Thomas Whelan: I think the key was we only have $80 million drawn on the revolver at June 30. So that leaves $280 million. And we sort of look at what’s left on Rochester with the revised guidance, $140 million to $160 million. So again, the plan would be to fund that primarily through the revolver. And then as fast as Nick and the team can get Rochester ramped up, that’s when we start repaying the debt. But in the meantime, we’ve always said we’re not going to come up short. And so we’ve got all these other levers to make sure that we don’t come up short. And on balance, we’ve but great — we’ve got great partners and our bankers who had new issue. They understood the challenge at Rochester and gave us that extra flexibility through to the end of the first quarter ’24. And so we’re feeling pretty comfortable.
Mitchell Krebs: I’d characterize it as kind of incremental at this point, smaller dollar amounts. And obviously, that comes with less time here to go until we’re done with the expansion out there in Nevada. Does that answer your question, Mike?
Mike Parkin: Yes. Just a follow-up there. We’ve seen some recent increase in the accounts payable sitting at $143 million at the end of June. Is some of that associated with the completion of Rochester, and we expect that to kind of come back down. Historically, it looks like you’re — it does move around quite a bit, but maybe something closer to $100-ish million in about a year’s time? Is that fair to assume?
Mitchell Krebs: Yes. You’re spot on there. Tom, do you want to follow a little further?
Thomas Whelan: Yes. Look, we’re, of course, managing the payables well. It’s a big invoice from TIC that comes in every month. And as you might suspect, we’re looking through that and coming through that pretty carefully. Having said that, there have been no issues on that front, but we’re obviously not going to pay the bill any sooner than it’s required. And as we’re in the last of the big spending those bills every month there significant. So — but yes, we’re almost through it. We’ll revert back to sort of our normal working capital levels by the end of the year.
Mike Parkin: And is that typical kind of construction turns to it in terms of doability on those payables? Is it 90 days, 180 maybe you can’t say because of privacy restrictions with the contractor. But do you have an ability to defer it a full year? Or is it the nature of the term basically shorter?
Thomas Whelan: Okay. I would say pretty standard commercial terms. We have a great relationship there. And again, we want them to be paid to make sure that they’re bringing in the 500-plus folks are coming across the gate every day. So now that’s all I’d say there.
Mike Parkin: Okay. No, that’s fair. Yes, I think that’s it for me. Thank very much guys.
Mitchell Krebs: Okay. No, thanks for the good questions Mike.
Operator: [Operator Instructions] Seeing no further lines in the queue, I would like to turn the conference back over to Mitch Krebs for any closing remarks.
Mitchell Krebs: Okay. Thanks. We appreciate everybody’s time this morning. Have a great rest of the summer and look forward to speaking again following the release of our third quarter results this fall. Have a good day.
Operator: The conference has now concluded. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.
