Autoliv, Inc. (NYSE:ALV) Q4 2024 Earnings Call Transcript

Autoliv, Inc. (NYSE:ALV) Q4 2024 Earnings Call Transcript January 31, 2025

Autoliv, Inc. beats earnings expectations. Reported EPS is $3.05, expectations were $2.84.

Operator: Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Autoliv Inc. Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Financial Results Conference Call and Webcast. All participants will be in listen-only mode during the conference. After the speakers’ presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please note that today’s conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker Anders Trapp, Vice President Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Anders Trapp : Thank you Ralf. Welcome everyone to our fourth quarter and full year 2024 earnings call. On this call we have our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mikael Bratt; and our Chief Financial Officer, Fredrik Westin; and me Anders Trapp, VP, Investor Relations. During today’s earnings call we will cover several key topics, including our sales and record earnings, strong cash flow and balance sheet. We will outline the expected margin improvement in 2025, as well as how our strong balance sheet and asset return will support continued high levels of shareholder returns. Following the presentation, we will be available to answer your questions. As usual, the slides are available on autoliv.com. Turning to the next slide, we have the Safe Harbor statement, which is an integrated part of this presentation and includes the Q&A that follows.

During the presentation, we will reference non-U.S. GAAP measures. The reconciliations of historical U.S. GAAP to non-U.S. GAAP measures are disclosed in our quarterly earnings release available on autoliv.com and in the 10-K that will be filed with the SEC. Lastly I should mention that this call is intended to conclude at 3 p.m. Central European time so please follow a limit of two questions per person. I will now hand over to our Chief Executive Officer, Mikael Bratt.

Mikael Bratt: Thank you Anders. Looking on the next slide. I am very happy to present the Record-Breaking Quarter. This is a testament to our employees’ hard work, dedication and commitment. And I want to thank them for their outstanding contributions and for consistently driving our success forward. Meeting our full year guidance despite accelerated market headwinds showcases the company’s adaptability and resilience driven by our diverse product portfolio and strong customer relationships. This achievement not only highlights our current success, but also lays a solid foundation for 2025 with continued margin expansion. Despite Light Vehicle Production, mixed deterioration leading to lower sales, we’ll reach new record highs in the quarter for operating profit, operating margin and earnings per share.

For the full year, we also had a record high operating cash flow. I am also pleased that we generated an exceptional level of return on our capital employed. Our strong performance was mainly a result of strict cost control. Our structural cost reduction program enabled us to reduce our indirect workforce by 1,400 since Q1 2023. We managed to accelerate our operating efficiency improvement, partly supported by the improved customer calloff accuracy, which contributed to a reduction of direct headcount by 4,500 in one year, which is a reduction of almost 9%. The strong results were also supported by agreements we reached with all major customers on excess inflation compensation. Cash flow continued to be strong, supporting a high level of shareholder returns.

In the quarter, we repurchased shares for $102 million and retired 3 million shares. The Board of Directors has approved an extension of the shares repurchase program until the end of 2025. Under the extended repurchase program, $480 million remains. Autoliv was rated BBB+ with a stable outlook by Fitch ratings in November. Looking now on financials in more detail on the next slide. Sales in the fourth quarter decreased by 5% year-over-year for several market related reasons. This includes negative effects from currency translation, LVP development, as well as the regional and customer mix development. Despite this, the adjusted operating income for Q4 increased by 5% to $349 million from $334 million last year. The adjusted operating margin was 13.4%, a record for the company.

Operating cash flow was a solid $420 million. Looking now on the next slide. We continue to generate broad-based improvement. Our direct labor productivity continues to improve as we reduce our direct production personnel by 4,500 year-over-year. This is supported by the implementation of our strategic initiatives including automation and digitalization. Our gross margin was 21% an increase of 180 basis points year-over-year. The improvement was mainly the result of direct labor efficiency and headcount reduction, partly offset by lower sales and supplier settlement as communicated in the previous quarter. As a result of our structural efficiency initiatives, the positive trend for RD&E and SG&A from the beginning of the year continued. Combined with the gross margin improvement, this led to the substantial improvement in adjusted operating margin.

Looking now on the market development in the fourth quarter on the next slide. According to S&P Global, total global light vehicle production for the fourth quarter increased by 40 basis points, exceeding the expectation from the beginning of the quarter by over 4 percentage points. Most of this improvement was driven by local OEMs in China, supported by the scrapping and replacement subsidy policy, as well as high growth in South America. Key markets in North America and Europe performed in-line with expectations. This resulted in a more unfavorable regional light vehicle production mix of around 4 basis points in the quarter significantly impacting our outperformance negatively. In the quarter, we did see calloff volatility improving, both from the third quarter and year-over-year.

