AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (NYSE:AB) Q4 2023 Earnings Call Transcript

AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (NYSE:AB) Q4 2023 Earnings Call Transcript February 7, 2024

AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. isn’t one of the 30 most popular stocks among hedge funds at the end of the third quarter (see the details here).

Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the AllianceBernstein Fourth Quarter 2023 Earnings Review. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session, and I will give you instructions on how to ask questions at that time. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded, and will be available for replay on our website shortly after the conclusion of this call. I would now like to turn the conference over to the host for this call, Head of Investor Relations for AllianceBernstein, Mr. Mark Griffin. Please –.

Mark Griffin: Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to our fourth quarter 2023 earnings review. This conference call is being webcast and accompanied by a slide presentation that’s posted in the Investor Relations section of our website, www.alliancebernstein.com. With us today to discuss the company’s results for the quarter are Seth Bernstein, our President and CEO; Matt Bass, Head of Private Alternatives; and Bill Siemers, Interim CFO. Onur Erzan, Head of Global Client Group & Private Wealth, will join us for questions after our prepared remarks. Some of the information we’ll present today is forward-looking and subject to certain SEC rules and regulations regarding disclosure, so I’d like to point out the Safe Harbor language on slide 2 of our presentation.

You can also find our Safe Harbor language in the MD&A of our 10-K, which we will file on Friday, February 9. Under Regulation FD, management may only address questions of material nature from the investment community in a public forum, so please ask all such questions during this call. Now, I’ll turn it over to Seth.

Seth Bernstein: Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. Financial markets enjoyed a strong rally to end 2023 as investors anticipated a shift in Fed policy to lower interest rates in 2024. In 2023, AB was among the beneficiaries of the early wave of fixed income reallocations with two of three channels growing organically. We drove continued market share gains in US retail, led by municipal SMA and taxable fixed income. We also saw strong cross-border fixed income flows. We made good progress in our key strategic initiatives, launching 10 active ETFs, now 12 in total at $1.5 billion in assets under management, receiving approval for our wholly-owned China fund management company license, and growing our relationship with Equitable in support of our private markets platform, which Matt Bass will touch on further.

Looking ahead, US money market funds entered the year at a record $6 trillion in AUM, some of which we expect will migrate to higher return opportunities as the rate cycle turns over later this year. Now, let’s get into the specifics, starting with a firm-wide overview on slide 4. Fourth quarter gross sales were $28.3 billion, down $2.6 billion from the year ago period. Firm-wide active net outflows were $2.8 billion. Full year gross sales of $101.5 billion compared to $115.6 billion last year. Adjusting for two large custom target date sales in 2022 totaling $16 billion, firm-wide sales rose slightly year-over-year. Full year active net outflows were $5.2 billion, snapping a streak of four straight years of firm-wide active organic growth.

Year-end asset under management of $725 billion increased by 12% year-over-year and 8% from the end of the third quarter. While fourth quarter average assets under management were up 8% from the prior year and full year average AUM was down 1%. Slide 5 shows our quarterly flow trend by channel. Firm-wide fourth quarter net outflows were $1.8 billion. Strong retail gross sales of $21 billion increased 47% year-over-year and 24% sequentially, driven by both fixed income and equities. Net inflows were $1.3 billion as we continued to gain share in fixed income, up 14% annualized organically. Our institutional channel had gross sales of $3 billion, down versus prior periods with last year’s fourth quarter, including $6.4 billion from custom target date sales.

Net outflows were $2.5 billion. In Private Wealth, gross sales were healthy at $4.3 billion, driven by taxable fixed income and munis. Net outflows were $600 million from some seasonal impact from year end tax-related planning. Turning to annual net flow trends on slide 6. In a challenging year for active managers, gross sales of $101 billion led to firm-wide net outflows of $7 billion or 1.1% attrition. Still, our average organic growth rate over the last five years was positive 2%. Retail sales of $71 billion grew by 8% year-over-year. Net inflows of $3.7 billion were driven by strength in taxable fixed income and munis. Institutional sales of $11.8 billion declined from $32 billion last year as we compared against last year’s $16 billion in custom target date fundings.

2023 net outflows were $11.8 billion. Private Wealth had strong gross sales of $18.6 billion with net inflows of $1.1 billion, the third straight year of organic growth. Investment performance is shown on slide 7. Starting with fixed income. Both government bonds and credit risk assets finished 2023 on a high note as bond yields fell sharply with most central banks ending their hiking cycles. The fourth quarter rally brought full year developed market treasury turns to 6.7% as measured by Bloomberg Global Treasury Index on a hedge basis. Most credit risk sectors posted strong relative returns to government bonds with developed markets high-yield up 13.8% and emerging market local currency bonds up 12.7%. AB’s fixed income performance remains strong with 75% of assets outperforming over the one-year period, 73% over the three year and 77% over the five year.

In 2023, we experienced $5.2 billion of net inflows into our American Income Fund as clients looking to put cash to work became more comfortable taking duration. Turning to equities. For many of the same reasons that bonds rallied, equity markets also registered strong gains in the fourth quarter with the S&P 500 up 12%. Market breadth improved with previously lagging segments of the market rebounding a small cap outperformed large cap and value outperformed growth. Large cap index returns in 2023 were concentrated within the Magnificent 7 stocks seen as leading beneficiaries of the AI revolution. Representing more than one-fourth of the index, these stocks disproportionately drove cap-weighted S&P 500’s total return of 26% versus 14% for the equal weighted version.

