And so regardless of whether the recession or not, the idea of the strategy of improving service levels, improving food and being a more consistent concept, that’s going to help us whether the macros get worse or not. And so my direction to the team is we got to stay focused on that. That might slow down our investments because we can’t be as aggressive if we’re — we don’t have a tailwind on the macros. But the things that we’re doing to fix the labor model and to provide better service levels to make sure that the restaurants look great and that our food is consistently perfect. Those are all really important things that we need to do regardless of what happens with the macro. As far as like the changes that we would make if things did get worse, I think one, we’d get a lot sharper with some of our CRM value and our loyalty value against the guests that we know need it because we’ll be able to see if they pull back on their trips.
So we instead of just having blasting out a value to everybody. I think the second thing is that we’ve got to continue to accelerate our simplification and get to a place where we’re making a fewer items, we’re making them a whole lot better, and that’s going to improve margins and as well as allow us to invest some of that back into the business. And then I think the third thing is I think we got to try to stay on advertising on a hot price point, because that’s going to obviously mitigate the traffic headwinds that you’re going to get from a macro. I think those are the things that we would then tweak, but I don’t see us like a major reverse course of our strategy. I do think you’d see the pendulum swing back a little bit more to the center in terms of balancing the long-term investments with some of the short-term traffic drivers.
Jeffrey Bernstein: Understood. And then just the follow-up, for full-year fiscal 2023 looks like at the mid-point you raised your EPS guidance by I guess $0.10, but it looks like at least versus consensus that you beat the second quarter by $0.25. So I’m just wondering if you can maybe prioritize whether or not you think your guidance is still conservatism or perhaps the second quarter beat relative to internal expectation was more modest than maybe consensus or perhaps as you mentioned earlier, maybe you’re factoring in the incremental labor and advertising and R&M and whatnot. Just trying to prioritize what led the pretty significant second quarter beat relative to the more modest increase in the full-year EPS. Thank you.
Joe Taylor: Yes. Jeff, again, as it relates to the beat relative to the consensus, I mean that — I’m not going to get too caught up in what the consensus and how they might have arrived at some of those numbers. The — it was a quarter that exceeded our expectations internally too, but there might have been a differential between those two numbers. And again, you’re thinking about what are the — what’s the prudent level to get to as we kind of see momentum in the business, but understand some of the macros that are sitting out there also. And it does incorporate the investments we’re talking about. So they’re — we really have the opportunity in some cases as we move into the second half of the year to move even a little quicker on some of those investments.
If the — again assuming the macro stays up, we want to be able to make the moves as quickly as we can. So we’re thinking through all this different pieces of the equation with the weariness of the macro that you see everybody talking about that we don’t need to get out over our skis on that piece of the equation either.
Operator: Your final question for today is coming from Brian Harbour with Morgan Stanley.