We will talk about the market development more in detail later in the presentation. Looking now on our sales growth in more detail on the next slide. Our consolidated net sales were $2.6 billion. This was $136 million lower than a year earlier, driven by lower life vehicle production, negative currency translation effects, and lower out of period cost compensation. The negative currency translation effect reduced sales by almost 2% in the quarter. Out-of-period cost compensation contributed with approximately $24 million in the quarter. This was $21 million lower than in the same period last year. Out-of-period compensations are retroactive price adjustments and other compensations that mainly related to the first three quarters but were settled in the fourth quarter.

Looking on the regional sales split, it reflects the high growth of automotive markets in Asia and our strong market position there. China accounted for 23%, Asia excluding China accounted for 20%, America’s for 30% and Europe for 27%. We outlined our organic sales growth compared to light vehicle production on the next slide. Our quarterly sales were robust but slightly below our expectations, primarily due to a more unfavorable regional and customer mix. We continued to outperform light vehicle production significantly in Japan, rest of Asia and in Europe, fueled by product launches and pricing. The outperformance in rest of Asia were driven by India and South Korea. We expect a continued strong outperformance in 2025 in India from a number of launches.

In China, we underperformed as the light vehicle production growth mix continued to be tilted towards lower CPV models from Chinese domestic OEMs. In Americas, we underperformed light vehicle production by 3 percentage points, mainly as a result of dealer inventory reductions by major customers and strong South American growth. Among the primary growth drivers for the company this quarter, five were Chinese OEMs and two were Japanese, underscoring the significance of the Asian market and its customers. On the next slide, we have the organic sales growth for the full year 2024. For the full year, we outperformed global light vehicle production by around 2 percentage points. We estimate that the regional light vehicle production mix was 2 to 3 percentage points worse than expected in the beginning of the year.

We outperformed in Japan by 13 percentage points, in rest of Asia by 10 percentage points and in Europe by 6 percentage points. Our sales to domestic Chinese OEMs grew by 24%, and they accounted for more than 37% of our China sales up from 28% in 2023. Even so, the negative market mix still resulted in an underperformance of 7 percentage points in China. We expect this to improve in 2025 as our strong order intake with Chinese OEMs should result in a record number of new launches in 2025, leading to significantly better sales performance compared to light vehicle production in China. Our global market position is strong and we are the market leader in all regions and product categories. In 2024, our global market share was around 44%. This excludes sales of components such as inflators.

This is almost 5 percentage points higher than in 2018. Supported by new launches, especially with Chinese OEMs and CPV growth, we expect sales to outperform light vehicle production by 2 to 3 percentage points in 2025. On the next slide, we see some key model launches from Q4. We saw a record number of significant launches in 2024. For 2025, we also anticipate a high number of launches, especially with Chinese OEMs. In this Slide, three of these models are from Chinese OEMs and three from OEMs in India. This highlights our growing position with Chinese OEMs and our success in capturing growth in the Indian market. The models shown here have an Autoliv content per vehicle from around $100 to over $400. In terms of Autoliv sales potential, the Toyota 4Runner and Suzuki DZIRE are the most significant.

This is the first time we have a model in India with the highest sales potential. The long-term trend to higher CPV is supported by front center airbags and on 6 of these models. Now looking on the next slide. In 2024, the industry’s sourcing of new business was at the lowest level since 2018. This was driven by technological and geopolitical uncertainties, causing the sourcing of several large platforms to be postponed until 2025. In addition, model lifetime is shortening as Chinese OEMs share of the order book increase. Models from Chinese OEMs typically have an average lifetime that — is a couple of years shorter. In order intake market share with the rapidly growing Chinese OEMs exceeded 40% and a significant improvement compared to our current market share of close to 25% with this group.

Looking on the order intake more in detail on the next slide. In 2024, order intake for new automakers mainly in the North America and China accounted for almost one-third of our order intake. We won multiple awards supporting new markets and industry trends like foldable steering wins for self-driving vehicles, including a new type of driver airbags that deploys from the dashboard or ceiling. Autoliv has successfully secured business in the commercial vehicle sector bolstering our mobility Safety Solutions business. This expansion not only strengthens our market position, but also enhances our ability to deliver innovative safety solutions to a broader range of customers. We also won airbag contracts featuring low carbon cushion material, a significant step towards sustainability in automotive safety.

