Kutgun Maral : I just wanted to follow up on the programming cost discussion, and then I had a quick housekeeping item on mobile, if I can. So on programming costs, the guide for it to be flat year-over-year is quite remarkable in many ways. Jessica, I know you just characterized it as a mix issue. I wanted to see if you’re seeing an acceleration in subs taking these lighter packages or cord shaving overall. And relatedly, you’ve been very vocal about the tensions with programmers for many years now. Is there anything else to call out in terms of Charter maybe taking a harder line with programmers and recent renegotiations, whether it’s in terms of pricing or even carriage of certain networks overall? Or maybe again, we shouldn’t read into it, and it’s purely just a consumer mix shift issue?
And quickly, just a housekeeping question on wireless, as we all try to better understand the industry-wide postpaid phone trends, any chance you could help size how much of your 5.3 million mobile lines are phone versus tablets?
Christopher Winfrey : I don’t have it in front of me that split on the 5.3 million, but the vast, vast majority, we’re in the connectivity business, and so we’re selling mobile service. And to the extent that a customer wants additional devices, of course, we have that and we make it available. But our view here is driving Internet both acquisition as well as Internet churn and to drive profitability, but having an overall higher ARPU and you get that through selling the mobile service combined with the broadband service. Maybe you start with programming and jump…
Jessica Fischer : Yes. To clarify, on the guidance, it’s programming cost per sub that is flat year-over-year. And the mix shift is not that that significantly different from what we have seen previously. The base is smaller. And so as the base — the mix of incoming customers does differ from the base, but the mix shift isn’t — it’s not that substantially different.
Christopher Winfrey : In terms of position with programmers, Tom mentioned the margin issue that exists inside of video. And we’ve talked about the availability of that content really almost anywhere, in some cases, in many cases, for free because of piracy. We’ve been a long proponent Tom has been around the problems related to that. So I guess it’s fair to say I don’t know about harder line. It’s just more indifferent about carriage of certain content at a higher increasing price when it’s available all across the market at cheaper rates or even for free. And so that’s not a harder line, that’s just a reality of where we’re at. The two biggest issues inside of the content category continued to be retrans, which is over-the-air content, which we’re forced to pass on as a significant cost to our customers.
And the development of sports and the other channels are important and put into what I was just describing, but those are the two biggest drivers of cost increases to consumer.
Operator: Our next question will come from Doug Mitchelson with Credit Suisse.