When combined with stock selection, our performance continued to lag the Mega-Cap tilted benchmarks, with 26% of equity assets outperforming over the one-year period, 45% over the three year and 42% outperforming over the five year period. Our research process remains robust, and our views are fundamentally driven. Over time, we believe the sources of market returns will broaden relative to the recent period of concentrated returns, encompassing a more fundamentally driven environment. Relative to peers, we continue to outperform the Morningstar peer group over the longer term with 62% and 68% of our equity assets outperforming over the three and five-year periods, respectively. Now I’ll review our client channels beginning with retail on slide 8.

Gross sales for the fourth quarter and the full year increased versus prior periods. The full year redemption rate normalized to 28% versus a historically low 24% last year. We generated net inflows of $1.3 billion in the quarter and $3.7 billion for the year with strength in cross-border fixed income and US retail outpacing equity outflows. US retail grew organically for the fifth consecutive year with $9 billion of net inflows, up 11% in 2023 and up 9% on average over the last five years. Our US large-cap growth product posted $1.4 billion of net inflows, driven by US demand, and we posted our 11th straight year of municipals growth with net flows up $5 billion, growing 19% organically. In taxable fixed income, we grew by 9% organically with $5.2 billion in net inflows in American income as well as money markets.

As shown on the bottom right, we ranked them the top 2% of US retail flows in munis and cross-border fixed income flows with the number one rankings in muni income, Global High Yield and American Income. We launched 10 active ETFs in 2023 with a total of 12 now at $1.5 billion in assets under management. Turning to institutional on slide 9. Fourth quarter gross sales were $3 billion with net outflows of $2.5 billion. Full year gross sales were $11.8 billion, coincidently net outflows were $11.8 billion, driven by equities and multi-asset. Our pipeline was $12 billion at quarter end, down $500 million sequentially. Fourth quarter fundings were $1.5 billion, led by AB CarVal’s residential mortgage and renewable energy strategies and mobile high yield.

In the quarter, we added over $1 billion in active equity mandates led by $600 million in Global Core and $325 million in US SMID value. Equitable’s initial $10 billion private market program is now 90% deployed, and we were pleased in December to announce the launch of the PCI NAV lending strategy supported by a $500 million commitment from Equitable. Moving to Private Wealth on slide 10. Fourth quarter gross sales of $4.3 billion rose 6% year-over-year and 7% sequentially. And 2023 gross sales of $18.6 billion were up 6% year-over-year. We posted strong sales in money market funds, municipals and our proprietary passive equity tax harvesting strategy, which grew to $3.6 billion, posting strong annualized organic growth of 41%. Fourth quarter net outflows of $600 million reflected some seasonal impact from year-end tax-related planning.

While full year net inflows of $1.1 billion represented our third straight year of organic growth. We’ve experienced strong productivity growth in our financial advisers, averaging 8% annually since 2018, and we continue to invest in FA headcount up 5% at year-end versus the prior year. Alternative capital raises were $1.9 billion, led by our secondaries partnership with LSV, real estate equity and our private credit business. I’ll finish our business overview with the sell side on Slide 11. Fourth quarter Bernstein Research revenues of $100 million were flat year-over-year and increased 7% sequentially. We saw modest improvement in the US, though key global markets remain subdued. Full year revenues of $386 million declined by 7% as institutional trading activity remain constrained.

We launched diversified new sector coverage and hosted two client-centric conferences, Healthcare Services Disruptors and US Quant. We had 12 top-ranked analysts and institutional investors All-American Research Team survey and ranked in the top 10 in generalist sales and trading. Our joint venture with Societe Generale is on track to close in the first half of 2024. We anticipate disclosing further financial details closer to that time. I’ll conclude by reviewing the status of our strategic initiatives on Slide 12. Performance of fixed income was strong for all periods while equities continued to lag based on stock selection versus concentrated large-cap benchmarks. Two of our three channels grew organically, retail and private wealth. Fixed income net flows grew by 5% with robust growth in US retail where our Muni SMA platform reached $23 billion in AUM, up 36% versus the prior year.

We were also pleased to be awarded a license for our wholly owned China fund management company. Fourth quarter adjusted operating income was up 6% year-over-year, operating margin of 29.2% was down 80 basis points and earnings and unitholder distributions of $0.77 per unit were up 10%. Full year 2023 operating income declined by 1%, margins of 28.2% declined by 70 basis points and earnings per unit of $2.69 declined 9% year-over-year. Lastly, we’re pleased that Jackie Marks has joined our team and will be appointed Chief Financial Officer on March 1. We thank our interim CFO, Bill Siemers for his dedication and service to AB, and I wish him all the best in his retirement. Now I’ll turn the call over to Matt Bass, Head of Private Alternatives to discuss our middle-market lending business.

Matt?

Matt Bass: Thanks, Seth, and good morning, everyone. I’m excited to discuss with you today AB’s private markets business, with a focus on our corporate direct lending business, AB Private credit investors. Turning to Slide 14. Over the last decade, we’ve built a scaled private markets platform. Now approximately $61 billion in AUM were up about 9% year-over-year. Our focus is on credit-oriented strategies, a core competency that aligns with the firm’s long-standing liquid credit business. Notably, with the acquisition of AB CarVal, which closed in 2022, AB now ranks in the top 20 private debt managers according to private debt investor. Highlighted at last May’s Equitable Investor Day, our goal is to grow private markets AUM to $90 billion to $100 billion by 2027, supported by Equitable’s $20 billion permanent capital commitment.

