BellRing Brands, Inc. (NYSE:BRBR) Q4 2023 Earnings Call Transcript

BellRing Brands, Inc. (NYSE:BRBR) Q4 2023 Earnings Call Transcript November 21, 2023

Operator: Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the BellRing Brands Fourth Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers’ presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Jennifer Meyer, Investor Relations for BellRing.

Jennifer Meyer: Good morning, and thank you for joining us today for BellRing Brands’ fourth quarter fiscal 2023 earnings call. With me today are Darcy Davenport, our President and CEO; and Paul Rode, our CFO. Darcy and Paul will begin with prepared remarks, and afterwards, we’ll have a brief question-and-answer session. The press release and supplemental slide presentation that support these remarks are posted on our website in both the Investor Relations in the SEC filings section at bellring.com. In addition, the release and slides are available on the SEC’s website. Before we continue, I would like to remind you that this call will contain forward-looking statements which are subject to risks and uncertainties that should be carefully considered by investors, as actual results could differ materially from these statements.

These forward-looking statements are current as of the date of this call, and management undertakes no obligation to update these statements. As a reminder, this call is being recorded, and an audio replay will be available on our website. And finally, this call will discuss certain non-GAAP measures. For a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the nearest GAAP measure, see our press release issued yesterday and posted on our website. With that, I will turn the call over to Darcy.

Darcy Davenport: Thanks, Jennifer, and thank you all for joining us. Last evening, we reported our fourth quarter and fiscal ’23 results and posted a supplemental presentation to our website. Fiscal ’23 was a fantastic year for BellRing Brands. Our net sales grew 22%, with adjusted EBITDA up 25%. As I reflect on the year, there are three things that stood out to me. The first is the expanding growth opportunity of this category, specifically the segments that we compete in, ready-to-drink shakes and ready-to-mix powders. Both segments have experienced double-digit growth in each of the last three years. Low household penetration, combined with strong macro trends, highlights a long path of growth. Second, the power and the future potential of our brands, this year, we saw tremendous growth on Premier Protein and Dymatize, both reaching new highs across many key metrics.

Premier Protein demonstrates strong resilience, as it quickly regained the TDPs and households lost in prior years during our capacity constraints. This shows the unbelievable consumer and retailer excitement around this brand, which will help fuel future growth. Third, I’ve been blown away by our organization. It is hard to manage a high-growth business with limited supply. It is a heavy load on all functions to optimize supply and demand, especially operations and sales. Despite this added pressure, our organization is stronger than ever, a reflection of the amazing people and our unique culture. We still have work to do, but are well positioned for a strong ’24 and beyond. Now to Q4. I’m pleased to share our results came in at the high end of our expectations.

Net sales grew 25% over prior year and adjusted EBITDA was up 23%. Significant production growth allowed us to restart light shake promotions this quarter. We gained meaningful new shelf space on both Premier Protein and Dymatize, and our relaunched shake flavors and seasonal offerings continue to drive incremental sales. Moving to shake production. In fiscal ’23, we made notable progress to grow and diversify our shake supply. Our production grew 17% over fiscal ’22, modestly above our expectations. We added two co-mans this year, which continue to scale up. And our second greenfield facility, Michael Foods, will start up in December. There will be a much larger contributor to our second half of fiscal ’24 and beyond. Over the past two years, we have transformed our shake co-man network.

We have partnered with the biggest and most reputable players in the aseptic, low-acid industry. We now have a scalable, regionally diverse supply chain, which will enable many years of robust growth. Now to the category and brand updates. The convenient nutrition category grew 9% in Q4 as tailwinds around health and wellness and fitness continued to drive growth. Consumer interest in functional beverages and sports nutrition products continues to be high. Ready-to-drink led the category, up 21%, and ready-to-mix grew 11%. Increased supply and distribution gains are lifting ready-to-drink growth, while increased marketing is boosting both segments. Premier Protein shake consumption accelerated this quarter, up 36%. Growth was tremendous across all channels, driven by improved supply, which allowed us to restart light promotion and expand distribution.

The highest growth was in mass and e-commerce, benefiting from our expanded range of flavors and higher in-stock levels. Additionally, e-commerce and club both saw strong growth behind promotional activity. Our fall seasonal flavor, Pumpkin Spice, demonstrated an impressive 90% incrementality to the brand. Q4 trends continued in October, with shake consumption up 27%, with volume driving 2/3 of this growth. Our brand metrics reflect our building momentum as Premier Protein reached all-time highs in TDPs and market share. Shake TDPs grew 11% versus Q3 behind distribution gains and relaunched shake flavors. Premier Protein RTD market share reached 21%, maintaining its position as the number one brand in the RTD segment as well as the number one brand in the broader convenient nutrition category.

