Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation (NYSE:CHMI) Q1 2024 Earnings Call Transcript

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation (NYSE:CHMI) Q1 2024 Earnings Call Transcript May 6, 2024

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation beats earnings expectations. Reported EPS is $0.3417, expectations were $0.18. CHMI isn’t one of the 30 most popular stocks among hedge funds at the end of the third quarter (see the details here).

Operator: Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation First Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker’s presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Peter Gustav [ph], Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Peter Gustav: We’d like to thank you for joining us today for Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corporation’s first quarter 2024 conference call. In addition to this call, we have filed a press release that was distributed earlier this afternoon and posted to the Investor Relations section of our website at www.chmireit.com. On today’s call, management’s prepared remarks and answers to your questions may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed today. Examples of forward-looking statements include those related to interest income, financial guidance, IRRs, future expected cash flows, as well as prepayment and recapture rates, delinquencies and non-GAAP financial measures, such as earnings available for distribution or EAD and comprehensive income.

Forward-looking statements represent management’s current estimates and Cherry Hill assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements in the future. We encourage listeners to review the more detailed discussions related to these forward-looking statements contained in the company’s filings with the SEC and the definitions contained in the financial presentations available on the company’s website. Today’s conference call is hosted by Jay Lown, President and CEO; Julian Evans, the Chief Investment Officer; and Michael Hutchby, the Chief Financial Officer. Now, I will turn the call over to Jay.

Jay Lown: Thanks, Peter, and welcome to our first quarter 2024 earnings call. On the fourth quarter call, we noted that towards the end of 2023, markets were expecting multiple rate cuts from the Fed in 2024, only to see that forecast evaporate over the first four months of 2024. As the first quarter progressed and inflation remained elevated, the Fed walked back considerably near the end of the quarter its prior rhetoric around rate cuts. Markets reacted significantly to any economic data believed to be important to the Fed’s strategy and the increased volatility impacted our sector during the quarter. Early in the quarter, spreads widened as inflation remained sticky. However, as the quarter progressed, spreads tightened as the Fed reconfirmed its likelihood to ease monetary policy later in the year.

Our positioning with respect to MSRs and investing in higher coupon RMBS played a pivotal role in our favor, helping to offset the impact of the flattening yield curve. As we look out towards the remainder of the year, we believe that the Fed will need to maintain its current posture longer than markets expect due to persistent inflationary data along with strong employment numbers. We do expect a twist in the yield curve eventually and are positioned for shorter maturity rates to move lower, resulting in a positively sloped curve. Given that the Fed is primarily driving market sentiment, we will continue to watch economic indicators intently and believe our overall strategy of pairing MSRs with Agency RMBS works well in the current environment.

For the first quarter, we generated GAAP net income applicable to common stockholders of $0.32 per diluted share and we generated earnings available for distribution or EAD, a non-GAAP financial measure of $4 million or $0.13 per share. EAD is just one factor we consider in setting our dividend policy. We also consider the existing market environment, portfolio return potential, our level of taxable income including hedge gain impacts and a degree of certainty regarding forward investment return economics. Thus, while EAD may continue to remain under our dividend level in the near-term, we believe other factors are important when considering whether we can sustainably cover our dividend. Book value per common share finished the quarter at $4.49, down modestly from December 31st as our portfolio positioning, particularly with respect to MSRs and higher coupon RMBS, helped offset the impact of the flattening yield curve.

On an NAV basis, which includes preferred stock in the calculation, NAV was down approximately 0.5% relative to December 31st. Financial leverage at the end of the quarter rose slightly to 4.5 times as we continue to stay prudently levered given that volatile market dynamics persist. We ended the quarter with $48 million of unrestricted cash on the balance sheet, maintaining a solid liquidity profile. As we’ve discussed previously, while our financial leverage has stayed relatively low, our capital structure leverage consisting of our mix of common to preferred equity amplifies how changes in our NAV or total equity impacts our common book value per share. During the quarter, we began to act on one of our top priorities of creating a more stable equity profile by repurchasing a portion of our Series B Preferred shares.

As of May 3rd, we have repurchased approximately $9.3 million of Series B Preferred shares and we expect that will continue in the days and months ahead. The repurchase of Series B Preferred shares benefits common shareholders by ultimately reducing the amount we pay for preferred dividends now that the Series B has transitioned to a floating rate, as well as right-sizing our capital structure and putting it more in line with peers. We will continue to work towards stabilizing our equity profile while remaining mindful of our balance sheet strength and our investment portfolio. I did want to take a moment to share that recently we announced that our Board of Directors established a Special Committee to explore strategic alternatives to maximize stockholder value.

We do not intend to discuss on these quarterly earnings call or any subsequent call any information or developments relating to the Special Committee or its process until the evaluation of strategic alternatives has been completed or the Special Committee determines disclosure is appropriate or legally required. Looking ahead, we continue to pay close attention to the ever-evolving macro environment and further focus on risk management. We will continue to selectively deploy capital into additional Agency RMBS, which still presents a strong risk-adjusted return profile and will continue to reduce the portion of preferred equity in our capital structure to provide greater stability of our equity profile for the ultimate benefit of common shareholders while not sacrificing our strong liquidity and leverage.