At this level of AUM, private markets will represent more than 20% of our asset management revenues. We’re well along on our path with private markets generating approximately 14% of asset management revenue in 2023, up from approximately 9% in the prior year. Today, we’re focusing on AB Private Credit Investors, or AB-PCI a middle market private lending and sponsor fund finance business, which manages more than $17 billion in AUM. Turning to Slide 15. AB- PCI is a scaled platform and team with a strong reputation. Team focuses on lending the businesses in the core middle market with further focus on sectors that exhibit our targeted investment characteristics. We have a strong track record of performance, which has been delivered to a diverse array of clients through a number of different perpetual vehicles.

We’re excited to highlight the differentiating aspects of this platform and our plan to execute on a focused organic growth strategy. On the next slide, we introduce the team. We got to know Brent Humphries and AB-PCI’s other founding team members in 2013 when we were looking to expand into direct lending. I would love to have Brent join us today, but he’s in Europe this week meeting with clients. Following the list out of the team that led a comparable investment strategy at Barclays from 2008 to 2013, AB-PCI was established in 2014, with the founding team of five and initial capital provided by Equitable. The team has grown to more than 75 professionals, facilitated by continued investment and strong retention. Notably, the team is based in Austin, Texas, although it has origination capabilities across the US.

AB-PCI currently manages more than $17 billion in capital, as I mentioned, and has invested nearly $25 billion since inception, spending nearly 600 transactions and aided by our broad sponsor relationships. Turning to Slide 17. The following factors differentiate AB-PCI’s investment strategy. AB-PCI focuses on directly originated and privately negotiated senior secured loans, specifically loans to borrowers in the core US middle market that are backed by leading financial sponsors. We invest in sectors that exhibit our target investment characteristics, such as recurring revenue or sectors with defensive characteristics. This has led to AB-PCI principally investing in sectors such as software and technology, digital infrastructure and services, healthcare and related IT and business services.

Lastly, we’re highly selective on the transactions we execute evident in our 4% historical close rate. Additional statistics at the bottom of this slide further dimension our market positioning and the profile of our borrowers. Slide 18 highlights AB-PCI’s consistent long-term performance track record, underpinned by our proven asset selection strategy. As previously mentioned, AB-PCI’s target investment characteristics have led our team to invest principally in select sectors, which ultimately has contributed to the strong performance we have generated for our clients. We realized consistent low double-digit returns for all three of our levered core institutional vehicles, including the predecessor fund, the team managed dating back to 2008.

Turning to Slide 19. Let’s talk about how we deliver investment solutions to our clients, along with some of our newer product innovations. Within our direct lending strategy, AB-PCI manages perpetual vehicles, including four commingled accounts and three customized accounts with large institutional clients. The various funds generally employ the same asset selection strategy, and therefore, AB-PCI typically has launched new funds to provide solutions to new client subsets. For example, we launched our first direct lending fund in 2015, which provided a solution for taxable and super-tax exempt clients. In 2018, we launched the second direct lending fund to accommodate tax-exempt clients. Thereafter, in 2020, AB-PCI launched a third private fund, an unlevered solution, principally to accommodate select non-US clients on a tax-efficient basis.

Looking ahead for this year, we anticipate launching a fourth private fund and will accommodate a wider range of non-US clients. Furthermore, we plan to launch a public non-traded BDC in 2024, providing a solution to retail clients globally. This BDC will complement our existing private BDC, which we have historically distributed exclusively through the Bernstein private wealth channel. Lastly, we plan to launch an insurance dedicated fund in 2024, with an emphasis on tax efficiency. Importantly, direct lending solutions are perpetual, which provides clients with ongoing exposure to the asset class and a number of other benefits. The perpetual nature of the funds also allow the platform to scale more easily without the launch of consecutive, more traditional vintage style funds.

On the private equity solutions side, AB-PCI co-manages a series of closed-end funds, focused on private equity fund investments and minority equity co-investments in partnership with Avid Capital. Here, we have annual vintages dating back to 2019. And in early December, we announced the launch of a new NAV lending strategy, supported by an initial $500 million commitment from Equitable. Slide 20 shows the robust organic growth that we have realized over the past nine years. We’ve grown the platform from just $500 million at the time of the initial team lift out to over $17 billion today for a CAGR of nearly 50% over the last decade. We believe this growth reflects AB-PCI’s ability to generate strong performance in our core investment strategy delivered to an expanding client base and perpetual funds through AB’s global distribution.

We’re excited to make meaningful progress towards our 2027 targets through expanding our existing solutions, accessing new client segments and extending into adjacencies. Let’s discuss each of these on slide 21. We plan to continue to scale our core strategy through a combination of factors. First, growing existing vehicles and solutions, in particular, our perpetual funds, thereby providing additional capital for our core investment strategy. Second, launching new vehicles and solutions, such as our expected new launches for 2024 to further penetrate existing client channels and access new ones across institutional, private wealth and retail and insurance. The final part of our growth strategy is to extend into adjacencies, as exemplified by our recently announced extension into NAV lending.

We will continue to work with clients, including Equitable to assess future adjacencies that leverage our core capabilities. To summarize, we’re excited about the breadth and strength of AB private credit investors with a strong team with proven performance and a well-structured platform with evergreen vehicles serving a wide array of clients, allowing us to drive consistent growth. We have an organic growth plan that we are executing. That contributes to our private markets target of $90 billion to $100 billion in AUM by 2027, all supported by Equitable’s permanent capital commitments, AB’s Private Wealth business and AB’s broad global institutional and retail footprint. Now, I’ll turn it over to Bill to walk through the financials. Bill?