Premier Protein household penetration added 1 percentage point versus Q3, reaching over 16% of households. Our household penetration continues to be the highest in the category, with this quarter’s growth driven by promotions and distribution gains. Our repeat and buy rates are holding steady, demonstrating our consumer loyalty. According to our most recent brand equity study, Premier Protein remains the number one brand I love and Net Promoter Score in the RTD category. We are very encouraged by all of these achievements, even though we still haven’t restarted meaningful marketing and promotion. Premier Protein saw great success this year in other forms, showing the power of the brand. In Q4, Premier Protein powders remain strong, growing over 50% behind new distribution and strong velocities.

It reached over $50 million in net sales this year, and we expect robust growth in ’24 as we invest behind marketing programs to drive awareness. In addition to powder, our licensing strategy continues to perform well. Although not a significant revenue driver, we are encouraged that the brand has seen success in other high-traffic aisles. Turning to Dymatize. The brand had a great quarter, with consumption up 38%. We saw double-digit growth in nearly all channels, driven by distribution gains and incremental promotions. Consumption growth continued into October, with the brand up 23%. Dymatize continues to have success in mainstream channels with both TDPs and household penetration reaching new highs this quarter. Encouragingly, as Dymatize adds new households and distribution points, repeat and buy rates are holding steady.

In fiscal ’24, we are launching a new marketing campaign to continue the momentum and drive awareness and new users to Dymatize. Before reviewing our outlook, I want to give our point of view on GLP-1 weight loss medication. Our proprietary research indicates consumers most likely to adopt GLP-1 are currently light users of protein shakes, but will become heavy users once on the medication. These individuals have reduced total caloric intake, but actually need more protein to mitigate muscle loss and certain other side effects. Products like Premier Protein are perfect because they are delicious, compact-size, high-protein nutrition, giving these individuals what they need without making them feel overly full. Research also indicates that once on the medication, consumers start exercising more and choosing healthier food and beverage options, ultimately increasing the demand for convenient and sports nutrition products.

After our initial phase of research, we believe our current products and growth strategies are already well aligned with this opportunity. They are great complements to GLPs while consumers are on the medication and a perfect nutrition solution when people decide to stop taking the drugs to maintain the weight loss benefit. We have begun our next phase of research to better understand this consumer and how we can serve them on this important health journey. In ’24, we plan to test media platforms and created to determine the strongest, most effective strategies and tactics to reach these consumers. We’re encouraged by the early results of these medications and feel that they strengthen the already strong macro trends behind our category and specifically, our business.

Now to our outlook. As you saw in yesterday’s press release, we expect fiscal ’24 net sales to grow between 10% and 15% and adjusted EBITDA to grow between 6% and 15%. At the midpoint, this guidance is on the high side of our long-term algorithm in both net sales growth and adjusted EBITDA margin. As a reminder, our algorithm in net sales growth is between 10% to 12% with EBITDA margins of between 18% and 20%. Our plan reflects strong volume growth for both Premier Protein and Dymatize and the restart of shake promotions in the second quarter. We plan to step up marketing on shakes in Q4, which is when we expect to hit our target weeks of supply. The demand and supply dynamics remain tight for most of the year, and we will continue to be nimble so we can navigate effectively.

In closing, I’m thrilled with our performance this year. we continue to gain momentum in every part of our business. Strong macro trends are driving sustained long-term growth in our categories. Premier Protein and Dymatize continue to reach new consumers and maintain all-time high market share positions. Our flavor strategy is working, and our innovation pipeline is rich, enabling us to bring excitement to consumers and retail partners. Last, we are moving forward on our shake capacity plan to support our future growth. Before passing over to Paul, I’m sure most of you have heard that Rob Vitale, our Executive Chairman, is currently on medical leave. We have been in close contact with him over the last several weeks. We wish him and his family the best throughout his recovery and we’ll be excited to have him back at full strength soon.

I will now turn the call over to Paul.

Paul Rode: Thanks, Darcy, and good morning, everyone. As Darcy highlighted, our fourth quarter results came in at the high end of our expectations. Net sales for the quarter were $473 million, and adjusted EBITDA was $99 million. Net sales grew 25% over prior year, and adjusted EBITDA increased 23%, with adjusted EBITDA margin up 20.8%. Starting with brand performance. Premier Protein net sales grew 30%, with volume growing 21%. In Q4, our shake production increased meaningfully over prior year, which allowed us to restart modest shake promotions driving growth. Volumes also benefited from the relaunch of temporarily discontinued flavors, performance of our seasonal offerings and strong growth from Premier Powders. Net pricing for Premier Protein grew 9%, reflecting the October 2022 price increase.

Shake consumption dollars grew 36%, outpacing shipment growth of 29%. The latter was modestly impacted by the lapping of a trade inventory build in the prior year. Dymatize net sales were relatively flat this quarter as the brand faced a tough prior year comparable. Recall last year’s Q4 had heavy trade inventory build in the international and domestic specialty channels. This headwind, combined with continued weakness in the specialty channel, was offset by strong growth in domestic mainstream channels, driven by distribution gains and organic growth. Gross profit of $155 million grew 27%, with an increase in gross profit margin of 60 basis points to 32.9%. The margin increase resulted from improved pricing that mitigated input cost inflation.

