Brian Russo: Okay. Great. And then lastly, just to clarify on the increased 2025 guidance. And it triangulates with the CapEx, but is all the CapEx accounted for, meaning it’s in your projects that have been announced on the unregulated side as well as the regulated projects that are embedded currently in the base case base case. I’m trying to get a sense for how do we track your progress in achieving that guidance? And at what point after new projects might be awarded to projects become incremental…
Beth Cooper: So Brian, I guess, what I would say, and I don’t know if this answers your question. So if it doesn’t, please feel free to ask me again. But what I would say is in looking at our capital forecast and then trying to identify what we wanted to announce as our CapEx guidance for 2023. We looked at those projects that were in motion. We looked at those projects that are about to be filed or we’re pretty far along and expect a filing to be undertaken this year and for us to begin constructing facilities — on the unregulated side, that would include dollars that are related to investments that we have announced, like the Full Circle dairy project. And then finally, what the number does not include, and we try to separate this out to provide more transparency is it does not include acquisitions because for us, those are opportunistic.
And so that was the reason actually in the CapEx chart that was now included within the deck that we broke out the acquisitions, and we actually included the base level of organic CapEx that we’ve experienced going all the way back to the SPU acquisition. And so you can see that this year, with the dollars that rolled over, coupled with again projects that are either announced very far along soon to be announced or we expect to undertake a little later this year. And we feel like that 200 to 230 really should be the level that we land for the year. If I missed it, please just feel free to ask it again.
Operator: Our next question comes from Tate Sullivan with Maxim Group.
Tate Sullivan: On the Wild Lake expansion, I mean, such a big housing development project and you put detail in the press release about the phases of that project. So does the pipeline injection point probably use your Marlin vehicles through completion of the entire project into 2025? Or is that almost permanent that pipeline injection on…
Jeff Householder: Actually, it’s a permanent installation that we made. It’s actually a few miles down the pipeline from the actual Wildlight development project that you referenced. We’ve actually delivered over 1,000 trader loads of RNG into that injection point already from a landfill that was waiting on a pipeline expansion from other utilities to serve it. So it’s a fairly active injection point serving really our entire nasal County. And right now you can actually get the gas down the Duvall County and the placement of that point. So it will remain, and we will be moving RNG from the full circle are into that point. So I’m fairly certain of before it’s over with. And it will serve not just Wildlight, but potentially other customers, including our Eight Flags CHP plants located on .
So it’s in service. It will remain in service. It’s capable of receiving not just R&D, but obviously CNG and LNG as well. So we could use it as an emergency service point. We can use it as a peaking facility or to provide obvious R&G deliveries.
Tate Sullivan: Would you say in your entire service territory, is this the first kind of objective that’s used that actively? Or do you have others?
Jeff Householder: Yes. Yes, it is. Yes. We are building a couple of other points like that in our northern service areas. And I suspect before it’s over with, and we’re already looking at engineering design, we’ll have 2 or 3 more in Florida scattered across the Peninsula.
