Operator: And our next question comes from Pavel Molchanov from Raymond James.
Pavel Molchanov: Two questions about Europe. We’re hearing more and more about this Green Deal industrial plan to support clean tech manufacturing inside the European Union. And very timely, of course, with Howden. Can you just run through the specific products that you’re going to be manufacturing in the EU that potentially would qualify for some of these subsidies?
Jillian Evanko: Thanks, Pavel, for pointing out that opportunity set €“ because we seem to generally discuss the US IRA mostly and the EU Green Deal industrial plan is similar in terms of what we expect to derive more commercial opportunity within the region. And Howden manufactures numerous of their products within the EU, as we do for Chart. And compressors, a variety of compressors, including the diaphragm and piston compressors that go into these clean applications, inclusive of hydrogen, as well as the steam turbine offering and the fans offering. I think the Howden sand offering is certainly, in our opinion, a market leader for applications like CCUS, in particular, and there’s going to be a great opportunity to do that as well.
That’s just to name a few. In addition to that, I don’t want to dismiss the answer without talking to their digital uptime offering as well as the event sim digital offering that they have because we see those as being tied really closely to the EU Green Deal applications and the ability to monitor and the ability to implement those in addition to the OEM equipment. So great opportunity ahead. And we haven’t sized that yet because we want to see some of the specifics of the deal itself, but I think that you’re going to see tailwinds similar to what we see in the potential commercial pipeline from the IRA in that region.
Pavel Molchanov: Following up on Europe, specific to Howden, presumably you’ll be going through some kind of facility consolidations, that sort of thing. Have you started your dialogue with the works councils, labor ? And if so, how is that dialogue progressing?
Jillian Evanko: I can’t go into specifics, Pavel, on that. But I can tell you that we have daily dialogues with the Howden team, as well as with weekly regular touch points with KPS Capital Partners who have been very supportive in what we can work on between signing and closing. So we think we’re in a good position to come out of the gate strong to achieve the synergies as well as to take advantage of the opposite effect, which is take advantage of the folks that are super key talent that we see doubling our engineering workforce as an example on day one and taking advantage of where these key resources are located. So it’s both parts of your question. It’s not just from synergy achievement and having dialogues with the right personnel within Howden. That stuff is happening, but I can’t go into specifics about works councils.
Operator: And our next question comes from Craig Shere from Tuohy Brothers.
Craig Shere: So, just a follow-up on Sam’s LNG technology question. I was frankly a little surprised Cheniere opted for larger scale legacy technology, train design for the Sabine expansion FERC filing, pre filing. And the explanation seemed to be along the lines that I guess the larger trains may draw less on grid power that may have a higher exposure to coal generation. And I guess that was a twist I wasn’t ever thinking about before. And maybe you could elaborate on the differences between technologies in terms of power usage and drawing on the grid, the availability of internal generation, and how that all could play out, while everybody’s trying to improve their carbon footprint.