This was partially offset by incremental promotional activity. Excluding onetime costs in the prior year period, SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales increased 40 basis points, half of which was driven by higher marketing spend. Operating profit of $78 million increased $17 million compared to prior year and was negatively impacted by $7 million of accelerated amortization. This was a noncash expense recorded in connection with our decision to discontinue PowerBar in our North American business and was treated as an adjustment for non-GAAP measures. We expect the remaining $17 million of noncash accelerated amortization to be recorded in the first quarter. Our international PowerBar business is unaffected by this decision and continues to grow.

Turning to full year 2023 results. Net sales were approximately $1.7 billion, up 22% over the prior year, with gross profit of $530 million growing 26%. Gross profit margin increased 100 basis points over 2022, driven by pricing actions that mitigated input cost inflation, along with favorable freight rates. SG&A expenses were $216 million, and excluding onetime items, increased 60 basis points as a percentage of net sales. Higher marketing spend drove the increase as our marketing spend in fiscal ’22 was exceptionally low. We saw modest leverage on our remaining G&A base. Adjusted EBITDA increased 25% to $338 million, with a margin of 20.3%, an increase of 50 basis points. Before reviewing our outlook, I would like to make a few comments on cash flow and liquidity.

We generated $85 million in cash flow from operations in the fourth quarter and $216 million for the year. In fiscal ’23, net working capital declined slightly despite our strong top line growth. In fiscal ’24, our net working capital growth will moderately exceed our net sales growth rate as we add weeks of shake supply. As a result, our cash flow in fiscal ’24 will be modestly lower than fiscal ’23. During the quarter, we repaid $54 million against our revolving credit facility. As of September 30, net debt was $817 million, and net leverage was 2.4x. With our EBITDA growth and strong cash flow generation, we anticipate net leverage to fall under 2x by the end of fiscal ’24. With respect to our share repurchases this quarter, we bought 200,000 shares at an average price of $39.20 per share or $8 million in total.

For the fiscal year, we repurchased 4.2 million shares at an average price of $29.56 per share or $125 million in total. Our remaining share repurchase authorization is $23 million. Turning to our outlook. We expect fiscal ’24 net sales of $1.83 billion to $1.91 billion and adjusted EBITDA of $360 million to $390 million. Our guidance implies strong top line growth of 10% to 15% and adjusted EBITDA growth of 6% to 15%, with healthy adjusted EBITDA margins of 20% at the midpoint. We expect dollar and percentage growth for both measures to be weighted to the first half of the year. From a brand perspective, we expect double-digit sales growth for both Premier Protein and Dymatize, driven primarily by volume gains and continued category tailwinds.

Key drivers of Premier Protein’s volume growth include increased promotional activity, distribution gains and the first half benefit of our relaunched flavors. Organic growth and distribution gains are the primary volume drivers for Dymatize. We expect fiscal ’24 adjusted EBITDA margins to be largely in line with fiscal ’23, with increased gross margins offset by higher SG&A. Gross margins are expected to benefit from favorable input costs, notably in the first half of the year, offset partially by higher promotional activity. Investments behind our brands, including promotional marketing spend, are expected to skew higher in both the second and fourth quarters. Turning to our first quarter forecast, we expect low double-digit net sales growth compared to a year ago.

We expect strong growth from Dymatize, as it has an easier prior year comparable, lapping a trade inventory deload in the international and domestic specialty channels. Premier Protein sales growth is expected to be in the high single digits as we lap a prior year trade inventory build, which we estimate to be a low double-digit headwind to Premier’s growth rate. As a result, we expect consumption growth to outpace net sales growth as we lap this headwind. Consumption growth will also benefit from higher net pricing, as price increases at retail lagged our October 22 price increase on shakes. We expect first quarter adjusted EBITDA margins to be similar to prior year as higher SG&A as a percentage of net sales was offset by higher gross margins.

Gross margins are expected to benefit from lower protein costs, offset partially by increased promotional spend and other input cost inflation. In closing, we are encouraged with our strong performance in fiscal ’23. Our momentum continues to grow, and we are excited about our prospects in fiscal ’24. I will now turn it over to the operator for questions.

See also 12 Asian Countries With The Best Education System and 17 Countries With The Best Education In Europe.

Q&A Session

Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Andrew Lazar with Barclays. You may proceed.

Andrew Lazar: Darcy, on your third quarter earnings call, you provided initial ’24 guidance to be at the high end of your long-term algorithm on sales and EBITDA margins. And today, you provided a range for guidance, which as you said, at the midpoint, correlates to that. There is a wider range, particularly on EBITDA that you provided. And I guess my question is just — does that indicate something has maybe changed in your confidence in the outlook? It doesn’t seem that way from all the metrics you provided. But if so, maybe you could get into some of the key factors? Or maybe I’m just reading too much into the range that you provided.