With that, I’ll turn the call over to Julian, who will cover more details regarding our investment portfolio and its performance over the first quarter.

Julian Evans: Thank you, Jay. We have been positioned for a higher for longer environment for some time now. While the interest rate rally at the end of 2023 impacted our book value, we have held relatively firm in that position given the economic and inflationary data we were seeing that supported our thesis. Throughout the first quarter inflation remained elevated, and just as quickly as the Fed shifted its tone towards rate cuts, the recent data has compelled the Fed to begin dialing back from that aggressive language. In the quarter, rate rose, spread fluctuated and our positioning with respect to the MSR and higher coupon RMBS enabled us to preserve book value. We continue to watch how the Fed reacts to macro data, as ongoing volatility requires us to pay significantly close attention to ensure that the portfolio is optimally positioned.

We will further proactively adjust our portfolio if necessary, as we move forward. At quarter end, our MSR portfolio had a UPB of $19.6 billion and a market value of approximately $250 million. The MSR and related assets represented approximately 44% of our equity capital and approximately 28% of our investable assets, excluding cash at the end of the quarter. Meanwhile, our RMBS portfolio accounted for approximately 41% of our equity capital. As a percentage of investable assets, the RMBS portfolio represented approximately 72% excluding cash at year end. Prepayment speeds for MSR and RMBS portfolios continue to remain relatively steady compared to the prior quarter, given the elevated mortgage rate environment. Our MSR portfolios net CPR averaged approximately 3.9% for the first quarter, modestly down from 4.2% net CPR in the previous quarter.

The portfolios recapture rate remained consistent, but low at approximately 1% as the incentive to refinance continues to be minimal. Moving forward, we continue to expect low recapture rates and a stable net CPR at least in near-term. The RMBS portfolios prepayment speeds remained low as expected, driven by the combination of new asset purchases, as well as the current higher mortgage rate environment, continuing to compress CPR for the existing portfolio. As of today, the majority of the mortgage universe remains out of the money in terms of refinancing. We would expect prepayments to remain low as long as interest rates remain at these levels. For the quarter, the RMBS portfolios weighted average three-month CPR was slightly higher to approximately 5.2%, compared to approximately 4.9% in the fourth quarter.

As of March 31st, the RMBS portfolio, inclusive of TBAs, stood at approximately $654 million, relatively flat compared to the previous quarter end. Quarter-over-quarter, we acquired additional RMBS higher coupon mortgages and increase some of our TBA hedges in the portfolio as we remain positions to protect against additional spread widening. For the first quarter, our RMBS net interest spread was 3.42%. Reduction from the prior quarter was driven by a reduction in dollar roll income and higher repo costs, due to higher repo balances. As Jay mentioned, the portfolio’s financial leverage stood at approximately 4.5 times and the 30-year securities position continues to represent 100% of the RMBS portfolio at quarter end. Moving forward, we expect investment markets to remain volatile in the near-term.

With upcoming Fed decisions being driven by persistent inflation. In this volatile environment, we will proactively manage our portfolio through the volatility, while continuing to shift our overall capital structure to add value for shareholders through improve performance and earnings. I will now turn the call over to Mike for our first quarter financial discussion.

Michael Hutchby: Thank you, Julian. GAAP net income applicable to common stockholders for the first quarter was $9.7 million or $0.32 per weighted average diluted share outstanding during the quarter. While comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders, which includes the mark-to-market of our available for sale RMBS was $3.2 million or $0.11 per weighted average diluted share. Our earnings available for distribution attributable to common stockholders were $4 million or $0.13 per share. EAD is inclusive of approximately $400,000 or about a penny a share of expenses related to Special Committee work. Our book value per common share as of March 31st was $4.49, compared to a book value of $4.53 at December 31, 2023.

We use a variety of derivative instruments to mitigate the effects of increases in interest rates on a portion of our future repurchase borrowings. At the end of the first quarter, we held interest rate swaps, TBAs and treasury futures, all of which had a combined notional amount of approximately $968 million. You can see more details with respect to our hedging strategy in our 10-Q, as well as in our first quarter presentation. For GAAP purposes, we’ve not elected to apply hedge accounting for our interest rate derivatives, and as a result, we record the change in estimated fair value as a component of the net gain or loss on interest rate derivatives. Our operating expenses were $3.6 million for the quarter. On March 14, 2024, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.15 per common share for the first quarter of the year, which was paid in cash on April 30, 2024.

We also declared a dividend of $0.5125 per share on our 8.2% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and a dividend of $0.515625 on our 8.25% Series B Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, both of which were paid on April 15, 2024. At this time, we will open up the call for questions. Operator?

See also Democrats and Corporate Insiders are Buying These 10 Stocks and 25 Cities with Tallest Buildings in the World.

Q&A Session

Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question will come from Mikhail Goberman from Citizens JMP. Your line is open.

