Kenneth Hoexter: Great. I’ll echo Ed, welcome back. Great to talk to you again. Ghislain, I’m going to throw one to you, I guess, very similar to the questions. But maybe talk about last year’s first quarter, let’s go near term. I know there’s so much in the year ahead, you don’t want to kind of guess too. But maybe talk about the weather impact that impacted first quarter last year because you had, I guess, you go about the last couple of years about a 500 basis points deterioration that’s been normal in the first quarter. Should we not expect that, given it sounds like weather is a little bit better or anything different because of the operations just maybe going near term on that? And then just a quick follow-up. Did you say the plan and traffic changed? Or were people just not following the plan that existed? Just trying to understand what difference happened so quickly.
Ghislain Houle: Well, let me start with your first piece of the question and then we can turn it over to Ed. So yes, Ken, absolutely last year, at this time, we were in deep freeze. And you remember well, we finished Q1 with an OR that was 66.6%. So this year, when you look at our volumes, they’re up and you see them on a weekly basis. The weather, we’ve been blessed with the weather across the network. So that’s helped. The team is functioning very well. But as I said, don’t — let’s not count our chickens too early. We have 20-some-odd days behind us. We’ll see what happens. Winter is not all over, by the way, when I look at next week, it’s supposed to be in the minus 20, 25 in some parts of the country. So what’s in the bank is in the bank, we’ll see. But definitely, we had good operating conditions so far. Maybe I’ll turn it over to you, Ed, for the second piece of the question.
Edmond Harris: I would say that my comment about following the trip plan, it was just something as simple as you got a plan out there, why don’t you run to it and run on time, depart on time. And that really is what pushed the envelope to getting people focused on following a scheduled railroad. That was the first step. And we’re well into it now. So…
Operator: The next question is from Ravi Shanker from Morgan Stanley.
Ravi Shanker: A follow-up on the volume commentary for ’23. Tracy, I think you said at the top of the call that you think the first half is going to be fine, but the second half visibility is low I think there is at least one scenario that believes that in the back half of the year, kind of inflation should be more under control and kind of rates are potentially under control and inventories are potentially under control. And so the back half outlook should be better in the first half outlook. Can you talk about kind of why you think there’s less visibility into the second half and maybe some of the kind of things that concern you about volumes right now?
Tracy Robinson: Ravi, what I said was that we have a clear line of sight in the first half, given we know what the grain crop is. And as Doug outlined, we know what coal looks like. And Doug outlined kind of where we see the softness. What I said about the second half is we don’t have line of sight. We’ve modeled a certain grain crop, but the crop is not in the ground yet. So it remains to be seen what that looks like. And we are hearing, like you, any number of different scenarios on what inflation may do and therefore, how quickly volumes may rebound. As I said, our guidance is based on the best information that we have right now. And as we get further into the year, we’ll give you an update as it becomes clear.
Ravi Shanker: Great. And just a very quick follow-up. How much of the NCIB is included in the EPS guide?