Darcy Davenport: Yes. There’s been no change in our confidence. I think that — yes, I wouldn’t read too much into the slightly expanded range in EBITDA.

Andrew Lazar: Okay. And then Paul, I think pricing, I think, was expected to be somewhat lower year-over-year in shakes in ’24, just in light of the move in dairy protein costs. I guess what sort of magnitude should we expect around pricing in Premier Protein? And have you seen any shifts in sort of competitive behavior along these lines that may have impacted your initial thinking on the shape pricing will likely take in ’24?

Paul Rode: Yes. We planned in ’24 to get back to a more normal cadence of promotion. And so that would obviously drive a pricing headwind for the year. So, we’re calling for a low- to mid-single-digit headwind on pricing to net sales growth. As far as competitive dynamic, I wouldn’t say anything has dramatically changed. We’ve actually seen some competitors take pricing higher recently. Because keep in mind, it’s not just protein costs. We have — we’re seeing those. Obviously, we’re expecting those to come down in fiscal ’24, but we’re also seeing inflation across a lot of the other input cost, including packaging and manufacturing costs, while net, we expect to be somewhat favorable from an overall cost perspective. There are other things going the other direction.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from David Palmer with Evercore. You may proceed.

David Palmer: Just a question on some of the data that you’re showing us here on Premier Protein ready — ready-to-drink shakes. On Slide 9, you talk about the shipments being in line with consumption or roughly in line with consumption in the last couple of quarters, but the all-channel consumption outpaced your shipped dollars by 8 points and 6 points, respectively, the last two quarters. I’m wondering, maybe give us a sense of what’s going on there? And do you expect that negative price/mix gap to all channel consumption to continue in the next couple of quarters?

Paul Rode: Yes, there’s a couple of things going on there. So for one, as you go into fiscal ’24, particularly in Q1 and even into Q2, we did see — and I mentioned this in my prepared remarks, that we’re seeing a lag in retailers taking price on shelf. So, we took a price increase on our shakes in October of ’22. So, as we get to Q1, we’ve now fully lapped pricing from a shipments perspective, but for the — for the consumption growth, that’s still benefiting from a high-single-digit growth in kind of into the first quarter, and we expect that to continue a bit into the second quarter as some retailers just didn’t fully reflect price until later. In the fourth quarter in particular, we are lapping trade inventory builds in the Q4 last year. So that is part of the — that is really the main reason between the difference between consumption outpacing shipment growth in Q4. But as we go into Q1 and Q2, it’s more about the pricing element there.

David Palmer: And then just on the capacity increase that Michael’s just bringing on in December, heading into calendar ’24. Is that about 10%? And do — is all signs there that consumption should go up with that capacity that basically that retailers are buying everything they can get from you guys?

Darcy Davenport: Yes. Ultimately, from Michael, yes, I mean, it will be about 10%, but that’s going to take some time to scale up. So I mentioned that December, we should start up, but it won’t be until the back half that really, it will be more of a contributor to our sales. But — but you’re absolutely right, yes. We need that volume to be able to feel comfortable to build our inventory and start marketing. We should be good, as I mentioned, we’ll be starting promotion in Q2, and then looking at — from a Premier Tetra standpoint, looking at starting marketing in Q4.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Ken Goldman with JPMorgan. You may proceed.

Ken Goldman: I just wanted to build on Andrew’s question, if I could. And Darcy, you were quite clear that nothing has changed in your outlook or your confidence in the business. But the EBITDA dollar spread sort of from high to low in guidance is higher than what you’ve typically done in the past. And I didn’t know if there was a specific reason for that. And I guess, kind of more importantly, maybe we could get a little bit of sense from you about what the key drivers would be that would lead that number to come in toward the upside or toward the downside? I mean, obviously, no one has a crystal ball. But just as you kind of think of what you’re most excited about and what you’re most concerned about or what some of the risks might be that you think are more important to call out? I’m just curious what those might be for this year.

Darcy Davenport: Sure. Yes. So why don’t we start just with net sales. So, the biggest factor that would force us to go to the higher, the low side is really production. So, it’s the timing of our production scale up, as you might expect. Other factors are response to promotion, competition, also the overall economy, but the biggest one from a net sales perspective is the timing of the production scale up. When you think of EBITDA, obviously, net sales is a — fact is the major factor and that would just flow through. And then protein mix and freight rates could also push us up or down. Paul, I don’t know if you want to talk a little bit about some of the fluctuations within protein? But again, I wouldn’t — I really wouldn’t read too much into the slightly expanded EBITDA range.

