Rex Geveden: Yes. Hey Michael. Thanks for the question. I will take a crack at that one. We have got quite a design capability in our commercial business in Canada. We had an in-house design capability when we spun in 2015. But recall that we acquired the GE Hitachi business from the Canadian nuclear businesses in late 2016 and brought in quite a design capability with that, that’s the team, it does the refueling robotics and a number of other things, they designed the target delivery system and they do other complex nuclear designs. So, we have got quite some design depth there. The team has plenty of capacity for it. Most of these designs, for example, the reactor pressure vessel for the BWRX-300, and now this Natrium heat exchanger, that’s a molten solute heat exchanger.
That’s an exotic thing, a pretty interesting project for us. Those are projects in the million single digit kind of millions. They are typically done at fixed price basis. But we have got a great history of being able to estimate what the design costs are going to be and managing all of that and so I don’t if not a risk that I worry about very much given our history there and our design depth.
Michael Ciarmoli: Okay. Good. And then just one more on – I think you kind of mentioned quickly you are working on pricing with the Navy. How does that – those negotiations, conversations and the capsules what the potential happens here with [indiscernible] and the transfer of those subs? Are they in this pricing agreement, or just how should we think about that expectation?
Rex Geveden: Yes. So, this pricing agreement certainly does not include anything related to Okta. So, I think that’s on the come. What we are negotiating right now is kind of a standard pricing agreement that would have Virginia, Columbia type content in it. So, we have nothing there yet. I expect that in the future years. And maybe, Mike, let me go back and add a footnote to my prior answer to you on design risk. Recall that for the government new reactor designs that we have, Pele and for DRACO, those are done – both of those are done under cost reimbursable contracts, and so we are not exposed to cost risk on those more exotic and more complex designs, let me say. And so we have that. We also have government indemnity on those things. And so much different posture on the government reactor design side of it.
Michael Ciarmoli: Got it. Okay. Thanks guys.
Rex Geveden: Thanks Michael.
Operator: Your next question comes from Andre Madrid with Bank of America. Your line is now open.
Andre Madrid: Hey. I know some – I know it’s kind of been touched on a little bit, but I was wondering if you could maybe quantify a bit more about the sales upside you could be seeing from medical through the end of the year?
Robb LeMasters: The sales upside, you said?
Andre Madrid: Yes.
Robb LeMasters: Yes. So, what we said is our ultimate goal for the year is to be up 20% plus. We had a better quarter than that. And I see for the remainder of the year prospect for coming in higher than that 20% growth for revenue. That was our target for ‘23. We are tracking, as I say, year-to-date to exceed that. And so we will keep going on that.
Andre Madrid: Got it. That’s in our model and I will hop back in the queue. Thank you.
Robb LeMasters: Okay. Great. Thanks.
Rex Geveden: Thanks Andre.
Operator: There are no further questions at this time. With that, I will turn the call back to Chase Jacobson for closing remarks.
Chase Jacobson: Thank you, Brianna and thank you everyone for joining us today. We look forward to seeing and speaking with many of you at upcoming investor events. If you have any questions, you can reach me by phone or e-mail at investors@bwxt.com. Thanks.
Operator: This will conclude the conference call. Thank you for joining us today. You may now disconnect.