Bill Siemers: Thanks. Let’s start with the GAAP income statement on slide 23. Fourth quarter GAAP net revenues of $1.1 billion increased 10% from the prior year period. Operating income of $238 million increased 17% and operating margin of 20.6% increased by 60 basis points. GAAP EPU of $0.71 in the quarter increased by 20% year-over-year. For the full year, GAAP net revenues of $4.2 billion increased 3%. Operating income of $818 million, increased by $3 million and operating margin of 19.1% decreased by 240 basis points. Full year GAAP EPU of $2.34 decreased by 13% year-over-year. I’ll focus my remarks from here on our adjusted results, which remove the effect of certain items that are not considered part of our core operating business.

We base our distribution to unitholders on our adjusted results, which we provide in addition to and not as a substitute for our GAAP results. Our standard GAAP reporting and a reconciliation of GAAP to adjusted results are in our presentation appendix, press release and 10-K. Our adjusted financial highlights are shown on slide 24, which I’ll touch on as we talk to the P&L shown on slide 25. On Slide 25, beginning with revenues. Net revenues of $871 million increased 9% versus the prior year period. For the full year, net revenues of $3.4 billion increased by 1% versus 2022. Fourth quarter base fees increased by 3% versus the prior year period, as 8% higher average AUM was offset by a lower fee rate. The fourth quarter fee rate of 39.6 basis points decreased 4% year-over-year, driven by mix, reflecting organic growth into lower fee rate fixed income products and a full quarter impact from last December’s large, low-fee custom target date inflow.

The full year fee rate of 39.9 basis points was flat year-over-year. Fourth quarter performance fees of $51 million increased by $33 million from the prior year period, and full year performance fees of $126 million, were up $35 million from the prior year, both driven by higher fees at Private Credit Services and AB CarVal. Fourth quarter revenues for Bernstein Research Services of $100 million were flat with the prior year period. Full year revenues of $386 million declined 7%, reflecting declines in customer trading activity across all regions as a result of market conditions. Fourth quarter dividend and interest revenues increased by 4% versus the prior year due to higher dividends and interest earned on broker-dealer investments. At the same time, fourth quarter broker-dealer interest expense associated with our private wealth brokerage accounts decreased by 22% due to lower interest paid on customer balances.

For the full year, dividend and interest revenues increased 103% versus last year due to higher dividends and interest earned on broker-dealer investments, while broker-dealer interest expense increased 62% due to higher interest paid on customer balances. Moving to adjusted expenses. All-in, our total fourth quarter operating expenses of $617 million were up 10% year-over-year. Full year operating expenses of $2.4 billion rose by 2% versus the prior year, well below inflation levels. Fourth quarter total compensation and benefits expense was up 12% versus the prior year period, driven by a 9% increase in revenues and slightly higher compensation ratio of 47.7% of adjusted net revenues, as compared to 46.4% in the prior year period. Our fourth quarter compensation ratio of 47.7% came in below our expectations, reflecting the fourth quarter market rally and continued discipline in our compensation process.

For the full year, compensation and benefits increased by 2%, driven by a 9% increase in base compensation, offset by a 13% decrease in commissions. For the full year 2023 compensation ratio was 49.0%, 60 basis points above the prior year, as wage inflation outpaced a 1% increase in revenues. We entered 2024 with AUM levels 7% above the 2023 average, driven by 2023’s market rally. Given market conditions, we plan to accrue at a 49.0% compensation ratio in the first quarter of 2024, below last year’s first quarter level of 49.5% and may adjust further throughout the year. Promotion and servicing costs increased by 18% from the prior year period, driven by higher T&E and firm meetings. For the full year, promotion and servicing costs increased 2% or 1%, excluding AB CarVal for which we had four quarters in 2023 versus two quarters in 2022, as higher T&E and firm meetings were partially offset by lower trade execution and clearance.

G&A expenses were up 2% in the fourth quarter versus the prior year period, below inflation levels. For the full year, G&A increased by 1% and was down 1%, excluding CarVal. Higher office and related expenses and professional fees were offset by lower portfolio services expenses and a favorable FX impact. Looking forward to 2024, we are targeting promotion and servicing and G&A growth up low single digits, below inflation levels. We remain committed to managing expenses given the continued volatile macroeconomic environment. Fourth quarter adjusted operating income of $254 million increased by 6% versus the prior year period, while full year 2023 operating income of $951 million decreased by 1%. Fourth quarter adjusted operating margin of 29.2% decreased 80 basis points year-on-year, while full year 2023 operating margin of 28.2% decreased 70 basis points from 2022.

Below the adjusted operating income line, fourth quarter interest expense increased by $4 million from the prior year period and for the full year, interest expense increased by $36 million, reflecting higher interest rates and higher average borrowings. As outlined in the appendix of our presentation, fourth quarter earnings exclude certain items, which are not part of our core business operations. In the fourth quarter, adjusted operating earnings were $16 million above GAAP operating earnings due to acquisition-related expenses and interest expense. Non-GAAP EPU was $0.06 above GAAP EPU, primarily reflecting acquisition-related expenses. The fourth quarter effective tax rate for ABLP was an approximate 1% tax credit, reflecting a one-time tax benefit of $22.5 million from the release of a valuation allowance on a capital loss tax asset.