These innovative airbags not only reduce the environmental impact, but also lower the cost of the airbag module. Thanks to the robust order intake in recent years. We anticipate that the number of product launches in 2025 to be on a similar level as in 2024. This progress supports our long-term success. Let’s now look at the sustainability program during 2024 on the next slide. Sustainability is an integral part of our business strategy and an important driver for market differentiation and stakeholder value creation. Our sustainability approach is based on four focused areas with clear ambitions and targets defined for each area. During 2024, we initiated and concluded a number of activities within these areas. For example, we continue to expand our addressable users by expanding testing, including diverse body shapes, ages and genders.

Through collaborations, we addressed protection for vulnerable road users. We significantly improved our recordable incidence rate, greenhouse gas emissions in own operations were reduced by [50%] (ph) compared to 2023, and the share of renewable electricity increased to 30%, having positive environmental and financial effects. We conducted our annual supplier climate survey to assess, their readiness for our net zero supply chain goals. And we also integrated climate performance into supplier selection and launched a climate accelerator program to support them. Turning the slide. I will now hand it over to Fredrik Westin.

Fredrik Westin: Thank you, Mikael. I will talk about the financials more in details on the next few slides. So turning to the next slide. This slide highlights our key figures for the fourth quarter of 2024 compared to the fourth quarter of 2023. The net sales exceeded $2.6 billion, representing nearly a 5% decrease. The gross profit increased by $20 million and the gross margin increased by 1.8 percentage points. The adjusted operating income increased from $334 million to $349 million and the adjusted operating margin increased by 120 basis points to 13.4%. The reported operating income of $353 million was $4 million higher than the adjusted operating income thanks to a positive impact from reversal of capacity alignment accruals.

Adjusted earnings per share diluted decreased by $0.70, where the main drivers were $0.90 from higher taxes and $0.10 from higher financial and non-operating items, partly compensated by $0.11 from higher operating income and $0.19 from lower number of shares. The adjusted return on capital employed was a solid 35% and our adjusted return on equity was 41%, driven by share buybacks impacting total equity. We paid a dividend of $0.70 per share in the quarter, and we repurchased shares for around $102 million and retired 3 million shares. Looking now on the adjusted operating income bridge on the next slide. In the fourth quarter of 2024, our adjusted operating income increased by $16 million, despite market headwinds from lower light vehicle production.

Operations contributed with $57 million, mainly from improved calloff accuracy and higher operational efficiency, as well as lower recall costs of the largest offsetting factor to the increase was lower net sales. The net currency effect was $1 million negative, as the positive effects, mainly from the Mexican peso versus U.S. dollar was offset by translation effects and negative transaction effects from the Mexican peso versus the euro, the Japanese yen versus the Thai baht and the U.S. dollar versus the Korean won. The impact from raw materials was around $6 million negative. Out-of-period cost compensation of $24 million was $21 million lower than last year. Costs for SG&A and RD&E net increased slightly on higher costs for SG&A personnel despite the offset from higher engineering income.

The impact of the supply settlement, Mikael mentioned earlier, was around $10 million in the fourth quarter. Looking now at the full year results on the next slide. 2024 was again impacted by labor and supplier cost inflation, lower and volatile light vehicle production and customer price negotiations. Our net sales were $10.4 billion, a 1% decline on negative currency translation effects. The adjusted operating income increased by 9.5% to over $1 billion. The adjusted operating margin was 9.7% compared to our guidance of around 9.5% to 10%. The operating cash flow was $1.1 billion, in-line with the guidance. Adjusted earnings per share increased to $8.32 per share, partly as a result of the share repurchases. Dividends of $2.74 per share were paid.

Despite market headwinds and lower sales, adjusted operating profit, operating cash flow as well as the earnings per share were all the highest we have ever achieved. Looking now at the cash flow in more detail on the next slide. For the fourth quarter of 2024, the operating cash flow decreased by $27 million to $420 million compared to the same period last year, mainly due to a less favorable working capital development. Capital expenditures net decreased by $18 million compared to the same period the previous year. Capital expenditures net in relation to sales was 5.4% versus — sorry, 5.0% versus 5.4% a year earlier. The free operating cash flow was positive $288 million compared to positive $297 million in the same period the prior year.

For the full year 2024, operating cash flow increased by $77 million to $1.1 billion, mainly on higher net income. The free operating cash flow was almost $0.5 billion. Capital expenditures net decreased by $6 million. Capital expenditures net in relation to sales was unchanged at 5.4%. This level is slightly above what we expect for the longer term due to investments in capacity, mainly in Asia and in footprint optimization. The cash conversion in 2024, defined as free operating cash flow in relation to net income was around 77%, in-line with our target of 80%. Now looking at our trade working capital development on the next slide. Trade working capital decreased by $117 million compared to the same period last year. where the main drivers were $204 million in lower accounts receivables, $179 million in lower accounts payables and $91 million in lower inventories.