Paul Rode: Yes. From a protein perspective, we have good line of sight really through the first half of the year into the third quarter. So, I think it’s still kind of wait and see how the protein costs. There’s been some fluctuations on the milk protein side. And then on whey protein, which is our primary input for our powder business, we have seen some tightness in that market recently, which likely will start to affect our second half. The question there is that that’s a temporary blip or if it stays at an elevated rate, but we have seen some fluctuations there. But to Darcy’s point, the wider range is just more of a reflection of our growth versus really anything fundamentally changing from how we’re thinking about fiscal ’24.

Operator: Thank you [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Pamela Kaufman with Morgan Stanley. You may proceed.

Pamela Kaufman: I have a follow-up question on your production capacity. I think you previously indicated that it would be up around 20% year-on-year in fiscal ’24. Is that still fair? And then in addition to Michael’s capacity, is there additional production that you’re bringing online? And then what is the visibility into production expansion beyond this year?

Darcy Davenport: Yes. We feel good about the 20% plus. And it — the growth slightly skewed to the second half, and that’s just a factor of the start-up from Michael Foods. If you break down the production growth for 24, about 40% of it is coming from new co-mans in ’24. So, new adds that we’re adding in ’24. About 40% of the growth is coming from lapping the ’23 adds and then about 20% is coming from just additional volume from our existing. So that gives you kind of a flavor for the growth that we’re bringing on this year. I think you asked, Pam, what other facilities or partners are coming on this year. So in addition to Michael Foods, we have two existing partners that are adding capacity, so some of our existing partners adding a line, basically.

And then your last question about looking forward on adding capacity. We have in our visibility. So currently, because of how much capacity we added this year — last year and this year, we will get the benefit of kind of a full year. And as they get up to kind of their run rate, the expected run rate. So we actually — we do long-range planning every — twice a year or if anything fundamentally changes. So, our long-range planning are five years out now. And currently, we’re looking at — we think that we will need additional capacity in 20 — bringing on late ’25-’26 and into ’27. So that’s our current. And so, we are already talking to all of our partners and figuring out who we’re going to partner with to expand the capacity.

Pamela Kaufman: Great. And then also, thanks for sharing your thoughts on how you’re thinking about the impact from GLP-1 drugs on the business. And it’s consistent with our research on the benefits to higher protein and weight management foods. But can you elaborate on your initiative to target these consumers? And how do you plan to identify them?

Darcy Davenport: I mean, as you know, Pam, it’s still early. So I think in general, we’re very encouraged by the results of the drugs just for society, but also for our category and our business, but we are in learning mode. So, we did kind of our initial research, mining the data, we’re now adding some additional research. We had already started — we did a pretty thorough study around consumers and how they approach kind of weight wellness. And now we’re adding to that. So, we’re going to — we need to better understand what these consumers need and their journey, how they get information. And then we’re going to test media to determine the best way to reach these consumers. So whether it’s outreach to support communities, to partner with, et cetera.

So I don’t want to go into too much detail. But suffice to say, we are definitely digging in and better understanding, and it will be this year, doing a lot of testing and learning and further understanding kind of their health journey.

Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Matt Smith with Stifel. You may proceed.

Matt Smith: I wanted to ask about promotional events timing through the year. Can you talk about the timing of your planned activity? You called out investments in 2Q and 4Q. And I guess when we think about the large promotional events to the extent that there will be timing differences between consumption and shipments beyond 1Q? That would be helpful.

Darcy Davenport: Sure, Matt. Yes. So Q2 will be — so remember, Q1 is kind of a seasonally low period. So, no promotions, very few promotions and marketing, Q2 is where in the category, most new users are entering into the category. So that’s when we will have promotions on both Premier and Dymatize. We will also be launching for Dymatize a new media campaign in Q2, along with some media on Premier Powder. When you go to Q3, extension of the media campaign on Dymatize, and then in Q4, we will have promotions on the Premier Protein full brand, and our plan right now is to launch a national marketing campaign in Q4, again, barring capacity. So, that is kind of when you look at the marketing and promotional calendar for ’24 as it sits today.

In regards to where there will be kind of promotional loads, I think one encouraging piece is that we will — I think in Q2, our major — one of our major cloud promotions is a little bit later in the quarter in Q2. So, there won’t — there shouldn’t be a massive difference between where you have a load-in in one quarter and consumption in the next. It will mostly be in the same quarter versus when back in kind of ’21 when we were doing big promotions. I don’t know, Paul, is there anything else that we’re — we’re going to see a big change between shipments and consumption?

Paul Rode: No. If you look at consumption and shipment volumes, we’re expecting those to be — to largely track throughout the year. We’re not at — to Darcy’s point, we’re not expecting any major loads, deloads. We are lapping in our first quarter a trade inventory deload, which is — or actually a load, I should say. So, it’s actually a headwind in the first quarter. So, that’s — some want to point that out. But that also — we also had a deload in the second quarter last year, which also benefits our — which should be a tailwind to our second quarter. So, those are the only two pieces a bit from true consumption volume versus shipment volume, we expect them to largely track in fiscal ’24 by quarter.