For the full year, the effective tax rate for ABLP was 3.6%. This compares to 4.9% in 2022, lower principally due to the aforementioned valuation allowance release. Our guidance for ABLP’s effective tax rate in 2024 is a range of 7% to 7.5%, reflecting our expanding business in non-US markets, some of which are experiencing higher tax rates. We also expect the Bernstein Research JV transaction to trigger a one-time tax gain in 2024. Post 2024, the normalized effective tax rate would be a range of 6% to 6.5%. For the full year 2023, the Nashville relocation generated $23 million of savings or $0.08 per unit, with compensation-related savings more than offsetting increased occupancy and costs. This compares with $19 million of savings in 2022.

We expect the Nashville relocation will be accretive for the full year 2024 and are on track to realize the full annual savings of approximately $75 million in 2025, following the lease expiration at 1345 Sixth Avenue in December 2024. With that, we are pleased to answer your questions. Operator?

See also 15 Biggest Agriculture Stocks in 2024 and 10 Best Stocks To Invest In 2024 For Beginners.

Q&A Session

Operator: Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And we will take our first question from Alex Blostein with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Alex Blostein: Thanks. Hi, everybody. Good morning. Thanks for the question. I appreciate the extra discussion around private lending, definitely really helpful and an important driver for the firm. So I guess on that note, you highlighted a number of new initiatives in private markets for 2024. And based on the public data, it looks like the retail dynamics are still quite strong offer a pretty good start in January. So just maybe assuming out, what are your guys’ expectations for organic base fee growth for 2024 since it feels like there’s some positive dynamics on the fee rate that are also unfolding in the business?

Bill Siemers: Hi Alex, this is Bill. For 2024, we expect the fee rate it will continue to be mix dependent. In 2023, as you know, we experienced organic growth in lower fee products, such as money markets, munis were seeing outflows and higher fee active equities. Simon, we’re going to continue to be dependent on the markets on interest rate movements during the year and invest a risk and return appetite. I mean on the positive side here, it’s also institutional, as we’ve mentioned, is supported by a high private wealth exposure with the pipeline fee rate is around 3 times the channel average. So, there’s no specific guidance at this point.

Alex Blostein: I guess maybe just asked another way, maybe keeping the fee rate aside, if we don’t want to go to the like organic base growth discussion. But in terms of the flows and the organic base — organic growth in the business between good momentum in retail and obviously, a lot of these new initiatives that you’re about to roll out in private markets. So, I was just curious if you could give us a range of kind of what your expectations for the flows organic growth for the year.

Onur Erzan: Hi Alex, this is Onur. Thanks for the question. Yes, we remain confident about our sales growth in 2024. We have good momentum starting the year on the sales front. And this is wide based in multiple businesses as a continuation of the last few years, right? We delivered positive five consecutive years of organic growth in US retail. We delivered three years of organic growth in private wealth. As you know, the Asia extra Pan taxable fixed income had a very strong momentum as well. So, a number of our strong engines are humming. So, we feel very good about the sales prospects. As you mentioned, on private alts, we have a strong pipeline. As also Bill mentioned and we are adding more solutions to that to participate in high-growth opportunities, whether it’s retail, whether it’s the insurance segment to the strategic priority for us, and we are seeing traction there.

Obviously, there will be some continued pressure on the institutional side. It is concentrated in a narrow set of equity strategies. We had some recent performance challenges, and it’s very hard to predict those outflows given it tends to be individual mandates and lumpy. So, strong confidence in sales, hopefully contributing to positive flows with the uncertainty of the institutional side in a narrow set of equity strategies.

Alex Blostein: Got you. That’s great. Yes, that’s what I was looking for. For my follow-up, one of the products you mentioned in private credit was around, I think, non-traded BDC that you’re likely to launch this year that will be more broadly disseminated. I guess when you look at that part of the market, it’s gotten really crowded over the last 12 to 18 months, there are some established players, there are some traditional firms that are entered the market with new products. What gives you confidence, I guess, that this is the right time to go after that opportunity? And what makes you feel like that you guess you’ll be successful with that product? And is there anything differentiated with that with respect to that non-traded BDC that doesn’t already exist out there? Like what would be the pitch? Thanks.

Matt Bass: Sure. So look, I think stepping back, first of all, hopefully, based on the commentary on ACI, we’re able to kind of articulate the competitive advantage and edge in the market if it’s historical track record kind of the consistency of the team are focused, our sector-led focus, our focused on the core middle market, et cetera. So, we believe we have a right to win from — certainly from an investment perspective. And now look, as it relates to the BDC as a vehicle, the market, yes, there have been a lot of launches and a lot of capital raise, but the backdrop there as well is a very large growing market for private credit, which has gone from, call it, 15 years ago, a niche asset class into a market that rivals the size of the BSL market.

And there are continued tailwinds for growth there from a supply perspective and also from a demand perspective, as retail interest and allocations increase over time. So we think the long-term supply demand dynamic is solid. But — and we have a right to win from a capability perspective. This will be our second BDC. We have a private BDC as I mentioned, in our private wealth channel. So have experience with the wrapper and really distributing the sort of product to individual casters in their needs.

Alex Blostein: Great. Thank you so much.

Operator: We will take our next question from Bill Katz with TD Cowen. Your line is open.

Bill Katz: Thank you very much for taking the question this morning. I appreciate the added discussion, and Bill, best of luck in your retirement, a bit jealous. I’ll say. A couple of questions. Maybe from a big picture down math for you. I just really appreciate the extra insight. One of the building debates for private credit is just sort of the reentry of banks, so the leverage lending and the high-yield market has a potential impact to volume and/or pricing. I was wondering if you could address how you’re positioned to potentially compete against a wider set of lenders. And then secondly, I wonder if you could just expand a little bit on the opportunity set into the third-party insurance sector in particular?