In relation to sales, trade working capital decreased from 11.2% to 10.7%. The improvement in trade working capital is a result of our multi-year working capital improvement program and an improvement in customer calloff accuracy, enabling a more efficient inventory management. Our capital efficiency program aims to improve working capital by $800 million. And to-date, we have achieved around $700 million. Now looking on our shareholder returns on the next slide. Over the years, Autoliv has demonstrated its capability to generate solid cash flow across different market conditions. During 2024, we returned over $770 million to shareholders through dividends and share buybacks, setting a new record for the company. Over the last five years, we have significantly reduced our net debt while returning $1.9 billion directly to shareholders, this includes stock repurchases totaling over $1 billion.

Since initiating the current stock repurchase program in 2022, we have reduced the number of outstanding shares by over 12%. When executing the program, we consider several factors, including our balance sheet, the cash flow outlook, our credit rating and the general business conditions as well as the debt leverage ratio. We always strive to balance what is best for our shareholders in both the short and the long term. Now looking on our debt leverage ratio development on the next Slide. Autoliv has consistently prioritized maintaining a strong leverage ratio, reflecting our prudent financial management and commitment to a strong balance sheet. This approach has enabled the company to navigate economic fluctuations, invest in innovation and continue delivering value to stakeholders.

While investing in our footprint and returning over $770 million to shareholders during 2024, our leverage ratio was unchanged at 1.2 times. Compared to the third quarter, our debt leverage ratio decreased by 0.2 times as our net debt decreased by $227 million, while the 12-month trailing adjusted EBITDA increased by $17 million. With that, I hand it back to you, Mikael.

Mikael Bratt: Thank you, Fredrik. On to the next slide. As we enter 2025, the full year outlook for the global light vehicle production by S&P Global stands at the minus 0.5%. The light vehicle production outlook is factoring in regional specific influences, particularly the recent extension of the vehicle scrappage and replacement policy in China, the system headwinds in Europe and North America and a slower EV adaptation growth. The latest forecast indicates a LVP decline of almost 2% for the first quarter versus last year. LVP in China is projected to increase 4% in the first quarter, following a particularly strong performance in the fourth quarter of 2024. The ongoing trend of global OEMs losing market share is expected to persist, but to moderate in the following quarters.

The forecast for North America first quarter LVP is minus 6%. The main reason is the continued need for more vehicle inventory corrections. The light vehicle production in Europe is expected to drop 9% for the first quarter, mainly due to inventory adjustments. From the fourth quarter to the first quarter, global LVP is projected to decline by 14%, a reduction of over 3 million vehicles. This drop is significantly higher than what we have observed over the past three years, where it has averaged around 7%. Based on S&P Global’s forecast and our own analysis, our 2025 guidance is built on a global light vehicle production decline of around 0.5%. And the region mix in-line with S&P’s forecast for the full-year. Now looking on the business outlook on the next Slide.

We expect 2025 to be a challenging year for the automotive industry with LVP declining and geopolitical risks remaining. However, our continued efficiency focus is expected to support further improvement of our profitability. We expect to significantly improve our sales performance in China and that the continued strong cash flow and balance sheet sets a solid foundation for our continued commitment to a high level of shareholder returns and our financial targets. We expect cost pressure from inflation to moderate in 2025, but we still expect some pressure coming mainly from labor, especially in Europe and the Americas. We expect calloff volatility in 2025, on average to be slightly lower than it was in 2024, but remaining higher than the pre-pandemic level.

We also anticipate a challenging first quarter in terms of operating margin, which should gradually improve throughout the year, similarly sequential development as we’ve seen in the past few years with a relatively weak first quarter and gradual improvements throughout the year. Turning to the next Slide. In closing, to summarize our 2025 outlook, we expect continued sales outperformance versus light vehicle production, improved profitability compared to 2024. This improvement is primarily supported by structural cost reduction and strategic initiatives, higher sales, as well as favorable currency effect. We remain mindful of the risk of deteriorating economic conditions and potential tariffs. But I am confident that our leading position, the work we have done to become more resilient and our experience and agility will enable us to manage future challenging conditions.

Now looking on the 2025 guidance in detail on the next Slide. This Slide shows our full year 2025 guidance, which excludes effects from capacity alignment, antitrust-related matters and other discrete items. Our full year guidance is based on a global light vehicle production decline of around 0.5%, a tax rate of around 28% and that the net currency translation effects on sales will be around minus 2%. Based on this, we expect our organic sales to increase by around 2%. The guidance for adjustment — the guidance for adjusted operating margin is around 10% to 10.5%. Operating cash flow is expected to be around $1.2 billion. Our positive cash flow trend and our strong balance sheet supports our continued commitment to high level of shareholder returns.