Mikhail Goberman: Hey. Good afternoon, gentlemen. Hope everybody’s doing well. Just wanted to get your thoughts on how you’re seeing the servicing market as we head in deeper into the sort of spring selling season from a bulk and flow perspective. And can we sort of expect that UPB to continue to drift downwards at the pace that it has been over the last few quarters? Thanks.

Jay Lown: Hey, Mikhail. How are you? It’s Jay. I’ll let Ray answer the — some of the question relative to what the market looks like because he’s in the midst of it day-to-day. But, broadly speaking, I think, the biggest reason we’ve let it drift down is we saw a more compelling risk return profile from the RMBS versus the MSR, and so we’ve deployed amortization or excess capital into MBS for that reason relative to the potential returns on the MSRs given current pricing. But it’s not because of a lack of interest in the product. It’s just a function of getting the best return we can for shareholders in the near-term. With respect to volumes and the strength of the market, et cetera, I’ll let Ray chime in on some of that.

Mikhail Goberman: Great. Thanks.

Ray Slater: Sure. I mean, volumes have been relatively high still going into Q1 of this year. I mean, it’s a little off from last year, but essentially volumes remain pretty strong. To Jay’s point, it’s essentially just a relative value play between MBS and where we see MSRs today.

Mikhail Goberman: Got you. Thank you, guys. And is there any appetite for maybe driving leverage a little bit higher in order to protect the EAD and the dividend coverage?

Jay Lown: It’s definitely something we talk about. We don’t have any current plans to dramatically take it up. But as we get closer to some sense of where the Fed’s going and where the shape of the curve might end up towards the end of the year, I think, it’s possible that we could definitely consider that.

Mikhail Goberman: Got you. And if I can squeeze in one more, given the nice little mini bond rally, I’d say, of recent days, any update on book value thus far this quarter? Thanks.

Jay Lown: I mean, it wouldn’t be a conference call if we didn’t get that question. Mike?

Michael Hutchby: That’s a fair point. As of Friday, we estimate that our book value per share was down about 3% from 3.31% and that is before any common dividend accrual as the Board has not yet met to approve the second quarter dividend.

Mikhail Goberman: Got you. Thank you very much, gentlemen. Best of luck going forward.

Jay Lown: Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. And our next question will come from Matt Howlett from B. Riley Securities. Your line is open.

Matt Howlett: Hey. Good afternoon, everybody. Hi, Jay. Thanks for taking my question.

Jay Lown: No problem, Matt.

Matt Howlett: Hey. You guys — look, you guys seem to own the playbook here on MBS spreads and interest rates. So I got to ask you, I think, I heard you say you expect near-term volatility, followed by, at some point, yield curve twists and steepening. I just love to hear the playbook, the CHMI here playbook, because you seem — you guys have nailed it, really, the last year or maybe two years.

Julian Evans: Hi, Matt. It’s Julian. Look, I think, when we look at the portfolio, we’re trying to look at it over a longer timeframe, not just maybe one quarter, but perhaps two quarters. We are currently positioned for convert yield curve steeper in the portfolio. We are long the front end and are short on the back end of the treasury curve at this point in time, whether that be through some type of derivatives play in terms of futures or via kind of how we’re positioned on the coupon stack. So we’re playing it from both fronts. We do believe that at some point in time, the Fed will shift. They kind of, Paul, I think at the last meeting was pretty adamant that he would like to cut rates at some point in time. He perceived that there will be a cut more so than a hike, but he’s highly data dependent.

And I think the data will play out in terms of how the curve will play out, as well as how the next steps forward. We were asked if we would increase leverage. I think if we got some bit of certainty, as kind of Jay mentioned, or a little something that we would like to see that really affirms that this, we’re going to be here, but steeper over a longer timeframe, we probably do bring up our leverage.

Matt Howlett: Yeah. That’s the view. You guys have a lot of room here to take up the leverage. When I look at the RMBS side, you’re up in coupon right now, mainly specified pools. Did I hear you correctly? What you’re focused on just?

Jay Lown: We have a combination of specified pools, as well as TBA.

Matt Howlett: Okay.

Jay Lown: Some of the positioning has shifted. I would say in terms of our specified pools, they’re mainly in 5s and 5.5s, and in TBAs, we own long positions in 6s and 6.5s, and we’re kind of short on TBAs in the lower coupons.

Matt Howlett: In the servicing book, it’s such a low coupon that it would — they’re so far out of the money, just that that’s got a cash flow, even if we get some lower rates. So I — do I see that right? It would take them just a massive rally in mortgage rates, right, to put that anywhere close to being refinanceable?

Jay Lown: You have that right, Matt. I mean, that portfolio is performing like a rock star right now.

Matt Howlett: So, Jay, I got to ask a question. I don’t want to ask you any specifics about the Special Committee, but why now? I mean, why — the company is so well positioned here for the next phase of the Fed and you really got it well. The preferred is coming down, the capital structure is improving. Everything you said here, the earnings power look like it’s terrific. What’s the — why want to — why look at a — why apply Special Committee or why even look at one at this point, given how well positioned the company is?