The hydraulic fracturing industry in the U.S. is booming. Roughly 90% of all U.S. onshore wells now require some degree of hydraulic fracturing, in which water and minerals are injected into a well under pressure to boost its rate of oil or gas production. When three companies control 60% of an industry, as is the case in the hydraulic fracturing service provision, collusion and price manipulation becomes pretty common. The three companies being investigated for anti-competitive practices by the U.S. Justice Department are Baker Hughes Incorporated (NYSE:BHI), Schlumberger Limited. (NYSE:SLB) and Halliburton Company (NYSE:HAL). At the same time, the number of energy rigs in the U.S. rose by six to 1,782, the highest level this year – a result of increasing profitability of the rigging business. So is it worthwhile to invest in these companies?
Baker Hughes Incorporated (NYSE:BHI)’ second quarter earnings fell 45% due to weak North America profits. Furthermore, volatile oil and gas prices have also disrupted the demand for Baker Hughes’ services – especially in the U.S. On the flipside, the company has become a large service contractor for unconventional drilling in the Vaca Muerta shale in Argentina. To improve efficiency and the company’s ability to extract greater amounts of oil and gas, Baker Hughes plans to introduce successfully tested electric submersible pumps – the FleX series.
Schlumberger Limited. (NYSE:SLB), being almost twice the size of Baker Hughes Incorporated (NYSE:BHI), should theoretically have less potential to grow. However, contrary to Baker Hughes’ weak quarter, Schlumberger reported a 49% increase to its net income in the latest quarterly report. Schlumberger is also initiating a $10 billion share buyback program as it forecast positive sentiment in the drilling industry for the remaining year. The company’s strength lies in having a global diversity of assets, as it makes two-thirds of its revenue outside North America.
Halliburton Company (NYSE:HAL) is still marred by the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill. The latest reports are that the company will plead guilty in destroying evidence to cut a deal – a deal which will end up making them pay the maximum fine. Furthermore, Halliburton reported that its profits fell 7.9% in the latest quarter much like its U.S. based counterpart, Baker Hughes Incorporated (NYSE:BHI). But the company’s international revenue grew 14%, driven by growth in its Middle East/Asia business—the company’s fastest growing market.
Financial Comparison
Indicator | Halliburton | Schlumberger | Baker Hughes |
---|---|---|---|
P/E TTM | 23.6 | 17.6 | 21.5 |
Forward P/E | 11.3 | 14.2 | 11.9 |
PEG Ratio | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.9 |
Operating Margin % TTM | 9.8% | 18.8% | 8.5% |
Dividend Yield , % | 0.93% | 1.42% | 1.24% |
Return on Equity | 12.7% | 17.6% | 5.9% |
Current Price | $46.16 | $82.87 | $48.40 |
Data from Morningstar and Financial Visualizations on August 6th, 2013
The industry has an average P/E value of 20.9, which makes Halliburton Company (NYSE:HAL) and Baker Hughes Incorporated (NYSE:BHI) overvalued. Schlumberger Limited. (NYSE:SLB) is the world’s leading supplier of oilfield services and also has strong growth prospects as suggested by the company’s strong PEG ratio. Furthermore, its operating margin is head and shoulder above its North American counterparts while the stock also offers the highest yield, subjectively. On the count of efficiency and returning value to the shareholders, Schlumberger outperforms the opposition yet again.
The quarterly average price for Brent oil, an international benchmark, has remained more than $100 a barrel since the start of 2011. Customers are spending more to get access to harder to reach oil and gas reserves around the world, including deep-water fields, and the company said it expects those increases to continue.