The guidance for 2025 does not include any new or increased tariffs or other trade limitations, which may impact our operations. We are monitoring the situation closely and are prepared to be agile, as possible to adjust to any such development. Looking on the next Slide. This concludes our formal comments for today’s earnings call. And we would like to open up the line for questions from analysts and investors. I now hand it back to operator, Raf.

Q&A Session

Operator: Thank you sir. [Operator Instructions] We are now going to proceed with our first question. The questions come from the line of Colin Langan from Wells Fargo. Please ask your question.

Colin Langan: Oh, great. Thanks for taking my questions. Maybe if you could just start with maybe framing some of the puts and takes when we think about the margins year-over-year. I think you mentioned FX transaction. I mean I think in ’23, that was like $60 million of a drag. Is that kind of the framework of the good news that we should be thinking about? And then does the labor inflation, is that offsetting 100% through the year with recoveries? Or is that maybe a net negative? And then maybe any framing of the restructuring help we should be expecting?

Fredrik Westin : Yes. On the FX, I would refrain from the guidance when it’s included in, obviously what we have here on the operating margin side. But I don’t want to give what we expect from different currency pairs here to contribute. But the pairs should continue to be a positive for us. Then on the contribution of restructuring, we expect, as we’ve said before, around $50 million incremental savings in 2025 and we had $50 million of savings in line with our expectations in 2024. And other than that, it is — the headwinds are from inflation. The headwind from the supplier cost inflation is higher than what we’re expecting from labor cost inflation and the labor cost inflation continues to come down. I mean, we’ve seen a gradual improvement, and we were talking now about clearly a small percentage numbers versus where as an excess inflation versus when this all kicked in.

And then we are expecting to offset that by commercial recoveries from our customers, but it will be throughout the year. And we also had lump sum settlements last year, although the majority was [feed] (ph) price agreements but some of them now fall away in the first quarter already. And then we need to replace them gradually throughout the year, but the ambition is to have a full offset for the gradual inflation that is hitting us.

Colin Langan: Got it. That’s very helpful. Obviously, a lot of headlines these days around tariffs, particularly on goods from Mexico to the U.S. Can you help us frame if a tariff is in place, how much of an impact that would be? And how you think you might be able to offset and work with customers to offset that?

Mikael Bratt : No, I think if or when tariffs would be implemented there. And for us, it is mostly a question of Mexico, U.S. tariffs. Of course, that is passed on to our customer that is necessary there. So I mean, that would start immediately to be discussion with our customer because there is no reason at all why we, as a supplier, should absorb any cost like that. And I mean ultimately, it will be a higher cost for vehicles sold in the U.S. And we are preparing ourselves for that as soon as that might come. So that would start immediately. That’s discussion.

Colin Langan: Okay, great. Thank you.

Operator: We are now going to proceed with our next question. The questions come from the line of Edison Yu from Deutsche Bank. Please ask your question. Your line is open.

Edison Yu: Thank you for taking our questions. First up on the outlook. I’m curious, what kind of impact are you embedding from mix in 2025? Is that going to actually be a positive going forward relative to 2024?

Fredrik Westin : We expect around a 1 percentage point negative mix in 2025 versus 2024. So we — it should be better than it was in ’24. So there we had a negative mix, as we said around between 2 and 3 percentage points, and then in ’25 that should improve to around 1 percentage point. And maybe one correction. I think in the presentation before, we said 4 basis points negative mix in Q4, that would be 4 percentage points in Q4.

Edison Yu: Understood. Understood. And then on the order intake, I know you have the slide showing obviously, there is a decline. And I think you called out a couple of big programs or a couple of big platforms. Can you give us a sense of what happened there and when you expect those or what kind of impact you would expect on the growth, if any?

Fredrik Westin : Yes. I mean it is — we have seen, as we saw, I mean, the lower sourcing activity from our customers basically since we spun off the electronics business. So it is a rather unusually low sourcing, what it was unusually lower sourcing activity, which continued to come down throughout the year. What we see is that, I mean there has been a lot of discussions around that OEMs are the leading sourcing on projects due to uncertainties on the drive train side. But what we also see on top of that is also uncertainty to location of production. So where actually they would start or in which location would produce a certain platform. And that’s had a significant impact on the overall market development in 2024 and more than we had expected going into the year.

We also said here that there are a couple of platforms that we are the incumbent that have also been delayed into 2025. And the expectation here is that, that sourcing should come in during the first half of this year.

Edison Yu: Got it. Thank you.

Operator: We are now going to proceed with our next question. The questions come from the line of Chris McNally from Evercore. Please ask your question.