Matt Smith: And as a follow-up, if we take a step back and we think about the level of promotional activity behind Premier Protein shakes and the rest of the business in fiscal ’24. Is this still just a step towards getting back to a full investment level? Or would you consider this year once you get through the first quarter kind of representative of the level of promotional activity that you think you need behind the two brands?

Darcy Davenport: It will largely be on track, I would say. We have — there isn’t — I think we’ve communicated this before. But back in ’21, I think we are a bit heavy on promotion. And so I mean, I think we were doing up to kind of three major promotions a year. I think what we’ve learned over the last couple years is that we are probably subsidizing a fair amount of volume. So as we move forward in ’24 and beyond, I think we are getting back to the level that we think is appropriate for our business without yes, subsidizing a lot of volume. So I would say ’24 is representative.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Jim Salera with Stephens. You may proceed.

Jim Salera: I wanted to ask, you had touched on the benefit from having some temporarily discontinued flavors come back online. Could you just offer some color around — does that represent an opportunity to bring incremental households back to the brand that maybe are more focused on a specific flavor? And so if their flavor is not available, they don’t shop Premier? Or is it more represent just increased buy rate, where a consumer is likely to buy both out of their plain vanilla flavor and then their preferred flavor?

Darcy Davenport: Yes. Jim, it’s really both. So you saw a bump up in household penetration in the supplemental presentation that we have on our website. You saw a bump up about one point in household penetration. It’s a combination of — we did start light promotion in the quarter, and so that was part of it, but it’s also partially bringing back those paused flavors. So — and those are people that they really like, cinnamon roll, for instance. And so, they were waiting for it. So absolutely, it’s a combination so both buy rate as well as household pen.

Jim Salera: And this might be too early for you guys to have an answer on this yet, given that the national marketing campaign is towards the end of the year. But do you have a sense of kind of what the messaging is going to be there? Is it really to kind of communicate use occasions to consumers so it’s more like to grow the category? Or is it something specific for Premier?

Darcy Davenport: So I’ll talk about — so both. So we plan to have a new campaign on both of our brands. Since Dymatize starts in Q2, I have more information on that than I do on the Premier side of things. We’re still working on — obviously, we have our strategy. So first on Dymatize, very excited about the campaign, it’s a stronger creative that really is going to differentiate, Dymatize versus the rest of the competitive set around its premium positioning and science-backed aspect, which is really why consumers pick Dymatize. It’s because it’s a super premium, high quality, kind of the highest quality science-backed brand. And so we’re really hitting on that in our new campaign. On Premier, our strategy from a marketing standpoint has always been to use our consumers to communicate why they love the brand so much.

So it’s super authentic. It’s been very effective for the brand. So it’s a combination of that as well as communicating the amazing taste. So I don’t expect us to change from that overall strategy, but the teams are working hard to figure out what the right angle is to — for the Q4 campaign.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Matt McGinley with Needham. You may proceed.

Matt McGinley: So for the higher marketing spend this year, I think you were targeting something like 3% or 4% this year versus the 2.5% of sales you spent last year. Is that 3% to 4% in marketing still the right range? Or do you have that tighter than that now? And is the critical decision point, you made a couple of comments around how you would spend it. Is the critical decision point more around the production? Or is it more around the effectiveness of the 2Q advertising campaign that you would then kind of ramp the spend into the fourth quarter, if you really got good results from what happens earlier in the year?

Paul Rode: Yes. Darcy, I’ll take the first question. You can take the second part of the question. Yes, we are modeling our marketing spend being kind of the 3% to 3.5% range. We don’t think we’ll get to 4%, that is more likely as we go forward with our full production capacity going, but we’ll be in that 3%, 3.5% range is our expectation for ’24.

Darcy Davenport: Yes. Your second part of the question, I just want to be clear. So, we are supporting — fully supporting in marketing the parts of the business where we have capacity. So think of we are fully supporting Dymatize, Premier Protein Powder, our Premier bottles. What we are waiting on until from a marketing perspective until Q4 is really the Tetra side of the business on Premier Protein. And that is purely a reflection of capacity. We just need to make sure that we have the capacity and we have the right level of inventory that we can — that we can support it from a marketing perspective and see the lift.

Matt McGinley: Got it. That makes sense. And with the debt repayments that you made on your revolver last year and into this one, you have a zero balance, and I don’t believe you can call your senior notes until a couple of years out. I think in the prepared remarks, it sounds like working capital would be more of an investment this year, but you’d still probably be building cash over the course of this year. Do you expect share repurchase to become more of a priority this year? Or does it make sense to sit on larger cash balances this year to, I guess, to have some dry powder if you see opportunities that present themselves?