Bill Siemers: Sure. Happy to. I guess on the first question, and I’ll kind of team up with owner on the second one as well. As it relates to the first question, the growth I mentioned in private credit rattling the size of the BSL market now. A lot of that has been driven by share shift deals that had historically been executed in the BSL market coming into the private market, and that’s either driven through ability to execute quicker, more flexibility, certainty of close. Now some of that’s secular. Some of it is certainly cyclical and we’ve seen banks become more offensive and aggressive and we’ve seen a lot of releases recently about banks moving more closely back into that market. So again, it’s a trend and there’ll be some cyclical ups and downs.

As it relates to our business specifically, we have a focus on the core middle market. There are a lot of ways to define that. But from an average cash flow perspective, median cash flow perspective, we’re around $50 million of media EBITDA and that, combined with our sector focus and the continuity of the team, gives us, we believe, a well-entrenched position in that market. We can go upmarket in certain instances, but we focus on the core. As it relates to the insurance side and Onur definitely chime in, given the focus, a key part of our growth strategy, so this is part of the CarVal thesis that applies to our other businesses as well, is leveraging existing investment capabilities that our teams have from an origination or asset class perspective into lower cost of capital strategies.

So I think private investment-grade credit as an example. So CarVal historically has invested in markets such as residential mortgage, consumer finance, transportation in the context of higher risk, higher return strategies, so the flagship fund. We’ll continue to do that, but increasingly working on delivering those investments to insurers on an unlevered basis or the senior part of the capital structure. So the residential mortgage mandate with Equitable is a good example there that Seth previously mentioned. We were able to leverage our existing origination capability in that asset class and deliver those loans on a whole loan basis to Equitable. And we think that would be interesting to other third-party insurers owing to attractive capital treatment, et cetera, and there are other asset classes as well that we’re actively looking at.

Bill Siemers: Yes. Thanks, Matt. The only a couple of things I would add, one, obviously, a recap for Bill. As you know, insurance is a large portion of our assets, roughly quarter of our assets, AUM is managed on behalf of insurance clients. So it’s core to our business. And second, as Matt briefly mentioned, we have the ability and the expertise to marry these specialized origination engines with insurance-friendly wrappers. So that structuring is very important, whether it’s specialty finance, mortgages, NAV lending, rated feeders or middle market lending. We have deep expertise in terms of packaging those solutions in a capital and regulatory efficient way for the insurance companies, both in the United States as well as globally. And that, I think, creates a solid foundation for our continued growth in the insurance space.

Bill Katz: Great. Thank you. And just as my follow-up, Seth, for you, I was just wondering, what was your and the Board’s decision to bring this marks in given where I think maybe the evolution of the Alliance Bernstein model might sit? And then within that, given that your margin today is bucking up against your 30% margin you laid out at the Investor Day more recently, how should we be thinking about that in light of just obviously a higher level of assets and just your incremental cost guidance, is 30 now, a bit of a stale outlook ex-markets? Or is there more opportunity here to get to a higher run rate margin? Thank you.

Seth Bernstein: Bill, thanks very much for the question. Good morning, everybody. I’m going to actually defer to Bill to talk about the margin impact, but let me touch on Jackie and her role. We have been blessed for a number of years by having an incredibly capable and well-regarded controller who has been CFO a couple of times now on an interim basis. And it’s precisely to reinforce the skills and disciplines that Bill has embedded into our team that I found Jackie so compelling. She has a very deep skill set and experience in the controller function generally, but also in global treasury and tax, as well as her skill set and strategy. So I think she brought a package of skills or brings a package of skills together that are quite complementary to what we have in the firm.

And I think she has the leadership skills to move forward without skipping a beat as Bill moves on to the call [ph] of course. So I would simply say that we’re very pleased that she’s arrived and Bill will transition after this quarter. And so I think she’s well-positioned to take the role forward. I think with respect to the relationship with Equitable, I think the skill set is quite complementary to what the Equitable team would be looking for. I think she will be an added voice with respect to advocacy for AB and its strategic goals and needs. And I think we’re off to a pretty good start. So let me pass it over to Bill to give you a little more color on our expectations on margin.

Bill Siemers: Thanks, Seth. Yeah, Bill, I mean, we don’t give, as you know, specific margin targets, particularly for the next year, but we did give the top side, 2027 targets at the Equitable Investor Day. But that said, yes, I mean, we are starting at a better AUM level this year, than last year. AUM starting point being almost $80 billion higher, but with that, I mean, we’re going to continue to invest in our business for growth. And then we have to continue to remain competitive and pay our people for performance and then, manage all our non-GAAP expenses. So with that said, from the Investor Day, we mentioned with the VRS JV, we were going to — on a run rate going forward, annual basis, get 250 basis points of improvement.

That’s definitely going to come into fruition this year. To what extent, we don’t know. It’s according to when the transaction takes place. So we might only get a piece of that. And then as we’ve mentioned, the completion of the relocation is going to add another 100 to 150bps. That will actually trigger first thing next year. Right now, we’re in the Hudson Yards and also 1345. So I mean, once we get at 1345, this year that will trigger. And then, of course, the other remaining stuff is just Growth Investments and Private Alts rounding out that number. But the big thing to note also is all these improvements that I’m talking about, I mean that’s potential benefit without market improvements in there right now. I mean, so we put some market improvements in there, we would be able to beat those numbers.