Chris McNally : Thanks so much team. Actually, just wanted to follow up on Edison’s question and think about mix in a different way. I don’t think, you obviously don’t guide by region. But when I think about plus 2% organic at the midpoint, I was wondering if you could just take a shot at sort of ranking from strongest organic to weakest sort of across your four regions, non-Asia, China, North America and Europe. Just sort of where we may see the highest to lowest?

Mikael Bratt : No. I think as we have indicated here, I mean, we see the strongest growth opportunities and growth in Asia. I mean, you have of course, China, where we are also taking market share with Chinese OEMs here that continue to strengthen our already leading market position there. And of course, in the rest of Asia, also, you have strong contribution from India where we not only see the [LVP growing] (ph), but also the content is growing there. And then, of course, we have, I’d say, Europe in a challenging situation and also, I’d say, North America here when we look at LVP growth in general there. So yes, I think it is a little bit the same picture as we have seen this year here. So the trend continues more.

Chris McNally : It is super encouraging. And I know it’s hard with quality, but it’s nice to hear China towards the top sort of implies that growth over market there is turning back positive. You mentioned that. Second question on some of the weakness in North America and Europe, is that where the OEM mix also is the sort of the — when you mentioned the minus 1 where we should think about the impact the most, the independent forecasters two of the Detroit 3, down sort of low to mid-single digits, the German 3 in Europe, it is going to be probably a tougher year, given NEV regulations. Again, is there less secular growth in North America and Europe? Or is it really more a mixed issue for 2025 in those two regions?

Mikael Bratt : No, I think, I mean, it’s very much related to, I would say, the overall, I would say, economic situation in those regions. So I mean it is the LVP production per se, that is the biggest challenge there. So no, nothing specific there on an OEM level, I would say it’s more related to what was mentioned here before around uncertainty on drive-lines from the end-consumer, the overall affordability from the end consumer and so forth. So they’re holding it down.

Fredrik Westin : And of course, when it comes to export out of these regions also the competitiveness, you could say.

Operator: We are now going to proceed with our next question. The questions come from the line of Vijay Rakesh from Mizuho. Please ask your question.

Vijay Rakesh : Yeah. Hi. Just a quick question. When you look at the 2% organic growth, I just wondering what you’re embedding in terms of any potential tariffs looks like coming down the pipe here in Canada, tariffs on the Mexico side or how that impact to the 2025 LVP or even the EV mandated piece, how do you — what are we embedding in that assumption? Thanks.

Mikael Bratt : Yes. No, I would say, I mean there is no tariff assumptions included in the guidance for 2025 here. basically for reason, it is very difficult to have a view on it. It’s many different scenarios you can think about the now the level of tariffs, the length of the tariffs and as an example. So that is not included in the outlook here. It’s something we are following very closely. And as we said here, in terms of our own impact potentially there, we will start negotiating with the customer immediately about passing that on. And then if the impact it may have on the demand from the end-consumer, we have no detail around at this point in time.

Vijay Rakesh : Got it. And then on China, definitely encouraging to see that you’re focusing on that. When you look at the CPV in 2020 — 2024, like approximately where there is average out and just wondering how much of a step-up you would see on the average CPV, let’s say, on 2025. Thanks.

Fredrik Westin : Actually, the CPV in China went down year-over-year, 2023 to 2024 slightly. And that was mostly due to the market mix that we saw, where as we said before these scrappage premiums and so on have favored more say lower-end vehicles. So with that, we have to actually see — saw that the overall content per vehicle in the China market went down year-over-year, but we expect this to reverse in 2025.

Mikael Bratt : And the trend in the market is, of course, to gradually increase the content in the vehicles in all different segments here. So I would say, this is a more [temporary nature] (ph) as a result of the shift in the OEM mix, so to speak.

Vijay Rakesh : Got it. Thank you.

Operator: We’re now going to proceed with our next question. The questions come from the line of Hampus Engellau from Handelsbanken. Please ask your question.

Hampus Engellau : Thank you very much. Two questions for me. I wanted to come back on the LVP just that when you look at your outlook, is it based on what your talks with the OEMs or S&P because I think it has included a 10% tariff for the U.S. And at the same time, we have a lot of ongoing in Europe with maybe a massive program on [centers] (ph) for battery electrics and also changing the relation on not putting penalties directly on the OEMs that will fail on the 93.6 MG. And maybe having that measured over 3 years in average. It’s just been interesting to hear your moving parts on being on par with S&P on 0.5 LVP. That’s my first question. Second question is more on — if you could talk a little bit about content per vehicle in India? I know you have a few sub-market share there and what’s happening with this commitment by the OEMs? Thank you.