Paul Rode: Yes. In ’24, we expect to continue to look at share repurchases as the primary use of our capital. I would say that in ’23, we actually — we bought back 125 million of shares. So I wouldn’t say it was light in ’23 as well. But as we go into ’24, to your point, the — we could build cash, but share repurchases and being opportunistic there is the more likely use of our capital.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Bryan Spillane with Bank of America. You may proceed.

Bryan Spillane: So I guess two kind of follow-ups. One, I think, Matt asked earlier about are promotion level this year kind of normalized. What about — can you comment also on just marketing, Darcy? I guess I was thinking back, you’ve had capacity spend on limitation for a while, on and off. And so, you — I think my impression has maybe restrained marketing spend a bit. So, now that you have more capacity and we’re looking at this year, is this a normal year? Or would you expect that you have more capacity, again, assuming demand continues to increase that marketing, whether it’s in absolute dollars or percentage of sales, how would that evolve with having more production?

Darcy Davenport: Yes. From a marketing perspective, it is not a normal year. So we would — because we’re really starting — like I said, we are supporting the size of the business that we have capacity. So normal year for Dymatize, Premier Protein Powder, bottles, but on the Tetra side of the business, which is really the bulk of the Premier Protein business, we are only marketing — we were planning to only market in Q4. So getting into ’25, we would absolutely be spending — and probably our biggest spend would be — the reason why we’re not doing Q2 this year is capacity, and we don’t — and the last thing we want to do, and we’re pushing promotion first and then marketing in the back half. So I think ’25 will be more of a normal marketing year for the entire business because we’ll have all of our greenfields up to — fully scaled up, and we’ll be able to really drive the business.

Bryan Spillane: Okay. And then my second — my follow — other follow-up is just to Pam’s question around GLP-1s. And I guess I was hearing it and listening to the prepared remarks. One question is just in terms of research, it sounds like what you’re doing with a lot of consumer research, but will you do any like product formulation research or anything that might be able to connect the efficacy of Premier to patients on GLP-1 and tied to that? Kind of like what we see in infant formula? Is there the potential to market to doctors and nutritionists, right, to sort of promote the efficacy of the product and helping people on that weight loss journey?

Darcy Davenport: Yes. So first, the exciting news is that we don’t have to do much. I mean, our products are very well formulated, positioned and already resonating with GLP users. I mean, you can go on social media and you see our brand pop-up kind of on Reddit and Facebook feeds, et cetera. However, I think that — and I would also say that we have experienced marketing to certain groups where certain specific kind of medical needs. And we do it in a way that doesn’t change our brand overall brand positioning, but we do it in a very kind of specific surgical way, which I think is how we would do this. And so we have some experience there. We just want to figure out the right place to communicate. Your last question around — would we go after doctors, et cetera, we have some experience there.

And the answer is possibly. I think our experience would say that doctors really have no interest in communicating what products people use, but some of the support groups or nurses or dieticians do. And so we’ll see. Again, this is a different, different product. It’s a different kind of health journey. So, we want to really understand it so we can do it the right way. And then from a — the last question around product formulation, absolutely, it’s part of what we’re evaluating. Remember, this is early. So, we want to better understand the nutrition that they’re missing. We know that when you were on these drugs that you do lose more muscle mass, so we know protein is important so kind of checked that box. There are other areas if there’s some micronutrients that are potentially lost.

Those are things that we need to learn, and we plan to.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from John Baumgartner with Mizuho Securities. You may proceed.

John Baumgartner: Darcy, first off, I wanted to ask about innovation as the supply chain issues are being solved in advertising and promos being turned back on, at what point do you think the model is ready and sort of capable of supporting innovation that’s larger and more platform-based in nature? You mentioned your long-range planning. So, how do we think about portfolio development from here, whether it’s flavors, format, differentiated products that we may even see in fiscal ’24?

Darcy Davenport: We dug into — I think that we have some new learnings in this area, John. So we dug into our data over the last several months with an outside partner. And I think that we have, yes, some exciting new learnings. I think the biggest piece is we have found we have much more upside with our existing products and what I’ll just call close-in innovation. So think flavors, pack sizes, formats, and so sort of closer in innovation as well as just more distribution of our existing products. What I like about that is it is less risky, it’s more efficient. However, we also have been spending the last two years — our R&I team have been working on new lines of products, especially on our Premier Protein business. So, we have a very full pipeline of new products.

But my expectation is that we’re going to focus on — in ’24 more on the closer-in innovation, and then ’25 and beyond will be — will be launching some of those lines that we have developed. And our goal is to launch a new line every 12 to 18 months on both Premier and Dymatize and focus on ’25 and beyond.

John Baumgartner: Okay. And then as a follow-up on marketing. You’ve also mentioned the TV campaigns, obviously and the high ROI you’re seeing from influencers and social media. But I’m curious, do other opportunities exist, whether it’s partnerships or brand sponsorships, that can maybe amplify and complement that influence your breadth and accelerate brand awareness? What levers are still out there, maybe that could be high impact, but haven’t been pulled yet given where the supply chain has been?