Bill Katz: Thank you. And best of luck again. Bye-Bye.

Bill Siemers: Thank you very much.

Operator: And we will take our next question from Craig Siegenthaler with Bank of America. Your line is open.

Craig Siegenthaler: Good morning, Seth. Thank you for taking my questions.

Seth Bernstein: It’s too good to hear you.

Craig Siegenthaler: Will give your perspective on how you think your fixed income lineup is positioned for money-in-motion duration extension with future Fed rate cuts and the yield curve steepening? And what I’m getting at is do you think you’re missing or light on any capabilities like core total return that could limit your ability to win some money motion.

Seth Bernstein: Craig, thanks for the question. Look, I think it’s clear that we’re at the end and the issue of the right of the raises and rates. And the issue now is when that starts easing. We have thought it’s later in the year all along. And the recent strength we’ve seen in payrolls and ISM, we don’t change our expectations in that regard. And while we do see the economy slowing, we do think that we’re in a soft land bank for the first time that I can remember. And so I’m going to rejoice in that. And what we’re seeing quite clearly is that, investors are now increasingly comfortable with extending duration and moving into credit. We’re seeing that most definitively offshore and the very strong growth that we’ve had in Asia.

And we think that continues. And in fact, that strength, I think, reflects both increased comfort with extending duration and having higher yields switch between AIP and American Income and Global High Yield range between 5% and 7% today. But I think what’s most interesting is that the alternatives available to our local investors are less attractive to the mainly onshore Chinese equities. I think that’s, I think, a pretty compelling case for us, and we hope to ride that. I think retail in the US, I think we’re quite well positioned with high net worth individuals, who are focused on the municipal marketplace, the tactics that marketplace we’ve been building share, as you know, for years, and we think we have a differentiated product proposition in how we build these separately managed accounts, which is where we see all the growth there in ETFs that I think will really drive pretty strong demand over the course of this year and hopefully into next.

We also feel that we benefit from an institutional capability and with insurance companies that will continue to pay us dividends as they seek better ways of managing public market investment grade credit. Our systematic strategies have proven to have very strong risk return characteristics and we can do so at a quite a competitive cost, and we’re seeing increasing interest there, not just in the US but really outside the US as well. But it’s certainly true, Bill, that we don’t have an installed base of traditional DBDC ag-based core strategies, although we think we have a pretty compelling product proposition that may be better at addressing our client teams, particularly to becoming increasingly cost competitive. So I’m going to actually ask Onur, if has anything to add to that answer

Onur Erzan: Great summary. Two-thirds of our institutional sales in the fourth quarter was fixed income. So, we are definitely showing strength in institutional and fixed income as well. That’s perfect to summarize the strength in retail across US and international markets. I would also highlight the growing ETF product range we have, where we participate in core and other taxable and tax-exempt fixed income categories. We are very pleased with the build-out and the asset capture of our ETF franchise and that should help us increase our penetration in taxable fixed income including core and core plus categories as well. Again, early days, but the signs are very encouraging, combined with our distribution power in US retail.

Craig Siegenthaler: Thanks, Onur and Seth. And I actually have a credit one, so I might take advantage that Matthew Bass is on the line too. But I know you launched a NAV lending strategy last year. And we know the LTVs are quite low in this product from a lender standpoint. But, you know, I wanted to see, if you think it’s a good idea for buyout funds to cross-colorize their portfolio companies in order to get early cash flow events to their LTVs?

Matt Bass: Yeah, sure. So I think stepping back, there are various use of proceeds for NAV loans. And I think considered along with a kind of growing and functioning secondaries market, is this just another way to provide liquidity to a growing private equity market, right? So, think of it holistically. NAV loans have been around for a while. They can be used offensively to enable portfolio companies to make acquisitions when capital is not available or funds outside of its investment period. Could be used, defensively to de-lever portfolio companies at a lower cost of capital. Could be also used, your point, as a liquidity tool for GPs to return capital to LPs. So we would look at all three types of transactions. Ultimately, it depends on the quality of the sponsor and the underlying. But there are various use cases that may or may not make sense for different sponsors based on the particular situation. So very, very, very situation-specific, I would say.

Craig Siegenthaler: Thanks, Matthew.

Operator: And we will take our next question from Dan Fannon with Jefferies. Your line is open.

Dan Fannon: Thanks. Good morning. Wanted to talk about the private wealth channel and adviser growth and productivity increased year-over-year, I was just curious, as you think about 2024, how those metrics should track and maybe any changes or plans to accelerate hiring or growth in that segment?

Seth Bernstein: Thanks for the question. Yes, you’re right in pointing out to our consistent growth pattern with the financial adviser, which we now call wealth advisers and the productivity along with that. We take it through the cycle mindset to growing our client-facing headcount, so we’ll continue to stay at that same pace. Obviously, it takes time for the new wealth advisers to become fully productive, but we have high confidence in our long-standing and well-regarded training programs. As you know, we have a heavy bias towards organic growth by hiring new advisers to the industry, which takes time to grow into our culture, but then delivers very strong outcomes, as you have seen on the sales productivity side. In addition to that, we continue to be open-minded about financial advisers with existing clients and books as well as adjacent opportunities in the RIA space [ph].

Again, we are always looking for the best value for our shareholders, and we’ll continue to stay on the organic growth path and be open-minded about any add-ons.