Mikael Bratt : Thank you, Hampus. On the LVP outlook and what we are based upon, I mean, as always, we — in the short next coming weeks, months, we adjust it maybe with what — we adjusted with our own insights there. But when I look at the total year-on-year on the 0.5% negative that we are mentioning here is I will say is mainly based on the LVP based on the S&P Global here. So we have not, as I mentioned before here, made our own judgment here on potential impact on tariffs and so on. So in the extent it is included in the S&P is there, but we have not massaged it on our side here. So as we said, we don’t have a better crystal ball here than anybody else. And I think when it comes to India, I mean, we see that continue to improve.

Overall, in 2024, it was around $120. And for next year, we expect it to raise to close to $140 and onwards here, so even $160 in size here. So what we have alluded to before here about the growth opportunities in India, we see both the LVP and CPV contributing to this. And with our 60% market share in India, we are well positioned to capture this. And it’s 4% of — India stands for 4% of our sales, which is basically equal to the South Korean market here.

Hampus Engellau: Excellent. Thank you very much.

Mikael Bratt : Thank you.

Operator: We’re now going to proceed with our next question and the question has come from the line of [indiscernible]. Hello, Michael your line is open.

Unidentified Analyst: Hi, great. Hi, Mikael, Fredrik. Thanks for taking my question as well. My first question would be great if you could share a more specific reading on the exit rate for calloff accuracy in Q4. It looks like it picks up quite nicely. And how that compares to the level that is built into the ’25 guidance. And then my second question just goes back to the point on favorable ForEx transactional effects. I know Fred, you don’t want to give a very specific guide on that. But does that imply that you see a net tailwind at an EBIT level? Or is you are just referring to some kind of an offset against the top-line ForEx headwinds that you’re expecting?

Fredrik Westin : Yes. So on the exit rate in terms of call-off stability, so we — as you see in the graph there, we were at around 94% in the fourth quarter, and we saw a good development in Europe, Americas and also in rest of Asia whereas China continues to be at that, say, lower reliability levels. And as we indicated here, we believe that 2025 on average should be at a better level than ’24 on average. So that it continues to be somewhere between 90%, 95% range, which we believe, I think, is encouraging. And Michael, can you ask your second question again?

Unidentified Analyst: Yes, sure. Thanks for that. Just back to the point on transactional effects for ForEx. Does that statement or that guide imply that you see a net tailwind at an EBIT level from transactional effects? Or is it meant to be just an offset against the top-line ForEx headwind that you’re seeing?

Fredrik Westin : I mean — yes, as I said, I don’t want to guide honestly, transactional effect for the full year. But when what we saw in the fourth quarter was a very positive development, obviously on the U.S. dollar to Mexican peso development with our cost base in peso that had around $12 million positive transactional effect for us. But then that was offset by — I already mentioned the currency pairings with the Japanese yen against the Thai baht, the U.S. dollar against the Korean won, and then they were importing euro-denominated products into Mexico, and they all roughly had about a $4 million negative effect. So that almost completely offset the positive effect we saw from the peso. And then so it is — depending on how this currency moves, you have the assumptions on our guidance slide here, what we are basing the forecast on and then we’ll have to see where the FX rates end up.

Unidentified Analyst: Okay, clear. Thank you Fredrik. If I could just sneak in one final one. Just in terms of your expectations around the phasing of improved outperformance in China, I think previously, you are a little more confident that you could start to see some outperformance already at the beginning of 2025. Is that still the case? Or is it more an H2 situation?

Mikael Bratt : No. I think what we have said here is that it will gradually improve here, and we it is always difficult to be exact on the timing here due to, as you said, I mean, here we are seeing a real push due to the incentives that are in place. But we feel confident about the shift in trend here as a result of the increased share of the orders that we are taking. So we are on the right track and have to come back on the exact detail as the place come through.

Unidentified Analyst: Okay, thank you very much.

Operator: We are now going to proceed with our next question. The questions come from the line of George Galliers from Goldman Sachs. Please ask your question.

George Galliers : Yeah. Good afternoon. And thank you for taking my questions. I had two questions, if I may. The first one, just related to order intake on Slide 11 and 12. It’s very helpful on Slide 12 to see the share of order take, which is accruing to new OEMs. But if I apply that to the dollar order amount on Slide 11, it would seem to imply that the absolute order intake from new OEMs was down year-over-year. Is that correct? And if yes, could you perhaps explain why that is? Is it because of the new OEMs also reconsidering product offerings? Or is it related to the point you make around some of the Chinese OEMs having shorter lifetime for that program. The second question I had was with respect to shareholder returns.

