So, we expect through 2024 to kind of manage that with probably a little bit of bumpiness in all realities. So, how we’re thinking from a marketing strategy is that we are going to initially be looking to secure some agreements and supply FOB at the dock itself. We’re going to want to see that get up to a good stable rate. However, we do have some intention to get into new markets. It gives us another great tool and a suite potentially into global markets. We’ve obviously got some good connections and access into Asian markets with some of our offshore work over in Indonesia and China. So, we are looking at that as a full suite of a new market access for us. But we’re going to do the right thing as we go into 2024, make sure that once they get up and operating that we can see the reliability of that get there, which I think will take a bit of time and we’ll step our self into FOB going onto the water at some point and accessing those new markets that TMX is going to allow us all to go after.
Greg Pardy: And we look forward to hearing more about it as we go. And it’s kind of a good segue into networking capital. I guess question for Cam is good cash flow generation, obviously, there’s a headwind and there’s an increasing pricing as Jon alluded to. What does the balance of the year look like? And the reason I ask that obviously is $65,000 question with you guys is when do they — when does the company get to $4 billion? Just curious what your thinking is there.
Jonathan McKenzie: So just on the working capital, so a couple things I would highlight. When you look at Q2 relative to where we ended Q3, first off, we did remember we did book the liability associated with the warrant purchase, which was that full $711 million. So, we drew that down at the end of Q3 for $600 million. So that was partly what drove working capital up in Q3 relative to Q2. The second piece I would just say is when you look at our inventory, didn’t see a lot of change from a volume perspective relative to where we’re in Q2, but obviously prices moved up significantly quarter-over-quarter, which is the lion’s share of the increase that you’ve seen in the working capital. But as we move into the fourth quarter, it’s obviously things continue to move around as we look at our marketing strategy on selling our barrels, but I don’t expect a big change.
And Drew kind of highlighted the one sort of more structural change that you’ll see in Q1 when we add more barrels into the system for the line fill associated with TMX.
Operator: [Operator Instructions]. Your next question is from Manav Gupta from UBS. Please ask your question.
Manav Gupta: A little bit of a macro question here. We have seen some widening of WCS here, Kelp — can you help us understand what’s exactly going on, and then where do you see the spread once, as you said, TMX does come online in 2Q? If you can help us understand some of those things.
Drew Zieglgansberger: Sure. Good morning, Manav, its Drew. Great question, as you’ve alluded to the crack or the diff has widened here, and that was not unexpected. We’ve had some incremental growth come out of the basin here over the course of this year. And with condensate pricing and whatnot being quite attractive, people are really moving a lot of sales volumes. So, we expected this to widen out. And as I alluded to with TMX coming on, I think, in the near-term people also probably saw some of those potential delays in construction issues that have kind of come out as of late. And I think people probably shifted some of their positions on timing, but we fully expect as the line fill even starts here early in the new year, I think, you’ll start to see things already start to head down the path of tightening back up.
