes. Thanks, Anika, for the question. Look, I think I mentioned in the last question, so I’m, I think from OpEx and from cost, we started 12 to 18 months ago with kind of a need to run cost programs that take cost out of our organization. I think what it has built for us is a core competency around both cost and continuous improvement. We have executed about 95% of our activity that’s needed to achieve the $850 million of OpEx, that core OpEx we talked about in 2024. The remaining is really just timing items and contracts. I think what’s exciting about our cost and our efficiency efforts is we’re starting to move from Canada hard status quo cuts that were needed early on in the market to more continuous improvement, right.

Se we are looking at and have actually implemented some AI from a marketing standpoint. We’re looking at robotics and have automation in our back office. We have a Lean Six Sigma team that’s really driving process improvement. And so we’ll kind of continue to do this as a regular thing. I think one, it allows us to be agile if the market turns. I don’t think it slows us down or we stop. I think these are things that actually both cut costs and also make process improvements. So we’re making it easier for everybody. But it also, in good and bad times allows us to fuel our own growth and fund our own growth. And so we’ll continue with those types of things. If we have to move harder, faster, I think we’ve proven our ability to be agile, and it’s something we think about almost every day.

Anika Dholakia: Great. Thank you both. Good luck.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Ryan McKeveny of Zelman. Please go ahead.

Ryan McKeveny: Hi. Thank you. Nice job on the quarter. I wanted to go back to Latter & Blum. Obviously, great brokerage, strong history, great leadership team, so congrats on that deal. I guess my question is, considering all the noise out there right now, settlements, litigation, etcetera, maybe some more color on just kind of what gave you the confidence to make that acquisition now and maybe talk to us how you’re thinking about the risk-reward of acquisitions going forward. So that would be kind of part one. The second aspect of it, what I think is rather interesting about the deal as well is the Gulf markets are obviously much lower price, significantly lower ASP than a lot of your geographies. So to some degree, could we think of the Compass platform operating in the same ways as existing markets?

Are there differences we should be thinking about in terms of the opportunity within a lower price market for things like productivity? Any thoughts there would be helpful. Thank you.

Robert Reffkin: So, on the – let me start the second question. You have got a platform that will work in the same way. And there are great agents there, just like every other market, that operate their business with the same workflows as every other market, the difference is ASP. But it will be the tools and programs and offerings and platforms that we have, will help them create success and better serve their buyers and sellers just like every other market. So, we feel good about that. On the former question, what gave us confidence, look, it’s a highly – it’s an accretive deal transaction with one of the most respected names in the space and with incredible leadership, incredible culture. I am very proud to have them join the Compass family.

And consistent with what I shared in my prepared remarks, we don’t view there being as much, the facts aren’t supporting that as much is happening as the headlines. And that creates opportunity as well. With our agent, it creates opportunity to coach them, train them, make them feel confident. With other brokerage firms, it creates the opportunity to say, hey, let’s come together and let’s create success together. And so I see this for sure more as an opportunity than a challenge, this entire environment. And I believe we will look back a year from now and say, well, that there were tremendous positives that came out of it.