I appreciate the current buyback mandate and what is outstanding. But given the implied EBIT forecast for this year and also the guide on cash flow, is it reasonable to expect a step-up in shareholder returns once more in 2025? If we look at the last three years, I think, on average, the step-up has been around $200 million per annum. Is there any reason not to assume that a similar step-up might be possible this year? And if it is, can you give us any insight into the split. It looks like the dividend has remained flat around the [$220 million] (ph) mark should we expect any step-up to be more focused on buybacks and dividends? Thank you.

Mikael Bratt : Let me start — thank you. Let me start with the order intake there I mean, the factors here when you look at the value of order intake is the factors we mentioned here that we see many — mainly in the — let’s call it, the western world here, pushing out in time the launches of new vehicle and thereby also the RFQs. And when it comes to the Chinese OEMs, it is, as we said, also there, the shortening lifetime. And those two main factors that is adding up to the difference there. I feel that we have an order intake here in order to support our ambition here of safeguarding the market share that we have, which is around 45%, as we move forward. And very encouraging in all this is that we also see the strong growth we have in the Chinese OEMs here that we have also described in detail here.

So this is more reflecting the dynamics in the industry right now than anything else. When it comes to the return to the shareholders here, as you know, we can’t communicate anything around what we might do or not do in this regard, more than what we have said in the past, and that is that we have a very strong ambition here to be a shareholder-friendly company by returning liquidity to our shareholders. I think in the last couple of years here shows that we are serious about that. And what we also have indicated about the ability to generate liquidity going forward is also, I’d say, something that supports that statement going forward. We have the mandates we have today and how and when we are using that. We have to report afterwards. And as you know, we post on our homepage there on a weekly basis on — frequency of a weekly basis there.

Under direct dividend, we have the ambition to have a stable and increasing dividend in that. So yes, I think that there is as much we can say around that.

George Galliers : Thank you.

Operator: We are now going to proceed with one last question. And the questions come from the line of Agnieszka Vilela from Nordea.

Agnieszka Vilela : Perfect. I have two questions, if I may. Starting with your market share, it was 44% in 2024, marginally lower than in ’23. Can you just say what was the reason for that? And also, do you expect a further decline in the market share in ’25.

Mikael Bratt : No. Thank you. As I said, I feel comfortable with the order book we have to support our market share around 45%. The difference you see between ’23 and ’24 is very marginal. And the main reason for that is actually that we have the strong growth of BYD in China where we and no one else is selling to them as they have their in-house manufacturer of safety products. But we are selling, for example, inflator to them. And that’s not included in our market share, and that I would say it’s a meaningful volume to them. So if you would count that, a little different. But — so in my book here, we are standing stable around 45%.

Agnieszka Vilela : Understood. Fair point. And then also you mentioned that Q1 will be a challenging quarter in terms of the operating margin. And when I look at your previous performance, usually, the margin decreased by some 4 to 5 percentage points sequentially in Q1. So should we expect a kind of similar decrease now or maybe even more pressure due to somewhat weaker Q-on-Q car production?

Fredrik Westin : I don’t want to guide you specifics on the first quarter. But I mean, if you look at what have been the drivers for the margin decline in the past couple of years, where it is been around 5 percentage points from Q4 to Q1. It is been the lower LVP, as we mentioned during the presentation, that was over the last three years, a decline of 7% sequentially quarter-over-quarter. Right now, we are seeing a decline of 14%, so twice that number. And that, of course, would also have a higher impact on our operating leverage and also the operating income. Then it’s the very traditional or typical seasonality that we have on the engineering income side. That’s not going to be any different this year than it has been in previous years.

And then also what we’ve seen in the last year is the combination of the fallaway of lump sum recoveries that we then need to reinstate throughout the year and inflation coming in and that combined effect is lower this year than it has been in previous years. But if you take all of the three combined, maybe that’s not so dissimilar to what we’ve seen previously because of the larger LVP decline.

Operator: The Q&A session is now closed. I will now hand back to Mikael Bratt for closing remarks.

Mikael Bratt : Thank you, Ralf. I am pleased to invite you to our Capital Markets Day on June 3, 2025, and I am looking forward to sharing with you how we see our way forward. More details to be announced shortly. Before we conclude today’s call, I want to emphasize our commitment to achieving our target of around 12% adjusted operating margins. Our focus remains on structural cost reduction in innovation, quality and sustainability. Despite significant market challenges such as fluctuating demand and lower LVP in important markets, we continued our strong performance. The positive trend in our cash flow and balance sheet reinforce our dedication to delivering strong shareholder return. Our first quarter call is scheduled for Wednesday, April 16, 2025. Thank you all for joining today’s call. We truly value your continued interest in Autoliv. Until next time, drive safely.

Operator: This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you all for participating. You may now disconnect your lines. Thank you.