Dan Fannon: Great. And then, Seth, just as a follow-up on your active ETF business. I know it’s small, but you’ve launched a bunch of products here in 2023. How do you think about that landscape over the next several years and your role within that and kind of obviously, some of what the growth potential of those products could be.

Seth Bernstein: Yes. Let me start, Dan, and then I’ll pass it over to Onur to give more color to it. In our view, ETFs are a better wrapper for many of our clients. And we think that increasingly, and in fact, it’s been the case for AB, we are going to introduce new strategies via ETFs to the extent they’re feasible from an underlying securities perspective to do so getting the better tax treatment for taxable investors, as well as just the day-to-day perceptions of liquidity and transparency, which we think actually offers real advantages and comfort to our investing clients. What I would say to you is we continue to plan to expand the range, particularly focused on new strategies and where we see differentiated opportunities that align well with the capabilities that we have.

So to the extent, for example, we see tax aware fixed income as a place where we have an edge, and it’s a very efficient tax vehicle for our clients, we’ll launch strategies like that. And tax key [ph], which is our vehicle has been a successful product in that array. But I think you should expect to see most of our issuance activity through ETFs going forward. Onur, please jump in.

Onur Erzan : No, thank you, Seth. Yes, I mean, our strategy is very clear. We look at basically areas where we can differentiate ETFs allow us to complement, supplement our SMAs, which has been very successful in U.S. retail. So we typically see that pairing quite powerful in the fixed income space, for instance. We also take advantage of conversions when it makes sense. Obviously, like any vehicle, ETFs have their limitations, particularly in the retirement plan space. And as a result, we are mindful about that. But in general, particularly in the non-qualified space, ETFs remain our dominant vehicle preference, along with SMAs and CITs, where we see the future. And then internationally, it’s a little bit more nuanced picture for the active ETFs. The regulatory framework is now catching up, and there might be opening up opportunities where we could potentially leverage our distribution reach to disrupt some markets by offering ETFs, but it’s more exploratory at this stage, and we don’t have any concrete plans.

I would say, it’s an option on the table. Our primary focus remains in the U.S. And you will see us build on the good momentum that you have seen in the last 1.5 years with the 12 ETFs and growing.

Dan Fannon: Great. Thank you.

Operator: And we will take our next question from John Dunn with Evercore ISI. Your line is open.

John Dunn : Thank you. Maybe could you expand a little more on the product demand trends you’re seeing in retail and institutional overseas, maybe ex American income and global high yield funds?

Onur Erzan : Sure. Happy to take that. As you know, in addition to Asia, ex Japan, we have a strong franchise in Japan. We continue to remain very strong in U.S. equities. We have a very dominant position in large cap growth that continues to be a strong area for us. So, definitely, I want to highlight outside Asia, ex Japan, outside the AIP and global high yields. Definitely, our U.S. — sorry, our EMEA business tends to be skewed towards equities as well because the European buyers like the U.S. and global equity products. We continue to see demand in some of the strategies that we offer in the UCIT formats, sometimes more lower volatility kind of strategies that are a little bit more defensive. For instance, would be an example of that.

And then definitely, with the non-traded BDC, we would be targeting the U.K. and Swiss market along with the Asian market. So definitely, we see demand towards private credits. And then finally, we have a strong position in LatAm with the pension systems, whether it’s in Mexico with afores or with the Chilean pension systems, and that tends to be a pretty strong demand for equities, including emerging markets, given their bias towards emerging markets. And then on the institutional side, we touched on it, but private market is a great focus area for us, and I see that as a global phenomenon. Again, there might be different self patterns when you think about different geographies and different types of clients, insurance versus pension plans versus storing wealth, but depending on the risk appetite constraints, yield expectations across middle market lending, real estate lending as well as specialized strategies through CarVal we see demand.

Seth Bernstein: And if I could just jump in, I think longer term, China does present a real opportunity for us. As you may know, we did get our license from the Chinese regulator at the end of the year, and we’re hopeful to launch our first strategy in the near term. China/Asia strategy, sentiment is not great, obviously, in China, but we think there’s strong demand ultimately and we plan to launch a number of strategies over the course of the next two to three years, which would both reflect equities as well as fixed income.

Q – John Dunn: Got it. And then there’s been recently an uptick in private markets firms deciding to join traditionals or other larger oil firms. Maybe just what you guys see a lot of activity. What are you seeing? And any change in your appetite for maybe adding teams or even bolt-ons?

Seth Bernstein: Well, let me start, and Matt or Onur smay join in. But my view is we have a pretty full set of capabilities today in Private Alts, for example, while we’ve had a good start with CarVal, there’s a lot more work to do there and to get private credit investors stuff in our commercial real estate business up to their full scale. That doesn’t mean there aren’t niche services and capabilities, we would not be interested in. We do when we look at them. But I think they would be smaller in size and very specific in terms of the needs, at least at the moment in Private Alts. Switching over to more traditional, as I think we’ve also disclosed, we have acquired a very talented team in Europe focused on global growth and has an excellent European capability as well.

And so we’re — it’s early days there, but we’re upbeat as to the potential of that service. The short summary is we have — we always are looking for teams. We’re always looking for ways of refining and updating our product suite, but there’s nothing in and or large at the moment we’re looking at.

Q – John Dunn: Thanks very much.

Operator: And ladies and gentlemen, that is all the time we have for questions today. Mr. Griffin, I will now turn the call back over to you.

Mark Griffin: Thank you, everyone, for participating in the call today. Please reach back out to Investor Relations with any questions, and have a great day.