Darcy Davenport: I mean, honestly, a lot of levers because we just haven’t — I mean — so again, I want to separate Dymatize and Premier. On Premier, we’ve been holding back. We have not had any significant marketing for two years. So other than kind of the basic social media that what we call kind of every day, keep the lights on marketing, but we haven’t had a big campaign since ’21, so absolutely a big opportunity. On Dymatize, we use — we have influencers. We call them our Shaker Program. And they’re basically — every day that — we have a bunch of criteria. They’re still — they’re everyday influencers, but they actually have a lot of reach. So we have had a lot of success with the Shaker Program within Premier. Now is there an opportunity to have a more high-profile influencer?

Possibly. On Dymatize, we actually have done that. So we’ve brought in a combination of — of just regular influencers, which have pretty high reach, but then we’ve also every year, brought on some kind of higher profile influencers, and we’ll continue to do that within the Dymatize business, even starting in ’24. I’m not ready to tell you who are high-profile influencers are, but we’re absolutely using that lever.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Bill Chappell with Truist Securities. You may proceed.

Bill Chappell: Yes. Thanks for squeezing me in. I guess, first, maybe just a little bit — talk with some of the additional capacity, talk about kind of different distribution, both international opportunities, but also kind of single serve at C-stores or stuff like that and kind of how that’s progressing or if that will progress as we look at the next end of the year?

Darcy Davenport: Yes. So first of all, international, actually, I think both of those opportunities as more longer range. We have so much — I mean, I just said when I was talking to John is that from an innovation standpoint, this new learning around we have so much opportunity in the U.S. with our existing products with kind of close-in innovation. International is absolutely an opportunity, but it is — it takes a little longer to build, and it is kind of — it’s — yes, it’s a slower build. Right now, international is about low teens, about to 10% to 12% of our business. And it’s growing very — it’s growing strongly about the same rate as we’re seeing in the U.S. But it’s on a lower base. So, we’re going to continue. We have a dedicated team that’s focused.

We have a nice sized business in Canada. We’re growing in Mexico. We are growing through our global customers across the globe. We have a business in the EU and an office there. So, I would say we are definitely investing and we see it as a future opportunity. It’s just a slower build, especially when we have so much opportunity within the U.S. On the single-serve question, the same thing, again, we see that as an opportunity. It’s a little more complicated because it requires a different route to market. So once again, we have this capacity. We are actually expanding our bottle co-man, which is exciting, which is also the format that we sell within e-commerce. And we think that there’s future opportunity with kind of bottles across channels.

Bill Chappell: Got it. And then just some housekeeping. Can you give us an idea of interest expense and tax rate for fiscal ’24?

Paul Rode: Yes, our tax rate will be around 25% to 26%, a little higher this year because of the accelerated amortization on PowerBar. What was your second question? It was the cash interest?

Bill Chappell: Yes, interest expense, cash interest expense.

Paul Rode: Cash interest ought to be around $60 million.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Jon Andersen with William Blair. You may proceed.

Jon Andersen: Just one quick question on Premier Protein. From the slides, it looks like consumption growth for the brand has been running stronger in tracked channels relative to untracked panels, both on a 52-week and 13-week basis. I’m assuming that’s a function of where the new distribution or TPs or the restoration of TPs is hitting the market. Could you remind us of kind of for Premier Protein, how much of the consumption for that brand is tracked versus untracked? And as you look to 2024 and restarting promotions, et cetera, how do you expect that channel mix may evolve in 2024 from here?

Darcy Davenport: So Jennifer might have to help me. I think it’s about 60% of our business on Premier is in track. Jennifer, is that about right?

Jennifer Meyer: I believe so.

Darcy Davenport: Okay. So about 60% of the Premier business is tracked. You’re absolutely right, Jon, that the reason why it’s outpacing on track is mainly, that’s where we’re gaining a lot of distribution. It’s a lot of food accounts, mass accounts where we’re increasing distribution quite a lot. And then — sorry, your second question around — was it just your…

Jon Andersen: More around the focus of marketing in 2024 and will it have a kind of a channel orientation to it that might affect that mix in ’24?

Darcy Davenport: No. So, all of our marketing is really supporting the overall brand, which should raise all channels kind of equally. We do some channel-specific marketing, but the bulk of it will be overall. I think the biggest — I do expect that — I mean it depends — it will be — I would say the difference between tracked and untracked moving forward will — we expect to continue to see increases in distribution more in tracked, but also on untracked, we’ll see promotion can really push untracked quite high when we have these big promotions within the quarter. So that’s something that we will see kind of like in Q2 and Q4.

Operator: Thank you. We reached the end of our Q&A session. This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.